GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Jun 2018, 15:25

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

7 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Keep fighting!
Affiliations: IIT Madras
Joined: 31 Jul 2010
Posts: 215
WE 1: 2+ years - Programming
WE 2: 3+ years - Product developement,
WE 3: 2+ years - Program management
An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 01 Sep 2017, 02:24
7
6
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

53% (01:30) correct 47% (01:38) wrong based on 693 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities unearthed five stone tablets incised with an undeciphered ancient script. The universities agreed that each would take one tablet to decipher. Because of the prestige involved for the university that cracks the script, critics of current academic practices fear that the universities will jealously guard their scholars' work until decipherment is complete, and this prevention of scholars building on each others' work will result in the script never being deciphered.

Which of the following, if true, would tend to weaken most seriously the critics' argument?

A. Without healthy competition, the intellectual life of the university stagnates and research loses forward momentum.

B. The decipherment of other ancient scripts has generally been the work of a single person working alone.

C. Universities will give substantial funding to projects they consider prestigious.

D. A university atmosphere generally provides an open forum for the exchange of ideas, which enhances the growth of intellectual projects.

E. When deciphering a code, the military always works in secrecy to prevent any leaks to the enemy that will warn them to change their code.

Don't forget KUDOS if you like the question. This is from KAPLAN CAT.

Originally posted by hemanthp on 02 Oct 2010, 09:21.
Last edited by broall on 01 Sep 2017, 02:24, edited 1 time in total.
Reformatted question
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesJamboree Discount CodesMagoosh Discount Codes
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Time to step up the tempo
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 385
Location: Milky way
Schools: ISB, Tepper - CMU, Chicago Booth, LSB
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2010, 10:35
hemanthp wrote:
An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities unearthed five stone tablets incised with an undeciphered ancient script. The universities agreed that each would take one tablet to decipher. Because of the prestige involved for the university that cracks the script, critics of current academic practices fear that the universities will jealously guard their scholars' work until decipherment is complete, and this prevention of scholars building on each others' work will result in the script never being deciphered.

Which of the following, if true, would tend to weaken most seriously the critics' argument?

-Without healthy competition, the intellectual life of the university stagnates and research loses forward momentum.
Not relevant.
-The decipherment of other ancient scripts has generally been the work of a single person working alone.
Seriously weakens. If the job can be done by a single person alone then there would be no need to work/share the knowledge.
-Universities will give substantial funding to projects they consider prestigious.
Not relevant.
-A university atmosphere generally provides an open forum for the exchange of ideas, which enhances the growth of intellectual projects.
Real world plausible option. However not relevant in the current context.
-When deciphering a code, the military always works in secrecy to prevent any leaks to the enemy that will warn them to change their code.
Seriously irrelevant.
Don't forget KUDOS if you like the question. This is from KAPLAN CAT.



I have a question here. Can we say that option D resembles a shell game?
_________________

:good Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog :thanks

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Keep fighting!
Affiliations: IIT Madras
Joined: 31 Jul 2010
Posts: 215
WE 1: 2+ years - Programming
WE 2: 3+ years - Product developement,
WE 3: 2+ years - Program management
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2010, 17:23
What is a Shell Game? Looks like the answer but isn't? I picked that.
Moderator
User avatar
Status: battlecruiser, operational...
Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Posts: 949
Schools: Carey '16
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2010, 19:01
yeah what's a shell game. I picked D too. B seems out of the scope.
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Time to step up the tempo
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 385
Location: Milky way
Schools: ISB, Tepper - CMU, Chicago Booth, LSB
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2010, 19:24
1
For info about the shell game, please refer to this post.

http://gmatclub.com/forum/headache-cr-100776.html#p779517

I got the info about the shell game from suyashjhawar.


Quote:
The shell game is basically an idea or concept is raised in the stimulus, and then a very similar idea appears in the answer choice, but the idea is changed just enough to be incorrect but still attractive.


:-D :-D :-D

Shell game -- a coin is placed in one of the three shell and the shells are quickly shuffled and the participants are asked to bet on the shell wherein they think the coin is present.

See below.

Attachment:
shell_game.jpg
shell_game.jpg [ 5.77 KiB | Viewed 6096 times ]

_________________

:good Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog :thanks

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 161
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2010, 21:21
its B.
The stimulus says :
The script will never be deciphered because the universities wont share each others work.

To weaken this we can prove that to decipher the script they wont need any help.

Option B states that The decipherment of other ancient scripts has generally been the work of a single person working alone.

So this weakens the argument.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 22
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Apr 2011, 22:14
I am confused among A, B, and D.

According to me, the argument says that if the universities stop the collaborative work of the scholars on the script, the script wont decipher.


(A) Without healthy competition, the intellectual life of the university stagnates and research loses forward momentum. ( I thought this to be correct. if there is no competition among the universities than intellectual life and research are affected. so to gain an competitive edge universities are shielding their scholar)

(B) The decipherment of other ancient scripts has generally been the work of a single person working alone. (I thought this was incorrect. What may be true for other ancient scripts, may not be true of the current scripts)

(D) A university atmosphere generally provides an open forum for the exchange of ideas, which enhances the growth of intellectual projects. (I thought this was incorrect. "Generally" what may be true, may not true every time. Similar to B)
_________________

WAHEGURU JEE DA KHALSA, WAHEGURU JEE DE FATEH

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 May 2011
Posts: 224
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jul 2011, 14:31
1
An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities unearthed five stone tablets incised with an undeciphered ancient script. The universities agreed that each would take one tablet to decipher. Because of the prestige involved for the university that cracks the script, critics of current academic practices fear that the universities will jealously guard their scholars' work until decipherment is complete, and this prevention of scholars building on each others' work will result in the script never being deciphered.

