It is currently 13 Dec 2017, 03:27

Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Ross R1 | Kellogg R1 | Darden R1 | Tepper R1


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Mo

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Board of Directors
User avatar
G
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 3106

Kudos [?]: 1144 [0], given: 327

Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Mo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2016, 07:48
HiLine wrote:
Following "then", the auxiliary verb has to be would/could. Only answer D fixes the problem without introducing new ones.


Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure.

Answer will be (B)

_________________

Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )

Kudos [?]: 1144 [0], given: 327

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 18 Oct 2014
Posts: 903

Kudos [?]: 454 [0], given: 69

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.98
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Mo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2016, 10:59
origen87 wrote:
Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure.

(A) if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure
(B) without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure
(C) their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it
(D) without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria
(E) never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it



Whenever something is mentioned in past keeping future in mind, we use 'would' form of verb.

In this sentence, french people assumed something about future in the past.

(A) if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure. 'was' is not showing the result that french wanted.
(B) without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure. Correct choice because 'would' is correctly showing the intended result in future
(C) their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it. 'Was' is wrong
(D) without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria. 'we want to know their grip on Algeria' and not 'about security'
(E) never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it. 'it' refers to what?
_________________

I welcome critical analysis of my post!! That will help me reach 700+

Kudos [?]: 454 [0], given: 69

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 09 May 2015
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 68

Concentration: Marketing, Statistics
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V28
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V30
GRE 1: 323 Q168 V155
GPA: 3.58
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Mo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jul 2016, 01:23
Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure.

(A) if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure
(B) without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure
(C) their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it
(D) without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria
(E) never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it

Because the author uses the word " assume", If then construction must represent a hypothetical situation. We can eliminate answer choices with simple past in them : A and C eliminated
/d: with out that??!!
E: Its not clear what "it" refers to ( Algeria or Morocco)
B: presents hypothetical situation in an efficient manner.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 68

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 482

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 342

Concentration: Finance, Marketing
CAT Tests
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Mo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Aug 2016, 21:20
Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure.

(A) if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure

did not = would (not was)

(B) without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure


(C) their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it
(D) without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria

"That" can not be used as standalone pronoun.
wrong meaning - the french could never be secure.
the intended meaning - grip won't be secure.

(E) never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it

why E is not Ok???

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 342

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 9

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 81

WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Mo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Sep 2016, 07:25
Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure.
(A) if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure
(B) without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure
(C) their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it
(D) without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria
(E) never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 81

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Posts: 198

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 30

Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Mo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Sep 2016, 22:54
anyone can help pronoun issue?

why it refers to Morocco in B, IMO, pronoun "it " is ambiguous, because the pronoun "it" can refer to Morocco, also Strait or Gibraltar

thanks in advance

have a nice day
>_~

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 30

Expert Post
Verbal Expert
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3227

Kudos [?]: 3632 [0], given: 22

Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Mo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2016, 06:10
zoezhuyan wrote:
anyone can help pronoun issue?

why it refers to Morocco in B, IMO, pronoun "it " is ambiguous, because the pronoun "it" can refer to Morocco, also Strait or Gibraltar

thanks in advance

have a nice day
>_~


There is a causation relation in this sentence.

Why Morocco was of interest to the French?... because without Morocco, the French would be at a disadvantage.

From the context of the sentence the logical antecedent of "it" is "Morocco".

Kudos [?]: 3632 [0], given: 22

Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 1783

Kudos [?]: 1062 [0], given: 90

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Mo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Mar 2017, 23:25
Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure.

(A) if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure - the if clause uses simple past tense , so the then clause should have "would+verb"
(B) without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure - This choice changes the “if-then” construction into conditional would. However, it clearly conveys the meaning that without holding “Morocco” the French grip would never be secure on Algeria.
(C) their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it - Antecedent of it is unclear - It can refer to either “Algeria” or “Morocco”.
(D) without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria - Pronoun it should be used to refer to Morocco ; to state a hypothetical scenario we need to use "would +verb"
(E) never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it - Antecedent of it is unclear - It can refer to either “Algeria” or “Morocco”.

Answer B
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Kudos [?]: 1062 [0], given: 90

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 06 Jun 2013
Posts: 188

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 314

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Tuck
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.6
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Premium Member
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Mo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Mar 2017, 08:11
chetan2u wrote:
origen87 wrote:
Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure.

(A) if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure
(B) without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure
(C) their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it
(D) without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria
(E) never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it

[Reveal] Spoiler:
In conditional verbs I learnt that
1. if..simple past....then simple past
2. if..simple past...then would..
Option A follows pattern 1, can you please highlight why it is wrong?


Hi,
two reasons --
1) the correct construction is only the second you have mentioned
if.. SP.., then..would..
2) Also ASSUMED itself suggests that the portion after that is hypothetical
In that case may be if IF can be avoided, it would be better..


