It is currently 20 Nov 2017, 09:02

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Status: Dedicates 2013 to MBA !!
Joined: 06 Jul 2012
Posts: 58

Kudos [?]: 186 [2], given: 14

Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.8
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2013, 07:20
2
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

74% (01:33) correct 26% (01:27) wrong based on 405 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain improvements to the main commuter rail line would increase ridership dramatically. The authority plans to finance these improvements over the course of five years by raising automobile tolls on the two highway bridges along the route the rail line serves. Although the proposed improvements are indeed needed, the authority's plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit.

Q. Which of the following, if true, would provide the authority with the strongest counter to the objection that its plan is unfair?

(A) Even with the proposed toll increase, the average bridge toll in the tristate region would remain less than the tolls charged in neighboring states.
(B) Any attempt to finance the improvements by raising rail fares would result in a decrease in ridership and so would be self-defeating.
(C) Automobile commuters benefit from well-maintained bridges, and in the tristate region bridge maintenance is funded out of general income tax revenues to which both automobile and rail commuters contribute.
(D) The roads along the route served by the rail line are highly congested and drivers benefit when commuters are diverted from congested roadways to mass transit.
(E) The only alternative way of funding the proposed improvements now being considered is through a regional income tax surcharge, which would affect automobile commuters and rail commuters alike.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Thanks and Regards,
Charu Kapoor

Never Never Never GIVE UP !!

Kudos [?]: 186 [2], given: 14

Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 132

Kudos [?]: 48 [3], given: 3

Re: Improvements to the main commuter rail line [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2013, 07:39
3
KUDOS
D suits the bill in best way------> it gives a reason to understand why i ,as an automobile rider ,might agree to pay for the development of rail road . the fact that this money put by me will ultimately help to reduce the congestion ,which is in fact a big problem at the moment , might become a solid reason as why i sud contribute (in terms of money ) to the development of this project

Kudos [?]: 48 [3], given: 3

VP
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 1078

Kudos [?]: 661 [0], given: 70

Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Re: Improvements to the main commuter rail line [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2013, 11:40
CharuKapoor wrote:
According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain improvements to the main commuter rail line would increase ridership dramatically. The authority plans to finance these improvements over the course of five years by raising automobile tolls on the two highway bridges along the route the rail line serves. Although the proposed improvements are indeed needed, the authority's plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit.

Q. Which of the following, if true, would provide the authority with the strongest counter to the objection that its plan is unfair?

(A) Even with the proposed toll increase, the average bridge toll in the tristate region would remain less than the tolls charged in neighboring states.
(B) Any attempt to finance the improvements by raising rail fares would result in a decrease in ridership and so would be self-defeating.
(C) Automobile commuters benefit from well-maintained bridges, and in the tristate region bridge maintenance is funded out of general income tax revenues to which both automobile and rail commuters contribute.
(D) The roads along the route served by the rail line are highly congested and drivers benefit when commuters are diverted from congested roadways to mass transit.
(E) The only alternative way of funding the proposed improvements now being considered is through a regional income tax surcharge, which would affect automobile commuters and rail commuters alike.

hi charu..
i think the answer must be D..
If I m nt wrong u chose B....if that is the case..than u shud think..conclusion is "its unfair to charge drivers for financing the rail project" We need to weaken the conclusion"so if we say that we do not have any other alternative to raise the fund ...that does not weaken......if there is none who could be charged...than why these truck drivers shud be a safe bait.....ti does not make sense to say , if nthn works than we are goin to ask truck drivers...."
On ther hand D says there are cases, where the drivers have benefited , if there is no congestion on the highway...so it make us to think that when the rail system will be improved the mass transit will be less and drivers will be those who will benifit max out f it..

Consider kudos if my post helps!!!!!!

Archit

Kudos [?]: 661 [0], given: 70

Current Student
Joined: 27 Jan 2013
Posts: 76

Kudos [?]: 30 [2], given: 4

Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
GPA: 3
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Re: According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jun 2013, 16:04
2
KUDOS
According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain improvements to the main commuter rail line would increase ridership dramatically. The authority plans to finance these improvements over the course of five years by raising automobile tolls on the two highway bridges along the route the rail line serves. Although the proposed improvements are indeed needed, the authority's plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit.

Q. Which of the following, if true, would provide the authority with the strongest counter to the objection that its plan is unfair?

(A) Even with the proposed toll increase, the average bridge toll in the tristate region would remain less than the tolls charged in neighboring states. irrelevant (no mention of other states)
(B) Any attempt to finance the improvements by raising rail fares would result in a decrease in ridership and so would be self-defeating.
it is about why drivers have to pay not why rail riders must not.
(C) Automobile commuters benefit from well-maintained bridges, and in the tristate region bridge maintenance is funded out of general income tax revenues to which both automobile and rail commuters contribute. stimules states why drivers have to absorb the ENTIRE COST.Hence we need to choose option which impacts either automobile drivers or rail riders.
(D) The roads along the route served by the rail line are highly congested and drivers benefit when commuters are diverted from congested roadways to mass transit.CORRECT
(E) The only alternative way of funding the proposed improvements now being considered is through a regional income tax surcharge, which would affect automobile commuters and rail commuters alike.same as C

Kudos [?]: 30 [2], given: 4

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 329

Kudos [?]: 229 [0], given: 12

Re: According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jun 2013, 18:29
CharuKapoor wrote:
According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain improvements to the main commuter rail line would increase ridership dramatically. The authority plans to finance these improvements over the course of five years by raising automobile tolls on the two highway bridges along the route the rail line serves. Although the proposed improvements are indeed needed, the authority's plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit.

