It is currently 23 Sep 2017, 22:14

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Oct 2004
Posts: 122

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Dec 2005, 20:30
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (00:43) correct 50% (00:33) wrong based on 2 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances posing any health threat, mounting scientific evidence has convinced many experts that there is cause for concern.

A. of electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances posing any health threat
B. of electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances that pose any threat to health
C. that electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances pose any threat to health
D. that poses any threat to health from electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances
E. for any health threat posed by electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2893

Kudos [?]: 316 [0], given: 0

Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Dec 2005, 21:55
Will go with C.

A. Very awkward
B. It suggests that health threat is due to household appliances rather than electromagnetic field of household appliances.
D. It suggests that health threat is due to a proof rather than electromagnetic field of household appliances.
E. "for" is incorrect here
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Kudos [?]: 316 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Posts: 1051

Kudos [?]: 177 [0], given: 0

Location: CA
Re: SC-proof [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Dec 2005, 00:07
A. of electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances posing any health threat ==> Use of 'of' is incorrect

B. of electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances that pose any threat to health ==> Use of 'of' is incorrect

C. that electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances pose any threat to health ==> Correct! Use of 'that' is needed to construct a restrictive clause

D. that poses any threat to health from electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances ==> Changes meaning. It sounds like its the proofs that pose threat

E. for any health threat posed by electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances ==> Use of 'for' is awkward
_________________

Don't be afraid to take a flying leap of faith.. If you risk nothing, than you gain nothing...

Kudos [?]: 177 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Oct 2004
Posts: 122

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Dec 2005, 10:02
OA is C.

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Jun 2007
Posts: 66

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Re: SC-proof [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jun 2007, 16:20
I go for C. Here is my reasoning.

A. " Appliance seem to be posing threat.
B. Same as B
C. correct
D. Sounds like "Health from Electromagnetic fields"
E. ...health threat ....generated by household appliances

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Completed GMAT on 22 Nov 2011
Joined: 08 Nov 2010
Posts: 160

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 12

Reviews Badge
Re: SC-proof [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2011, 02:31
Got this one completely wrong :)

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 12

Re: SC-proof   [#permalink] 31 May 2011, 02:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.