According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 Feb 2017, 22:27

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 19 Jan 2013
Posts: 31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 45 [3] , given: 19

According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Feb 2013, 10:50
3
KUDOS
35
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

29% (02:25) correct 71% (01:38) wrong based on 1889 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose nostrils have been pinched so that smelling is impossible will have great difficulty in differentiating a bite of an apple from a bite of a raw potato. This clearly demonstrates that taste buds are not the only sense organs involved in determining the taste of a piece of food.

Which of the following premises, is an assumption required by the argument?

a. All people agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste.

b. There are no other senses involved in tasting other than taste, smell, and sight.

c. The word "taste" can be used to describe an experience that involves sight or smell or both.

d. The research was based on experiments that were conducted on a broad spectrum of the general population.

e. People who have been blindfolded and whose nostrils are pinched can differentiate a bite of an apple from a bite of an onion more easily than they can differentiate a bite of an apple from a bite of a raw potato.

What is the negation of a? Would it be - "No one agrees that an apple and a potato differ in taste" or is the negation - "At least one person doesn't agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste"?
I chose A because I negated it the first way I described above. I am guessing the negation is the 2nd way.

Thanks
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7185
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 2167

Kudos [?]: 14019 [16] , given: 222

Re: According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose nos [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2013, 05:17
16
KUDOS
Expert's post
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Practicegmat wrote:
@
Kris01 ur explanation is faulty :

a ) All people agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste.
the negation of A wud be not All people agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste. that means that some people do not agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste

Could you explain further ? I still feel (a) is the answer.

Anyone from VeritasPrep can help here ?
This is a Veritas Prep QBnak question.
I went through through through explanation in the Vertias Prep QBank, but still have doubt.

First of all, the negation of (A):

(A) All people agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste.
Negation: Not all people agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste.
This means there is at least one person who does not agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste. It is still possible that taste buds are not the only sense organs involved in determining the taste of a piece of food. Even after we negate (A), the conclusion is possible so (A) is not an assumption.
Think of it this way: The given research was conducted. Blindfolded people with pinched noses found it very hard to differentiate the taste. One person comes up and says that he himself cannot differentiate between the two while looking and smelling. Does it mean that senses other than taste buds are not involved? No. There could be many other people who feel that they can easily differentiate between an apple and a potato taste. So other senses could be involved. So (A) is not your answer.

Let's negate (C)

