GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 17 Nov 2018, 01:36

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in November
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
28293031123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829301
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### FREE Quant Workshop by e-GMAT!

November 18, 2018

November 18, 2018

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score. November 18th, 7 AM PST
• ### How to QUICKLY Solve GMAT Questions - GMAT Club Chat

November 20, 2018

November 20, 2018

09:00 AM PST

10:00 AM PST

The reward for signing up with the registration form and attending the chat is: 6 free examPAL quizzes to practice your new skills after the chat.

# An amendment to section 362-SC-Economist GMAT Tutor

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2016
Posts: 54
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Schools: AGSM '20 (A)
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
GPA: 3.5
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
An amendment to section 362-SC-Economist GMAT Tutor  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 26 Dec 2016, 10:57
21
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

31% (01:10) correct 69% (01:12) wrong based on 568 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

An amendment to section 362 of the Veterans' Benefits Amendments of 1989 authorizes a clothing allowance for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing.

A) for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

B) for certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

C) to certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

D) for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

E) to certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

Originally posted by dnalost on 25 Dec 2016, 22:37.
Last edited by Vyshak on 26 Dec 2016, 10:57, edited 1 time in total.
Replaced 'which' with 'that'
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4488
Re: An amendment to section 362-SC-Economist GMAT Tutor  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2016, 18:48
6
4
dnalost wrote:
An amendment to section 362 of the Veterans' Benefits Amendments of 1989 authorizes a clothing allowance for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing.

A) for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

B) for certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

C) to certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

D) for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

E) to certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

Dear dnalost,

I'm happy to help.

This MGMAT question, like many others, is a very good one. MGMAT has high quality questions.

This one explores a couple idioms. The first is what we do to clothing. Tearing clothes is a form of damage. Wearing clothes is not a form of damage, so "wear or tear clothing" sound odd: the two verbs are not logically in parallel. Wearing out is another form of damage, so "wear out or tear clothing" is a valid logical parallel construction. (A) & (B) & (E) are out. Remember: parallelism is NOT a grammatical construction; instead, parallelism is a logical construction, and the grammar reflects the logical relationships. Logic is always primary in GMAT SC.

The other is quite specific. To authorize X for [somebody]. The preposition "to" is idiomatically incorrect in this unique construction. The only possible answer is (D).

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

##### General Discussion
SVP
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 1880
Re: An amendment to section 362-SC-Economist GMAT Tutor  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2016, 01:53
mikemcgarry wrote:
dnalost wrote:
An amendment to section 362 of the Veterans' Benefits Amendments of 1989 authorizes a clothing allowance for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing.

A) for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

B) for certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

C) to certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

D) for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

E) to certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

Dear dnalost,

I'm happy to help.

This MGMAT question, like many others, is a very good one. MGMAT has high quality questions.

This one explores a couple idioms. The first is what we do to clothing. Tearing clothes is a form of damage. Wearing clothes is not a form of damage, so "wear or tear clothing" sound odd: the two verbs are not logically in parallel. Wearing out is another form of damage, so "wear out or tear clothing" is a valid logical parallel construction. (A) & (B) & (E) are out. Remember: parallelism is NOT a grammatical construction; instead, parallelism is a logical construction, and the grammar reflects the logical relationships. Logic is always primary in GMAT SC.

The other is quite specific. To authorize X for [somebody]. The preposition "to" is idiomatically incorrect in this unique construction. The only possible answer is (D).

Does all this make sense?
Mike

Hi Mike,

Just a quick correction. The source is Economist not MGMAT.

https://gmat.economist.com/gmat-practic ... structions
Manager
Status: Preparing for GMAT!!
Joined: 11 Oct 2015
Posts: 134
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, International Business
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.1
WE: General Management (Entertainment and Sports)
Re: An amendment to section 362-SC-Economist GMAT Tutor  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2016, 03:26
2
dnalost wrote:
An amendment to section 362 of the Veterans' Benefits Amendments of 1989 authorizes a clothing allowance for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing.

