Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 26 May 2017, 23:53

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 27 Jun 2005
Posts: 504
Location: MS
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 132 [2] , given: 0

According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Nov 2005, 13:45
2
KUDOS
51
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (02:18) correct 45% (01:08) wrong based on 2758 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not a direct rendering of speech, but was more likely to begin as a separate and distinct symbolic system of communication, and only later merged with spoken language.

(A) was more likely to begin as
(B) more than likely began as
(C) more than likely beginning from
(D) it was more than likely begun from
(E) it was more likely that it began

Official Guide 12 Question

 Question: 39 Page: 41 Difficulty: 600

Find All Official Guide Questions

Video Explanations:
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2898
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 289 [2] , given: 0

### Show Tags

29 Nov 2005, 15:12
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I will go with B

The sequence of events is first it was a symbolic system of communication, then the writings and then merged with the spoken language.

So "was more likely to begin as" must use "began". A, C and D are eliminated.

E is not sounding correct to ears because it is not using "as" or "from" in the end.

The explanation is based on my knowledge only.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1806
Location: New York
Followers: 38

Kudos [?]: 934 [0], given: 5

OG11-D39 According to scholars, the earliest writing was [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Nov 2007, 21:46
OG11-D39
According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not a direct rendering of speech, but was more likely to begin as a separate and distinct symbolic system of communication, and only later mred with spoken language.

a)was more likely to begin as
b)more than likely began as
c) more than lkely beginning from
d) it was more than likely begun from
e) it was more likely that it began.
Manager
Joined: 20 Jun 2007
Posts: 156
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Nov 2007, 02:44
I agree with B.

A - wrong tense - should be to have begun as
C - no verb in the sub clause
D - I'm not sure about parallelism. I don't think the two clauses are parallel just because they both have "was"! In fact, I'd say that they're not parallel because one is active voice and the other passive (was not a rendering vs was begun from).
E - wrong tense - should be it is more likely
Intern
Joined: 23 Sep 2011
Posts: 49
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.44
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 21

### Show Tags

18 Oct 2011, 05:03
Hi,

I am having trouble understanding option B (correct answer) from parallelism perspective.

Not a direct rendering of speech, but more than likely began as

a direct rendering of speech -> complex gerund
began -> verb

How are they both parallel in the NOT..BUT construct above?

Many thanks!
Manager
Affiliations: IIBA
Joined: 04 Sep 2010
Posts: 55
Location: India
Schools: HBS, Stanford, Stern, Insead, ISB, Wharton, Columbia
WE 1: Information Technology (Banking and Financial Services)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 40 [7] , given: 0

Re: OG11-D39 According to scholars, the earliest writing was [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jan 2013, 18:06
7
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not a direct rendering of speech, but was more likely to begin as a separate and distinct symbolic system of communication, and only later merged with spoken language.

a)was more likely to begin as -- more must be accompanied by than
b)more than likely began as -- correct
c) more than likely beginning from -- beginning from is not parallel with merged.
d) it was more than likely begun from -- begun is not the correct form, began must be used to make it parallel to merged.
e) it was more likely that it began. -- more must be accompanied by than.
_________________

~soaringAlone
~Live fast, die young and leave a marketable corpse behind !!

BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Posts: 1194
Followers: 134

Kudos [?]: 1617 [0], given: 147

Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Nov 2013, 23:33
cool_jonny009 wrote:
According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not a direct rendering of speech, but was more likely to begin as a separate and distinct symbolic system of communication, and only later merged with spoken language.

(A) was more likely to begin as
(B) more than likely began as
(C) more than likely beginning from
(D) it was more than likely begun from
(E) it was more likely that it began

Official Guide 12 Question

 Question: 39 Page: 41 Difficulty: 600

Find All Official Guide Questions

Video Explanations:

Hi Verbal Experts,
probably not X but more than likely Y (where X and Y are parallel) - This is the correct idiomatic usage. Right?

So, could you please explain how this has been maintained in the correct option B ?
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Apr 2013
Posts: 276
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 27

Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 May 2014, 21:35
a very tricky one, which I missed

the idiom is

subject do not do x but do y and z.

