GMAT Changed on April 16th - Read about the latest changes here

 It is currently 24 May 2018, 08:50

# Happening NOW:

INSEAD Rolling Out R1 Admission Decisions - Join CHAT Room2 to Get Latest Updates from Fellow Applicants

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 04 Apr 2015
Posts: 109
Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2017, 00:27
sayantanc2k wrote:
vroldao wrote:
Question - doesn't "more than likely" change the original meaning?
Originally we have something that can possibly be explained by the second. By using "more than likely" aren't we introducing certainty in the statement?

It has not been mentioned in any official guideline that the correct answer must retain the meaning of the original sentence. If there is only one grammatically correct choice, it must be selected even when it deviates in meaning from the original. However if there are two grammatically correct sentences, select the one that agrees with the intended meaning of the original sentence (that too if the original sentence makes sense).

Please explain why there should not be "it was" after comma "but"
Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3201
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Apr 2017, 10:39
varundixitmro2512 wrote:
sayantanc2k wrote:
vroldao wrote:
Question - doesn't "more than likely" change the original meaning?
Originally we have something that can possibly be explained by the second. By using "more than likely" aren't we introducing certainty in the statement?

It has not been mentioned in any official guideline that the correct answer must retain the meaning of the original sentence. If there is only one grammatically correct choice, it must be selected even when it deviates in meaning from the original. However if there are two grammatically correct sentences, select the one that agrees with the intended meaning of the original sentence (that too if the original sentence makes sense).

Please explain why there should not be "it was" after comma "but"

There are two options containing "it was": D and E.
D: wrong meaning- implies that the earliest writing and separate and distinct symbolic system of communication are different things (The former began from the latter). But the intended meaning is that both are the same ("began as").
E: wrong meaning - similar issue as above - moreover this option implies that earliest writing began separate and distinct symbolic system of communication.
Manager
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Posts: 119
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.99
Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Apr 2017, 13:55
Hi experts, I answered B correctly and understand why it is correct.

What I want to explore here is the structure of the sentence. What is independent and what is dependent clause? The idiom NOT ... BUT confuses me here.

Is ', and only later merged with spoken language' an independent clause nested under but (is such thing possible, I wouldn't be surprised if it isn't), or should we look at the sentence as a combination of two parallel independent clauses?

According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not a direct rendering of speech, but more than likely began as a separate and distinct symbolic system of communication (1st one), and only later merged with spoken language. (2nd)

Thanks.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 19 Mar 2014
Posts: 974
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.5
Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2017, 08:37
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not a direct rendering of speech, but was more likely to begin as a separate and distinct symbolic system of communication, and only later merged with spoken language.

Let's try to understand the sentence, as we glance through we come to know that the sentence tense is most probably past tense because of the words - was & merged. In the underlined portion as well we should be looking for an option that is in past tense.

Also, in comparison questions, the word "more" is always followed by the word "than".

(A) was more likely to begin as

- more likely to begin is non-idiomatic, also the word begin does not go with the words - was and merged, begin should be in the past tense. We are also missing the word THAN after the word MORE.

(B) more than likely began as

- CORRECT - BEGAN is parallel with the words - was and merged (past tense), THAN is used after MORE
- IDIOM - Not X but more than likely Y

(C) more than likely beginning from

- missing verb here, beginning is not a verb, also does not go along with was and merged.

(D) it was more than likely begun from

- Begun - is not the correct tense here. Does not go along with was and merged.

(E) it was more likely that it began

In this awkward, unclear, and wordy construction, the first it must be followed by is, not was, because the theory is current; the second it acts as the subject of the subordinate clause, and this usage requires the omission of the comma after communication.

_________________

"Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not: nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not: the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent."

Best AWA Template: https://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-get-6-0-awa-my-guide-64327.html#p470475

Status: It's now or never
Joined: 10 Feb 2017
Posts: 257
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q40 V39
GPA: 3
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Sep 2017, 11:14
'B' is the correct choice - In this sentence, more than likely is the correct comparative construction.

Eliminated: 'C' and 'D' for using from .... should have to ('to' not present in the question stem)
_________________

Class of 2019: Mannheim Business School
Class 0f 2020: HHL Leipzig

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2015
Posts: 280
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
WE: Investment Banking (Venture Capital)
Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Sep 2017, 11:34
According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not a direct rendering of speech, but was more likely to begin as a separate and distinct symbolic system of communication, and only later merged with spoken language.