A) for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

B) for certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

C) to certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

D) for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

E) to certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

devices wear or tear clothing --> devices wear clothing? Funny A, B, E can be eliminated.
D -> using is perfectly modifying veterans, nothing wrong.. I'll stick to it as I'm confused between to and for but still 'for' sounds right.

mikemcgarry can you please explain the usage of for and to again for me? :D

_________________

Yours,
Siva Rama Krishna Meka

Director
Joined: 27 May 2012
Posts: 609
Re: An amendment to section 362-SC-Economist GMAT Tutor  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Sep 2017, 05:19
1
mikemcgarry wrote:
dnalost wrote:
An amendment to section 362 of the Veterans' Benefits Amendments of 1989 authorizes a clothing allowance for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing.

A) for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

B) for certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

C) to certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

D) for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

E) to certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

Dear dnalost,

I'm happy to help.

This MGMAT question, like many others, is a very good one. MGMAT has high quality questions.

This one explores a couple idioms. The first is what we do to clothing. Tearing clothes is a form of damage. Wearing clothes is not a form of damage, so "wear or tear clothing" sound odd: the two verbs are not logically in parallel. Wearing out is another form of damage, so "wear out or tear clothing" is a valid logical parallel construction. (A) & (B) & (E) are out. Remember: parallelism is NOT a grammatical construction; instead, parallelism is a logical construction, and the grammar reflects the logical relationships. Logic is always primary in GMAT SC.

The other is quite specific. To authorize X for [somebody]. The preposition "to" is idiomatically incorrect in this unique construction. The only possible answer is (D).

Does all this make sense?
Mike

Dear Mike,
Thank you for the explanation.

How would one decide between these two options if present.

for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing
for certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

Thank you.
_________________

- Stne

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4488
Re: An amendment to section 362-SC-Economist GMAT Tutor  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Sep 2017, 10:06
2
stne wrote:
Dear Mike,
Thank you for the explanation.

How would one decide between these two options if present.

for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing
for certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

Thank you.

Dear stne,

I'm happy to respond.

My friend, both of those are 100% fine. The GMAT SC would NOT expect you to choose between two alternate correct answers.

Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Director
Joined: 27 May 2012
Posts: 609
Re: An amendment to section 362-SC-Economist GMAT Tutor  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Sep 2017, 04:11
1
mikemcgarry wrote:
stne wrote:
Dear Mike,
Thank you for the explanation.

How would one decide between these two options if present.

for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing
for certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

Thank you.

Dear stne,

I'm happy to respond.

My friend, both of those are 100% fine. The GMAT SC would NOT expect you to choose between two alternate correct answers.

Mike

Thank you so much Mike +1, Sorry for the delayed response.
I Always learn something more, from your responses.
_________________

- Stne

Manager
Joined: 17 Feb 2016
Posts: 93
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V36
GPA: 3.12
WE: Education (Internet and New Media)
Re: An amendment to section 362-SC-Economist GMAT Tutor  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Sep 2017, 07:03
Choice is between for and to
Allowance for someone is better than allowance to someone
So B, E gone

Among A,C,D choice is between using, who use and wear, wear out

An amendment authorizes a clothing allowance for a certain veterans
*Here the allowance to particular veterans is already filtered

Who use prosthetic...
Using prosthetic...

Allowance for X who Y
Allowance for X using Y

Second is more preferable as it tells how allowance is provided to those veterans

Wear and tear clothing
Wear out and tear clothing

First choice distorts the meaning slightly as wear and tear clothing as a type of clothing

Option D

Please correct me if I am wrong

Sent from my Nexus 5 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
_________________

Never stop fighting until you arrive at your destined place - that is, the unique you. Have an aim in life, continuously acquire knowledge, work hard, and have the perseverance to realise the great life. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam

Intern
Joined: 02 Dec 2012
Posts: 22
Schools: Mannheim"19
GMAT 1: 600 Q47 V24
GPA: 3.5
Re: An amendment to section 362-SC-Economist GMAT Tutor  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2018, 01:30
C) to certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

D) for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing
between "C" & "D"- I chose "D" because in "C" use of "who" seems redundant. "certain" is already modifying veterans and we do not need "who".
Re: An amendment to section 362-SC-Economist GMAT Tutor &nbs [#permalink] 19 Oct 2018, 01:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# An amendment to section 362-SC-Economist GMAT Tutor

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.