Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 29 May 2017, 03:09

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields

Author Message
VP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1382
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 330 [0], given: 0

Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Oct 2008, 05:18
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances posing any health threat, mounting scientific evidence has convinced many experts that there is cause for concern.
(A) of electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances posing any health threat
(B) of electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances that pose any threat to health
(C) that electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances pose any threat to health
(D) that poses any threat to health from electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances
(E) for any health threat posed by electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances
_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

SVP
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2476
Followers: 70

Kudos [?]: 774 [0], given: 19

### Show Tags

12 Oct 2008, 12:36
spriya wrote:
Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances posing any health threat, mounting scientific evidence has convinced many experts that there is cause for concern.

(A) of electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances posing any health threat
(B) of electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances that pose any threat to health
(C) that electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances pose any threat to health
(D) that poses any threat to health from electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances
(E) for any health threat posed by electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances

(C) that electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances pose any threat to health
_________________

Gmat: http://gmatclub.com/forum/everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html

GT

VP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1382
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 330 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Oct 2008, 00:32
GMAT TIGER wrote:
spriya wrote:
Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances posing any health threat, mounting scientific evidence has convinced many experts that there is cause for concern.

(A) of electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances posing any health threat
(B) of electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances that pose any threat to health
(C) that electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances pose any threat to health
(D) that poses any threat to health from electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances
(E) for any health threat posed by electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances

(C) that electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances pose any threat to health

What about proof for !!! usage !!is not it correct
_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

SVP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1553
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 264 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2008, 02:26
I find both B and C correct, unless "proof of" is a wrong idiom. Can someone confirm please?
Intern
Joined: 15 Apr 2008
Posts: 40
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2008, 03:00
I would choose A. I don't find anything wrong with "proof of".

Pls post the OA.
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2007
Posts: 291
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2008, 14:16
A for me. Correct idiom is 'proof of'

Example: Economic growth is the proof of the pudding for the president's tax and budget plans.

Okay? need other examples?
Okay one more...The best proof of love is trust. — Dr. Joyce Brothers

So this close down our options to A and B

Now B.
Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances that pose any threat to health

The intension is to use THAT as pronoun but instead of refering to any subject, 'That' refers to electromagnetic fields generated by household appliances

I dont think 'That' here is used as restrictive clause cause it doesn't make any sense.

A, correctly use participle 'Posing' to modify 'em 'fields

IMO right option is A
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2007
Posts: 291
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2008, 20:13
nikhilpoddar wrote:
clear C

what is 'clear' about C. there are ppl who preferred other choces too So C might be the OA but not the 'clear' choice for for sure lol.
VP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1382
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 330 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Oct 2008, 06:25
Too gud discussion!!
thanks OA is C

i just missed on the OA

but ultimately i understand one thing that here we want to prove that EM ways dont pose threat

if we say there is no proof EMways doing this ,we mean we dont have proof of such EMways which do this

but hen we sy : we dont have proof that EMways dont cause threat

we are talking about the scnario created by EM wavs

HTH
thanks for all the posts and replies !!!
_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 243
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 240 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Oct 2008, 06:30
IMO C . Only C expresses the intent/meaning of the sentence.
Re: sc-proof   [#permalink] 21 Oct 2008, 06:30
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Their lack of field research and their reliance on ancient 5 03 May 2008, 11:16
Until recently, the Inuit people led a nomadic existence, 4 28 Apr 2008, 22:56
Despite no proof that the consumption of any particular 3 03 Feb 2008, 04:14
Until recently, the Inuit people led a nomadic existence, 11 17 Oct 2007, 16:29
Although no proof yet exists of electromagnetic fields 3 07 Jul 2007, 10:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by