(A) was more likely to begin as
- "begin" NOT // with "merged". also, "more" should be accompanied with "than"

(B) more than likely began as
- correct as is

(C) more than likely beginning from
- "beginning from" NOT // to "merged"

(D) it was more than likely begun from
- "begun from" NOT // to "merged". also, "it" not needed

(E) it was more likely that it began
- way too many "it" pronouns. not needed.

KEY: Know the proper idiom when comparing/contrasting with "more". Should be "more THAN". also, parallelism here: "began" must be // to "merged", since they're the two main verbs here

Intern
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 28
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GPA: 2.61
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)
Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Nov 2017, 15:30
cool_jonny009 wrote:
According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not a direct rendering of speech, but was more likely to begin as a separate and distinct symbolic system of communication, and only later merged with spoken language.

(A) was more likely to begin as
(B) more than likely began as
(C) more than likely beginning from
(D) it was more than likely begun from
(E) it was more likely that it began

Official Guide 12 Question

 Question: 39 Page: 41 Difficulty: 600

Find All Official Guide Questions

Video Explanations:

Approach:
5-second scan, reveals split between more and it. Pronouns and Parallelism could be in play.

The earliest X was, but was appears redundant and non-idiomatic for a two-part parallel construction.

A - Eliminate based on the above.
B - The earlest X was, but more than likely began as - two part idiom X more than Y is correct and the verb tense is correct. Keep
C - eliminate - verb tense is incorrect. The writing already took place if the scholars are in a position to pass judgement on it.
D - it? what is IT refering to? The Speech or the earliest writing? eliminate for ambiguity.
E - eliminate for same reason as D.

Anyone have any comments on my logic applied, feel free to give feedback.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 1981
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jan 2018, 23:21
According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not a direct rendering of speech, but was more likely to begin as a separate and distinct symbolic system of communication, and only later merged with spoken language.

(A) was more likely to begin as -- the writing was already present --> use of was to begin is non-sensical
(B) more than likely began as -- Correct
(C) more than likely beginning from -- beginning is not a verb--> incorrect ; began as vs began from -- different meanings --> A began from X --> source of A was X
A began as X --> X was the first form of A
(D) it was more than likely begun from -- was begun is in passive -- distorts meaning; began as vs began from -- same as C ; use of comma before and is incorrect
(E) it was more likely that it began -- it was is incorrect ; different meaning

_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Intern
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Posts: 22
Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jan 2018, 09:16
Can you please explain is comma before but necessary, because but is seperated by comma, we should use two independent clauses and that now we require ‘it’ after but. Where I went wrong?

sayantanc2k wrote:
vroldao wrote:
Question - doesn't "more than likely" change the original meaning?
Originally we have something that can possibly be explained by the second. By using "more than likely" aren't we introducing certainty in the statement?

It has not been mentioned in any official guideline that the correct answer must retain the meaning of the original sentence. If there is only one grammatically correct choice, it must be selected even when it deviates in meaning from the original. However if there are two grammatically correct sentences, select the one that agrees with the intended meaning of the original sentence (that too if the original sentence makes sense).
Director
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Posts: 531
Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jan 2018, 10:59
cool_jonny009 wrote:
According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not a direct rendering of speech, but was more likely to begin as a separate and distinct symbolic system of communication, and only later merged with spoken language.

(A) was more likely to begin as
(B) more than likely began as
(C) but more than likely beginning from
(D) it was more than likely begun from
(E) it was more likely that it began

Official Guide 12 Question

 Question: 39 Page: 41 Difficulty: 600

Find All Official Guide Questions

Video Explanations:

Greetings!

I have a couple of questions:

What does this question test ? for example when I read each SC, and in case my answer is not correct than I learn from mistake like ok I did mistakes in verb agreement, sequence of tence, parallelism, pronouns etc... now when it comes to this question I dont understand what should I learn from my mistake I chose C, because it seemed correct in terms of parallelism (nouns)..

"According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not a direct rendering of speech...but more than likely beginning from

thank you for your kind explanation
Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not   [#permalink] 15 Jan 2018, 10:59

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 30 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by