SVTTCGMAT wrote:
Although the cacao plant probably originated in the upper Amazon region, its first cultivation for seeds and pulp was apparently begun in Mexico and Central America.
A) its first cultivation for seeds and pulp was apparently begun
B) apparently it was cultivated for its seeds and its pulp beginning
C) it was apparently first cultivated for its seeds and pulp
D) the beginning of its cultivation for seeds and pulp appears to be
E) the first cultivation for its seeds and pulp appears to have begun
Can anyone explain why E is wrong?
hxzworld wrote:
i'm totally confused with this question.
could someone explain more specifically, especially, what's wrong with A ??
Dear
hxzworld,
I'm happy to respond.
Unfortunately, SVTTCGMAT posted the question with multiple errors, and much of the discussion on this page revolves around discussing those errors rather than the substance of the original official question. The version above is the correct version: one we remove all the errors originally introduced when this question was posted, it is a wonderful question.
Here's what is so hard about the question: all five of the answer choices are grammatically correct! This is a wonderful question because it really doesn't test grammar at all. This question is almost completely a pure test of
rhetorical construction.
Think about it. What is the core action here? The core action is the action of cultivating cacao for its seed & pulp. The discussion of this action is essential to the sentence. Well, as a general rule, if a sentence is about an action, often the most effective version that sentence involves
the action as a verb.
A)
its first cultivation for seeds and pulp was apparently begunThe main action is a noun, "
cultivation," and the sapless alternative "
was begun" is the main verb. This is grammatically correct, but it is about as direct and persuasive as wet toast. This is a rhetorical failure and is wrong.
B)
apparently it was cultivated for its seeds and its pulp beginningThe main action is a verb--good. The problem here is the participle "
beginning": the
Modifier Touch Rule suggests that the "pulps" "
begin in Mexico and Central America." This is illogical. We can step back from this grammar and figure out logically what the target noun should be, but in a well-constructed sentence, everything should be clear already. This is ambiguous and wrong.
C)
it was apparently first cultivated for its seeds and pulpThe main action is a verb--good. No logical problems. This is active and powerful. These seems promising.
D)
the beginning of its cultivation for seeds and pulp appears to beThe main action is a noun, "
cultivation," and the punchless alternative "
appears to have began" is the main verb. This version seems as if it were trying to make the sentence as long, boring, and indirect as possible. This is completely mealy-mouthed, a rhetorical train wreck. This is incorrect.
E)
the first cultivation for its seeds and pulp appears to have begunOnce again, the main action is a noun, "
cultivation," and the lily-livered alternative "
appears to have began" is the main verb. This is flabby, indirect, timid, and without any persuasive power. This yawn-inducing version is another rhetorical failure.
The only possible answer is (C).
Does all this make sense?
Mike