It is currently 20 Jan 2018, 22:51

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 May 2011
Posts: 241

Kudos [?]: 296 [0], given: 8

Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jul 2011, 10:49
(A) The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers. INCORRECT this statement does not give us any information about the reason for switching (neither financial nor moral)
(B) Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication. INCORRECT unrelated - we are not concerned about other advertisers
(C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew. CORRECT if advertisers were not concerned financially then they must be morally motivated
(D) People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence. - INCORRECT readers are irrelevant to the argument
(E) It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group. INCORRECT income groups is irrelevant information

Kudos [?]: 296 [0], given: 8

3 KUDOS received
Math Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1946

Kudos [?]: 2175 [3], given: 376

Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jul 2011, 11:23
3
This post received
KUDOS
vineetgupta wrote:
Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people's tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentrating on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.
Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?
(A) The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.
(B) Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.
(C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.
(D) People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.
(E) It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.

Please give reasons for ur choice....


A is caused only by B and C.
Conclusion: A was caused by B.
Assumption or strength: We know that C was not present OR C definitely didn't cause A this time.

Likewise:
Advertisers are motivated by MORAL and MONEY.
Conclusion: Advertisers withdrew from publication because they were morally motivated.

Attack: Why it can't be MONEY?
Answer to attack: Because, they would have most certainly earned more money had they chosen to advertise in the new publication. Yet, they didn't choose to advertise in new publication. Thus, the only remaining factor is moral that must have dictated their decision.

Ans: "C"
_________________

~fluke

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 2175 [3], given: 376

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Apr 2011
Posts: 263

Kudos [?]: 701 [0], given: 13

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jul 2011, 05:48
Damn it! I picked A too but C is a better choice.
_________________

Powerscore CR Bible Full Chapter Notes | Easily Extend Vocabulary List with Google Dictionary

Please kudo me if you found my post useful. Thanks!!! :)

Kudos [?]: 701 [0], given: 13

Retired Thread Master
User avatar
Status: How can I crack Verbal
Joined: 12 May 2011
Posts: 205

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 33

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V32
GPA: 3
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jul 2011, 12:39
vineetgupta wrote:
Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentrating on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.
Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?
(A) The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.-they might have switched bcoz the other newspapers are charging less,hence doesn't strengthen
(B) Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.-Question is why/for what are they changing from Changed Publication to other newspapers and not the reverse
(C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.Provides a strong reason for switching even though the switch comes with a loss
(D) People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.So, they are switching keeping in mind the Ad visibility rather than their moral and Fin consideration- IMO,weakens the argument
(E) It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.-irrelevant/weakens

Please give reasons for ur choice....

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 33

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2011
Posts: 9

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jan 2012, 16:07
Guys, I am unable to find wht to strengthen out here...

pls help!

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Posts: 129

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 24

Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jan 2012, 08:54
C

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 24

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Apr 2011
Posts: 274

Kudos [?]: 402 [0], given: 51

Schools: Booth,NUS,St.Gallon
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jan 2012, 21:34
C is the answer !! a good question
_________________

+1 if you like my explanation .Thanks :)

Kudos [?]: 402 [0], given: 51

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jul 2008
Posts: 139

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 1

Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jan 2012, 16:19
It is C

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Posts: 263

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 6

Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jun 2012, 03:16
Straight C. If the advertisers are switching despite knowing that they will lose though then it means that moral consideration plays a factor in the decision making of some advertisers.

Cheers,
Der alte Fritz.
_________________

+1 Kudos me - I'm half Irish, half Prussian.

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 6

Expert Post
3 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 303

Kudos [?]: 1316 [3], given: 2

Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jun 2012, 14:04
3
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
One possible objection to this argument is that the advertisers had some financial incentive to pull their ads from publication after it changed to sex and violence. Because we are looking to strengthen the argument, we would have to defuse this potential objection. Only, (C) shows that the advertisers were not motivated by money. By pulling out they had money to lose, compared to had they not retracted their advertisements. Therefore the answer is (C).
_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep


Image

Image

Kudos [?]: 1316 [3], given: 2

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Posts: 402

Kudos [?]: 983 [0], given: 184

Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Feb 2013, 21:13
Choice (C). It strengthens the claim that the advertises have left the publication because they were morally disapproved, not primarily because decreased sales/revenue. -- This choice eliminates the other possibilities.
_________________

Thanks,
Prashant Ponde

Tough 700+ Level RCs: Passage1 | Passage2 | Passage3 | Passage4 | Passage5 | Passage6 | Passage7
Reading Comprehension notes: Click here
VOTE GMAT Practice Tests: Vote Here
PowerScore CR Bible - Official Guide 13 Questions Set Mapped: Click here
Looking to finance your tuition: Click here

Kudos [?]: 983 [0], given: 184

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 18 Dec 2012
Posts: 22

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 1

Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V27
WE: Supply Chain Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Feb 2013, 23:26
"There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations"

Since we know they withdrew based on moral grounds: to strengthen the argument we just need to look for one they did on financial grounds. Leading to only (C) .

