Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 May 2017, 12:57

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1352
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 678 [0], given: 10

Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2008, 09:56
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:23) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 11 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend less time with each.

a. imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend
b. imposing stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending
c. that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients, and spend
d. that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending
e. that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Posts: 518
Schools: Wharton
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 155 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2008, 10:17
goalsnr wrote:
Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend less time with each.

a. imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend
b. imposing stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending
c. that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients, and spend
d. that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending
e. that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending

I'd go with d.

insurance plans that impose...and require doctors to see more patients, spending less time with each.

a. the list should be the first two items, because insurance plans don't spend time with patients; incorrect usage of the verbs in the list -- you need "that" + infinitives
b. list is now parallel but includes spending less time with each; incorrect usage of the verbs in the list
c. list is now parallel but includes spending less time with each
d. correct
e. list isn't parallel, among other problems
Manager
Joined: 24 Apr 2008
Posts: 162
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2008, 10:20
I think D is perfect - "that" is required and D corrects the modifier issue.
Director
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 624
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 184 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2008, 17:32
goalsnr wrote:
iamcartic wrote:
I think D is perfect - "that" is required and D corrects the modifier issue.

How do we know "that" is required or not?

in this situation you have to use "that" because if you use "imposing" then you'd be modifying the whole sentence instead of the low-end insurance plan.
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 271
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2008, 17:35
goalsnr wrote:
iamcartic wrote:
I think D is perfect - "that" is required and D corrects the modifier issue.

How do we know "that" is required or not?

If there is no that, then it looks as though the union members impose the stricter limits on medical services and not the plans itself. Hence a and b are out.
Impose and restrict follows subjunctive rule.
Spending modifies doctors
Hence D
VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1352
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 678 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2008, 17:45
Ashwin_Mohan wrote:
goalsnr wrote:
iamcartic wrote:
I think D is perfect - "that" is required and D corrects the modifier issue.

How do we know "that" is required or not?

If there is no that, then it looks as though the union members impose the stricter limits on medical services and not the plans itself. Hence a and b are out.
Impose and restrict follows subjunctive rule.
Spending modifies doctors
Hence D

I was wondering if "imposing" can be used in the sentence. I agree it messes the doctor and time part.

Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients.
- If we had a sentence like this it would be grmmatically correct?Thats what I was trying to understand.
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 271
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2008, 19:05
I was wondering if "imposing" can be used in the sentence. I agree it messes the doctor and time part.

Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients.
- If we had a sentence like this it would be grmmatically correct?Thats what I was trying to understand.

In your example, I agree imposing modifies the insurance plans(right next to each other....), but what does requiring modify??? Again is it union members or the plan?
Now when we use that, it logically divides this ambiguity. In this case, require and impose can only modify the word just before 'that', ie insurance plans.
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2007
Posts: 292
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2008, 19:19
Quote:
If there is no that, then it looks as though the union members impose the stricter limits on medical services and not the plans itself. Hence a and b are out.
Impose and restrict follows subjunctive rule.
Spending modifies doctors
Hence D

Quote:
I was wondering if "imposing" can be used in the sentence. I agree it messes the doctor and time part.

Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients.
- If we had a sentence like this it would be grmmatically correct?Thats what I was trying to understand.

First, IMO participle phrase modifies whole previous clause. In the given sentence, participle pharse imposing stricter limits.... will modify whole previous clause Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans while 'that' modifies the last (connecting ) noun ( insurance plans)......makes sense? I guess so.

second, Spending modifies doctors... no spending doesn't modifies docters here, but modifies require doctors to see more patients, spending

I guess this will help.
VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1352
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 678 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2008, 21:33
rishi2377 wrote:
Quote:
If there is no that, then it looks as though the union members impose the stricter limits on medical services and not the plans itself. Hence a and b are out.
Impose and restrict follows subjunctive rule.
Spending modifies doctors
Hence D

Quote:
I was wondering if "imposing" can be used in the sentence. I agree it messes the doctor and time part.

Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients.
- If we had a sentence like this it would be grmmatically correct?Thats what I was trying to understand.

First, IMO participle phrase modifies whole previous clause. In the given sentence, participle pharse imposing stricter limits.... will modify whole previous clause Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans while 'that' modifies the last (connecting ) noun ( insurance plans)......makes sense? I guess so.

second, Spending modifies doctors... no spending doesn't modifies docters here, but modifies require doctors to see more patients, spending

I guess this will help.

So do you think "Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients." is grammatically correct?
VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1352
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 678 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2008, 06:47
OA is D
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2006
Posts: 271
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2008, 07:48
rishi2377 wrote:
Quote:
If there is no that, then it looks as though the union members impose the stricter limits on medical services and not the plans itself. Hence a and b are out.
Impose and restrict follows subjunctive rule.
Spending modifies doctors
Hence D

Quote:
I was wondering if "imposing" can be used in the sentence. I agree it messes the doctor and time part.

Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients.
- If we had a sentence like this it would be grmmatically correct?Thats what I was trying to understand.

First, IMO participle phrase modifies whole previous clause. In the given sentence, participle pharse imposing stricter limits.... will modify whole previous clause Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans while 'that' modifies the last (connecting ) noun ( insurance plans)......makes sense? I guess so.

second, Spending modifies doctors... no spending doesn't modifies docters here, but modifies require doctors to see more patients, spending

I guess this will help.

Hmm....Can you explain a little more....