I do not learn gmat but go out for change and meet her

when the first verb is to be, we have our sentence.

I am not a student at the school but go to the school to learn gmat . this is correct and similar to our sentence.

that is the reason why b is correct.
_________________

If anyone in this gmat forum is in England,Britain, pls, email to me, (thanghnvn@gmail.com) . I have some questions and need your advise. Thank a lot.

Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2015
Posts: 93
Location: Thailand
Schools: Duke '19 (A), HKU (A)
GMAT 1: 540 Q41 V23
GMAT 2: 570 Q44 V24
GMAT 3: 550 Q44 V21
GMAT 4: 660 Q48 V33
GPA: 3.31
WE: Science (Other)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 654

Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Mar 2016, 07:32
I think B is the best among the choices but I fail to understand the idiom not x but y here.

Not a direct rendering of speech but more than likely began

Can anyone shed some light?
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 4515
Followers: 394

Kudos [?]: 4200 [0], given: 109

Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Mar 2016, 07:59
Aves wrote:
I think B is the best among the choices but I fail to understand the idiom not x but y here.

Not a direct rendering of speech but more than likely began

Can anyone shed some light?

Hi
here it is not that classical NOT X but Y...

According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not a direct rendering of speech, but more than likely the earliest writing began as a separate and distinct symbolic system of communication, and only later merged with spoken language.
_________________

Absolute modulus :http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html

VP
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1393
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 130 [1] , given: 859

Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Mar 2016, 02:58
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
cool_jonny009 wrote:
According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not a direct rendering of speech, but was more likely to begin as a separate and distinct symbolic system of communication, and only later merged with spoken language.

(A) was more likely to begin as
(B) more than likely began as
(C) more than likely beginning from
(D) it was more than likely begun from
(E) it was more likely that it began

Official Guide 12 Question

 Question: 39 Page: 41 Difficulty: 600

Find All Official Guide Questions

Video Explanations:

very hard and beautiful question.
the first pattern is
no A but B, both A and B are of the same type of word.

above pattern is very easy to remember. this pattern applies to every case.
but the problem happen with the verb to be

she is not beautiful now but begin to be beautiful

now the pattern is
not+to be +but +verb.
this pattern is hard to remember. very hard. I miss this question.
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3041
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Followers: 515

Kudos [?]: 2273 [0], given: 22

Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Nov 2016, 12:33
The OA is correct and explanation provided above appears sufficient. If there are any specific questions, please post them here and then click again on the "Request Expert Reply" button.
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2016
Posts: 269
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V24
GRE 1: 314 Q167 V147
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 906

Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2017, 09:02
I made a mistake by eliminating all the choice with "than".My reason is that normally "than" is used when we want to compare things,but this sentence just conveys the meaning that earliest writing was more likely began as...;hence,"than" is not required. What am I missing?

Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3041
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Followers: 515

Kudos [?]: 2273 [0], given: 22

Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2017, 23:47
sleepynut wrote:
I made a mistake by eliminating all the choice with "than".My reason is that normally "than" is used when we want to compare things,but this sentence just conveys the meaning that earliest writing was more likely began as...;hence,"than" is not required. What am I missing?

"More" is a comparative adjective and hence should ideally be accompanied by "than". Hence all choices without "than" should first be eliminated. Compare with the following examples:

I have more than 2 pens. (The comparison is between the number of pens I have and the number 2)
I am more than happy. (The comparison is between my mental state and being happy)

Similarly in option B the comparison is between "likelihood that earliest writing was probably not a direct rendering of speech" and "likely". (The likelihood is not just likely, but somewhat close towards certainty.)
Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3041
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Followers: 515

Kudos [?]: 2273 [0], given: 22

Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2017, 04:23
cuhmoon wrote:
Hi sayantanc2k,

Is there a reason why IC, FANBOYS, IC wasn't considered for this sentence? Accordingly, then D and E could be considered as possible choices to evaluate although for reasons mentioned earlier, I understand why those choices aren't correct.

