GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 10 Dec 2018, 18:53

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### Free lesson on number properties

December 10, 2018

December 10, 2018

10:00 PM PST

11:00 PM PST

Practice the one most important Quant section - Integer properties, and rapidly improve your skills.
• ### Free GMAT Prep Hour

December 11, 2018

December 11, 2018

09:00 PM EST

10:00 PM EST

Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics. December 11 at 9 PM EST.

# Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over globa

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2010
Posts: 159
Re: Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over globa  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Dec 2011, 21:31
i'm left only with A, after selecting out all the other options.
Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2011
Posts: 138
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.7
WE: Account Management (Consumer Products)
Re: Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over globa  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Dec 2011, 22:01
A when negated will totally disprove the conclusion.
_________________

DETERMINED TO BREAK 700!!!

Intern
Joined: 23 Sep 2011
Posts: 47
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.44
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Re: Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over globa  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Dec 2011, 22:08
Conclusion: rising temperatures will cause rise in sea levels, displacing millions of people
A - Defender. When negated, ie, If there were technological developments that would prevent all the said catastrophic effects, then conclusion falls apart.
B - Irrelevant
C - Irrelevant to conclusion
D - Irrelevant
E - strong wording, irrelevant
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 7100
Re: Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over globa  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Feb 2015, 05:50
2
Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over global warming, most scientists now agree that human activity is causing the Earth’s temperature to rise. Though predictions vary, many global warming experts believe that average global temperatures will rise between three and eight degrees Fahrenheit during the next century. Such an increase would cause an alarming rise in sea levels, displacing millions of people by destroying major population centers along the world’s coastlines. Which of the following is an assumption in support of the argument’s conclusion?

• New technological developments in the next century will not divert rising seas from the world’s coastal cities.
this is an asssumption which is directly affecting conclusion.. so correct
• Individuals will not become more aware of the steps they can take to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases.
a very close second. it is truly an assumption but if we look closely. it does not support conclusion but supports the prediction...
• Rising sea levels similarly affect all coastal population centers.
no role in supporting..
• Some global warming experts predict a greater than eight degree Fahrenheit increase in global temperatures
during the next century.
out of scope
• Human activity is the sole cause of increasing global temperatures.
out of scope..
_________________

1) Absolute modulus : http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
2)Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html
3) effects of arithmetic operations : https://gmatclub.com/forum/effects-of-arithmetic-operations-on-fractions-269413.html

GMAT online Tutor

Retired Moderator
Joined: 19 Apr 2013
Posts: 589
Concentration: Strategy, Healthcare
Schools: Sloan '18 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V41
GPA: 4
Re: Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over globa  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Feb 2015, 09:27
The answer is A. B was the nearest one, but it is wrong, because the argument speaks about what an increase would cause, not whether it will happen or not.
_________________

If my post was helpful, press Kudos. If not, then just press Kudos !!!

Current Student
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4406
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over globa  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Mar 2015, 18:41
4
1
The argument concludes that rising sea levels caused by global warming will
destroy major coastal population centers and displace millions of people. Any
assumption in support of this conclusion would have to corroborate that these
events will definitively take place.

(A) CORRECT. If new technological developments in the next century allow
people to divert rising seas from the world’s cities (i.e., population centers), cities
will not be destroyed and millions of people will not be displaced. Thus, a
necessary assumption is that these technologies will not be developed.

(B) A simple awareness of the steps to reduce emissions in no way undermines
the argument’s conclusion, as this answer choice does not describe any action
being taken by individuals. Additionally, greenhouse gases are never mentioned
as the primary by-product of human activity that causes global warming, and are
therefore not sufficient to address the argument.

(C) The argument never suggests that all coastal population centers are similarly
affected; this choice is too extreme and overreaching for the argument’s
conclusion.

(D) This might be true, but it is not an assumption on which the conclusion rests.
Instead, this answer choice is simply an inference that might be drawn from the
premises.

(E) The idea that human activity is the sole cause of global warming is neither
suggested nor assumed by the argument. In addition, the wording "sole cause" is
too extreme.
_________________
Current Student
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Posts: 286
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 640 Q40 V37
GMAT 2: 650 Q43 V36
GMAT 3: 600 Q47 V27
GPA: 3.3
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)
Re: Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over globa  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2015, 10:25
2
The trick here is to correctly identify the conclusion which is:

OA: The argument concludes that rising sea levels caused by global warming will destroy major coastal population centers and displace millions of people. Any assumption in support of this conclusion would have to corroborate that these events will definitively take place.

(A) CORRECT. If new technological developments in the next century allow people to divert rising seas from the world’s cities (i.e., population centers), cities will not be destroyed and millions of people will not be displaced. Thus, a necessary assumption is that these technologies will not be developed.

