It is currently 21 Sep 2017, 12:41

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Posts: 23

Kudos [?]: 35 [2], given: 0

Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Oct 2005, 13:03
2
KUDOS
33
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

27% (01:23) correct 73% (02:26) wrong based on 737 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is about the same in Clarksville and Metroville, there are almost 15% more gun owners in Metroville. The difference in gun ownership is the most logical explanation for the fact that there are 23% fewer homicides in Clarksville than Metroville.

The explanation rests on the assumption that

A)Most violent crimes in Metroville is connected to groups of organized criminals that do not operate in Clarksville

B)Fire ammunition is easy to obtain in Clarksville than Metroville

C) Clarksville and Metroville are far apart that crime in one does not affect the other

D)The number of criminals in Metroville are not larger in number than the number in Clarksville.

E) Clarksville does not have significantly better emergency medical services than Metroville.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by Vyshak on 25 Jul 2016, 03:47, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 35 [2], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 01 Aug 2005
Posts: 68

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Re: Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Oct 2005, 13:09
Extremely tricky one - close choice between D and E for me.

I will go with E.

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1112

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 0

Location: CA
Re: Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Oct 2005, 13:15
D.

% decrease (or increase) in homicides only makes sense if number of criminals are same at both cities.

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1704

Kudos [?]: 457 [0], given: 0

Location: Dhaka
Re: Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Oct 2005, 14:10
I am stuck between C and D.

on the exam day I will probably pick D.
_________________

hey ya......

Kudos [?]: 457 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 09 Jul 2005
Posts: 589

Kudos [?]: 64 [2], given: 0

Re: Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Oct 2005, 14:29
2
KUDOS
The argument is the following
There are more guns in M than in C
There rate of violent crimes is the same in C as in M
There are fewer homicides in C that in M

Therefore, there are fewer homicides in C that in M because there fewer guns.

A)Irrelevant.
B)It weaken the conclusion
C) Irrelevant
D)Irrelevant. Other people can have guns.
E) It introduces evidence that, if false, would weaken the conclusion. Since we are talking about homicides, the number of dead people by gun shot matters.

E should be. A tricky one.

Kudos [?]: 64 [2], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 01 Aug 2005
Posts: 68

Kudos [?]: 18 [2], given: 0

Re: Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Oct 2005, 14:32
2
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
automan exactly my reasoning. If you shoot/stab/injure someone and he doesnt die its not a homicide, its a violent crime. Hence if they have the same amount of violent crime (in proportion to population), one reason why homicide might be higher in one city is because they are for example far away from any good hospitals and more violent crimes end up being homicides. Hope im making sense.

Kudos [?]: 18 [2], given: 0

Director
Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 984

Kudos [?]: 209 [1], given: 0

Location: South Korea
Re: Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Oct 2005, 20:27
1
KUDOS
xennie wrote:
automan exactly my reasoning. If you shoot/stab/injure someone and he doesnt die its not a homicide, its a violent crime. Hence if they have the same amount of violent crime (in proportion to population), one reason why homicide might be higher in one city is because they are for example far away from any good hospitals and more violent crimes end up being homicides. Hope im making sense.

Perfect explanation.

However, would you please explain why (C) is irrevalent?

This is my reasoning.

- If criminals (criminals who have guns) can easily move between C and M, the fact that there are more guns in M than in C serves no purpose.
_________________

Auge um Auge, Zahn um Zahn !

Kudos [?]: 209 [1], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 498

Kudos [?]: 14 [1], given: 0

Re: Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Oct 2005, 23:00
1
KUDOS
Very Tricky but I vote for 'C'.
What is the OA?

Kudos [?]: 14 [1], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 104

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Oct 2005, 23:19
Tricky indeed. But in the light of homicide definition. E might be more logical answer.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Posts: 23

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

Re: Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is [#permalink]

Show Tags

31 Oct 2005, 00:04
Thanks for the explanation xennie and automan !

OA is E

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 454

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 0

Location: New York
Re: Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is [#permalink]

Show Tags

31 Oct 2005, 07:52
Great question. Another reason why I need to slow down while reading these. I mistook violent crime to equate to homocide.

Should be E based on explanations given above.

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10170

Kudos [?]: 253 [0], given: 0

Re: Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Jun 2014, 23:39
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 253 [0], given: 0

Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Getting strong now, I'm so strong now!!!
Affiliations: National Institute of Technology, Durgapur
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Posts: 572

Kudos [?]: 667 [0], given: 80

Location: India
GPA: 3.32
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Nov 2014, 23:39
Yes , E should be the answer. Please let's discuss more on this.
_________________

Regards,

S

Consider +1 KUDOS if you find this post useful

Kudos [?]: 667 [0], given: 80

Senior Manager
Status: Always try to face your worst fear because nothing GOOD comes easy. You must be UNCOMFORTABLE to get to your COMFORT ZONE
Joined: 15 Aug 2014
Posts: 359

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 472

Concentration: Marketing, Technology
GMAT 1: 570 Q44 V25
GMAT 2: 600 Q48 V25
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 May 2016, 22:02
hsgmat wrote:
Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is about the same in Clarksville and Metroville, there are almost 15% more gun owners in Metroville. The difference in gun ownership is the most logical explanation for the fact that there are 23% fewer homicides in Clarksville than Metroville.