According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not a direct rendering of speech, but was more likely to begin as a separate and distinct symbolic system of communication, and only later merged with spoken language.

(A) was more likely to begin as
(B) more than likely began as
(C) more than likely beginning from
(D) it was more than likely begun from
(E) it was more likely that it began

sayantanc2k wrote:
sleepynut wrote:
I made a mistake by eliminating all the choice with "than".My reason is that normally "than" is used when we want to compare things,but this sentence just conveys the meaning that earliest writing was more likely began as...;hence,"than" is not required. What am I missing?

"More" is a comparative adjective and hence should ideally be accompanied by "than". Hence all choices without "than" should first be eliminated. Compare with the following examples:

I have more than 2 pens. (The comparison is between the number of pens I have and the number 2)
I am more than happy. (The comparison is between my mental state and being happy)

Similarly in option B the comparison is between "likelihood that earliest writing was probably not a direct rendering of speech" and "likely". (The likelihood is not just likely, but somewhat close towards certainty.)

The parallel structure used here is NOT X, BUT Y: X = was probably a..., Y = began as....
(It is awkward to place "not" before the verb "was", and hence the parallelism is difficult to notice.)
Intern
Joined: 10 Nov 2016
Posts: 6
Location: Mexico
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
GPA: 3.8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 3

Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Feb 2017, 08:40
Question - doesn't "more than likely" change the original meaning?
Originally we have something that can possibly be explained by the second. By using "more than likely" aren't we introducing certainty in the statement?
Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3041
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Followers: 515

Kudos [?]: 2273 [0], given: 22

According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Feb 2017, 12:30
vroldao wrote:
Question - doesn't "more than likely" change the original meaning?
Originally we have something that can possibly be explained by the second. By using "more than likely" aren't we introducing certainty in the statement?

It has not been mentioned in any official guideline that the correct answer must retain the meaning of the original sentence. If there is only one grammatically correct choice, it must be selected even when it deviates in meaning from the original. However if there are two grammatically correct sentences, select the one that agrees with the intended meaning of the original sentence (that too if the original sentence makes sense).
Senior Manager
Status: Choice is yours... Complain Or Fight..
Joined: 03 Jul 2016
Posts: 262
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
Schools: IIMB
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 38

Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Feb 2017, 04:09
From the tenses used in sentence, it is clear that we need to use simple past tense and hence I selected choice B which is the only choice with simple past tense.

However, I am not very much convinced with this structure.. But MORE THAN LIKELY BEGAN..
Intern
Joined: 05 Jan 2017
Posts: 18
Schools: Anderson '20
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V33
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 57

Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Apr 2017, 15:07
daagh wrote:
If the subject of the second arm is the same as the subject of the first in a pair of sentences joined by a fanboy conjunction, then we can elide the subject of the second arm; This writing will be considered parallel.

What do you mean "the second arm"? There are 3 verbs in this sentence.

Do ", but" and ", and" have to connect independent clauses? It makes sense to omit the subject of began after ", but" to make it parallel with ", and merged". But how can ", and" was not followed by an independent clause?

What if this sentence only have two verbs.
" According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not a direct rendering of speech, but was more likely to begin as a separate and distinct symbolic system of communication."

Should "but" be followed by an independent clause?

Manager
Joined: 04 Apr 2015
Posts: 93
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 3803

Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2017, 00:26
I believe the correct OA should have "it was " since clause after comma ",but...." is an independent clause and it must have a noun(pronou) and verb combo
Re: According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not   [#permalink] 08 Apr 2017, 00:26

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 23 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 According to anthropologists, early religious beliefs were probably no 4 29 Mar 2017, 08:34
69 According to the writings of Thorstein Veblen 6 11 Apr 2016, 12:16
3 An important scientist has hypothesized that the earliest 4 04 Jun 2015, 07:20
28 One of the earliest known birds with a beak and contour 24 29 Nov 2016, 06:52
14 From the earliest days of the tribe, kinship determined the 24 25 Jan 2016, 18:54
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# According to scholars, the earliest writing was probably not

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.