GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 22 Jun 2018, 21:07

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Target MBA
Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 165
Location: Singapore
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Oct 2011, 07:09
prakhag wrote:
I thought B strengthens rather than weakens the critics' argument!

If a single person has been able to decipher in the past, that means he was working without any dependancies. Now the critics point out that because there will be dependancies in case of deciphering 5 tablets, if any one/two/three/four/all university(ies) guard(s) part of deciphered result then other universities are bound to be affected because of the "missing link" in the code.

Please let me know what am I missing here?


What we need to weaken - "this prevention of scholars building on each others' work will result in the script never being deciphered."
B weakens because it tells previous success stories of working alone and yet deciphering the script.
Hence, even if students work individually, chance are that one of them will decipher the script.
_________________

Thanks and Regards,
GM.

BSchool Forum Moderator
avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 777
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Nov 2011, 00:42
Quote:
An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities unearthed five stone tablets incised with an undeciphered ancient script. The universities agreed that each would take one tablet to decipher. Because of the prestige involved for the university that cracks the script, critics of current academic practices fear that the universities will jealously guard their scholars' work until decipherment is complete, and this prevention of scholars building on each others' work will result in the script never being deciphered.


Premise 1: 5 Us sponsored 1 archaeological dig and found 5 stone tablets that were not deciphered before

Premise 2: Each U take 1 tablet. Who crack the script will be honored

Conclusions: U will guard their scholars' work => prevent the scholars building on each others' work from deciphering

Which of the following, if true, would tend to weaken most seriously the critics' argument?

-Without healthy competition, the intellectual life of the university stagnates and research loses forward momentum. => Strengthen one
-The decipherment of other ancient scripts has generally been the work of a single person working alone. => Contender
-Universities will give substantial funding to projects they consider prestigious. => irrelevant
-A university atmosphere generally provides an open forum for the exchange of ideas, which enhances the growth of intellectual projects. => Contender
-When deciphering a code, the military always works in secrecy to prevent any leaks to the enemy that will warn them to change their code. => military will protect the work within the country from enemy. If 5 University located in 1 country, this one is not strength to attack conclusion

Between B and D, I chose B because I think that D is normal atmosphere, but now the 5 tablets is the most secret in history of archaeology that will make the prestige for one school and create the competitive atmosphere.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: D-Day is on February 10th. and I am not stressed
Affiliations: American Management association, American Association of financial accountants
Joined: 12 Apr 2011
Posts: 208
Location: Kuwait
Schools: Columbia university
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Nov 2011, 10:06
I am sad, I picked D :(
_________________

Sky is the limit

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 293
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Nov 2013, 09:27
The OA is B guys.... E is a trap. It was actually an easy question.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1881
Concentration: Finance
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jan 2014, 10:13
hemanthp wrote:
An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities unearthed five stone tablets incised with an undeciphered ancient script. The universities agreed that each would take one tablet to decipher. Because of the prestige involved for the university that cracks the script, critics of current academic practices fear that the universities will jealously guard their scholars' work until decipherment is complete, and this prevention of scholars building on each others' work will result in the script never being deciphered.

Which of the following, if true, would tend to weaken most seriously the critics' argument?

-Without healthy competition, the intellectual life of the university stagnates and research loses forward momentum.
-The decipherment of other ancient scripts has generally been the work of a single person working alone.
-Universities will give substantial funding to projects they consider prestigious.
-A university atmosphere generally provides an open forum for the exchange of ideas, which enhances the growth of intellectual projects.
-When deciphering a code, the military always works in secrecy to prevent any leaks to the enemy that will warn them to change their code.

Don't forget KUDOS if you like the question. This is from KAPLAN CAT.


I'm going with B on this one because we are told that the universities will prevent scholars building on others' work and that in turn will make the script unable to be deciphered.

Answer choice B says that the decipherment is often a work of a single person. Therefore, this clearly weakens the argument because there's no reason to believe that scholars will be prevented to build on others' work since they don't usually need to rely on them to decipher a script.

