MAGOOSH Official Explanation:
This is a tough question, one with few, if any, low-hanging fruit. Perhaps, the best way to eliminate is to focus on the “were responsible” vs. “are responsible.” Wegener discovered a process that holds true today, so the original sentence uses “are.” (Yes, while it is true that something has fundamental to geology as the movement of plates wouldn’t suddenly have stopped post-Wegener, the GMAT does not assume outside knowledge.)
Based on the “were” vs. “are” split, we can eliminate (C) and (E).
Other ways of getting the answer
The good news is you can still eliminate other answer choices without having to rely on the “effecting” distinction. After the “were” vs. “are” (A), (B) and (D) remain. (B) uses the slightly unidiomatic “credited for”. Notice, too, the “responsible in”. This is not quite the same as “responsible for”. The first refers to a person’s ability to be responsible while doing a certain job.
Finally, (A) creates a lot of distance between the subject (Alfred Wegener) and the verb (“had been”). This isn’t a clear, cut rule. It’s just bad manners, so to speak, as far as style is concerned, and it’s something the GMAT would most likely not do.
Answer: (D)
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What’s up with “effecting?” Isn’t that wrong?
A: This question is written with only the highest GMAT scorers in mind, and they should be familiar with this distinction. Now you're going to join their ranks, so hopefully you will also be in the top!
The verb "effect" means "to bring about a change" or "to bring into existence." While it may seem that this is a mistake, this should not be the word "affecting." Here are some examples of how "effecting" can be used in a sentence:
1) MLK effected sweeping changes in the lives of African Americans.
2) By placing a young Joe Montana in the game, Bill Walsh effected one of the greatest comebacks in NFL history.
The reason we need "effect" is that it isn’t quite right to say that a person is credited with one of the greatest paradigm shifts in history. There is a stronger element of bring into being or creation.
Q: In answer choice D, why is there a comma before “that?” I thought we needed to use a comma before the word “which,” but not before “that.” Isn't this wrong?
A: When we're using "that" as a standard relative pronoun we don't need a comma. (e.g. The chair that I bought is red.) We also don't want commas when a subordinate clause follows "that." (e.g. He was sad that she did not want to see him again.)
But here, we're using "that" to begin a substantive clause. When "that" is being used to introduce a substantive clause, it is acceptable (often necessary) to have a comma before "that."
In answer choice D, the whole clause "that large plates in the earth’s crust are responsible for the movement of continents" actually functions as a noun. That’s why it’s a substantive / noun clause. We could also change this clause to "the discovery that large plates in the earth's crust..." This clause is modifying the first noun clause in the sentence ("one of the greatest paradigm shifts in geology”).
It’s also helpful to know that have the structure of an appositive phrase. We use the commas to separate the appositive phrase from the rest of the sentence. Being familiar with this structure will definitely serve you well!