It is currently 19 Oct 2017, 08:02

STARTING SOON:

Live Chat with Cornell Adcoms in Main Chat Room  |  R1 Interview Invites: MIT Sloan Chat  |  UCLA Anderson Chat  |  Duke Fuqua Chat (EA Decisions)


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

After the Second World War unionism

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

2 KUDOS received
BSchool Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 589

Kudos [?]: 449 [2], given: 412

GMAT 1: 530 Q47 V17
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
WE: Business Development (Telecommunications)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
After the Second World War unionism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Sep 2013, 22:39
2
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
After the Second World War, unionism in the Japanese auto industry was company-based, with separate
unions in each auto company. Most company unions played no independent role in bargaining shop-floor
issues or pressing autoworkers' grievances. In a 1981 survey, for example, fewer than 1 percent of workers said they sought union assistance for work-related problems, while 43 percent said they turned to management instead. There was little to distinguish the two in any case: most union officers were foremen or middle-level managers, and the union's role was primarily one of passive support for company goals. Conflict occasionally disrupted this cooperative relationship—one company union's opposition to the productivity campaigns of the early 1980s has been cited as such a case. In 1986, however, a caucus led by the Foreman's Association forced the union's leadership out of office and returned the union's policy to one of passive cooperation. In the United States, the potential for such company unionism grew after 1979, but it had difficulty taking hold in the auto industry, where a single union represented workers from all companies, particularly since federal law prohibited foremen from joining or leading industrial unions.

The Japanese model was often invoked as one in which authority decentralized to the shop floor empowered production workers to make key decisions. What these claims failed to recognize was that the actual delegation of authority was to the foreman, not the workers. The foreman exercised discretion over job assignments, training, transfers, and promotions; worker initiative was limited to suggestions that fine-tuned a management-controlled production process. Rather than being proactive, Japanese workers were forced to be reactive, the range of their responsibilities being far wider than their span of control. For example, the founder of one production system, Taichi Ohno, routinely gave department managers only 90 percent of the resources needed for production. As soon as workers could meet production goals without working overtime, 10 percent of remaining resources would be removed. Because the "OH! NO!" system continually pushed the production process to the verge of breakdown in an effort to find the minimum resource requirement, critics described it as "management by stress."


1. The passage is primarily concerned with
(A) contrasting the role of unions in the Japanese auto industry with the role of unions in the United
States auto industry after the Second World War
(B) describing unionism and the situation of workers in the Japanese auto industry after the Second World War
(C) providing examples of grievances of Japanese auto workers against the auto industry after the Second World War
(D) correcting a misconception about the role of the foreman in the Japanese auto industry's union system after the Second World War
(E) reasserting the traditional view of the company's role in Japanese auto workers' unions after the Second World War
[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA:B


2. According to the passage, a foreman in a United States auto company differed from a foreman in a Japanese auto company in that the foreman in the United States would
(A) not have been a member of an auto workers' union
(B) have been unlikely to support the goals of company management
(C) have been able to control production processes to a large extent
(D) have experienced greater stress
(E) have experienced less conflict with workers
[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA:A


3. The author of the passage mentions the "OH! NO!" system primarily in order to
(A) indicate a way in which the United States industry has become more like the Japanese auto industry
(B) challenge a particular misconception about worker empowerment in the Japanese auto industry
(C) illustrate the kinds of problem-solving techniques encouraged by company unions in Japan
(D) suggest an effective way of minimizing production costs in auto manufacturing
(E) provide an example of the responsibilities assumed by a foreman in the Japanese auto industry
[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA:B


4. It can be inferred that the author of the passage sees which of the following as the primary advantage to companies in implementing the "OH! NO!" system?
(A) It permitted the foreman to take initiative.
(B) It minimized the effort required to produce automobiles.
(C) It ensured that production costs would be as low as possible.
(D) It allowed the foreman to control the production process.
(E) It required considerable worker empowerment to achieve managers' goals.
[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA:C

Kudos [?]: 449 [2], given: 412

BSchool Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 589

Kudos [?]: 449 [0], given: 412

GMAT 1: 530 Q47 V17
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
WE: Business Development (Telecommunications)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: After the Second World War unionism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Sep 2013, 22:48
HI,

Can some one explain 2 & 3 answers please.

Kudos [?]: 449 [0], given: 412

Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
G
Status: It always seems impossible until it's done!!
Joined: 29 Aug 2012
Posts: 984

Kudos [?]: 1453 [0], given: 270

Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q47 V34
WE: General Management (Aerospace and Defense)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: After the Second World War unionism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Sep 2013, 23:39
RaviChandra wrote:
HI,

Can some one explain 2 & 3 answers please.


Hi Both are inference questions, As far i read the passage.

Question 2 : According to the passage, a foreman in a United States auto company differed from a foreman in a Japanese auto company in that the foreman in the United States would?

