Agricultural societies cannot exist without staple crops. Se : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 01 Mar 2017, 10:36

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Agricultural societies cannot exist without staple crops. Se

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 15 Jan 2013
Posts: 58
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 27 [1] , given: 10

Agricultural societies cannot exist without staple crops. Se [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jun 2014, 10:15
1
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

59% (02:48) correct 41% (01:48) wrong based on 411 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Agricultural societies cannot exist without staple crops. Several food plants, such as kola and okra, are known to have been domesticated in western Africa, but they are all supplemental, not staple, foods.
All the recorded staple crops grown in western Africa were introduced from elsewhere, beginning, at some unknown date, with rice and yams. Therefore, discovering when rice and yams were introduced into western Africa would establish the earliest date at which agricultural societies could have arisen there.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. People in western Africa did not develop staple crops that they stopped cultivating once rice and yams were introduced
B. There are no plants native to western Africa that, if domesticated, could serve as staple food crops.
C. Rice and yams were grown as staple crops by the earliest agricultural societies outside of western Africa
D. Kola and okra are better suited to growing conditions in western Africa than domesticated rice and yams are
E. Kola and okra were domesticated in western Africa before rice and yams were introduced there.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by carcass on 04 Jun 2014, 16:51, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the title of the question
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 15 Jan 2013
Posts: 58
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

04 Jun 2014, 10:17
Agricultural societies cannot exist without staple crops. Several food plants, such as kola and okra, are known to have been domesticated in western Africa, but they are all supplemental, not staple, foods.
All the recorded staple crops grown in western Africa were introduced from elsewhere, beginning, at some unknown date, with rice and yams. Therefore, discovering when rice and yams were introduced into western Africa would establish the earliest date at which agricultural societies could have arisen there.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. People in western Africa did not develop staple crops that they stopped cultivating once rice and yams were introduced
B. There are no plants native to western Africa that, if domesticated, could serve as staple food crops.
C. Rice and yams were grown as staple crops by the earliest agricultural societies outside of western Africa
D. Kola and okra are better suited to growing conditions in western Africa than domesticated rice and yams are
E. Kola and okra were domesticated in western Africa before rice and yams were introduced there.

after i finished the passage, My rethinking was : the conclusion "discovering when rice and yams were introduced into western Africa would establish the earliest date at which agricultural societies could have arisen there" would not be true if Western Africa have another staple corps before getting the rice and rams. so my assumption was: Western Africa didn't plant other staple plants before receiving the Rice and Yams. but i couldn't find something similar to my rethinking among the answer choices. My problem was : the way they wrote answer A is very weird so i couldn't realize that "A" is the same as my rethinking.

Answer A : "People in western Africa did not develop staple crops that they stopped cultivating once rice and yams were introduced"
i couldn't understand this phrase "that they stopped cultivating"

Any advice to how can i understand unclear answers in future ?

thanks
Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3139
Followers: 809

Kudos [?]: 6802 [0], given: 1050

Re: Agricultural societies cannot exist without staple crops. Se [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jun 2014, 16:52
Hi,

please before to post a question use the search button, because probably the same was already discussed.

Secondly use the first sentence of the same as title, to help future student to identify the question easily.

All these points are mandatory.

Regards
_________________
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2033
Followers: 2130

Kudos [?]: 7386 [2] , given: 279

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2014, 06:41
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
shagalo wrote:
Agricultural societies cannot exist without staple crops. Several food plants, such as kola and okra, are known to have been domesticated in western Africa, but they are all supplemental, not staple, foods.
All the recorded staple crops grown in western Africa were introduced from elsewhere, beginning, at some unknown date, with rice and yams. Therefore, discovering when rice and yams were introduced into western Africa would establish the earliest date at which agricultural societies could have arisen there.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. People in western Africa did not develop staple crops that they stopped cultivating once rice and yams were introduced
B. There are no plants native to western Africa that, if domesticated, could serve as staple food crops.
C. Rice and yams were grown as staple crops by the earliest agricultural societies outside of western Africa
D. Kola and okra are better suited to growing conditions in western Africa than domesticated rice and yams are
E. Kola and okra were domesticated in western Africa before rice and yams were introduced there.

after i finished the passage, My rethinking was : the conclusion "discovering when rice and yams were introduced into western Africa would establish the earliest date at which agricultural societies could have arisen there" would not be true if Western Africa have another staple corps before getting the rice and rams. so my assumption was: Western Africa didn't plant other staple plants before receiving the Rice and Yams. but i couldn't find something similar to my rethinking among the answer choices. My problem was : the way they wrote answer A is very weird so i couldn't realize that "A" is the same as my rethinking.

