It is currently 26 Jun 2017, 00:52

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 189
Location: Finland
WE 1: 3.5 years international
Re: Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2010, 03:41
tenaman10 wrote:
Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than nonunion members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend less time with each.
(A) imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend
(B) imposing stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending
(C) that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients, and spend
(D) that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending
(E) that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending

I will go for C.
A and B are eliminated because you need "that" in this clause, otherwise it sounds like its the plans which are imposing thses rules rather than the peopl who came up with these plans.
D is incorrect, because the last part "spending less time with each" is not even a sentence as it misses the verb and the -Ing form itself cannot be used as a verb.
E is incorrect because it is what we call superfiaicial parallelism. Its incorrect because all three parallel elements should have equal weightage, instead of the last two being a subordinatinate to the first one.
C correctly uses "that" to create perfect parallelism.
Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 182
Re: Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Jan 2011, 04:49
(D)

(A) imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend
(B) imposing stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending
(C) that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients, and spend
(D) that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending
(E) that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending
_________________

Raptor

Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 182
Re: Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Jan 2011, 04:52
(D)

(A) imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend
(B) imposing stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending
(C) that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients, and spend
(D) that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending
(E) that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending
_________________

Raptor

Senior Manager
Affiliations: SPG
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 327
Re: Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2011, 03:30

plans THAT
impose ..
require ..
spend ...

the verbs should be 'logically parallel' and not just simply parallel. impose and require are fine, but what about spend. do plans spend? of course not, spend is not logically parallel.

'plans THAT require doctors to see more patients, spending less time with each'
CORRECT

_________________

press kudos, if you like the explanation, appreciate the effort or encourage people to respond.

Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2011
Posts: 131
Re: Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Oct 2011, 04:40
tenaman10 wrote:
Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than nonunion members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend less time with each.
(A) imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend
(B) imposing stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending
(C) that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients, and spend
(D) that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending
(E) that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending

Between C and D, I would go for D.

I found a nice explanation for this on manhattangmat site. http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/amo ... t1904.html

you have to realize which verbs are supposed to be parallel and which aren't. there's no grammatical formula for this; you have to examine the meaning of the sentence to figure it out.
- 'impose' (in whatever form) should be parallel to 'require' (again, in whatever form). these are two different things, both of which are aspects of the plan (= logical parallelism).
- 'spend' should not be parallel to 'see', because it functions as a modifier of 'see' (it's a descriptive adverb modifier, detailing the way in which the doctors see the patients).

choice a: 'spend' is ungrammatical here (it has no logical subject, and isn't parallel to anything).
choice b: imposing, requiring, and spending are all parallel, implying that the insurance plans do all three of these things (an absurdity in the last case).
choice c: all three verbs are parallel again, leading to the same absurdity witnessed in choice b.
choice d (= correct): the parallelism follows the model outlined above: only the verbs that are logically parallel appear in parallel structure.
choice e: 'requiring' and 'spending' are parallel in the modifier, implying that the plans themselves spend time with patients (in addition to requiring blah blah blah). this doesn't make sense.

in choice d, you could legitimately make a case that 'spending' could modify the entire huge clause about what insurance plans do, and is therefore ambiguous. however, that's the OA, so you've learned that this problem is ok in the eyes of the gmat people. if there's a rule that can be articulated here, it's probably something along the lines of 'participial modifier applies to nearest action'.
Manager
Joined: 17 Jul 2011
Posts: 84
Re: Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Dec 2011, 02:50
A good qn..... that "require" should be parallel to" impose "or to "spend."..
finally require to be parallel to impose ...spending is consequence of the earlier action..while the earlier two action should be parallel because of in dependency.
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3972
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Dec 2011, 07:34
among-lower-paid-workers-union-members-are-less-likely-than-78730.html

Please refer to the above link; there are 57 posts on this topic running to 3 pages. I wonder what more is required.

Let me remind freshers that most of the questions they ask these days have already been thoroughly discussed in this forum. Please avail them and benefit, becos, there are opinions from great many experts such as as Brian, Parker, and Adams et all, in those threads. Freshers shouldn't miss them.

.
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 147
Re: Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Dec 2011, 06:12
Its all the matter of how you structure and look at three verbs.

E puts impose at a separate level and require and spend at a lower level together essentially meaning

imposing the stricter limit in medical services
requires doctors to see more patient and the doctor spends less time ..

And D puts it differently. here
impose the stricter limits in medical services and require doctors to see more patients
which basically force doctors to spend less time with patient.