Hope its clear

Cheers!
J :)
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2013
Posts: 160
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Feb 2014, 04:42
I chose D. but none seemed good to me. My doubt with B is how is it relevant to this particular deciphering in question? 5 different tablets are with 5 different universities. "Each would take one tablet to decipher" I understood this as each univ deciphers one tablet and collaboration is needed to decipher the whole, so single person deciphering this particular puzzle didn't make sense. Did I miss anything?
_________________

Click on Kudos if you liked the post!

Practice makes Perfect.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2014
Posts: 59
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Feb 2014, 07:31
gmatprav wrote:
I chose D. but none seemed good to me. My doubt with B is how is it relevant to this particular deciphering in question? 5 different tablets are with 5 different universities. "Each would take one tablet to decipher" I understood this as each univ deciphers one tablet and collaboration is needed to decipher the whole, so single person deciphering this particular puzzle didn't make sense. Did I miss anything?


and this prevention of scholars building on each others' work will result in the script never being deciphered.

B seems fit that.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2013
Posts: 160
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Feb 2014, 00:36
Can you please elaborate? I didn't understand.
samsmalldog wrote:

and this prevention of scholars building on each others' work will result in the script never being deciphered.

B seems fit that.

_________________

Click on Kudos if you liked the post!

Practice makes Perfect.

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2014
Posts: 59
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Feb 2014, 18:37
2
gmatprav wrote:
Can you please elaborate? I didn't understand.
samsmalldog wrote:

and this prevention of scholars building on each others' work will result in the script never being deciphered.

B seems fit that.



Background:An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities unearthed five stone tablets incised with an undeciphered ancient script. The universities agreed that each would take one tablet to decipher.

Premise:Because of the prestige involved for the university that cracks the script, critics of current academic practices fear that the universities will jealously guard their scholars' work until decipherment is complete,

Conclusion:and this prevention of scholars building on each others' work will result in the script never being deciphered.

The answer would weaken the critics' argument, so if the answer attack or weaken the main conclusion, choose it.

The red part is the main point of the conclusion:prevent working with each other will result that the work will never finished. i,e, work alone --> never deciphered.

B.The decipherment of other ancient scripts has generally been the work of a single person working alone.
This answer hits the point, "generally" told us that it's usual to work alone in decipherment, like there is one teacher teaching in the class and it works,, this answer actually weaken the conclusion

D.A university atmosphere generally provides an open forum for the exchange of ideas, which enhances the growth of intellectual projects.
irrelevent, told us nothing about work alone and decipherment

NEVER EVER attack background information, In weaken question we must focus on the MAIN CONCLUSION. or you will go too far.

hope it helps,

Jack.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2013
Posts: 82
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GPA: 3.62
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jun 2014, 19:18
D is talking about the atmosphere within a university not between universities. So D is limited in scope to weaken the conclusion.

B is a little out of scope because it may not 100% true for this particular case.

But between the two D is anyways disqualified because of the above reasons
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 399
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jun 2014, 22:48
samsmalldog wrote:
gmatprav wrote:
Can you please elaborate? I didn't understand.


Background:An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities unearthed five stone tablets incised with an undeciphered ancient script. The universities agreed that each would take one tablet to decipher.

Premise:Because of the prestige involved for the university that cracks the script, critics of current academic practices fear that the universities will jealously guard their scholars' work until decipherment is complete,

Conclusion:and this prevention of scholars building on each others' work will result in the script never being deciphered.

The answer would weaken the critics' argument, so if the answer attack or weaken the main conclusion, choose it.

The red part is the main point of the conclusion:prevent working with each other will result that the work will never finished. i,e, work alone --> never deciphered.

B.The decipherment of other ancient scripts has generally been the work of a single person working alone.
This answer hits the point, "generally" told us that it's usual to work alone in decipherment, like there is one teacher teaching in the class and it works,, this answer actually weaken the conclusion

D.A university atmosphere generally provides an open forum for the exchange of ideas, which enhances the growth of intellectual projects.
irrelevent, told us nothing about work alone and decipherment

NEVER EVER attack background information, In weaken question we must focus on the MAIN CONCLUSION. or you will go too far.

hope it helps,

Jack.