(C) The word "taste" can be used to describe an experience that involves sight or smell or both.
Negation: The word "taste" can not be used to describe an experience that involves sight or smell or both.
It says that "taste" does not involve sight and smell. But our conclusion is based on the premise that sight and smell are involved. Hence we need (C) to be true to arrive at our conclusion.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199 Veritas Prep Reviews Manager Joined: 24 Sep 2012 Posts: 90 Location: United States Concentration: Entrepreneurship, International Business GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V39 GPA: 3.2 WE: Education (Education) Followers: 5 Kudos [?]: 135 [2] , given: 3 Re: According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose nos [#permalink] ### Show Tags 22 Feb 2013, 13:21 2 This post received KUDOS Hello, A can be negated to mean "No one can tell the difference between the taste of apple and potato". This includes people with eyesight etc. Now when one applies this to the first statement, one understands that no one can tell the difference is taste between potato and apple while some blind people can tell the difference, although with a bit of difficulty. All that might let us to conclude is that eyesight might be an obstacle in recognizing or differentiating between the taste of two or more food items. We can in no way conclude that taste buds are not the only receptors of taste. Hope it is clear. Let me know if you require further explanation. gmatprep1982 wrote: According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose nostrils have been pinched so that smelling is impossible will have great difficulty in differentiating a bite of an apple from a bite of a raw potato. This clearly demonstrates that taste buds are not the only sense organs involved in determining the taste of a piece of food. Which of the following premises, is an assumption required by the argument? a. All people agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste. b. There are no other senses involved in tasting other than taste, smell, and sight. c. The word "taste" can be used to describe an experience that involves sight or smell or both. d. The research was based on experiments that were conducted on a broad spectrum of the general population. e. People who have been blindfolded and whose nostrils are pinched can differentiate a bite of an apple from a bite of an onion more easily than they can differentiate a bite of an apple from a bite of a raw potato. What is the negation of a? Would it be - "No one agrees that an apple and a potato differ in taste" or is the negation - "At least one person doesn't agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste"? I chose A because I negated it the first way I described above. I am guessing the negation is the 2nd way. Thanks Director Joined: 05 Sep 2010 Posts: 854 Followers: 89 Kudos [?]: 250 [2] , given: 61 Re: According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose nos [#permalink] ### Show Tags 24 Feb 2013, 09:33 2 This post received KUDOS @ Kris01 ur explanation is faulty : a ) All people agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste. the negation of A wud be not All people agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste. that means that some people do not agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Posts: 7185 Location: Pune, India Followers: 2167 Kudos [?]: 14019 [2] , given: 222 Re: According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose [#permalink] ### Show Tags 20 Apr 2014, 20:25 2 This post received KUDOS Expert's post nidhi12 wrote: why not B b. There are no other senses involved in tasting other than taste, smell, and sight. If I say there other senses involved, such as skin.. then?? taste buds not only responsible for taste sense ...then also negation test is cleared Negate (B): There ARE other senses involved in tasting other than taste, smell, and sight. Conclusion of the argument: taste buds are not the only sense organs involved in determining the taste of a piece of food. Can the conclusion hold even after negating (B)? Sure, even if some other sense are also involved, the conclusion is saying that taste buds are not the only sense organs. So (B) is not the assumption. _________________ Karishma Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor My Blog Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7185
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 2167

Kudos [?]: 14019 [1] , given: 222

Re: According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2015, 20:36
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
mosesrah wrote:
hello and thank you for your explanation. this is indeed a very complicated question! however, I have another issue with question:

There is another major underlying assumption here: Apples and Potatoes are different! so by giving any definition to taste, you are implying that some people may be able to differentiate between apples and potatoes. (because they are different). so by assuming that taste is an experience that involves sight or smell or both, you imply that there is a combination of features that will help some people pick apples from potatoes.

what if there is 1 person who thinks apples and Potatoes taste the same, because they are the same, therefore all their features are the same, including any definition you give to "taste". If this is the case, your whole argument will collapse, because taste buds may very well be the only organs involved in determining the taste when two objects are different!

So when we say all people agree that apples and Potatoes taste different, we logically and clearly imply that all people think apples and Potatoes are different in at least in one feature! this is why i think "A" is the correct answer here.

Note that usually, people's opinion will not count for much. What will be important is the fact. The only opinion we care about is the author's. We cannot strengthen/weaken the author's opinion by giving similar/dissimilar opinions of other people.
Say, you negate (A) and get that at least one person says that apple and potato have the same taste. The point is - it doesn't matter. What we would be interested in is getting a fact - apple and potato have the same taste. We don't really care about what one person thinks. We are only interested in facts.

