It is currently 19 Oct 2017, 15:21

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 635

Kudos [?]: 637 [8], given: 6

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2009, 00:34
8
KUDOS
14
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

51% (01:06) correct 49% (01:18) wrong based on 698 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Advertisement: The world’s best coffee beans come from Colombia. The more Colombian beans in a blend of coffee, the better the blend, and no company purchases more Colombian beans than Kreemo Coffee. Inc. So it only stands to reason that if you buy a can of Kreemo’s coffee, you’re buying the best blended coffee available today.

The reasoning of the argument in the advertisement is flawed because it overlooks the possibility that

(A) the equipment used by Kreemo to blend and package its coffee is no different from that used by most other coffee producers
(B) not all of Kreemo’s competitors use Colombian coffee beans in the blends of coffee they sell
(C) Kreemo sells more coffee than does any other company
(D) Kreemo’s coffee is the most expensive blended coffee available today
(E) the best unblended coffee is better than the best blended coffee

How to solve this kind of questions? Let me know how you workout on this question.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space

Kudos [?]: 637 [8], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2008
Posts: 91

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Blend it well [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2009, 13:39
Is it A?
The logic of the argument is flawed because it assumes that the best blended coffee depends solely on the quality of coffee beans. Therefore, all other elements impacting the quality of blended coffee are assumed to be constant including blending equipment.

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 19 Feb 2009
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Blend it well [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Apr 2009, 01:25
IMO A...

"no company purchases more Colombian beans than Kreemo Coffee . Inc. So it only stands to reason that if you buy a can of Kreemo’s coffee, you’re buying the best blended coffee available today. " - The argument is flawed because 'purchasing more beans ' - doesn't always mean that they use more beans in the blend. They could still be using the same quantity as any other coffee producers. I guess the argument overlooks this very possibility.
So imo A has to be right.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 30 Jul 2008
Posts: 32

Kudos [?]: 11 [5], given: 0

Re: CR - Blend it well [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Apr 2009, 07:43
5
KUDOS
I think it should be C.

Kreemo sells more coffee than does any other company. It is true that Kreemo purchases most Colombian beans but it is quite possible that Kreemo mixes these Colombian beans in their other blends because Kreemo sells more coffee than does any other company. Hence we cannot say that if we are buying Kreemo coffee we are buying the best blend.

Kudos [?]: 11 [5], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 07 Apr 2009
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: 8 [4], given: 0

Re: CR - Blend it well [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Apr 2009, 11:04
4
KUDOS
I'd say C.

The statement says that ratio of Colombian beans to total beans in a blend affects quality.

So

Colombian beans
---------------- = quality (roughly)
Total number of beans

The conclusion is therefore the more Colombian beans purchased, the higher the quality.

However the second part of the equation is not clear, i.e. how many beans total they use.

So if Kreemo's sales are sufficiently high, they may be diluting their coffee with lesser quality beans, and hence not have the highest quality coffee. This is also born out by real world experience (not that I'm suggesting you rely on that for GMAT =) ).

Using process of elimination, A states all equipment used is the same, and therefore removes a possible alternative factor affecting quality, strengthening the argument rather than weakening it. B also strengthens it. D price has no connection to quality, or to the argument made, which is solely referring to quality. E may be true, but the statement specifically says "You're buying the best blended coffee available today" and so is out of scope.

Both methods reach the same conclusion so I'm fairly confident.

What is OA?

Kudos [?]: 8 [4], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 364

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 1

Location: India
Re: CR - Blend it well [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2009, 19:00
yeah C, easy pick.

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 255

Kudos [?]: 93 [4], given: 1

Re: CR - Blend it well [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Apr 2009, 09:58
4
KUDOS
The correct answer is C. The advertisement says that tha more the amount of Columbian bean in the coffee, the better is the coffee. Kreemo buys more Columbian bean than any other company. But it is possible that Kreemo produces more coffee than its competitor. So that averge amount of Columbian bean in every unit of Kreemo's coffee can be less than its competitors, and therefore its coffee can be NOT the best blended coffee
_________________

Choose Life

Kudos [?]: 93 [4], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 15 May 2007
Posts: 23

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

05 Aug 2009, 05:51
C it is
Kreemo purchases more coffee beans because of its sales, it does not mean that it adds more columbian beans in the blend.

