It is currently 24 Nov 2017, 00:50

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

An amendment to section 362-SC-Economist GMAT Tutor

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Jul 2016
Posts: 57

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 17

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Schools: AGSM '20 (A)
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
GPA: 3.5
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
An amendment to section 362-SC-Economist GMAT Tutor [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Dec 2016, 23:37
8
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

30% (01:04) correct 70% (01:12) wrong based on 375 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

An amendment to section 362 of the Veterans' Benefits Amendments of 1989 authorizes a clothing allowance for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing.

A) for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

B) for certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

C) to certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

D) for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

E) to certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by Vyshak on 26 Dec 2016, 11:57, edited 1 time in total.
Replaced 'which' with 'that'

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 17

Expert Post
4 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4503

Kudos [?]: 8789 [4], given: 106

Re: An amendment to section 362-SC-Economist GMAT Tutor [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Dec 2016, 19:48
4
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
dnalost wrote:
An amendment to section 362 of the Veterans' Benefits Amendments of 1989 authorizes a clothing allowance for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing.

A) for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

B) for certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

C) to certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

D) for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

E) to certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

Dear dnalost,

I'm happy to help. :-)

This MGMAT question, like many others, is a very good one. MGMAT has high quality questions.

This one explores a couple idioms. The first is what we do to clothing. Tearing clothes is a form of damage. Wearing clothes is not a form of damage, so "wear or tear clothing" sound odd: the two verbs are not logically in parallel. Wearing out is another form of damage, so "wear out or tear clothing" is a valid logical parallel construction. (A) & (B) & (E) are out. Remember: parallelism is NOT a grammatical construction; instead, parallelism is a logical construction, and the grammar reflects the logical relationships. Logic is always primary in GMAT SC.

The other is quite specific. To authorize X for [somebody]. The preposition "to" is idiomatically incorrect in this unique construction. The only possible answer is (D).

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Kudos [?]: 8789 [4], given: 106

VP
VP
avatar
P
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 1285

Kudos [?]: 298 [0], given: 165

Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: An amendment to section 362-SC-Economist GMAT Tutor [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2016, 02:53
mikemcgarry wrote:
dnalost wrote:
An amendment to section 362 of the Veterans' Benefits Amendments of 1989 authorizes a clothing allowance for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing.

A) for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

B) for certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

C) to certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

D) for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

E) to certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

Dear dnalost,

I'm happy to help. :-)

This MGMAT question, like many others, is a very good one. MGMAT has high quality questions.

This one explores a couple idioms. The first is what we do to clothing. Tearing clothes is a form of damage. Wearing clothes is not a form of damage, so "wear or tear clothing" sound odd: the two verbs are not logically in parallel. Wearing out is another form of damage, so "wear out or tear clothing" is a valid logical parallel construction. (A) & (B) & (E) are out. Remember: parallelism is NOT a grammatical construction; instead, parallelism is a logical construction, and the grammar reflects the logical relationships. Logic is always primary in GMAT SC.

The other is quite specific. To authorize X for [somebody]. The preposition "to" is idiomatically incorrect in this unique construction. The only possible answer is (D).

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)



Hi Mike,

Just a quick correction. The source is Economist not MGMAT.

https://gmat.economist.com/gmat-practic ... structions

Kudos [?]: 298 [0], given: 165

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Status: Preparing for GMAT!!
Joined: 11 Oct 2015
Posts: 134

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 110

Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, International Business
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.1
WE: General Management (Entertainment and Sports)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: An amendment to section 362-SC-Economist GMAT Tutor [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2016, 04:26
dnalost wrote:
An amendment to section 362 of the Veterans' Benefits Amendments of 1989 authorizes a clothing allowance for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing.