When we conclude: taste buds are not the only sense organs involved in determining the taste of a piece of food.
How do we define "taste"? Taste buds we know tell us whether the food is salty/sweet/sour etc. But how do we say that "taste" is not defined by only these features? We are assuming that taste is defined by sight/smell too.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199 Veritas Prep Reviews Manager Status: Time to apply! Joined: 24 Aug 2011 Posts: 220 Location: India Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V25 GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29 GMAT 3: 690 Q49 V34 GPA: 3.2 WE: Engineering (Computer Software) Followers: 4 Kudos [?]: 119 [0], given: 166 Re: According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose nos [#permalink] ### Show Tags 01 Sep 2013, 08:14 aditya8062 wrote: @ Kris01 ur explanation is faulty : a ) All people agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste. the negation of A wud be not All people agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste. that means that some people do not agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste Could you explain further ? I still feel (a) is the answer. Anyone from VeritasPrep can help here ? This is a Veritas Prep QBnak question. I went through through through explanation in the Vertias Prep QBank, but still have doubt. _________________ Didn't give up !!! Still Trying!! Manager Status: Persevering Joined: 15 May 2013 Posts: 225 Location: India Concentration: Technology, Leadership GMAT Date: 08-02-2013 GPA: 3.7 WE: Consulting (Consulting) Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 34 Re: According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose nos [#permalink] ### Show Tags 02 Sep 2013, 03:53 Practicegmat wrote: aditya8062 wrote: @ Kris01 ur explanation is faulty : a ) All people agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste. the negation of A wud be not All people agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste. that means that some people do not agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste Could you explain further ? I still feel (a) is the answer. Anyone from VeritasPrep can help here ? This is a Veritas Prep QBnak question. I went through through through explanation in the Vertias Prep QBank, but still have doubt. All people becomes not all people which does not mean no people. So this assumption on negation does not destroy the argument. Also C provides a clear explanation as to why the people might consider different things to be of same taste. Because if smelling is helpful for people to distinguish b/w things of same "taste" (Here taste takes other form as mentioned in the definition of taste) then taste buds might not be the only organs to determine the taste of the item. _________________ --It's one thing to get defeated, but another to accept it. Manager Joined: 05 Jun 2013 Posts: 59 Location: India Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29 GPA: 3.6 WE: Business Development (Education) Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 31 Re: According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose [#permalink] ### Show Tags 26 Nov 2013, 07:30 this is surely a 700 level question. SDA Bocconi Thread Master Joined: 27 Dec 2012 Posts: 38 Location: India Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33 GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V40 WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities) Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 34 Re: According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose nos [#permalink] ### Show Tags 03 Jan 2014, 14:00 VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: Practicegmat wrote: aditya8062 wrote: @ Kris01 ur explanation is faulty : a ) All people agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste. the negation of A wud be not All people agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste. that means that some people do not agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste Could you explain further ? I still feel (a) is the answer. Anyone from VeritasPrep can help here ? This is a Veritas Prep QBnak question. I went through through through explanation in the Vertias Prep QBank, but still have doubt. First of all, the negation of (A): (A) All people agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste. Negation: Not all people agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste. This means there is at least one person who does not agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste. It is still possible that taste buds are not the only sense organs involved in determining the taste of a piece of food. Even after we negate (A), the conclusion is possible so (A) is not an assumption. Think of it this way: The given research was conducted. Blindfolded people with pinched noses found it very hard to differentiate the taste. One person comes up and says that he himself cannot differentiate between the two while looking and smelling. Does it mean that senses other than taste buds are not involved? No. There could be many other people who feel that they can easily differentiate between an apple and a potato taste. So other senses could be involved. So (A) is not your answer. Let's negate (C) (C) The word "taste" can be used to describe an experience that involves sight or smell or both. Negation: The word "taste" can not be used to describe an experience that involves sight