E is irrelavant

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1

Director
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 808

Kudos [?]: 373 [1], given: 106

WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2009, 01:42
1
KUDOS
OA is C.. why is E wrong?

Conclusion: So it only stands to reason that if you buy a can of Kreemo’s coffee, you’re buying the best blended coffee available today.

The conclusion is that Kremo's cofee serve the best blended coffee.
Even if unblended coffees are better than blended coffees, it is not relevant with the conclusion.
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ...
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Kudos [?]: 373 [1], given: 106

Manager
Joined: 17 Jul 2008
Posts: 247

Kudos [?]: 472 [3], given: 29

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2009, 02:32
3
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Advertisement: The world’s best coffee beans come from Colombia. The more Colombian beans in a blend of coffee, the better the blend, and no company purchases more Colombian beans than Kreemo Coffee, Inc. So it only stands to reason that if you buy a can of Kreemo’s coffee, you’re buying the best blended coffee available today.

The reasoning of the argument in the advertisement is flawed because it overlooks the possibility that
(A) the equipment used by Kreemo to blend and package its coffee is no different from that used by most other coffee producers
(B) not all of Kreemo’s competitors use Colombian coffee beans in the blends of coffee they sell
(C) Kreemo sells more coffee than does any other company
(D) Kreemo’s coffee is the most expensive blended coffee available today
(E) the best unblended coffee is better than the best blended coffee

Premise 1: The world’s best coffee beans come from Colombia
Premise 2: The more Colombian beans in a blend of coffee, the better the blend, and no company purchases more Colombian beans than Kreemo Coffee, Inc.
Conclusion: it only stands to reason that if you buy a can of Kreemo’s coffee, you’re buying the best blended coffee available today

The sentence need an assumption : Kreemo's sales figure must be comparable that of others if the quality will be compared. If Kreemo sells more coffee than others than it is incorrect to assert that their coffee is best since The more Colombian beans in a blend of coffee, the better the blend,
C
_________________

Please give kudos if you enjoy the explanations that I have given. Thanks

Kudos [?]: 472 [3], given: 29

Intern
Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Re: CR - Blend it well [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2010, 06:47
Given the choices , C looks the best bet .
Not because it addresses the issue directly , but cause all the other options do not fit the bill .

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 15 Feb 2010
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Re: CR - Blend it well [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2010, 07:43
I am not sure about the answer C, for it is not very convincing. If Kreemo is selling more than competitors, it does not mean that because of low price or low Colombian beans. It may be because of image, or high quality of coffee. In fact it assures that if Kreemo is selling more, then its coffee is of higher quality than its competitors. So Kreemo is using more of Colombian beens than its competitors.

In my opinion this question is not a GMAT type question, because GMAC tries to make questions without ambigous answers. It tries to be on safer side

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Manhattan Prep Instructor
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 347

Kudos [?]: 1642 [11], given: 11

Location: San Francisco
Re: CR - Blend it well [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Feb 2010, 12:48
11
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hey All,

Everybody seems to be on the right track with this one, but I wanted to respond to a few complaints. This is a VERY realistic GMAT question. There are no ambiguous answers. The problem is only if you spend too much time writing stories in your head, in which case, any answer choice can begin to look good. This argument says they buy the most Colombian beans, but think of it this way:

If I buy 10 beans and you only buy one bean, it may look like I must have the best coffee.

But if you only sell one cup of coffee, your one bean means the overall quality of your coffee is super excellent.
If I then sell 10,000 cups of coffee, splitting my ten beans between them, the overall quality of my coffee is super poor.

This is why the answer is what it is. Don't get into thought processes involving the history of the company, why people buy their coffee, what effect technology may have...ANYTHING that isn't in the passage itself. Keep in mind that this question asks you weaken THE ARGUMENT, not THE CONCLUSION, so you won't be bringing in any new information.

Word up.