My issue is that B claims that someone, working alone can figure it out.
The problem here is that the tablets were split five-ways, so when one person working alone can descypher, he would have access to all tablets, which is not the case here...
Can someone help me with this?
2 KUDOS received
BSchool Forum Moderator
avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 777
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jul 2014, 07:40
2
This is my new project: Renew Old Thread => Back to basic => Just try It and give your reasoning


An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities unearthed five stone tablets incised with an undeciphered ancient script. The universities agreed that each would take one tablet to decipher. Because of the prestige involved for the university that cracks the script, critics of current academic practices fear that the universities will jealously guard their scholars' work until decipherment is complete, and this prevention of scholars building on each others' work will result in the script never being deciphered.

Which of the following, if true, would tend to weaken most seriously the critics' argument?

A, Without healthy competition, the intellectual life of the university stagnates and research loses forward momentum.
B, The decipherment of other ancient scripts has generally been the work of a single person working alone.
C, Universities will give substantial funding to projects they consider prestigious.
D, A university atmosphere generally provides an open forum for the exchange of ideas, which enhances the growth of intellectual projects.
E, When deciphering a code, the military always works in secrecy to prevent any leaks to the enemy that will warn them to change their code.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2013
Posts: 90
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jul 2014, 04:00
This is not to counter anyone's claims, but does renewing the threads erase what experts and members had posted that time.
If yes, then I guess that might hurt the forum.

Specifically, I did this question wrong and now am looking here and there to just find a descent explanation !
_________________

Best
MKS
Appreciate it with Kudos !! :)

Expert Post
MBA Section Director
User avatar
V
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 5181
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jul 2014, 08:03
MKS wrote:
This is not to counter anyone's claims, but does renewing the threads erase what experts and members had posted that time.
If yes, then I guess that might hurt the forum.

Specifically, I did this question wrong and now am looking here and there to just find a descent explanation !


Hi. The old threads with explanations are still on the forum

an-archaeological-dig-sponsored-by-five-universities-118026.html?fl=similar
an-archaeological-dig-sponsored-by-five-universities-102069.html?fl=similar

This is just to encourage people solving questions on a random basis (also questions are selected on how difficult/popular they were)
_________________

Have an MBA application Question? ASK ME ANYTHING!

My Stuff: Four Years to 760 | MBA Trends for Indian Applicants

My GMAT Resources
V30-V40: How to do it! | GMATPrep SC | GMATPrep CR | GMATPrep RC | Critical Reasoning Megathread | CR: Numbers and Statistics | CR: Weaken | CR: Strengthen | CR: Assumption | SC: Modifier | SC: Meaning | SC: SV Agreement | RC: Primary Purpose | PS/DS: Numbers and Inequalities | PS/DS: Combinatorics and Coordinates

My MBA Resources
Everything about the MBA Application | Over-Represented MBA woes | Fit Vs Rankings | Low GPA: What you can do | Letter of Recommendation: The Guide | Indian B Schools accepting GMAT score | Why MBA?

My Reviews
Veritas Prep Live Online

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 399
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2014, 14:41
ronr34 wrote:
samsmalldog wrote:
gmatprav wrote:
Can you please elaborate? I didn't understand.


Background:An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities unearthed five stone tablets incised with an undeciphered ancient script. The universities agreed that each would take one tablet to decipher.

Premise:Because of the prestige involved for the university that cracks the script, critics of current academic practices fear that the universities will jealously guard their scholars' work until decipherment is complete,

Conclusion:and this prevention of scholars building on each others' work will result in the script never being deciphered.

The answer would weaken the critics' argument, so if the answer attack or weaken the main conclusion, choose it.

The red part is the main point of the conclusion:prevent working with each other will result that the work will never finished. i,e, work alone --> never deciphered.