Quote:
US federal law prohibited US foremen from joining or leading industrial unions.
this what we can infer from the last line of 1st para.


I chose A after POE.

For

Question 3 : The author of the passage mentions the "OH! NO!" system primarily in order to

Quote:
The 2nd para says that though Japanese unions empowered production workers to take key decision. The actual authority was with the foremen only..
The author then gives the example.

After doing the POE, I was left with B.

A: Not relevant.
B: sounds good-hold
C: WE cannot infer this.
D: The critics says this as a stress- reject.
E: The foreman exercised discretion over job assignments, training, transfers, and promotions(stated in the passage)- eliminated.


Hope it helps :)
_________________

Become a GMAT Club Premium member to avail lot of discounts

Kudos [?]: 1453 [0], given: 270

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 May 2012
Posts: 29

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 84

Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.28
WE: Analyst (Investment Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: After the Second World War unionism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Oct 2013, 09:06
RaviChandra wrote:
HI,

Can some one explain 2 & 3 answers please.

Q2: As above :-D
Q3:
"Rather than being proactive, Japanese workers were forced to be reactive, the range of their responsibilities being far wider than their span of control.
For example, blah blah blah "

Therefore, the author introduced the "OH-NO" system in order to resolve the misconception about the Japanese workers characteristics.

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 84

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10117

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: After the Second World War unionism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Oct 2014, 20:50
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 02 Jan 2017
Posts: 18

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 13

Re: After the Second World War unionism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Feb 2017, 02:35
9 Minutes -All correct.
Need Expert opinion?Is the speed OK?

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 13

Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 694

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 855

Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Re: After the Second World War unionism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jun 2017, 23:50
2) A. not have been a member of an auto workers' union
"In the United States, the potential for such company unionism grew after 1979, but it had difficulty taking hold in the auto industry, where a single union represented workers from all companies, particularly since federal law prohibited foremen from joining or leading industrial unions."



3) Here's the first sentence in paragraph 2: The Japanese model was often invoked as one in which authority decentralized to the shop floor empowered production workers to make key decisions.
We discover later in the paragraph that this is a misconception: Rather than being proactive, Japanese workers were forced to be reactive, the range of their responsibilities being far wider than their span of control.
The system described is one example of this misconception, so the answer is B.
The last line describes the process: Because the "OH! NO!" system continually pushed the production process to the verge of breakdown in an effort to find the minimum resource requirement, critics described it as "management by stress."
Pushed the process to the verge of breakdown? It seems like a stretch to refer to that process as "effective." Moreover, we get this description in the context of a paragraph that is trying to convey the notion that what people think about the Japanese model is, at best, a distortion. The point isn't to show that such a model works well.
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 855

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 26 Feb 2017
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: After the Second World War unionism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2017, 07:54
could you please explain question-4. No where in question the cost is mentioned. I think ans should be B?

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Expert Post
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
G
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1024

Kudos [?]: 1579 [0], given: 400

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
Re: After the Second World War unionism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jul 2017, 20:46
anmol28 wrote:
could you please explain question-4. No where in question the cost is mentioned. I think ans should be B?

Quote:
4. It can be inferred that the author of the passage sees which of the following as the primary advantage to companies in implementing the "OH! NO!" system?
(A) It permitted the foreman to take initiative.
(B) It minimized the effort required to produce automobiles.
(C) It ensured that production costs would be as low as possible.
(D) It allowed the foreman to control the production process.
(E) It required considerable worker empowerment to achieve managers' goals.

With the "OH! NO!" system, department managers are given "only 90 percent of the resources needed for production". Workers are then pushed until they meet production goals without overtime. At that point, resources are cut again, and the cycle is repeated. This system most likely involves CONSIDERABLE effort on the part of the workers and the department managers, so (B) should be eliminated. However, this approach would minimize the COSTS of production, since resources (and, thus, costs) are cut whenever production goals are met without overtime. (C) is the best option.
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor at www.gmatninja.com | GMAT blog |food blog | Friendly warning: I'm really bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99... in any section order

YouTube verbal webinars:
"Next-level" GMAT pronouns | Uses of "that" on the GMAT | Parallelism and meaning

Kudos [?]: 1579 [0], given: 400

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Sep 2016
Posts: 215

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 42

Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 4
After the Second World War unionism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jul 2017, 22:46
RaviChandra wrote:
HI,

Can some one explain 2 & 3 answers please.


Ques 2: Look at the last 2 lines of para 1 , in the passage.

The lines say " but it had difficulty taking hold in the auto industry, where a single union represented workers from all companies, particularly since federal law prohibited foremen from joining or leading industrial unions. "

Ques 3, even I thought the answer was D. :p
_________________

Desperately need 'KUDOS' !!


Last edited by rekhabishop on 15 Jul 2017, 20:37, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 42

After the Second World War unionism   [#permalink] 14 Jul 2017, 22:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by

After the Second World War unionism

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.