GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 18 Oct 2019, 14:31

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# It appears that the number of peple employed by a typical American sof

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2010
Posts: 273
It appears that the number of peple employed by a typical American sof  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 09 Oct 2018, 22:55
1
4
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

57% (02:04) correct 43% (02:16) wrong based on 117 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Hey everyone.

Please let me know how you separate between C and E.

i understand why C is right, but still dont understand why E is wrong.

Lets say i had in 1980 three companies - that all had 50 workers.
and in 2000 - we have one company with 2 workers, one company with 5 workers and one company with 1,000,000 workers. the median will be lower but the total number of workers will be higher in 2000 than in 1980.

Am i missing something?

thanks.

Attachments

Untitled.jpg [ 80.51 KiB | Viewed 2731 times ]

_________________

Originally posted by 144144 on 02 Jul 2011, 04:15.
Last edited by bb on 09 Oct 2018, 22:55, edited 2 times in total.
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1806
Re: It appears that the number of peple employed by a typical American sof  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2011, 05:13
5
1
The argument says the 'typical' software firm employs fewer people now than in 1980. That conclusion is based on a study which compares the number of employees in 1980 and now at the *same* firms. The study thus ignores any firms that came into existence after 1980. Those newer firms might be today's 'typical' software firms, so you can't just ignore them, which is why C is correct.

E is not correct; if you want to work out what is 'typical', you normally want to look at the median and not the average. The average takes into account wildly extreme values (that is, values which are *not* 'typical'), and the median does not. For example, if some entrepreneur making \$10 billion per year were to buy a house in an otherwise low-income neighbourhood, the average annual income in that neighbourhood would be enormous, because that \$10 billion would make a significant contribution to the sum of the incomes in the neighbourhood. The average would not represent the 'typical' income level for that neighbourhood. The median would, however, represent in some way the typical income, since (being a bit imprecise) half of people will earn more than the median, and half will earn less. The presence of one extreme income in the neighbourhood barely affects the median at all. So for the argument in question, you genuinely do want to look at the median and not the average precisely because you do not want some extreme values to distort your statistics.
_________________
GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
##### General Discussion
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2010
Posts: 273
Re: It appears that the number of peple employed by a typical American sof  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2011, 05:19
Very nice explanation. I didnt put enough attention to the word "typical"

Thanks +1.
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2010
Posts: 273
Re: It appears that the number of peple employed by a typical American sof  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2011, 08:42
hmm... im sorry im nagging again about this one... i understand why C is right, but still dont understand why E is wrong.

Lets say i had in 1980 three companies - that all had 50 workers.
and in 2000 - we have one company with 2 workers, one company with 5 workers and one company with 1,000,000 workers. the median will be lower but the total number of workers will be higher in 2000 than in 1980.

Am i missing something?

thanks.
_________________
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1806
Re: It appears that the number of peple employed by a typical American sof  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2011, 15:31
2
144144 wrote:
hmm... im sorry im nagging again about this one... i understand why C is right, but still dont understand why E is wrong.

Lets say i had in 1980 three companies - that all had 50 workers.
and in 2000 - we have one company with 2 workers, one company with 5 workers and one company with 1,000,000 workers. the median will be lower but the total number of workers will be higher in 2000 than in 1980.

Am i missing something?

I think you're trying to answer a different question from the one that's being asked.

The question is not asking whether the total number of workers increased. If it were, then yes, the mean would be a better measurement than the median. The question asks instead about the number of workers at *one* 'typical' software firm. The median is more likely to tell you what is 'typical' than is the mean, because the median is not affected by crazy extreme values.
_________________
GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1578
Re: It appears that the number of peple employed by a typical American sof  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2011, 16:10
2
In addition to the qualified reasoning above:
"E" diverts the context from "firm" to "industry".
Firm is just one company. Industry is the entire Software industry.

Conclusion:
Number of people employed by a firm decreased.

E's reasoning:
Median is not a good indicator for the number of employees in an industry.

Author: Ok true!!!
But, Median may be a good indicator for deducing the number of employees in a software firm.

This becomes a fact that has little to no effect on the conclusion.
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2010
Posts: 273
Re: It appears that the number of peple employed by a typical American sof  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2011, 19:35
damn. I keep missing these small things. Thanks guys. +1 +1
_________________
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 5924
Re: It appears that the number of peple employed by a typical American sof  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2019, 23:38
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: It appears that the number of peple employed by a typical American sof   [#permalink] 26 Mar 2019, 23:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by