Hope that helps!
_________________

Tommy Wallach | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Kudos [?]: 1642 [11], given: 11

Manager
Status: Applying
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 149

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 6

Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.65
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Re: CR - Blend it well [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2010, 22:13
Great Question ....
THanks for the explanations...

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 26 Sep 2010
Posts: 148

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 18

Nationality: Indian
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
Re: CR - Blend it well [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Mar 2011, 02:53
C)

Once you read this argument's facts and its conclusion, you can pretty much know what the flaw is. By the way, I'd suggest that you read the question first and then read the argument.
_________________

You have to have a darkness...for the dawn to come.

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 18

Manager
Joined: 14 Feb 2011
Posts: 68

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 2

Re: CR - Blend it well [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Mar 2011, 03:03
Very easy. C is the correct variant.

AD sugests: the company buys more colombian bean - so the company`s coffe must be the best.
But the possible solution may be that it just sells more coffee.

That variant corresponds us ti take C.

Problem for 45-60 seconds max.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 2

Manager
Status: Trying to get into the illustrious 700 club!
Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Posts: 78

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 58

Re: CR - Blend it well [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Mar 2011, 12:51
priyankur_saha@ml.com wrote:
Advertisement: The world’s best coffee beans come from Colombia. The more Colombian beans in a blend of coffee, the better the blend, and no company purchases more Colombian beans than Kreemo Coffee. Inc. So it only stands to reason that if you buy a can of Kreemo’s coffee, you’re buying the best blended coffee available today.

The reasoning of the argument in the advertisement is flawed because it overlooks the possibility that

(A) the equipment used by Kreemo to blend and package its coffee is no different from that used by most other coffee producers
-->irrelevant
(B) not all of Kreemo’s competitors use Colombian coffee beans in the blends of coffee they sell
-->if not all use Colombian coffee than Kreemo's might be the better quality choice.. this looks to strengthen argument
(C) Kreemo sells more coffee than does any other company
-->leave for now and look for others to eliminate
(D) Kreemo’s coffee is the most expensive blended coffee available today
-->irrelevant, we are looking at coffee blends and not pricing to determine quality
(E) the best unblended coffee is better than the best blended coffee
-->well yes, this could be true but does it have anything to do with our particular argument? We are talking about BLENDED coffee only

How to solve this kind of questions? Let me know how you workout on this question.

I burned 2:16 on this question and actually had to use POE again to come up with the right answer.

So this leaves me with B and C. B looks to strengthen the argument. If we break down C we say that even though Kreemo buys the most Colombian coffee than any of its competitors because it sells more coffee than does any other company the blend MAY be low per bag resulting in lower quality. This MAY is important.
_________________

I'm trying to not just answer the problem but to explain how I came up with my answer. If I am incorrect or you have a better method please PM me your thoughts. Thanks!

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 58

Forum Moderator
Status: mission completed!
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1391

Kudos [?]: 949 [1], given: 621

GPA: 3.77
Re: CR - Blend it well [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 May 2011, 04:49
1
KUDOS
I would provide may be the best explanation to this question.

let us say there are three companies A, B and Kreemo Coffee (KC).

Company:________________________ A | B | KC |
Columbian beans used in production:___1 | 2 | 20 |
Total beans used in production:_______10 |10 |1000| <- WHO PRODUCES/SELLS MORE?!
concentration (quality):_____________10%|20%| 2%| <- What is the best quality?

The higher the concentration the better the quality of coffe.

therefore C is the best answer, whihc is saying that although KC sells more it's quality isn't the best.
_________________

Audaces fortuna juvat!

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 949 [1], given: 621

Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1964

Kudos [?]: 2051 [0], given: 376

Re: CR - Blend it well [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 May 2011, 06:55
priyankur_saha@ml.com wrote:
Advertisement: The world’s best coffee beans come from Colombia. The more Colombian beans in a blend of coffee, the better the blend, and no company purchases more Colombian beans than Kreemo Coffee. Inc. So it only stands to reason that if you buy a can of Kreemo’s coffee, you’re buying the best blended coffee available today.

