Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 22 May 2017, 19:52

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 312
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 338 [0], given: 9

All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2009, 23:03
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

45% (02:38) correct 55% (01:22) wrong based on 38 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's theory and Professor Heissman's. However, the predictions that these theories make about the result of the planned experiment cannot both be true. Therefore, the result of this experiment will confirm one of these theories at the expense of the other.

The argument above exhibits an erroneous pattern of reasoning most similar to that exhibited by which one of the following?

(a)Dave and Jane both think they know how to distinguish beech trees from elms, but when they look at trees together they often disagree. Therefor, at least one of them must have an erroneous method.

(b) Although David thinks the tree they saw was a beech, Jane thinks it was an elm. Jane's description of the tree's features is consistent with her opinion, so this description must be inconsistent with David's view.

(c) David and Jane have been equally good at identifying trees so far. But David says this one is an elm, whereas Jane is unsure. Therefore, if this tree turns out to be an elm, we'll know David is better.

(d)David thinks that there are more beeches than elms in this forest. Jane thinks he is wrong. The section of the forest we examined was small, but examination of the whole forest would either confirm David's view or disprove it.

(e) David thinks this tree is a beech. Jane thinks it is an elm. Maria, unlike David or Jane, is expert at tree identification, so when Maria gives her opinion it will verify either David's or Jane's opinion.

OA and OE will follow after the discussion
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2009
Posts: 350
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 32

Re: All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2009, 01:17
IMO 'B'.

Same evidence presented to Dr. Grippen and Professor Heissman but different outcomes (or outputs) from Grippen and Heissman.

Same tree to David and Jane but David sees a beech (different output) while Jane sees a elm (different output).
Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2009
Posts: 222
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 106 [1] , given: 13

Re: All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2009, 12:49
1
KUDOS
I am down to C and E, and ultimately will go with E.
In C, conclusion does not confirm one alternative at the expense of other as Jane is unsure. If tree is not elm, then David is wrong but not on expense of Jane.

Choice E correctly states that when Maria gives her opinion, it will verify either David's or Jane's opinion. So this choice confirms one opinion at the expense of other.
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 416
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 394 [0], given: 14

Re: All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2009, 00:53
OE A
Director
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 882
Name: Ronak Amin
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 702 [0], given: 18

Re: All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2009, 02:22
Initially I chose B. But later on I realized that C is more apt.
"at the expense of" suggests that both theories are equally good but due to the results one theory will be rejected. Now, C says that Davids theory will be "better" than Jane's and hence Jane's theory will rejected inspite of being "good".
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 4511
Followers: 394

Kudos [?]: 4184 [0], given: 109

Re: All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2009, 02:49
should be 'a'
_________________

Absolute modulus :http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 312
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 338 [0], given: 9

Re: All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Sep 2009, 11:14
OA is E. The argument proceeds as follows.

The conclusion of the author is that the experiment will confirm one of these theories at the expense of the other. In other words, one will be true whereas the other will be false. The flawed in the argument is that the author does not account for both theories to be false.

Option E contains the same flawed in reasoning. Maria is the experiment and David and Jane the theories.

+ 1 for getmba
SVP
Affiliations: HEC
Joined: 28 Sep 2009
Posts: 1636
Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V44
Followers: 100

Kudos [?]: 647 [0], given: 432

Re: All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2009, 18:02
I picked E. My reasoning was that both Dave and Jane have the same evidence: the tree. However, both arrive at different results based off of the evidence. Maria acts as the "result of the experiment" in the passage.

I was torn between A and E, and took too much time to answer this one.
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 425
Schools: UT at Austin, Indiana State University, UC at Berkeley
WE 1: 5.5
WE 2: 5.5
WE 3: 6.0
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 127 [0], given: 16

Re: All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jan 2010, 20:41
I still was not able to get the reasoning behind the answer choice. I thought the answer need to be B.
_________________

Never give up,,,

SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1806
Location: New York
Followers: 37

Kudos [?]: 930 [0], given: 5

Re: All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jan 2010, 20:57
mirzohidjon wrote:
I still was not able to get the reasoning behind the answer choice. I thought the answer need to be B.

All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's theory and Professor Heissman's. However, the predictions that these theories make about the result of the planned experiment cannot both be true. Therefore, the result of this experiment will confirm one of these theories at the expense of the other.

In original sentence. "result of this experiment confirm one of the theories" -->
Experiment (Z - Third Party Expert) will tell you which one is better ..Is it X or Y.

in B) this part is mssing. Janes(Y) description of tree's features is consistent with her opinion. that means.. Y is saying.. Y is correct.. there is no third party "Z" involved.

in E) Z ( Maria) will tell you which one is good .. is it X( or Y

Is it clear?
_________________

Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 425
Schools: UT at Austin, Indiana State University, UC at Berkeley
WE 1: 5.5
WE 2: 5.5
WE 3: 6.0
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 127 [0], given: 16

Re: All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jan 2010, 22:10
Ok, now I got it, thank u!
_________________

Never give up,,,

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 265
Location: India
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 252 [0], given: 25

Re: All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2010, 07:20
mikeCoolBoy wrote:
All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's theory and Professor Heissman's. However, the predictions that these theories make about the result of the planned experiment cannot both be true. Therefore, the result of this experiment will confirm one of these theories at the expense of the other.

The argument above exhibits an erroneous pattern of reasoning most similar to that exhibited by which one of the following?

(a)Dave and Jane both think they know how to distinguish beech trees from elms, but when they look at trees together they often disagree. Therefor, at least one of them must have an erroneous method.

(b) Although David thinks the tree they saw was a beech, Jane thinks it was an elm. Jane's description of the tree's features is consistent with her opinion, so this description must be inconsistent with David's view.

(c) David and Jane have been equally good at identifying trees so far. But David says this one is an elm, whereas Jane is unsure. Therefore, if this tree turns out to be an elm, we'll know David is better.

(d)David thinks that there are more beeches than elms in this forest. Jane thinks he is wrong. The section of the forest we examined was small, but examination of the whole forest would either confirm David's view or disprove it.

(e) David thinks this tree is a beech. Jane thinks it is an elm. Maria, unlike David or Jane, is expert at tree identification, so when Maria gives her opinion it will verify either David's or Jane's opinion.

OA and OE will follow after the discussion

Main passage has an erroneous reasoning: the predictions that these theories make about the result of the planned experiment cannot both be true. Both can be false or one each can be false at a time. Conclusion assumes that one theory will be tru and other will be false.

Only option E has similar erroneous logic: when Maria gives her opinion it will verify either David's or Jane's opinion. Maria can nullify both of them.
_________________

Cheers,
SD

Manager
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 166
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 5

Re: All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Feb 2010, 03:50
what is the OA and source
Re: All the evidence so far gathered fits both Dr. Grippen's   [#permalink] 16 Feb 2010, 03:50
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The coal mines at Newcastle were so rich that all the coal 4 20 Mar 2011, 03:47
There is evidence to suggest that our cave-dwelling 6 14 Mar 2011, 17:20
Dr. Ruiz: Dr. Smith has expressed outspoken antismoking 5 18 Sep 2008, 11:42
Two paleontologists, Dr Tyson and Dr. Rees, disagree over 6 06 Sep 2008, 10:46
Dr. Ruiz: Dr. Smith has expressed outspoken antismoking 10 17 Apr 2008, 12:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by