I have a doubt in option B.
do we need a comma after 'it'.

without it, their grip on Algeria would never be secure.

Can someone explain, how the meaning would differ with and without comma after 'it'.

Thanks in advance :)

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 314

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 16 May 2016
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Mo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Mar 2017, 10:50
Quote:
I have a doubt in option B.
do we need a comma after 'it'.


The comma might be useful stylistically to help break things up, but the sentence is short enough to be acceptable without it. There is no substantive difference in meaning with/without it. Remember that sometimes the correct answer isn't necessarily ideal according to real-world standards. It's simply the best out of the options you're given.

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Posts: 16

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 38

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
WE: Supply Chain Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Mo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Mar 2017, 10:02
Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure.
(A) if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure
Tense used in A is wrong.

(B) without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure
Proper Pronoun and Tenses.

(C) their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it
Not ever Secure - Improper Construction & Tense.

(D) without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria
THEY ASSUMED THAT WITHOUT THAT - Ambiguous Pronoun & Improper Construction.

(E) never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it
Improper Construction.

Answer B

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 38

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 479

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 18

Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Mo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Mar 2017, 08:38
Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure.

(A) if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure
(B) without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure
(C) their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it
(D) without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria
(E) never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it

the Pronoun must have only one logical antecendent.While A has ambiguity, B fixes the ambiguity.
B is the correct answer.

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 18

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 10 Apr 2015
Posts: 205

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 35

GPA: 3.31
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Mo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Mar 2017, 05:33
Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure.

(A) if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure
'would' instead of 'was'
(B) without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure
simple. meaning is not distorted. Correct.

(C) their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it
Complex.wordy.
(D) without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria
assumed that without that, ?
not clear construction of sentence.

(E) never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it
Wrong construction of sentence.
_________________

In case you find my posts helpful, give me Kudos. Thank you.

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 35

Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1254

Kudos [?]: 1362 [0], given: 440

Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Mo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 May 2017, 05:11
kizito2001 wrote:
The Official Guide for GMAT Review 2016

Practice Question
Question No.: SC 88
Page: 690

Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure.

(A) if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure
(B) without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure
(C) their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it
(D) without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria
(E) never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it


First Glance

The underline begins with the word if. Some kind of conditional verb structure might be an issue.

Issues

(1) Verb: was

The original sentence uses the conditional structure if X, (then) Y. Conditional structures require certain verb tenses, depending on the intended meaning of the sentence. (Note: Some answers don't specifically use the word if, but the conditional nature of the meaning is still clear.)

In this case, the if portion is in past tense (if they did not hold it) and the full meaning is hypothetical: They did not know what was going to happen after that. The second half of the structure, then, should be in the present conditional form: Their grip would be insecure. Answers (A) and (C) both incorrectly use simple past was for the conditional portion of the sentence; eliminate them.

(2) Pronoun: it; that

Four of the five answers use the pronoun it; answer (D) uses the pronoun that. The word it is a personal pronoun; the word that is a demonstrative pronoun.

When demonstrative pronouns are used alone, not in conjunction with a noun, such as "that car", they should not refer to a noun that is located within the same main clause. In answer (D), the pronoun that refers to Morocco, which is in the same main clause. Eliminate answer (D).

The other four all use it, so they must all be correct, right? Not so fast. Answers (A) and (B) do correctly use it; first, the noun Morocco appears, then the pronoun it, which refers to Morocco, and finally Algeria (so it's clear that it does not refer to Algeria). In answers (C) and (E), however, the pronoun it does not appear until the end of the sentence. Do the French need to hold Morocco or Algeria? The sentence is no longer clear. Eliminate answers (C) and (E).

(3) Meaning

The original sentence says that their grip was insecure. Answer (B) conveys a similar meaning, this time with the correct conditional tense: Their grip would never be secure. In both cases, the grip is the thing that is (or is not) secure. Answer (D) changes this structure: The French could never be secure about their grip. What's the difference?

The meaning in answer (D) no longer indicates whether the grip actually is secure. Rather, this choice talks about how the French feel about the situation. For example: The dog could not be secure about his grip on the bone (he wasn't sure he had a good grip on the bone). The dog's grip on the bone was not secure (he definitely did not have a good grip on the bone). The two sentences convey different meanings. Eliminate answer (D).

The Correct Answer

Correct answer (B) fixes the initial tense error by changing was to the conditional would be.
_________________

"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Kudos [?]: 1362 [0], given: 440

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 30 Apr 2013
Posts: 91

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 9

CAT Tests
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Mo [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Nov 2017, 20:54
In option b why cant pronoun "it" refer back to France and only Morocco?

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 9

Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Mo   [#permalink] 09 Nov 2017, 20:54

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   [ 75 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Mo

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.