Answer A : "People in western Africa did not develop staple crops that they stopped cultivating once rice and yams were introduced"
i couldn't understand this phrase "that they stopped cultivating"

Any advice to how can i understand unclear answers in future ?

thanks

Hi,

When I look at your post, I see that you have tried to apply the process to solve the question. However, in your prethinking, you have missed an important point here which could have led to the difficulty that you faced.

The assumption that you identified in your prethinking is – “Western Africa didn't plant other staple plants before receiving the Rice and Yams.”.

If I interpret your statement correctly, according to you, the assumption made by the author is: “People in western Africa did not develop staple crops before rice and yams were introduced there”.

Let’s look at how you reached the above statement. If we refer to the argument, it says that rice and yam were the first known staple crops that were grown in Africa. From this statement, the author makes a jump by saying that discovering when rice and yams were introduced into Western Africa would establish the earliest date at which agricultural societies would have arisen there. Now first known/recorded evidence and earliest date could be two different things. So you are right that the other author is assuming that there were no other staple crops grown before the introduction of rice and yams, but how is he assuming that? What is the link he/she is making? Obviously, the author is making a link between the timing of the two event and, hence, suggesting that one could deduce the timing of one event (earliest date) from that of the other (introduction of rice and yams).

Now an important step in pre-thinking the correct assumption is thinking of scenarios in which the conclusion will not hold. Accordingly, what if one argued against the link by suggesting that there were crops that were grown before the introduction of rice and yams (this is the part that you have addressed in your assumption) but of which there is no record (this is the part you have missed)?

If crops were grown before the introduction of rice and yams, can there be a situation where the crops were not included along with rice and yam at the time the first record was captured? Such a situation is possible if the cultivation of those crops was stopped before the first record was captured. Under such circumstances, will the author’s argument hold? The answer is NO! Therefore, it is to guard against such a consideration that option A is so constructed: People in western Africa did not develop staple crops that they stopped cultivating once rice and yams were introduced.
In the light of the above discussion, my advice is that you need to focus a bit more on the application of the process. You are indeed on the right path. More practice in asking yourself the right questions in the pre-thinking phase will ensure that you do not miss the right answer because of the way it’s been written.
Also, I can understand how you may have found the answer choice complex. Here, I would like to advise you to, use the concepts learned in the SC course to your benefit in CR. 
What we prescribe in our SC course will really help you understand such long/complex sentences. Break down complex statements in to segments/clauses. The option statement in this case says: “People in western Africa did not develop staple crops that they stopped cultivating once rice and yams were introduced”. Breaking it into segments, we get:
1. People in western Africa did not develop staple crops
2. that (refers back to the staple crops in the first clause) they stopped cultivating once rice and yams were introduced

So in the above sentence basically says that those people did not develop some type of staple crops. What type of staple crops are these? These are staple crops whose cultivation was stopped once rice and yams were introduced there. Hence, this statement basically guards the author’s argument against a possible counter.

Hope the above discussion helps!

Thanks
Aninda
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10646
Followers: 943

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0

Re: Agricultural societies cannot exist without staple crops. Se [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2016, 01:26
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2015
Posts: 104
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 80

Re: Agricultural societies cannot exist without staple crops. Se [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2016, 01:08
egmat wrote:
shagalo wrote:
Agricultural societies cannot exist without staple crops. Several food plants, such as kola and okra, are known to have been domesticated in western Africa, but they are all supplemental, not staple, foods.
All the recorded staple crops grown in western Africa were introduced from elsewhere, beginning, at some unknown date, with rice and yams. Therefore, discovering when rice and yams were introduced into western Africa would establish the earliest date at which agricultural societies could have arisen there.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. People in western Africa did not develop staple crops that they stopped cultivating once rice and yams were introduced
B. There are no plants native to western Africa that, if domesticated, could serve as staple food crops.
C. Rice and yams were grown as staple crops by the earliest agricultural societies outside of western Africa
D. Kola and okra are better suited to growing conditions in western Africa than domesticated rice and yams are
E. Kola and okra were domesticated in western Africa before rice and yams were introduced there.

after i finished the passage, My rethinking was : the conclusion "discovering when rice and yams were introduced into western Africa would establish the earliest date at which agricultural societies could have arisen there" would not be true if Western Africa have another staple corps before getting the rice and rams. so my assumption was: Western Africa didn't plant other staple plants before receiving the Rice and Yams. but i couldn't find something similar to my rethinking among the answer choices. My problem was : the way they wrote answer A is very weird so i couldn't realize that "A" is the same as my rethinking.