(B) A simple awareness of the steps to reduce emissions in no way undermines the argument’s conclusion, as this answer choice does not describe any action being taken by individuals. Additionally, greenhouse gases are never mentioned as the primary by-product of human activity that causes global warming, and are therefore not sufficient to address the argument.

(C) The argument never suggests that all coastal population centers are similarly affected; this choice is too extreme and overreaching for the argument’s conclusion.

(D) This might be true, but it is not an assumption on which the conclusion rests. Instead, this answer choice is simply an inference that might be drawn from the premises.

(E) The idea that human activity is the sole cause of global warming is neither suggested nor assumed by the argument. In addition, the wording "sole cause" is too extreme.
_________________

KUDO me plenty

Current Student
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4406
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over globa  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2016, 22:54
1
2
Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over global warming, most scientists now agree that human activity is causing the Earth’s temperature to rise. Though predictions vary, many global warming experts believe that average global temperatures will rise between three and eight degrees Fahrenheit during the next century. Such an increase would cause an alarming rise in sea levels, displacing millions of people by destroying major population centers along the world’s coastlines. Which of the following is an assumption in support of the argument’s conclusion?

A. New technological developments in the next century will not divert rising seas from the world’s coastal cities.

B. Individuals will not become more aware of the steps they can take to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases.

C. Rising sea levels similarly affect all coastal population centers.

D. Some global warming experts predict a greater than eight degree Fahrenheit increase in global temperatures during the next century.

E. Human activity is the sole cause of increasing global temperatures.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2015
Posts: 89
GPA: 3.9
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over globa  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2016, 01:49
souvik101990 wrote:
Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over global warming, most scientists now agree that human activity is causing the Earth’s temperature to rise. Though predictions vary, many global warming experts believe that average global temperatures will rise between three and eight degrees Fahrenheit during the next century. Such an increase would cause an alarming rise in sea levels, displacing millions of people by destroying major population centers along the world’s coastlines. Which of the following is an assumption in support of the argument’s conclusion?

A. New technological developments in the next century will not divert rising seas from the world’s coastal cities.

B. Individuals will not become more aware of the steps they can take to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases.

C. Rising sea levels similarly affect all coastal population centers.

D. Some global warming experts predict a greater than eight degree Fahrenheit increase in global temperatures during the next century.

E. Human activity is the sole cause of increasing global temperatures.

Option D and E- Out of Scope
Option C: Similarity in affecting costal populations. Out of Scope
Option B: Not sure. But rejected because of green house gases. Even if individuals become aware will they take steps or will the temperature reduce.

IMO: A
Manager
Joined: 23 Jul 2014
Posts: 90
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over globa  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2016, 04:41
Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over global warming, most scientists now agree that human activity is causing the Earth’s temperature to rise. Though predictions vary, many global warming experts believe that average global temperatures will rise between three and eight degrees Fahrenheit during the next century. Such an increase would cause an alarming rise in sea levels, displacing millions of people by destroying major population centers along the world’s coastlines. Which of the following is an assumption in support of the argument’s conclusion?

Conclusion here is a little fragmented and If I can get then together it says something like -
In the next century , the rising sea levels ,caused by temperature hike , will destroy coastal cities and displace people.

A. New technological developments in the next century will not divert rising seas from the world’s coastal cities.

-This is the only option that strengthens the conclusion by eliminating the possibility that Technological enhancements will not save the coastal cities

B. Individuals will not become more aware of the steps they can take to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases.
-Argument does not talk about greenshouse gases and we do not know for sure what effect green house gases produce

C,D,E does not tackle the conclusion

_________________

The Mind ~ Muscle Connection
My GMAT Journey is Complete.Going to start the MBA in Information Management from 2016
Good Luck everyone.

Jamboree GMAT Instructor
Status: GMAT Expert
Affiliations: Jamboree Education Pvt Ltd
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 273
Location: India
Re: Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over globa  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Feb 2016, 04:31
1
1
The argument states that global warming will lead to an increase in temperature which will eventually raise the sea levels, displacing millions of people by destroying major population hubs along the coastlines. The author assumes that people have to be relocated and there are no means to combat the situation. "A" rightly states the assumption. If "A" is reversed that is "Technological developments will divert the seas" then it goes against the conclusion.Hence that is the assumption.
_________________

Aryama Dutta Saikia
Jamboree Education Pvt. Ltd.