or smell or both. It says that "taste" does not involve sight and smell. But our conclusion is based on the premise that sight and smell are involved. Hence we need (C) to be true to arrive at our conclusion. Can a conclusion also become an assumption? Based on the experiments I concluded that apart from taste buds, taste involves other senses as well. This then becomes a fact inferred and thus ground for my conclusion. How is this an assumption then? Or maybe I am missing something. Regards, DJ Verbal Forum Moderator Joined: 15 Apr 2013 Posts: 194 Location: India Concentration: General Management, Marketing GMAT Date: 11-23-2015 GPA: 3.6 WE: Science (Other) Followers: 17 Kudos [?]: 545 [0], given: 28 Re: According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose [#permalink] ### Show Tags 06 Jan 2014, 01:11 Thanks Karishma for nice explanation. Got it correct thought. Regards Vikas Intern Joined: 24 May 2013 Posts: 29 Concentration: Operations, General Management WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities) Followers: 2 Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 21 Re: According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose [#permalink] ### Show Tags 18 Apr 2014, 04:20 why not B b. There are no other senses involved in tasting other than taste, smell, and sight. If I say there other senses involved, such as skin.. then?? taste buds not only responsible for taste sense ...then also negation test is cleared Manager Status: Persevering Joined: 15 May 2013 Posts: 225 Location: India Concentration: Technology, Leadership GMAT Date: 08-02-2013 GPA: 3.7 WE: Consulting (Consulting) Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 34 Re: According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose [#permalink] ### Show Tags 18 Apr 2014, 06:00 nidhi12 wrote: why not B b. There are no other senses involved in tasting other than taste, smell, and sight. If I say there other senses involved, such as skin.. then?? taste buds not only responsible for taste sense ...then also negation test is cleared Skin is out of the bounds of the argument isn't it ? _________________ --It's one thing to get defeated, but another to accept it. Senior Manager Joined: 07 Apr 2012 Posts: 464 Followers: 2 Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 58 Re: According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose [#permalink] ### Show Tags 01 Jul 2014, 10:21 VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: nidhi12 wrote: why not B b. There are no other senses involved in tasting other than taste, smell, and sight. If I say there other senses involved, such as skin.. then?? taste buds not only responsible for taste sense ...then also negation test is cleared Negate (B): There ARE other senses involved in tasting other than taste, smell, and sight. Conclusion of the argument: taste buds are not the only sense organs involved in determining the taste of a piece of food. Can the conclusion hold even after negating (B)? Sure, even if some other sense are also involved, the conclusion is saying that taste buds are not the only sense organs. So (B) is not the assumption. How would you negate D? The research wasn't based on experiments that were conducted on a broad spectrum of the general population. So this would mean that we only took a small spectrum and maybe that affected the results? Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Posts: 7185 Location: Pune, India Followers: 2167 Kudos [?]: 14019 [0], given: 222 Re: According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose [#permalink] ### Show Tags 02 Jul 2014, 22:07 ronr34 wrote: VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: nidhi12 wrote: why not B b. There are no other senses involved in tasting other than taste, smell, and sight. If I say there other senses involved, such as skin.. then?? taste buds not only responsible for taste sense ...then also negation test is cleared Negate (B): There ARE other senses involved in tasting other than taste, smell, and sight. Conclusion of the argument: taste buds are not the only sense organs involved in determining the taste of a piece of food. Can the conclusion hold even after negating (B)? Sure, even if some other sense are also involved, the conclusion is saying that taste buds are not the only sense organs. So (B) is not the assumption. How would you negate D? The research wasn't based on experiments that were conducted on a broad spectrum of the general population. So this would mean that we only took a small spectrum and maybe that affected the results? Negate D: Research was based on experiments that were not conducted on a broad spectrum of the general population. The conclusion does not say that for people of most classes/regions, taste buds are not the only sense organs involved in determining the taste of a piece of food. It is acceptable if the research was conducted on a few people and it was determined that other senses are involved. Even if some people found it difficult to differentiate between the two things, we can say that other senses are involved. They may or may not be involved for all - it doesn't change anything. _________________ Karishma Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor My Blog Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Intern
Joined: 03 Jul 2013
Posts: 36
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jul 2014, 14:58
Don't know whether it would be stupid question but word order of option C has confused me .