Answer A : "People in western Africa did not develop staple crops that they stopped cultivating once rice and yams were introduced"
i couldn't understand this phrase "that they stopped cultivating"

Any advice to how can i understand unclear answers in future ?

thanks

Hi,

When I look at your post, I see that you have tried to apply the process to solve the question. However, in your prethinking, you have missed an important point here which could have led to the difficulty that you faced.

The assumption that you identified in your prethinking is – “Western Africa didn't plant other staple plants before receiving the Rice and Yams.”.

If I interpret your statement correctly, according to you, the assumption made by the author is: “People in western Africa did not develop staple crops before rice and yams were introduced there”.

Let’s look at how you reached the above statement. If we refer to the argument, it says that rice and yam were the first known staple crops that were grown in Africa. From this statement, the author makes a jump by saying that discovering when rice and yams were introduced into Western Africa would establish the earliest date at which agricultural societies would have arisen there. Now first known/recorded evidence and earliest date could be two different things. So you are right that the other author is assuming that there were no other staple crops grown before the introduction of rice and yams, but how is he assuming that? What is the link he/she is making? Obviously, the author is making a link between the timing of the two event and, hence, suggesting that one could deduce the timing of one event (earliest date) from that of the other (introduction of rice and yams).

Now an important step in pre-thinking the correct assumption is thinking of scenarios in which the conclusion will not hold. Accordingly, what if one argued against the link by suggesting that there were crops that were grown before the introduction of rice and yams (this is the part that you have addressed in your assumption) but of which there is no record (this is the part you have missed)?

If crops were grown before the introduction of rice and yams, can there be a situation where the crops were not included along with rice and yam at the time the first record was captured? Such a situation is possible if the cultivation of those crops was stopped before the first record was captured. Under such circumstances, will the author’s argument hold? The answer is NO! Therefore, it is to guard against such a consideration that option A is so constructed: People in western Africa did not develop staple crops that they stopped cultivating once rice and yams were introduced.
In the light of the above discussion, my advice is that you need to focus a bit more on the application of the process. You are indeed on the right path. More practice in asking yourself the right questions in the pre-thinking phase will ensure that you do not miss the right answer because of the way it’s been written.
Also, I can understand how you may have found the answer choice complex. Here, I would like to advise you to, use the concepts learned in the SC course to your benefit in CR. 
What we prescribe in our SC course will really help you understand such long/complex sentences. Break down complex statements in to segments/clauses. The option statement in this case says: “People in western Africa did not develop staple crops that they stopped cultivating once rice and yams were introduced”. Breaking it into segments, we get:
1. People in western Africa did not develop staple crops
2. that (refers back to the staple crops in the first clause) they stopped cultivating once rice and yams were introduced

So in the above sentence basically says that those people did not develop some type of staple crops. What type of staple crops are these? These are staple crops whose cultivation was stopped once rice and yams were introduced there. Hence, this statement basically guards the author’s argument against a possible counter.

Hope the above discussion helps!

Thanks
Aninda

Hi Egmat team : can you please help why C is not an assumption? I know A is definitely an assumption but I'm not able to rule out C. If rice and Yams were introduced in western africa from somewhere else then these needs to be grown as crops outside of africa. If we negate this - RIce and Yams were not grown as staple crops outsde W africa then it falls.
Re: Agricultural societies cannot exist without staple crops. Se   [#permalink] 16 Oct 2016, 01:08
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
9 Rice is a staple crop in the country of Bhupet, and ... 6 13 Oct 2013, 16:01
7 John: There is no God because we cannot prove the existence 4 02 Jan 2013, 23:20
Agricultural societies cannot exist without the staple 1 15 Nov 2012, 04:32
18 Agricultural societies cannot exist without staple crops. 8 10 Jul 2012, 07:21
3 Columnist: A democratic society cannot exist unless its 11 01 Sep 2011, 04:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by