GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 15 Jul 2018, 17:57

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 22 Aug 2014
Posts: 41

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2015, 00:41
elegan wrote:
Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?

According to promotional material published by the city of Springfield, more tourists stay in hotels in Springfield than stay in the neighboring city of Harristown. A brochure from the largest hotel in Harristown claims that more tourists stay in that hotel than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel in Springfield. If both of these sources are accurate, however, the “Report on Tourism” for the region must be in error in stating that ____________.

(A) the average length of stay is longer at the largest hotel in Harristown than it is at the Royal Arms Hotel.

(B) There is only one hotel in Harristown that is larger than the Royal Arms Hotel.

(C) More tourists stay in hotels in Harristown than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel.

(D) The Royal Arms hotel is the largest hotel in Springfield.

(E) The royal arms hotel is the only hotel in Springfield.

Published material says "more ppl stay in Springfield than in Harristown".
Hotel in Harristown claims that "more ppl stay in their hotel than in Royal Arms in Springfield".

The above statements are right and Now we find the wrong statement issued by "Report on tourism" by looking at the choices.

If you look at options A, B, C and D we understand that the claims support the above 2 statements. And in Option E we see that it is an error statement.

"(E) The royal arms hotel is the only hotel in Springfield" - If Royal arms is the only hotel in Springfield then the claim by published material is wrong. Thus this is the error which Report on Tourism must have stated.
Manager
Joined: 08 Sep 2010
Posts: 67

### Show Tags

12 Oct 2015, 11:10
nelz007 wrote:
Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?

According to promotional material published by the city of Springfield, more tourists stay in hotels in Springfield than stay in the neighboring city of Harristown. A brochure from the largest hotel in Harristown claims that more tourists stay in that hotel than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel in Springfield. If both of these sources are accurate, however, the “Report on Tourism” for the region must be in error in stating that ____________.

(A) the average length of stay is longer at the largest hotel in Harristown than it is at the Royal Arms Hotel.

(B) There is only one hotel in Harristown that is larger than the Royal Arms Hotel.

(C) More tourists stay in hotels in Harristown than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel.

(D) The Royal Arms hotel is the largest hotel in Springfield.

(E) The royal arms hotel is the only hotel in Springfield.

Will provide official answer after explanations.

Simple question. Not sure whether this is a 700 level question. The question involves working around the statistical data.
My take is Option E.

Explanation:

Question Stem:
There are two towns - Harristown and Springfield.
Data 1: More tourists stay in hotels in Springfield than stay in Harristown
Data 2: Largest hotel in Harristown claims that more tourists stay in that hotel than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel in Springfield

If above facts are true then there must be other hotels in Harristown where tourists stay, so that Harristow has more tourists than Springfield.

Looking at Option E - "The royal arms hotel is the only hotel in Springfield." It directly contradicts Data 1. Hence the answer.

Thanks,
Chanakya

Hit kudos if you like the explanation!
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 2618

### Show Tags

29 Nov 2015, 18:45
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
VP
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1196
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: 314 Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)

### Show Tags

26 Jun 2017, 06:59
Imo E
E. The royal arms hotel is the only hotel in Springfield.
This gives us a fact to prove that the report on tourism is wrong .
_________________

Director
Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Posts: 774
Location: United States
Schools: Yale '18
GMAT 1: 650 Q43 V37
GRE 1: 315 Q157 V158
GPA: 2.66

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2017, 21:51
rohansherry wrote:
Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?

According to promotional material published by the city of Springfield, more tourists stay in hotels in Springfield than stay in the neighboring city of Harristown. A brochure from the largest hotel in Harristown claims that more tourists stay in that hotel than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel in Springfield. If both of these sources are accurate, however, the “Report on Tourism” for the region must be in error in stating that ______________.

A. the average length of stay is longer at the largest hotel in Harristown than it is at the Royal Arms Hotel.

B. There is only one hotel in Harristown that is larger than the Royal Arms Hotel.

C. More tourists stay in hotels in Harristown than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel.

D. The Royal Arms hotel is the largest hotel in Springfield

E. The royal arms hotel is the only hotel in Springfield.

E cannot be true on the basis of information because there MUST be more people in Springfield then in Harristown. If the Royal Arms hotel is the only hotel in Springfield, then how can it be true that Springfield's largest hotel has more occupants than Royal Arms? That would mean there are more people in Harristown than in Springfield which is a clear contradiction.

E
Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2071
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

### Show Tags

06 Sep 2017, 07:27
1
Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?

According to promotional material published by the city of Springfield, more tourists stay in hotels in Springfield than stay in the neighboring city of Harristown. A brochure from the largest hotel in Harristown claims that more tourists stay in that hotel than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel in Springfield. If both of these sources are accurate, however, the “Report on Tourism” for the region must be in error in stating that ______________.

Type - must not be true

A. the average length of stay is longer at the largest hotel in Harristown than it is at the Royal Arms Hotel. - Irrelevant

B. There is only one hotel in Harristown that is larger than the Royal Arms Hotel. - Irrelevant

C. More tourists stay in hotels in Harristown than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel. - May be true

D. The Royal Arms hotel is the largest hotel in Springfield - Irrelevant

E. The royal arms hotel is the only hotel in Springfield. - Correct - if this is true , then it contradicts the fact "more tourists stay in hotels in Springfield than stay in the neighboring city of Harristown"

_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Manager
Joined: 03 Oct 2016
Posts: 135

### Show Tags

04 May 2018, 07:29
rohansherry wrote:
Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?

According to promotional material published by the city of Springfield, more tourists stay in hotels in Springfield than stay in the neighboring city of Harristown. A brochure from the largest hotel in Harristown claims that more tourists stay in that hotel than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel in Springfield. If both of these sources are accurate, however, the “Report on Tourism” for the region must be in error in stating that __________.

(A) The average length of stay is longer at the largest hotel in Harristown than it is at the Royal Arms Hotel.
(B) There is only one hotel in Harristown that is larger than the Royal Arms Hotel.
(C) More tourists stay in hotels in Harristown than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel.
(D) The Royal Arms hotel is the largest hotel in Springfield.
(E) The Royal Arms hotel is the only hotel in Springfield.

Fact 1: Total no. of tourists in S hotels > Total no. of tourists in H hotels.
Fact 2: No. of tourists in Largest hotel in H > No. of tourists in RAH in S.

We are told that above two facts are 100% accurate, there is no way to doubt about it.

Question: “Report on Tourism” has made an error and what is that?

If RAH is the only hotel in S then how come Fact 1 is true? Note that Fact 2 will be valid in this case hence, stating "The Royal Arms hotel is the only hotel in Springfield." is the error.

_________________

Non-Allergic To Kudos

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 27 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.