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 1

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 13 Jul 2012
Posts: 8

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jun 2013, 12:18
I dont know why there is so much confusion.

This is a strengthen Question.
© Cos they morally disapproved publication of salacious material. We need to find something that will prove that it is because of moral principles against salacious material and not cos of other motives.
For example:- Changing publication because the readership of publication has changed will weaken. If the new readership is teenage girls , and advertisers don’t have teenage girls as their target audience, then they will obviously change. This is not cause of moral consideration.
How ever, if it is proven that staying with the publication is profitable, and the advertisers have changed despite that, then the argument will be strengthened }
(A) The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.
-> Weakens due to the reasoning above.
(B) Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.
-> What “some” other advertisers do is not a concern for us
(C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.
-> Strengthen. Had the advertisers stayed, they could have made more money. But still decided to withdraw. A clear proof that this is because they are driven by moral values.
(D) People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.
-> Neutral or Probably weakens. It restates that the readership has changed, An information that is already given in the passage. One could argue that since readership has changed, the advertisers withdrew as the new readers are not target audience. They did not change cos of morals.
(E) It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.
-> Same as D.


Hope it helps .

Rahul Ajith

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2012
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 2

Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jun 2013, 00:45
C is clear winner. The sales is expected to drop if advertisers withdrew ads in new publication even then they do so. This clearly shows some other motivation to withdrew ads such as moral obligations.
A is confusing but as the advertisers move to other family publications . It indicates that there are other reason to do so. May be the product doesn't suit new publication policy.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 2

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 329

Kudos [?]: 240 [0], given: 12

Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jun 2013, 17:22
A) The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.\\ May be their product was for family segment and not for the readers interested in sex and violence or may be they pulled out because of moral obligation. Also , this is mentioned in the passage.So we don't know. Out
(B) Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.// This is opposite of strenghthen,it weakens the passage.
(C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew. // This talks about the financial side of advertisers mind and it is not mentioned in the passage. hence this is the answer.
(D) People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence. // this is not talking about the advertisers. The argument is not concerned with what people feel. Hence out.
(E) It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.// this is mentioned in the passage, hence out

Kudos [?]: 240 [0], given: 12

1 KUDOS received
BSchool Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 557

Kudos [?]: 1014 [1], given: 322

GPA: 3.4
WE: General Management (Non-Profit and Government)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Nov 2013, 01:57
1
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED

Kudos [?]: 1014 [1], given: 322

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2013
Posts: 34

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 26

Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Feb 2014, 23:53
younggun044 wrote:
Here you have to be careful i understanding the argument. in the beginning it mentions that their motive is based on moral / profits.
So "C" hows the profit criteria.


To explain it, we need to understand the conclusion....The conclusion in this case is not that "advertisers are influneced by moral and financial considerations " but the conclusion is that "the advertisers must have switched to other newspaper beacuse of moral decision" and since advertisers have 2 things in mind moral and financila consideration so option c clearly states that even though they knew that their revenue would decline so the decision to change to othe newspaper must have been taken beacuse of moral consideration

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 26

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2013
Posts: 266

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 29

Location: India
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Feb 2014, 07:07
Straight C.
If the advertisers behaved morally while withdrawing it would strengthen their case if they actually lost sales because of the decision to withdraw.

Posted from my mobile device

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 29

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10271

Kudos [?]: 287 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Dec 2014, 19:59
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 287 [0], given: 0

Current Student
avatar
Status: Applied
Joined: 02 May 2014
Posts: 164

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 46

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38
GPA: 3.35
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jan 2015, 00:56
C tells us that even if the advertisers were about to incur loss by withdrawing from the publication they did so as they considered doing so morally correct, this strengthens the argument. hence C.

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 46

Re: Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous   [#permalink] 02 Jan 2015, 00:56

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 59 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.