Already discussed at the below thread: cr-74667.html A : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 27 Feb 2017, 00:18

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 313
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 540 [0], given: 20

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2010, 01:27
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

59% (02:44) correct 41% (01:49) wrong based on 157 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A certain experimental fungicide causes no harm to garden plants, though only if it is diluted at least to ten parts water to one part fungicide. Moreover, this fungicide is known to be so effective against powdery mildew that it has the capacity to eliminate it completely from rose plants. Thus this fungicide, as long as it is sufficiently diluted, provides a means of eliminating powdery mildew from rose plants that involves no risk of harming the plants.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) There is not an alternative method, besides application of this fungicide, for eliminating powdery mildew from rose plants without harming the plants.
(B) When the fungicide is sufficiently diluted, it does not present any risk of harm to people, animals, or beneficial insects.
(C) Powdery mildew is the only fungal infection that affects rose plants.
(D) If a fungicide is to be effective against powdery mildew on rose plants, it must eliminate the powdery mildew completely.
(E) The effectiveness of the fungicide does not depend on its being more concentrated than one part in ten parts of water.

I am still not able to get this CR ques. An easier to understand answer needed
cr-74667.html
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by reto on 03 Jul 2015, 05:56, edited 2 times in total.
style and format
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 11 May 2010
Posts: 224
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 122 [1] , given: 11

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2010, 01:23
1
KUDOS
E it is.

The argument say that the Fungi is effective against Mildew. But to apply it safely, we can only use diluted Fungi, so the assumption has to be that the diluted Fungi is also as effective against Mildew.
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 997
Location: Singapore
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 764 [0], given: 36

### Show Tags

07 Aug 2010, 08:13
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Yes this one is hard. Because B is so tempting. But mark the keywords "harm"

Conclusion says that the method does NOT harm the plants. B says that its does NOT harm people, animals etc. Negate B - it does not affect the conclusion.

(B) When the fungicide is sufficiently diluted, it does not present any risk of harm to people, animals, or beneficial insects.

Now look at E. Argument says that one part in ten parts water concentration is ATLEAST required to cause the desired effect. Premise - A certain experimental fungicide causes no harm to garden plants, though only if it is diluted at least to ten parts water to one part fungicide. ---> More concentration is worthless.
(E) The effectiveness of the fungicide does not depend on its being more concentrated than one part in ten parts of water. Hence E is the answer.
_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 333
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2010, 23:55
OK after a horrendous CAT yesterday, m happy i got this one right its got to be E..>Was down to D and E and I happily choose E!!!
Manager
Joined: 29 Dec 2009
Posts: 122
Location: india
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2010, 01:29
GOT TO BE E
Senior Manager
Affiliations: Volunteer Operation Smile India, Creative Head of College IEEE branch (2009-10), Chief Editor College Magazine (2009), Finance Head College Magazine (2008)
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 471
Location: India
WE2: Entrepreneur (E-commerce - The Laptop Skin Vault)
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Marketing (Other)
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 150 [0], given: 24

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2010, 02:00
IMO E
_________________

Kidchaos

http://www.laptopskinvault.com

Follow The Laptop Skin Vault on:

Consider Kudos if you think the Post is good
Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot. Nothing is going to change. It's not. - Dr. Seuss

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10638
Followers: 939

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Feb 2015, 22:04
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Joined: 12 Jul 2015
Posts: 27
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
WE: General Management (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 456

### Show Tags

20 Jan 2016, 07:36
Conclusion:
Thus this fungicide, as long as it is sufficiently diluted, provides a means of eliminating powdery mildew from rose plants that involves no risk of harming the plants.

(A) There is not an alternative method, besides application of this fungicide, for eliminating powdery mildew from rose plants without harming the plants. - negation - There is an alternate method for .... - This does not affect the argument. The argument concludes that fungicide provides a means and not the only means.
(B) When the fungicide is sufficiently diluted, it does not present any risk of harm to people, animals, or beneficial insects. - The conclusion states that Fungicide provides a means of eliminating powdery mildew from rose plants that involves no risk of harming PLANTS. It does not talk about animals, people or other beneficial insects
(C) Powdery mildew is the only fungal infection that affects rose plants. - negation - It is not the only infection - Does not affect the argument. Same as A.
(D) If a fungicide is to be effective against powdery mildew on rose plants, it must eliminate the powdery mildew completely. - This is tricky. But the arguments states that it provides a means and not claims to be the best to eliminate completely
(E) The effectiveness of the fungicide does not depend on its being more concentrated than one part in ten parts of water. - Correct- The argument states the Dil Fungicide is harmless and Fungicide eliminates powdery mildew.
negation - The fungicide is effective when the concentration is more - implies that it will not be a means to eliminate mildew - T His affects the argument
Chat Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 238
GPA: 4
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 84

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2016, 06:56
My 2 cents:

(A) There is not an alternative method, besides application of this fungicide, for eliminating powdery mildew from rose plants without harming the plants.
No relevance to the conclusion which talks about effectiveness of a specific fungicide.
(B) When the fungicide is sufficiently diluted, it does not present any risk of harm to people, animals, or beneficial insects.
The conclusion focuses on effectiveness of the experimental fungicide and not its health hazards.
(C) Powdery mildew is the only fungal infection that affects rose plants.
May or may not be true. It is not the assumption on which conclusion is based.
(D) If a fungicide is to be effective against powdery mildew on rose plants, it must eliminate the powdery mildew completely.
The experimental fungicide has the capacity to eliminate it completely. The question never mentions that in order to be effective, the fungicide should eliminate the mildew completely.
(E) The effectiveness of the fungicide does not depend on its being more concentrated than one part in ten parts of water.
Part of pre-thinking. The first part says that when diluted it is not harmful to garden plants. Second part says that it is effective to eliminate completely the mildew but does not mention if the fungicide is diluted or concentrated etc. This is an assumption that even when diluted it is still effective. Negating E, conc falls apart.
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Any serious policy discussion 3 04 Jun 2015, 22:08
Already disccused at the below thread: cr-cancer-2636.html 14 26 Jul 2010, 00:46
This topics is already discussed in following two posts: 10 26 May 2009, 21:38
LSAT CR discussion thread location 1 07 May 2008, 00:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.