It is currently 19 Oct 2017, 17:21

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Although improved efficiency in converting harvested

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 05 Sep 2005
Posts: 18

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 0

Although improved efficiency in converting harvested [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 May 2006, 22:10
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

65% (00:48) correct 35% (00:54) wrong based on 1522 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, thereby boosting consumption.

(A) in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, thereby boosting.
(B) In converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply and lowering prices, which boost.
(C) Of converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, which boosts.
(D) Of harvested trees being converted into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand, because it will increase supply and lower prices, thereby boosting.
(E) When harvested trees are converted into wood products may reduce harvest rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply and lowering prices, which boost.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 27

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore
Re: Although improved efficiency in converting harvested [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 May 2006, 02:08
Can someone tell me what is wrong with C ?

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 05 Sep 2005
Posts: 18

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 0

Re: Although improved efficiency in converting harvested [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 May 2006, 12:29
avinashbhatm wrote:
Can someone tell me what is wrong with C ?

C. Of converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, which boosts.

which boosts should be which boost

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 06 May 2006
Posts: 790

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 2

Re: Although improved efficiency in converting harvested [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 May 2006, 14:40
I think there may be a distinction between 'efficiency in' and 'efficiency of'. But I can't put my finger on it. Can somebody explain the difference (if any)?

I vote for A.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 2

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5034

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore
Re: Although improved efficiency in converting harvested [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 May 2006, 20:36
A - best choice
B - not parallel
C - 'boosts is wrong' --> supply and lowering prices is compound noun
D - 'lenthgy and awkward phrasing'
E - 'when....' is awkward

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 14 Oct 2006
Posts: 30

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Location: Boston
Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2006, 20:02
Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, thereby boosting consumption.

A. in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, thereby boosting.

B. In converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply and lowering prices, which boost.

C. Of converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest ates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices which boosts.

D. Of harvested trees being converted into wood products may reduce arvest rates, it will stimulate demand, because it will increase supply and lower prices, thereby boosting.

E. When harvested trees are converted into wood products may reduce arvest rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply nd lowering prices, which boost.
_________________

1st 600, 2nd 680, 3rd 760 ? =)

Last edited by broall on 27 May 2017, 03:43, edited 1 time in total.
Merged topic. Please search before posting question.

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 840

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 1

GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42
Re: Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2006, 20:09
A seems fine.
B - "because of" seems unnecessary

C and D - IMO "of converting" somehow is less attractive than "in converting". Someone else think so too? There are other things wrong with D as well.

E - totally out.

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 1

VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1115

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 1

Location: India
Re: Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2006, 20:15
I pick A.
The only reason for me is that the original sentence is contrasting the two effects of "increased efficiency".
In all the other choices we are missing that, plus they have problems individually as well.
_________________

Trying hard to conquer Quant.

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 14 Oct 2006
Posts: 30

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Location: Boston
Re: Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2006, 20:19
Guys,,,, OA is NOT A..

think of it more in terms of meaning, specifcially what stimulate demand!
_________________

1st 600, 2nd 680, 3rd 760 ? =)

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2005
Posts: 448

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

Re: Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2006, 03:38
winskc wrote:
Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, thereby boosting consumption.

A. in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, thereby boosting.

B. In converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply and lowering prices, which boost.

C. Of converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest ates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices which boosts.

D. Of harvested trees being converted into wood products may reduce arvest rates, it will stimulate demand, because it will increase supply and lower prices, thereby boosting.

E. When harvested trees are converted into wood products may reduce arvest rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply nd lowering prices, which boost.

Honestly I thought it was A too but "it" was bothering me because I know we may seem to think that it refers to efficiency but we are not sure.

Umm B because efficiency in... is correct. Which seems to refer to increasing supply and lowering prices.

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 1367

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Re: Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2006, 04:17
uvs_mba wrote:
winskc wrote:
Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, thereby boosting consumption.

A. in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, thereby boosting.

B. In converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply and lowering prices, which boost.

C. Of converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest ates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices which boosts.

D. Of harvested trees being converted into wood products may reduce arvest rates, it will stimulate demand, because it will increase supply and lower prices, thereby boosting.

E. When harvested trees are converted into wood products may reduce arvest rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply nd lowering prices, which boost.

Honestly I thought it was A too but "it" was bothering me because I know we may seem to think that it refers to efficiency but we are not sure.

Umm B because efficiency in... is correct. Which seems to refer to increasing supply and lowering prices.

B and E is absolutely ruled out "because of" is a wrong usage

A,C are a RunOn

I would tend towards D

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2005
Posts: 448

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

Re: Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2006, 05:14
Because of is not bad to use. I just re-read the sentence, which is ambiguous. Changing my answer back to A

I guess its too early in the morning

But since it clearly refers to efficiency, how is A a run-on, in that sense A should make perfect sense.

Winsec what is the correct answer? What is your source. I just did a search and Jerry had posted this question some time back and there was no OA posted for it.

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1681

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 0

Re: Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2006, 06:44
I think "A" is good enough.

How is "A" run-on? I don't think so.

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1681

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 0

Re: Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2006, 06:46
Are you sure? Not convicing....can you please post the OE?

winskc wrote:
Guys,,,, OA is NOT A..

think of it more in terms of meaning, specifcially what stimulate demand!

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 14 Oct 2006
Posts: 30

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Location: Boston
Re: Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2006, 08:43
OA is B.....

There is no OE.. Sorry,, ^^

But, A can not be answer becasue

boosting modifies "DEMAND".

And, supply and prices stimulate demand, not demand by
supply and prices.. ^^
_________________

1st 600, 2nd 680, 3rd 760 ? =)

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2006
Posts: 159

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Re: Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2006, 09:06
Agree with B,

As A has a pronoun reference problem with 'it'.

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Posts: 494

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Re: Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2006, 09:49
I picked up A at first but the it scares me..so my choice is B

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1012

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Re: Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2006, 10:09
can some one please clarify whether "it" can be used to refer to an action such as "improved efficiency"?
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 212

Kudos [?]: 342 [0], given: 0

Location: Taipei
Re: Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2006, 20:19
uvs_mba wrote:
Because of is not bad to use. I just re-read the sentence, which is ambiguous. Changing my answer back to A

I guess its too early in the morning

But since it clearly refers to efficiency, how is A a run-on, in that sense A should make perfect sense.

Winsec what is the correct answer? What is your source. I just did a search and Jerry had posted this question some time back and there was no OA posted for it.

A

efficiency in

in B ......, which is ambigious

Kudos [?]: 342 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1012

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Re: Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2006, 20:23
jerrywu wrote:
uvs_mba wrote:
Because of is not bad to use. I just re-read the sentence, which is ambiguous. Changing my answer back to A

I guess its too early in the morning

But since it clearly refers to efficiency, how is A a run-on, in that sense A should make perfect sense.

Winsec what is the correct answer? What is your source. I just did a search and Jerry had posted this question some time back and there was no OA posted for it.

A

efficiency in

in B ......, which is ambigious

I agree with Jerry. Which refers to "prices" or "lowering prices"? I think which can't refer to a verb. Please correct me.
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Re: Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees   [#permalink] 16 Oct 2006, 20:23

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 58 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by