Spending....needs to modify a noun. Who is spending?? Doctors....I am not sure how spending can modify an entire phrase....
Someone or something spends time....
Am I missing something?
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2007
Posts: 292
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2008, 13:33
Ashwin_Mohan wrote:
rishi2377 wrote:
Quote:
If there is no that, then it looks as though the union members impose the stricter limits on medical services and not the plans itself. Hence a and b are out.
Impose and restrict follows subjunctive rule.
Spending modifies doctors
Hence D

Quote:
I was wondering if "imposing" can be used in the sentence. I agree it messes the doctor and time part.

Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients.
- If we had a sentence like this it would be grmmatically correct?Thats what I was trying to understand.

First, IMO participle phrase modifies whole previous clause. In the given sentence, participle pharse imposing stricter limits.... will modify whole previous clause Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans while 'that' modifies the last (connecting ) noun ( insurance plans)......makes sense? I guess so.

second, Spending modifies doctors... no spending doesn't modifies docters here, but modifies require doctors to see more patients, spending

I guess this will help.

Hmm....Can you explain a little more....

Spending....needs to modify a noun. Who is spending?? Doctors....I am not sure how spending can modify an entire phrase....
Someone or something spends time....
Am I missing something?

yes in my opinion, spending does modifies the phrase require doctors to see more patients

I will try to explain.
How docters to see more patients? 'by' spending less time on each patient.
anyway, lets see, 'spending.....each' is a participle phrase right?
it ought to modify somethings now, it wont modify the last noun 'patient' for sure
now, it is a present participle and if it is modifying docters, it will mean that 'docters are currently spending less time' which is not the case....now, since it is modifying the phrase 'require docters....'
it means that docters will be seeing more patients by spending less time with each. it is modifying what docters will be doing not what docters are....got the difference?

I dont know if I've been able to explain it in a right way since I am not good in explaining (my gf will vouch for that). It is 0200 in the morning and I am sleepy otherwise I would have given some examples as well. I am curious to know the opinions of English gurus on GMAT club.
SVP
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1520
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 816 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2008, 13:49
The reason "imposing" is wrong is that the following contruction is considered WRONG:

1) preposition + noun + present participle

Eg: James jumped over the cat speeding at 30 km.

In this sentence, is "speeding" modifying "the cat" or "James"?? We have "the cat" right after the preposition "over", and then "the cat" is followed by the present participle "speeding."

In option A, this is what we have:

in lower-end insurance plans imposing

Is "imposing" modifying "lower-end insurance plans" or is it modifying "union members" or "non union members"????
The construction "preposition + noun + present participle" creates this confusion.

One more note: Unlike the past participle, the present participle doesn't have to be placed right next to the noun that it modifies. The present participle can be placed far away from it referent noun, which is why "imposing" here creates an issue because we have 3 different nouns behind it.
VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1352
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 678 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2008, 15:38
tarek99 wrote:
The reason "imposing" is wrong is that the following contruction is considered WRONG:

1) preposition + noun + present participle

Eg: James jumped over the cat speeding at 30 km.

In this sentence, is "speeding" modifying "the cat" or "James"?? We have "the cat" right after the preposition "over", and then "the cat" is followed by the present participle "speeding."

In option A, this is what we have:

in lower-end insurance plans imposing

Is "imposing" modifying "lower-end insurance plans" or is it modifying "union members" or "non union members"????
The construction "preposition + noun + present participle" creates this confusion.

One more note: Unlike the past participle, the present participle doesn't have to be placed right next to the noun that it modifies. The present participle can be placed far away from it referent noun, which is why "imposing" here creates an issue because we have 3 different nouns behind it.

Thanks. I feel confident when I can eliminate an answer choice using grammatical rules.
SVP
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1520
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 816 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2008, 16:03
yeah me too. I try to find as many rules as I can. Also, when you narrow your choices to 2 answer choices and believe that you tackled the grammar issues, this is when conciseness and proper logic should be applied. Sometimes, you might get too caught up with the grammar rules that you wouldn't even read the given sentence to understand it properly. you'll be surprised how that can also help you a lot.

would someone eliminate answer choice E for me? I also chose D as my answer, but I would like a more solid explanation for eliminating answer choice E. The reason I eliminated answer choice E is that I felt that it's not logical that "medical sevices" can actually do the "spending time." Is this correct?
thanks
Manager
Joined: 12 May 2006
Posts: 183
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2008, 17:58
Though D is the best answere but if we have the following choice (say F)

that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spend

Then what will be the answere D or F.

I say this because isnt "see" and "spend" paralled rarther than "see" and "spending"

VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1352
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 678 [1] , given: 10

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2008, 19:58
1
KUDOS
tarek99 wrote:
yeah me too. I try to find as many rules as I can. Also, when you narrow your choices to 2 answer choices and believe that you tackled the grammar issues, this is when conciseness and proper logic should be applied. Sometimes, you might get too caught up with the grammar rules that you wouldn't even read the given sentence to understand it properly. you'll be surprised how that can also help you a lot.

would someone eliminate answer choice E for me? I also chose D as my answer, but I would like a more solid explanation for eliminating answer choice E. The reason I eliminated answer choice E is that I felt that it's not logical that "medical sevices" can actually do the "spending time." Is this correct?
thanks

In D : "requiring " and " spending " modifies plans
1. It would read somethink like this - "plan requiring doctors to ...." - this makes sense
2. It would read somethink like this - "plan spending time with each...." - this makes no sense. It has a logical error because of a misplaced modifier
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10370
Followers: 996

Kudos [?]: 224 [0], given: 0

Re: Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jan 2015, 12:52
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than   [#permalink] 08 Jan 2015, 12:52
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely 0 08 Jan 2015, 10:31
Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than 0 09 Jan 2016, 05:36
7 Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than 6 23 Mar 2016, 20:30
89 Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than 61 14 May 2017, 12:02
1 Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than 7 05 Oct 2014, 11:22
Display posts from previous: Sort by