Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 May 2017, 12:38

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Posts: 151
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Re: According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Nov 2010, 04:16
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

47% (02:37) correct 53% (01:20) wrong based on 124 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

WashingtonGMAT wrote:
daagh wrote:
I am afraid that this is a weird question. No choice seems satisfying.

B looks apparently better than others, because, in gist, it maintains the comparison between wild animals and domestic animals, although it is also meaning to say that wild animals have less total fat than they have livestock, which is indeed absurd

The right answer is B which is surprising. This is kind of interesting question.

Going by the same logic that you have used, I picked B.

But does the sentence imply that "wild animals have less total fat than they have livestock"?

Let's consider some examples:

Japan has more money than China (has).
Japan's economy is better than that of China.
Japan's economy is better than China.

In the first example, you are comparing two countries. In the second, you are comparing economies. So both the sentences are correct. The third example is wrong because the comparison is wrong.

Please correct me if I'm mistaken but I think that you are attributing the mistake in the third example to the question when in fact it has a structure similar to the first example.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3830
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 816

Kudos [?]: 6299 [1] , given: 324

Re: According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Nov 2010, 06:42
1
KUDOS
The problem with the choice B is its ambiguity. IMO, though weird as it may look, it does imply a possibility that the wild animals have less total fat than they have livestock.

Japan has more money than China (has).
Japan's economy is better than that of China.
Japan's economy is better than China.

In the first one, which seems to have no problem, the saving grace is the elliptical verb “has.” If you had not indicated it, the meaning may distort that Japan has more money than Japan has China.( absurd though)

Let me give you a couple of examples, where it may not be so absurd

I Jack loves Jill more than Tom.

Basically two interpretations are possible,

1. Jack loves Jill more than he loves Tom,
2. Jack loves Jill more that Tom loves Jill

II Nobody knows the baby better than the mother

1 nobody knows the baby better than the mother knows the baby
2. Nobody knows the baby better than he or she knows the mother

In order to remove this ambiguity only, we have to provide a necessary verb in the second arm of the comparison. In the given text, B would have been better, if it had stated “wild animals have less total fat than have livestock fed on grain and more of a kind of fat thought to be

Is it of any help?
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Posts: 151
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Re: According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Nov 2010, 20:51
Thank you daagh. Now I understand the concept better. Thanks again for your time and effort!!
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 May 2010
Posts: 321
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Schools: CBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 590 Q47 V25
GMAT 2: 560 Q47 V20
GMAT 3: 600 Q47 V25
GMAT 4: 680 Q49 V34
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 32

Re: According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Nov 2010, 21:11
raghavs wrote:
According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value of meat from wild animals
and meat from domesticated animals, wild animals have less total fat than do livestock
fed on grain and more of a kind of fat they think is
good for cardiac health.
A. wild animals have less total fat than do livestock fed on grain and more of a kind
of fat they think is
B. wild animals have less total fat than livestock fed on grain and more of a kind of
fat thought to be
C. wild animals have less total fat than that of livestock fed on grain and have more
fat of a kind thought to be
D. total fat of wild animals is less than livestock fed on grain and they have more fat
of a kind thought to be
E. total fat is less in wild animals than that of livestock fed on grain and more of
their fat is of a kind they think is

I reached to answer B only by POE. A and E are out due to ambiguity over 'they'. C & D are out due to incorrect comparisons.
Can some explain how phrase 'According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value of meat..' is referring to wild animals? I thought some answer choice will have 'meat' as a subject rather than 'animals'.
_________________

"Whether You Think You Can or Can't, You're Right"--Henry Ford
680 Debrief
600 Debrief
590 Debrief
My GMAT Journey

Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Dec 2015
Posts: 299
GMAT 1: 600 Q44 V27
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 36

Re: According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2016, 04:06
OA is B according to eGMAT.

The question is from OG 16, nº116.
Intern
Joined: 23 Jun 2016
Posts: 18
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 36

Re: According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Mar 2017, 07:42
please give further explanation on option C

Sent from my SM-T530 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Aiming 800 Q51 V51
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 1650
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, International Business
GMAT 1: 670 Q50 V32
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.65
WE: Brand Management (Health Care)
Followers: 38

Kudos [?]: 394 [0], given: 51

Re: According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Mar 2017, 06:18
I think problem in A is only 'they'.

Out of B and C, I believe B is 100% incorrect ad here we are comparing fat with livestock while the comparison should be between wild animals and livestock.

in option C, Does 'that of' refers to fat? Please confirm.
_________________

Good Luck

Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3041
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Followers: 512

Kudos [?]: 2257 [0], given: 22

Re: According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Mar 2017, 12:24
abhimahna wrote:
I think problem in A is only 'they'.

Out of B and C, I believe B is 100% incorrect ad here we are comparing fat with livestock while the comparison should be between wild animals and livestock.

in option C, Does 'that of' refers to fat? Please confirm.

B is alright - the verb has been omitted (correctly) from the second element of the parallel structure:

..wild animals have less total fat than livestock (have).

Omission (including verbs) is acceptable when the meaning is not obscured. Take the following examples:

I like chocolates more than Madhu.

The above sentence may imply:
I like chocolates more than Madhu (likes chocolates).
OR
I like chocolates more than (I like) Madhu.

In such cases omission is not acceptable. However in the above example the following does not make sense:
Wild animals have less total fat than (they have) livestock.

The only possible meaning is:
Wild animals have less total fat than livestock (have total fat).

Hence omission is acceptable is this case. B is alright.
==========================================

Yes, in option C "that" refers to "fat", making the comparison faulty.
Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2015
Posts: 111
GPA: 3.92
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 109

Re: According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Mar 2017, 13:18
Option C: Wild animals have less total fat than that of livestock fed on grain and have more fat of a kind thought to be

"Wild animals" is being compared to "livestock." "Than that of" is awkward.

"Have" seems redundant.

"A kind thought to be" could be correct in some situations, but it feels awkward in this sentence.
Re: According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value   [#permalink] 12 Mar 2017, 13:18
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Advanced SC According to recent studies comparing nutritional value 0 08 Nov 2015, 08:33
According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value 0 19 Jan 2016, 09:44
According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value 0 07 Mar 2015, 20:06
111 According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value 36 21 May 2017, 18:13
According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value 0 12 Mar 2017, 06:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.