A) for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

B) for certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

C) to certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

D) for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

E) to certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing


devices wear or tear clothing --> devices wear clothing? Funny :P A, B, E can be eliminated.
D -> using is perfectly modifying veterans, nothing wrong.. I'll stick to it as I'm confused between to and for but still 'for' sounds right.

mikemcgarry can you please explain the usage of for and to again for me? :D

Thanks in advance :)
_________________

Yours,
Siva Rama Krishna Meka :)

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 110

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 27 May 2012
Posts: 420

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 485

Premium Member
Re: An amendment to section 362-SC-Economist GMAT Tutor [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Sep 2017, 06:19
mikemcgarry wrote:
dnalost wrote:
An amendment to section 362 of the Veterans' Benefits Amendments of 1989 authorizes a clothing allowance for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing.

A) for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

B) for certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

C) to certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

D) for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

E) to certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear or tear clothing

Dear dnalost,

I'm happy to help. :-)

This MGMAT question, like many others, is a very good one. MGMAT has high quality questions.

This one explores a couple idioms. The first is what we do to clothing. Tearing clothes is a form of damage. Wearing clothes is not a form of damage, so "wear or tear clothing" sound odd: the two verbs are not logically in parallel. Wearing out is another form of damage, so "wear out or tear clothing" is a valid logical parallel construction. (A) & (B) & (E) are out. Remember: parallelism is NOT a grammatical construction; instead, parallelism is a logical construction, and the grammar reflects the logical relationships. Logic is always primary in GMAT SC.

The other is quite specific. To authorize X for [somebody]. The preposition "to" is idiomatically incorrect in this unique construction. The only possible answer is (D).

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)


Dear Mike,
Thank you for the explanation.

How would one decide between these two options if present.

for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing
for certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing


Thank you.
_________________

- Stne

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 485

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4503

Kudos [?]: 8789 [1], given: 106

Re: An amendment to section 362-SC-Economist GMAT Tutor [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Sep 2017, 11:06
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
stne wrote:
Dear Mike,
Thank you for the explanation.

How would one decide between these two options if present.

for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing
for certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

Thank you.

Dear stne,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

My friend, both of those are 100% fine. The GMAT SC would NOT expect you to choose between two alternate correct answers.

Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Kudos [?]: 8789 [1], given: 106

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 27 May 2012
Posts: 420

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 485

Premium Member
Re: An amendment to section 362-SC-Economist GMAT Tutor [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2017, 05:11
mikemcgarry wrote:
stne wrote:
Dear Mike,
Thank you for the explanation.

How would one decide between these two options if present.

for certain veterans using prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing
for certain veterans who use prosthetic or orthopedic devices that wear out or tear clothing

Thank you.

Dear stne,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

My friend, both of those are 100% fine. The GMAT SC would NOT expect you to choose between two alternate correct answers.

Mike :-)


Thank you so much Mike +1, Sorry for the delayed response.
I Always learn something more, from your responses.
_________________

- Stne

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 485

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 17 Feb 2016
Posts: 106

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 59

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V36
GPA: 3.12
WE: Education (Internet and New Media)
Reviews Badge
Re: An amendment to section 362-SC-Economist GMAT Tutor [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2017, 08:03
Choice is between for and to
Allowance for someone is better than allowance to someone
So B, E gone

Among A,C,D choice is between using, who use and wear, wear out

An amendment authorizes a clothing allowance for a certain veterans
*Here the allowance to particular veterans is already filtered

Who use prosthetic...
Using prosthetic...

Allowance for X who Y
Allowance for X using Y

Second is more preferable as it tells how allowance is provided to those veterans

Wear and tear clothing
Wear out and tear clothing

First choice distorts the meaning slightly as wear and tear clothing as a type of clothing

Option D

Please correct me if I am wrong

Sent from my Nexus 5 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
_________________

Never stop fighting until you arrive at your destined place - that is, the unique you. Have an aim in life, continuously acquire knowledge, work hard, and have the perseverance to realise the great life. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 59

Re: An amendment to section 362-SC-Economist GMAT Tutor   [#permalink] 13 Sep 2017, 08:03
Display posts from previous: Sort by

An amendment to section 362-SC-Economist GMAT Tutor

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.