"" The word "taste" can be used to describe an
experience that involves sight or smell or both. """

Here ,is it not possible to assume that " taste can be used to describe an experience that involves sight only or smell only or both ?""

, sight or smell or both ? so Taste can be describe in term of sight only . in this case , don't need more than one organ to experience taste of a food .
Intern
Joined: 28 Dec 2013
Posts: 40
Location: United States
GPA: 3
WE: Information Technology (Insurance)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 18

Re: According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jul 2014, 02:28
Can someone please tell me why not D?
_________________

Never give up, never celebrate, never leave your spot until it is finally over
We are winning this GMAT-war together

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7185
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 2167

Kudos [?]: 14019 [0], given: 222

Re: According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jul 2014, 04:07
janxavier wrote:
Can someone please tell me why not D?

I have taken it here: according-to-recent-research-a-blindfolded-person-whose-147631.html#p1379519
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Current Student
Joined: 23 Nov 2014
Posts: 54
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 12

According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2015, 12:52
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
Practicegmat wrote:
@
Kris01 ur explanation is faulty :

a ) All people agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste.
the negation of A wud be not All people agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste. that means that some people do not agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste

Could you explain further ? I still feel (a) is the answer.

Anyone from VeritasPrep can help here ?
This is a Veritas Prep QBnak question.
I went through through through explanation in the Vertias Prep QBank, but still have doubt.

First of all, the negation of (A):

(A) All people agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste.
Negation: Not all people agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste.
This means there is at least one person who does not agree that an apple and a potato differ in taste. It is still possible that taste buds are not the only sense organs involved in determining the taste of a piece of food. Even after we negate (A), the conclusion is possible so (A) is not an assumption.
Think of it this way: The given research was conducted. Blindfolded people with pinched noses found it very hard to differentiate the taste. One person comes up and says that he himself cannot differentiate between the two while looking and smelling. Does it mean that senses other than taste buds are not involved? No. There could be many other people who feel that they can easily differentiate between an apple and a potato taste. So other senses could be involved. So (A) is not your answer.

Let's negate (C)

(C) The word "taste" can be used to describe an experience that involves sight or smell or both.
Negation: The word "taste" can not be used to describe an experience that involves sight or smell or both.
It says that "taste" does not involve sight and smell. But our conclusion is based on the premise that sight and smell are involved. Hence we need (C) to be true to arrive at our conclusion.

hello and thank you for your explanation. this is indeed a very complicated question! however, I have another issue with question:

There is another major underlying assumption here: Apples and Potatoes are different! so by giving any definition to taste, you are implying that some people may be able to differentiate between apples and potatoes. (because they are different). so by assuming that taste is an experience that involves sight or smell or both, you imply that there is a combination of features that will help some people pick apples from potatoes.

what if there is 1 person who thinks apples and Potatoes taste the same, because they are the same, therefore all their features are the same, including any definition you give to "taste". If this is the case, your whole argument will collapse, because taste buds may very well be the only organs involved in determining the taste when two objects are different!

So when we say all people agree that apples and Potatoes taste different, we logically and clearly imply that all people think apples and Potatoes are different in at least in one feature! this is why i think "A" is the correct answer here.
MBA Section Director
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 3587
Location: India
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 1562

Kudos [?]: 12277 [0], given: 1872

Re: According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2015, 22:43
In assumption questions, remember that you can negate the potential assumptions. If that negation destroys the argument, then you've found an assumption.

(A)
Negation: There are people who can't distinguish the taste of an apple from that of a potato.
If that's the case, then the argument is destroyed, because we have an alternate explanation for the results of the experiment.

--

Getting rid of (B) and (C) isn't so bad.
The argument is only concerned with "taste buds" vs. "NOT taste buds".
The particular identity of "NOT taste buds" is fungible-it doesn't matter whether it's your eyes, or your nose, or your feng shui, or whatever. If it's not taste buds, it's all the same. So, we don't need to assume anything about the particular identity of the NOT-taste buds.

(D) For this to be relevant, you'd need even more assumptions. For instance, you'd have to assume that different people taste things differently. (If not, then there's no advantage in testing a diversity of people.) We don't know about those additional assumptions, so this choice is weak sauce.

(E) We obviously don't have to assume anything about onions.
_________________
Re: According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose   [#permalink] 03 Feb 2015, 22:43

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 26 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Assumptions CR: Blindfolded person 0 15 Feb 2017, 07:49
14 #Top150 CR: According to recent research, a blindfolded person 8 01 Dec 2015, 21:16
According to recent research 0 21 Oct 2016, 07:51
10 According to recent studies, people whose diet is 19 16 May 2015, 21:31
13 According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose nostril 2 02 May 2015, 22:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# According to recent research, a blindfolded person whose

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.