Q. Which of the following, if true, would provide the authority with the strongest counter to the objection that its plan is unfair?

(A) Even with the proposed toll increase, the average bridge toll in the tristate region would remain less than the tolls charged in neighboring states.
(B) Any attempt to finance the improvements by raising rail fares would result in a decrease in ridership and so would be self-defeating.
(C) Automobile commuters benefit from well-maintained bridges, and in the tristate region bridge maintenance is funded out of general income tax revenues to which both automobile and rail commuters contribute.
(D) The roads along the route served by the rail line are highly congested and drivers benefit when commuters are diverted from congested roadways to mass transit.
(E) The only alternative way of funding the proposed improvements now being considered is through a regional income tax surcharge, which would affect automobile commuters and rail commuters alike.

In order to answer this question , think about how automobile owners benefit from the toll increase. D clearly answers that.

Kudos [?]: 229 [0], given: 12

Princeton Review Representative
Joined: 17 Jun 2013
Posts: 162

Kudos [?]: 432 [0], given: 0

Re: According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jun 2013, 09:38
CharuKapoor wrote:
According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain improvements to the main commuter rail line would increase ridership dramatically. The authority plans to finance these improvements over the course of five years by raising automobile tolls on the two highway bridges along the route the rail line serves. Although the proposed improvements are indeed needed, the authority's plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit.

Q. Which of the following, if true, would provide the authority with the strongest counter to the objection that its plan is unfair?

(A) Even with the proposed toll increase, the average bridge toll in the tristate region would remain less than the tolls charged in neighboring states.
(B) Any attempt to finance the improvements by raising rail fares would result in a decrease in ridership and so would be self-defeating.
(C) Automobile commuters benefit from well-maintained bridges, and in the tristate region bridge maintenance is funded out of general income tax revenues to which both automobile and rail commuters contribute.
(D) The roads along the route served by the rail line are highly congested and drivers benefit when commuters are diverted from congested roadways to mass transit.(E) The only alternative way of funding the proposed improvements now being considered is through a regional income tax surcharge, which would affect automobile commuters and rail commuters alike.

we have to counter the claim that asking drivers to pay is unfair specifically because drivers get no benefit. Thus, the best way to counter this is to show how drivers would benefit D shows exactly how they would benefit while the other answers focus on other topics that are irrelevant.
_________________

Special offer! Save \$250 on GMAT Ultimate Classroom, GMAT Small Group Instruction, or GMAT Liveonline when you use the promo code GCVERBAL250. Or, save \$150 on GMAT Self-Prep when you use the code GCVERBAL150. Enroll at www.princetonreview.com

Kudos [?]: 432 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 24 Jan 2012
Posts: 27

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 9

Re: According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jul 2013, 07:08
Conclusion: Although the proposed improvements are indeed needed, the authority's plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit.

What we need to do:
1. Should not be rejected
2. Explain why: because there can be a benefit to the drivers

(D) answers it perfectly. drivers benefit when commuters are diverted from congested roadways to mass transit. - In Scope and weakens the conclusion.

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 9

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10127

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Mar 2016, 09:25
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Manager
Status: Final Call! Will Achieve Target ANyHow This Tym! :)
Joined: 05 Jan 2016
Posts: 92

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 135

Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V25
GPA: 3.8
Re: According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2017, 03:03
According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making certain improvements to the main commuter rail line would increase ridership dramatically. The authority plans to finance these improvements over the course of five years by raising automobile tolls on the two highway bridges along the route the rail line serves. Although the proposed improvements are indeed needed, the authority's plan for securing the necessary funds should be rejected because it would unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit.

Q. Which of the following, if true, would provide the authority with the strongest counter to the objection that its plan is unfair?

(A) Even with the proposed toll increase, the average bridge toll in the tristate region would remain less than the tolls charged in neighboring states. Eventhough the proposed toll increase would be less than the tolls charged in neighboring states, it does not answer the question why to unfairly force drivers to absorb the entire cost of something from which they receive no benefit.
This option does not provide any solution to the objection raised. Therefore, INCORRECT.

(B) Any attempt to finance the improvements by raising rail fares would result in a decrease in ridership and so would be self-defeating. so what?? then why should the automobile drivers suffer the loss of decreased ridership of rails. This option even does not provide any solution to the objection raised.

(C) Automobile commuters benefit from well-maintained bridges, and in the tristate region bridge maintenance is funded out of general income tax revenues to which both automobile and rail commuters contribute. If for bridge maintenance, both automobile and rail commuters contribute. Then for maintaining commuter rail line why only the automobile drivers suffer. It deepens the paradox. This option even does not provide any solution to the objection raised.

(D) The roads along the route served by the rail line are highly congested and drivers benefit when commuters are diverted from congested roadways to mass transit.
Only this option provides a solution to the objection raised. It says that the proposed plan would benefit the automobile drivers as well. So, the plan is good.
It provides the authority with the strongest counter to the objection that its plan is unfair.

(E) The only alternative way of funding the proposed improvements now being considered is through a regional income tax surcharge, which would affect automobile commuters and rail commuters alike.
It provides an alternative solution. Therefore, irrelevant.
_________________

Regards,
Varun

Trying my best..... will succeed definitely! :)

The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long.
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful. :)

Do Check OG 2017 SC Solutions - http://gmatwithcj.com/solutions-gmat-official-guide-2017-sentence-correction-questions/

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 135

Re: According to the Tristate Transportation Authority, making   [#permalink] 08 Aug 2017, 03:03
Display posts from previous: Sort by