Director
Joined: 24 Nov 2015
Posts: 521
Location: United States (LA)
Re: Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over globa  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Apr 2016, 14:02
use of negation test on option A gives us 'technological developments will divert seas towards world's coastal cities' breaks the conclusion . So this is the correct answer
Intern
Joined: 19 Jan 2014
Posts: 24
Re: Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over globa  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 May 2016, 11:23
hi,

as this is the cause and effect question. human activity ----->rise in earth temp----> rise in sea level----->coastal cities and people get displaced.

in cause and effect question.1.) cause comes before effect 2.) no alternate cause for the effect.
so, option E, which states human activity is the 'sole reason' is what i thought the correct answer due to above reasons.Please explain.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2127
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over globa  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2017, 23:15
The argument concludes that rising sea levels caused by global warming will destroy major coastal population centers and displace millions of people. Any assumption in support of this conclusion would have to corroborate that these events will definitively take place.

(A) CORRECT. If new technological developments in the next century allow people to divert rising seas from the world’s cities (i.e., population centers), cities will not be destroyed and millions of people will not be displaced. Thus, a necessary assumption is that these technologies will not be developed.
(B) A simple awareness of the steps to reduce emissions in no way undermines the argument’s conclusion, as this answer choice does not describe any action being taken by individuals. Additionally, greenhouse gases are never mentioned as the primary by-product of human activity that causes global warming, and are therefore not sufficient to address the argument.
(C) The argument never suggests that all coastal population centers are similarly affected; this choice is too extreme and overreaching for the argument’s conclusion.
(D) This might be true, but it is not an assumption on which the conclusion rests. Instead, this answer choice is simply an inference that might be drawn from the premises.
(E) The idea that human activity is the sole cause of global warming is neither suggested nor assumed by the argument. In addition, the wording "sole cause" is too extreme.
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2012
Posts: 324
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.81
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over globa  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 May 2017, 00:38
Clearly option A is the answer. Option B, when negated, tackles the awareness of the humans but it does not translate that Humans will do something about rising temperatures and sea levels. Hence B is out.
_________________

Citius, Altius, Fortius

Board of Directors
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3613
Re: Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over globa  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 May 2017, 09:36
DeepikaV wrote:
hi,

as this is the cause and effect question. human activity ----->rise in earth temp----> rise in sea level----->coastal cities and people get displaced.

in cause and effect question.1.) cause comes before effect 2.) no alternate cause for the effect.
so, option E, which states human activity is the 'sole reason' is what i thought the correct answer due to above reasons.Please explain.

I think you have not understood the argument properly. The argument concluded that the rising sea level will displace millions of people by destroying major population centers along the world’s coastlines.

So, Assumption could be something that says people don't have a way to save themselves or something that says these people are not the part of the whole problem, hence killing them is not going to help us.

Option E is saying Humans are the sole reason. What if they are not the sole reason? In that case also they are still a problem and displacing that would help us. So, this cannot be an assumption.

If I talk about option A, we are given "New technological developments in the next century will not divert rising seas from the world’s coastal cities.". It means we don't have a way to save those people. Hence, this point lies inline with what we thought.

I hope that makes sense.

P.S: Sorry, I saw your post after 1 year otherwise I would have replied on time.
_________________

My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place

GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.
New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!
Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free
Check our new About Us Page here.

SVP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1652
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Re: Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over globa  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2017, 18:57
this is so unbelievable, the lesson here is to recognize the pattern and try not to pay attention to outside knowledge. Clearly, test takers have to assume that there is a technology to prevent catastrophe in the conclusion of the argument.
Board of Directors
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3613
Re: Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over globa  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jun 2017, 02:04
1
chesstitans wrote:
this is so unbelievable, the lesson here is to recognize the pattern and try not to pay attention to outside knowledge. Clearly, test takers have to assume that there is a technology to prevent catastrophe in the conclusion of the argument.

That's the beauty of this question.

The author said an increase in temperature would displace people. That means he is assuming that we cannot save them anyhow.

This is what option A is doing. It says even we have some sort of technological improvement, we cannot save them. Hence, it strengthens author's conclusion.

I know rejecting A because it seems to provide an outside knowledge could be our first step. But my friend, be careful.
_________________

My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place

GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.
New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!
Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free
Check our new About Us Page here.

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 382
Re: Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over globa  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jul 2017, 21:31
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
_________________

Intern
Joined: 08 Mar 2016
Posts: 32
Re: Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over globa  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jul 2017, 07:03
I agree A might be best of the rest, but it certainly isn't the best. It talks about only cities,whereas nowhere in the premise or the conclusion or even the stimuli has it been mentioned that "major population centers" are mostly coastal cities. Bad question, I'd say! part of the reason, I am always scared to do CR from any company other than OG or GMATPrep
Re: Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over globa &nbs [#permalink] 28 Jul 2017, 07:03

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 47 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by