The explanation rests on the assumption that

A)Most violent crimes in Metroville is connected to groups of organized criminals that do not operate in Clarksville

B)Fire ammunition is easy to obtain in Clarksville than Metroville

C) Clarksville and Metroville are far apart that crime in one does not affect the other

D)The number of criminals in Metroville are not larger in number than the number in Clarksville.

E) Clarksville does not have significantly better emergency medical services than Metroville.

Can someone explain this :
I got 'D' but OE is 'E'..Pls advise how E is correct ans
_________________

"When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe, then you’ll be successful.” - Eric Thomas

I need to work on timing badly!!

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 472

Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1505

Kudos [?]: 1042 [1], given: 882

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Jul 2016, 04:01
1
KUDOS
smartguy595 wrote:
hsgmat wrote:
Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is about the same in Clarksville and Metroville, there are almost 15% more gun owners in Metroville. The difference in gun ownership is the most logical explanation for the fact that there are 23% fewer homicides in Clarksville than Metroville.

The explanation rests on the assumption that

A)Most violent crimes in Metroville is connected to groups of organized criminals that do not operate in Clarksville

B)Fire ammunition is easy to obtain in Clarksville than Metroville

C) Clarksville and Metroville are far apart that crime in one does not affect the other

D)The number of criminals in Metroville are not larger in number than the number in Clarksville.

E) Clarksville does not have significantly better emergency medical services than Metroville.

Can someone explain this :
I got 'D' but OE is 'E'..Pls advise how E is correct ans

Premise: There are 15% more gun owners in Metroville.
Conclusion: Difference in gun ownership has resulted in 23% fewer homicides in Clarksville than Metroville.

D. Number of criminals in Metroville <= Number of criminals in Clarksville. But we already know that there are 15% more gun owners in Metroville. The number of criminals is irrelevant to the argument. Fewer criminals may commit more crime since more criminals have gun ownership in Metroville.

E. Clarksville does not have significantly better emergency medical services than Metroville. - Correct.
Negate E: Clarksville has significantly better emergency medical services than Metroville. --> Medical services are responsible for fewer homicides and not gun ownership --> Provides an alternate reason to negate the conclusion.

Kudos [?]: 1042 [1], given: 882

Director
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 603

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 41

Schools: Cambridge'16
Re: Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Aug 2016, 04:30
took D, but conclusion is about difference in homicide. So, E is better

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 41

Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2015
Posts: 117

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 647

GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Aug 2016, 17:23
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
guns are immediately causing the death and because of more gun in M town more death compare to C town, author concludes that.
we need to defend it from any weakner, it is the cause vs effect argument
we need to find that there is no other cause for the low homicide ( death ) in town C -such as better hospital for emergency services in case of serious crime

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 647

Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2016
Posts: 91

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 5

Location: United States (MI)
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V28
GPA: 3.6
Re: Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Aug 2016, 07:02
These are very ahrd questions. No wonder, my accuracy in CR questions is ~25%

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 5

Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2016
Posts: 268

Kudos [?]: 169 [0], given: 101

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Olin '19 (A)
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.7
WE: General Management (Other)
Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Sep 2016, 12:55
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
hsgmat wrote:
Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is about the same in Clarksville and Metroville, there are almost 15% more gun owners in Metroville. The difference in gun ownership is the most logical explanation for the fact that there are 23% fewer homicides in Clarksville than Metroville.

The explanation rests on the assumption that

Conclusion: The difference in gun ownership is the reason for 23% fewer homicides in Clarksville than Metroville.

A)Most violent crimes in Metroville is connected to groups of organized criminals that do not operate in Clarksville
This statement says that criminals in Metroville do not operate in Clarksville. So? This doesn't bridge the gap.

B)Fire ammunition is easy to obtain in Clarksville than Metroville
Out of Scope.

C) Clarksville and Metroville are far apart that crime in one does not affect the other
Negation doesn't help. - Fail.

D)The number of criminals in Metroville are not larger in number than the number in Clarksville.
We are concerned about the number of Crimes and not the Criminals. Therefore, this option is going pout of Scope.

E) Clarksville does not have significantly better emergency medical services than Metroville.
A Better Emergency Medical Service aptly provides an alternate explanation for the difference in the Number of Homicides and negating it helps to consolidate the conclusion.
_________________

I'd appreciate learning about the grammatical errors in my posts

Please hit Kudos If my Solution helps

My Debrief for 750 - https://gmatclub.com/forum/from-720-to-750-one-of-the-most-difficult-pleatues-to-overcome-246420.html

My CR notes - https://gmatclub.com/forum/patterns-in-cr-questions-243450.html

Rest of the Notes coming soon.

Kudos [?]: 169 [0], given: 101

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 473

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 49

Location: India
Schools: Duke '20, Tepper '20
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GPA: 4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Apr 2017, 09:23
Most tricky one .

IMO its E

Note : Here know that Homicide victims can be survived using immediate medical access .
hence, E is removing alternate cause - > hence it is the assumption .
Even i was confused I checked through net about homicide survivors , articles were cool. These articles stated how people survived and fought in court of law for justice.

Kudos if you like the post.

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 49

Re: Although the ratio of violent crime to total population is   [#permalink] 26 Apr 2017, 09:23
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 The rate of violent crime in this state is up 30 percent 5 01 Jul 2017, 04:41
4 The rate of violent crime in this state is up 35 percent 8 26 Sep 2015, 08:14
71 The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 residents) 41 26 Aug 2017, 13:29
3 Violent crime in this town is becoming 4 23 May 2016, 04:38
Violent crime in this town 3 25 Feb 2017, 09:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by