So IMO D is better than E though I chosen E
Manager
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Posts: 196
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
WE: Operations (Insurance)
Re: Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jan 2012, 22:05
Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than nonunion members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend less time with each.
(A) imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend
(B) imposing stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending
(C) that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients, and spend
(D) that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending
(E) that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending

the OA is D..

Couple of questions on the structure of the sentence
- since there is no comma between plans and imposing - imposing here is modifying plans and not the whole clause?
- how do we chose between imposing and that impose (essential modifier) is there a rule of thumb
- since spending is set off by a comma is it safe to say that it is modifying the action of the doctor?

Need specific suggestions on how to decide when to use THAT and when to use -ING
Manager
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Posts: 196
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
WE: Operations (Insurance)
Re: Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jan 2012, 22:44
spending is not || it is subordinate to the doctors .. hence || is mantained between the first 2 parts
Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Posts: 129
Location: United States
Re: Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Mar 2012, 13:26
daagh wrote:
The question is whether this sentence flaunts two equal elements or three elements in the second part. If there are three, all the three should be equated and the use of a co-ordinate conjunction is proper. However, if there are only two functions and if the other function is indeed part of the second function, then conjugating with a coordinated conjunction and is wrong. The third factor entails a sub position or a modifying role using a participle.

In the given case, there is Plans imposing or that impose 1. Stricter limits and 2. (that) require doctors to see more patients. These are the only two stipulations that the plans impose. The act of spending is a corollary of seeing more patients, meaning that the doctors have to see more patients by spending less time with each patient. Therefore, all choices that use the ordinate conjunction and to conjugate spend or spending as if it is an independent function are wrong.

As per this norm, only D survives and is the right answer.

Plans imposing or plans that impose?. Note that there is no comma before imposing. Hence imposing is a straight-ahead, essential modification of plans and is acceptable. However, plans tht impose is more direct than imposing and hence preferable.

Overall, we can see how meaning is gaining predominance over other things. Given the newfound importance to meaning, this topic promises to be a good pitch.

But, jus one question here, don't u think, the comma before spending is wrong, or probably modifying the whole clause, rather than doctors alone..

And if you say, that this is better of the other choices, then in that case, E also has a similar error, of "and spending" that made me rule this out.

Pl throw light.
Raghu
VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1381
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Re: Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Oct 2012, 06:15
Though I can see the logical relationship between "impose stricter limits" and "require doctors to see more patients", but the only thing that is making my head scratch is the use of ", and spending". Is it the union members who are less likely to spend less time with each other? If yes then its absolutely correct.
_________________
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2096
Re: Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2012, 06:56
Hi there,

Click on the following link for detailed explanation of this question by e-gmat:

among-lower-paid-workers-union-members-are-less-likely-83575-20.html

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Director
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 832
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
Re: Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2013, 10:26
venkat18290 wrote:
hgp2k wrote:
tejal777 wrote:
Could somebody please explain why exactly is A akward??Stuck between A and D:(

I think it is a classic case of "command subjunctive". Impose and Require are BOSSY words, which always require word "that" in the sentence. A is wrong as it lacks the word "that".

Also the use of -ing participle "imposing" wrongly suggests that union/nonunion members are imposing the stricter norms than the insurance plans. One more reason to strike out A.

Please correct me if I am wrong.
_____________________________
Consider KUDOS for good posts

Hi HGP2K

I dont think the command subjunctive is the reason for the usage of that in this sentence , because the general structure is BOSSY verb+that + subject +command subjunctive . Here the verb impose comes after "THAT" . However the 2nd reason you have stated is the perfect reason i believe. Correct me if i am wrong ?

parallelism tested here:

whenever there is a parallelism list:
All elements of the list must talk about a common topic/theme/idea.
now imposing stricter limits ...and requiring doctors to see...==>they are related to common idea .ie lower end insurance plans
but spending less time is not the requirement of lower end insurance plans...rather its a result occuring when doctors will see more patients.
so to sum up we need to parallel only requiring and imposing....but not spending is not in the list.

Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than nonunion members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend less time with each.
(A) imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend ==>incorrect parallelism...spend is not supposed to be in list.moreover its not parallel too

(B) imposing stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending ==>spending is not supposed to be parallel.

(C) that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients, and spend ===>spend is not supposed to be parallel

(D) that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending ===>correct ==>spending is result of doctors seeng more patients.

