It is currently 22 Oct 2017, 23:53

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# According to some analysts, whatever its merits, the

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 29 May 2009
Posts: 28

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

According to some analysts, whatever its merits, the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2009, 05:27
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

According to some analysts, whatever its merits, the proposal to tax away all capital gains on short-term investments would, if enacted, have a disastrous effect on Wall Street trading and employment.
(A) its merits, the proposal to tax
(B) its merits may be, the proposal of taxing
(C) its merits as a proposal, taxing
(D) the proposal’s merits, to tax
(E) the proposal’s merits are, taxing

What is the answer ? Why we accept this answer ? Explain it ? Pls.

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 30 May 2009
Posts: 214

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2009, 07:49
According to some analysts, whatever its merits, the proposal to tax away all capital gains on short-term investments would, if enacted, have a disastrous effect on Wall Street trading and employment.
(A) its merits, the proposal to tax - "its merits may be is correct".
(B) its merits may be, the proposal of taxing - CORRECT. its merits may be correctly modifies the 'proposal'. And the it is the proposal if enacted that could have a disastrous effect
(C) its merits as a proposal, taxing - surely wrong....its merits as a proposal...yuk!!
(D) the proposal’s merits, to tax - 'the proposal's merits' again missing a verb like 'are/may be'
(E) the proposal’s merits are, taxing I think E is a trap here.... Pay attention to the non-underlined portion of this sentence. 'if enacted'....this should mean that the proposal if enacted. But sentence E conveys that 'taxing if enacted' which is wrong. Also you cannot argue that the 'if enacted' can actually modify proposal because proposal is used in possessive voice in E. So if enacted can go with taxing only ....and thats wrong.

What's the OA?

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 33

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2009, 08:09
OA is A.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 727

Kudos [?]: 845 [0], given: 99

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2009, 08:22
nawaab007 wrote:
OA is A.

'proposal to' is idiomatic ... so OA is correct. B comes close but 'proposal of' is not idioamtic.

Kudos [?]: 845 [0], given: 99

Intern
Joined: 09 Aug 2009
Posts: 25

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2009, 00:41
apramanik wrote:
According to some analysts, whatever its merits, the proposal to tax away all capital gains on short-term investments would, if enacted, have a disastrous effect on Wall Street trading and employment.
(A) its merits, the proposal to tax
(B) its merits may be, the proposal of taxing
(C) its merits as a proposal, taxing
(D) the proposal’s merits, to tax
(E) the proposal’s merits are, taxing

What is the answer ? Why we accept this answer ? Explain it ? Pls.

I have a doubt on OA--> A. Just rewrite the sentence: "According to some analysts, proposal to tax away all capital gains on short-term investments would, if enacted, have a disastrous effect on Wall Street trading and employment, whatever its merits..[color=#FF0000]"are missing"..[/color]

That's why I think E is correct.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 2

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2009
Posts: 305

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2009, 01:44
IMO A. proposal to sounds correct

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 13

Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Posts: 452

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 5

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2009, 20:41
Between A & B, A follows the correct idiomage!

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 5

Intern
Joined: 15 Jul 2009
Posts: 42

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Jun 2010, 18:27
pk wrote:
According to some analysts, whatever its merits, the proposal to tax away all capital gains on short-term investments would, if enacted, have a disastrous effect on Wall Street trading and employment.
(A) its merits, the proposal to tax
(B) its merits may be, the proposal of taxing
(C) its merits as a proposal, taxing
(D) the proposal’s merits, to tax
(E) the proposal’s merits are, taxing

I have a doubt on OA--> A. Just rewrite the sentence: "According to some analysts, proposal to tax away all capital gains on short-term investments would, if enacted, have a disastrous effect on Wall Street trading and employment, whatever its merits..[color=#FF0000]"are missing"..[/color]

That's why I think E is correct.

If E is chosen, then if enacted will not make sense. Question will be what is if enacted? Merits cannot be enacted. It has to be what is being proposed if enacted will have some consequences described in the question.
Now, between A and B, B is ruled out only if you know that "proposal of" is unidiomatic whereas "proposal to" is.

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 24 Apr 2010
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

27 Jun 2010, 19:28
I would go with E as well because 'its' always stands for something that's singular and in this case 'its' stands for capital gains, which is pleural. Thus the answer cannot be A.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

Re: Tax Proposal   [#permalink] 27 Jun 2010, 19:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by