The reasoning of the argument in the advertisement is flawed because it overlooks the possibility that

(A) the equipment used by Kreemo to blend and package its coffee is no different from that used by most other coffee producers
(B) not all of Kreemo’s competitors use Colombian coffee beans in the blends of coffee they sell
(C) Kreemo sells more coffee than does any other company
(D) Kreemo’s coffee is the most expensive blended coffee available today
(E) the best unblended coffee is better than the best blended coffee

How to solve this kind of questions? Let me know how you workout on this question.

This question is flawed in my opinion, because none of the options really present a correlation between columbian beans and the coffee sold as cans.

If I had an options saying, "it overlooks the possibility that the coffee blend in the can may not even contain the purchased Columbian beans".

What's the guarantee that Kreemo’s Coffee is not reselling the columbian beans at a higher price and used some other bean for the coffee blend in the can the ad talks about. The other flaw is that there's no comparative analysis between the concentration of coffee beans used by Kreemo's and its competitors.

"C", in my opinion, could be a possible assumption but not a flaw. Kreemo's Coffee cans could be best even if they don't get sold as much as their competitor's. Where is it mentioned that quantity of sale determines the quality of a product. Maybe the company is not able to sell its coffee because of poor marketing. Thus, Kreemo's cofee could possibly be the best coffee inspite of not having a good sale.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 2051 [0], given: 376

Forum Moderator
Status: mission completed!
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1391

Kudos [?]: 949 [2], given: 621

GPA: 3.77
Re: CR - Blend it well [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 May 2011, 09:15
2
KUDOS
Fluke,
I might agree with you to a certain extent.
the source is unknown (well, it is from 1000 series, but is it a seflmade question or it came from GMAT-paper tests, or any other source i don't know).

A good question does not require additional assumptions to arrive to correct answer choice.

The argument says:
premise 1: "the more Colombian beans in a blend of coffee, the better the blend".
It means that best blend is achieved when a coffee maker uses 100% of Columbian beans.

premise 2: "no company purchases more Colombian beans than Kreemo Coffee. Inc"

Conclusion "Kreemo’s coffee is best blended coffee " (this is why E is wrong).

So the K's coffee is best because they buy a lot of C beans.

To weaken a question one must weaken the conclusion. But, the correct answers do not have to absolutely, without a doubt, in all circumstances weaken the conclusion. They only have to open up the possibility that the conclusion is not valid. The correct answer on a weaken question will typically accomplish this by introducing a new piece of information that calls into question an assumption made by the author.

The possible assumptions made by author are:
1. KC does not resell Columbian beans,
2. KC uses all Columbian beans in production of coffee
3. None of competitors puts more Columbian beans in coffee than KC does.
4. Quantity of Columbian beans and the coffee sold as cans perfectly correlates.
5. beans are used in production of coffee.
6....etc

You are right saying that:
Quote:
it overlooks the possibility that the coffee blend in the can may not even contain the purchased Columbian beans

your statement attacks the 2nd assumption.

I definitively agree with this statement:
Quote:
" is not reselling the columbian beans at a higher price and used some other bean for the coffee blend"
it weakens the 1st assumption.

this is are both very valid weakening arguments, but in test-makers view these are too easy to spot.
Thus probably they decided to use the argument that weakens the 3rd assumption:
"C) Kreemo sells more coffee than does any other company "

but this answer is too stretched. Why?!

Because it requires additional assumptions, such as "all coffee beans that KC buys, it uses later in production", "purchases are equal to sales", "no columbian beans are stored in stock", etc...

But C opens up a possibility that high volumes does not necessarily mean high % or in our case higher quality.

In my example above you may change the figure 20 in 400 resulting in 40% instead of 2% concentration of Columbian beans in a cup of coffee. This strenghtens the argument.
But also the total volume of beans a company purchases leaves a gap in possibility to intrepret differently the given information.

If the argument said that KC sells less coffee than any other company and buys more columbian beans than any other company, it would be much difficult to weaken such argument. (becuase it would result in higher concentration of coffee beans).

Hope it helps.
_________________

Audaces fortuna juvat!

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 949 [2], given: 621

Re: CR - Blend it well   [#permalink] 14 May 2011, 09:15

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 38 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by