(E) that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending==>spending is coming in the parallel list hence wrong.
_________________

When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...

learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-analytical-writing-assessment

Director
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 666
Location: Bangalore, India
Re: Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2013, 10:48
venkat18290 wrote:
Correct me if i am wrong ?

Yeah..actually "imposing" would correctly modify "lower-end insurance plans" in A.

In A, the grammatical parallelism is between "are" and "spend": These are the only two "verbs" in A and since they are connected by "and", the structure of A is:

...union members are ....and spend less time with each.

So, A seems to suggest that union members spend less time with each!!

The intent is obviously that doctors spend less time with each patient.
_________________

Thanks,
Ashish (GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle)
http://www.EducationAisle.com

Sentence Correction Nirvana available at Amazon.in and Flipkart

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi.com

Manager
Joined: 24 May 2013
Posts: 86
Re: Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2013, 23:02
tenaman10 wrote:
Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than nonunion members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend less time with each.
(A) imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend
(B) imposing stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending
(C) that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients, and spend
(D) that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending
(E) that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending

Here usage of "that " is clear. So a and b out.
Now consider all the parallel elements:
Lower end insurance plans that imposing stricter limits on medical services ( impose in place of imposing )
Lower end insurance plans that requiring doctors to see more patients ( require in place of requiring)
Lower end insurance plans that spend less time with each. ( doesn't sounds good as rest two items used words like require and impose. Spend doesn't match with them. So it is not the part of list.)

Open for further discussion.
Intern
Joined: 07 Jul 2013
Posts: 7
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39
Re: Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Aug 2013, 08:51
tenaman10 wrote:
Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than nonunion members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend less time with each.
(A) imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend
(B) imposing stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending
(C) that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients, and spend
(D) that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending
(E) that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending

A The absence of relative pronoun that in the original sentence leads to the meaning that union members are less likely to be enrolled in insurance plans while imposing stricter limits and requiring doctors to see. Insurance plans and not union members impose stricter limits.
B Same
C The and spend part in the end suggests that it is insurance plans and not doctors who spend less time with each patient
D Correct. The relative pronoun that clearly conveys that insurance plans impose stricter limits and require doctors to see more patients. Use of ing form instead of complete verb leaves no doubt that doctors see more patients thereby spending less time with each
E and spending suggest that insurance plans and not doctors spend less time with each patient
Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 148
Re: Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2013, 06:13
tenaman10 wrote:
Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than nonunion members to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend less time with each.
(A) imposing stricter limits on medical services and requiring doctors to see more patients, and spend
(B) imposing stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients, and spending
(C) that impose stricter limits on medical services, require doctors to see more patients, and spend
(D) that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending
(E) that impose stricter limits on medical services, requiring doctors to see more patients and spending

I got directly to A and B.

What i really felt is that since, union members are less likely than non-unions member to be enrolled in lower-end insurance plans, then what will happen...
If they are not taking the insurance plans, they will take medical expenses at their own , so they have to limit the medical services as they are not covered by lower-end insurance plans... So that got me directly A and B..

Thanks,
Jai
_________________

MODULUS Concept ---> http://gmatclub.com/forum/inequalities-158054.html#p1257636
HEXAGON Theory ---> http://gmatclub.com/forum/hexagon-theory-tips-to-solve-any-heaxgon-question-158189.html#p1258308

Senior Manager
Status: Student
Joined: 26 Aug 2013
Posts: 256
Location: France
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: EMLYON FT'16
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
GPA: 3.44
Re: Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2014, 06:20
Hi,

this is indeed a bad question because you have not put the right answer choices.

Answer D is that impose stricter limits on medical services and require doctors to see more patients, spending

You have to take off the AND!

HIH
_________________

Think outside the box

Manager
Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 152
Concentration: Finance, Finance
Re: Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Oct 2014, 11:22
My doubt in question answer about the use of Comma+ verb ing
So far we know comma+verb ing refers to preceding clause or sub of preceding clause.

But here "spending" refers to "Doctors" which is not the subject of preceding clause.
In exam time only depending on that issue I may eliminate the right choice D.
Need expert help
Re: Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than non union   [#permalink] 05 Oct 2014, 11:22

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 74 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely 0 25 Aug 2015, 06:31
2 Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely 0 08 Jan 2015, 10:32
Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than 0 23 Mar 2016, 20:30
Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than 0 08 Jan 2015, 12:52
Among lower-paid workers, union members are less likely than 0 05 Oct 2014, 11:22
Display posts from previous: Sort by