B.The decipherment of other ancient scripts has generally been the work of a single person working alone.
This answer hits the point, "generally" told us that it's usual to work alone in decipherment, like there is one teacher teaching in the class and it works,, this answer actually weaken the conclusion

D.A university atmosphere generally provides an open forum for the exchange of ideas, which enhances the growth of intellectual projects.
irrelevent, told us nothing about work alone and decipherment

NEVER EVER attack background information, In weaken question we must focus on the MAIN CONCLUSION. or you will go too far.

hope it helps,

Jack.

My issue is that B claims that someone, working alone can figure it out.
The problem here is that the tablets were split five-ways, so when one person working alone can descypher, he would have access to all tablets, which is not the case here...
Can someone help me with this?

Bumping.....
Can someone address my doubts?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 22 Sep 2014
Posts: 1
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Sep 2014, 13:32
My understanding of why B is wrong. Can anyone, please, clarify this for me?

B: states that the decipher of scripts (scripts=a whole script) is done by a single person, alone. The Universities have taken different stones of a single script. This means that the Universities need to come together to form one whole team of 1 (the equivalent of a single person), which is not being done.

For this reason I believe B is wrong.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 May 2014
Posts: 91
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
Schools: HKUST '15, ISB '15
GMAT Date: 12-26-2014
GPA: 3
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2014, 02:09
profeta305 wrote:
My understanding of why B is wrong. Can anyone, please, clarify this for me?

B: states that the decipher of scripts (scripts=a whole script) is done by a single person, alone. The Universities have taken different stones of a single script. This means that the Universities need to come together to form one whole team of 1 (the equivalent of a single person), which is not being done.

For this reason I believe B is wrong.

The argument :
An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities unearthed five stone tablets incised with an undecipherable ancient script. The universities agreed that each would take one tablet to decipher. Because of the prestige involved for the university that cracks the script, critics of current academic practices fear that the universities will jealously guard their scholars' work until decipherment is complete, and this prevention of scholars building on each others' work will result in the script never being deciphered.

Five stone tablets are found and all are incised with an undeciphered ancient script.It is NO WHERE written that all these tablets are a part of a big tablet and all need to be put together to get it deciphered.
I think you are watching too much of TOMB RAIDER movies :lol: Consider these tablets as some ancient coins with some symbols on it and symbols are independent and standalone.
_________________

Success has been and continues to be defined as Getting up one more time than you have been knocked down.

Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 13 Dec 2016
Posts: 44
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jan 2017, 08:26
I was successful in eliminating options A, C and D and was struggling to choose between B and E. I felt that both were equal contenders but finally swayed towards option E because of the word 'generally' that I saw in Option B.

Seeking guidance on how I should have weighed option B over E.
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 701
Premium Member
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Aug 2017, 06:48
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
_________________

Please Read: Verbal Posting Rules

Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 27 Jan 2016
Posts: 147
Schools: ISB '18
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2017, 00:35
hemanthp wrote:
An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities unearthed five stone tablets incised with an undeciphered ancient script. The universities agreed that each would take one tablet to decipher. Because of the prestige involved for the university that cracks the script, critics of current academic practices fear that the universities will jealously guard their scholars' work until decipherment is complete, and this prevention of scholars building on each others' work will result in the script never being deciphered.

Which of the following, if true, would tend to weaken most seriously the critics' argument?

-Without healthy competition, the intellectual life of the university stagnates and research loses forward momentum.
-The decipherment of other ancient scripts has generally been the work of a single person working alone.
-Universities will give substantial funding to projects they consider prestigious.
-A university atmosphere generally provides an open forum for the exchange of ideas, which enhances the growth of intellectual projects.
-When deciphering a code, the military always works in secrecy to prevent any leaks to the enemy that will warn them to change their code.

Don't forget KUDOS if you like the question. This is from KAPLAN CAT.


mikemcgarry - I am confused between A & B. Can you pls explain why A is incorrect.
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities   [#permalink] 01 Sep 2017, 00:35

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 40 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.