Which of the following, if true, would tend to weaken most seriously the critics' argument?

Without healthy competition, the intellectual life of the university stagnates and research loses forward momentum.
The decipherment of other ancient scripts has generally been the work of a single person working alone.
Universities will give substantial funding to projects they consider prestigious.
A university atmosphere generally provides an open forum for the exchange of ideas, which enhances the growth of intellectual projects.
When deciphering a code, the military always works in secrecy to prevent any leaks to the enemy that will warn them to change their code.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Nov 2010
Posts: 184
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Ross '15, Duke '15
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jul 2011, 16:26
IMO B

Conclusion is - if scholars work in isolation then the code might not get cracked.

Without healthy competition, the intellectual life of the university stagnates and research loses forward momentum.
while healthy competition might be good it doesnot say whether healthy competition involves working in groups or in isolation
The decipherment of other ancient scripts has generally been the work of a single person working alone.if other scripts could be cracked by one person working in isolation then there should not be much concern about working in isolation this time. So this weakens the argument
Universities will give substantial funding to projects they consider prestigious. -- irrelevant
A university atmosphere generally provides an open forum for the exchange of ideas, which enhances the growth of intellectual projects.this just says that working in isolation within the university is hard. irrelevant
When deciphering a code, the military always works in secrecy to prevent any leaks to the enemy that will warn them to change their code. military works in isolation but the statement does not say whether that helps them to crack codes or if codes are often never cracked
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Posts: 78
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2011, 10:15
this question is kinda odd. i cant find the answer althought i understand what the text writes :(
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 577
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2011, 18:25
+1 for B.

The argument was clear, however I too found the choices a little abstract. What is the OA and OE?

Crick
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2011
Posts: 174
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2011, 23:56
i'll try A

The conclusion is that the tablets will never be deciphered

Premise: each university will guard its researcher's work until the other universities reveal their work. thereby causing a stalemate.

This would be weakened if we assume there is competition among them to show the others and the world the decoding the researchers have done so -far
That is if they try to show what they have done so -far other universities will be compelled to portray their own efforts to show they are good if not better from the previous university. thereby helping break the code.

B im skeptical because it says generally the researchers work alone. and we cannot conclude how the work will proceed when 5 different teams from 5 different universities are working seperately.

its possible that when one person had the entire tablet, he could understand the whole script and break the code.

What if the codes were inter-dependent. if ?University a guards its info, and the tablet univ B has is dependent on info of A,
It will never be able to decode its tablet and the chain goes on.... and the tablets will NEVER be decoded.

WEll atleast thats my understanding.. would love to know the OA - OE to analyze my understanding and assumptions
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Feb 2011
Posts: 251
Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: HBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V47
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2011, 00:14
1
Without healthy competition, the intellectual life of the university stagnates and research loses forward momentum.: Irrlevant, no one is talking about intellectual environment of the univeristy
The decipherment of other ancient scripts has generally been the work of a single person working alone. : The conclusion fears that the scholars alone and not building on each others' work will never be able to decipher. But this example directly contradicts by saying generally in past single scholars have been able to decipher to code.
Universities will give substantial funding to projects they consider prestigious.: Question of funding is not important here. Noone are we presented with any correlateion of successful decoding with the finding available
A university atmosphere generally provides an open forum for the exchange of ideas, which enhances the growth of intellectual projects. Here it is clearly stated in teh argument that university will jealously guard the work done on code - so it is unlikely that it will be dicussed in the 'open forum' university has! also, the exchange of ideas in such open forum might or might not be with other scholars who can provide any helpful insights!
When deciphering a code, the military always works in secrecy to prevent any leaks to the enemy that will warn them to change their code. This is irrelavant - military decosing a code is not similar to archaeologist scholars in purpose or in consequence. and the script cant be changed, while military code can be! no analogy.
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2010
Posts: 194
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2011, 03:56
B clearly weakens the argument because if one person alone can do it in the past then it is possible now also.
Retired Thread Master
User avatar
Status: How can I crack Verbal
Joined: 12 May 2011
Posts: 180
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V32
GPA: 3
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2011, 12:54
B?? they found 5 tablets..how can 1 person decipher the code if he/she doen't have the rest of the code?
Author also fears the same- will result in the script never being deciphered.- as people will not reveal what they decoded from the tablet they worked on..

OA pls.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 May 2011
Posts: 224
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Aug 2011, 12:25
If only one person does the work, then there is no question of collaboration and jealosy
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Status: Now or never
Joined: 07 Aug 2010
Posts: 324
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GPA: 3.5
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Premium Member
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Aug 2011, 03:26
What is the OA , I get B as wrong in my workbook
_________________

Please press KUDOS if you like my post

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Jul 2011
Posts: 101
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Oct 2011, 23:09
one more B !
please add OA :)
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Posts: 103
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Oct 2011, 01:28
I thought B strengthens rather than weakens the critics' argument!

If a single person has been able to decipher in the past, that means he was working without any dependancies. Now the critics point out that because there will be dependancies in case of deciphering 5 tablets, if any one/two/three/four/all university(ies) guard(s) part of deciphered result then other universities are bound to be affected because of the "missing link" in the code.

Please let me know what am I missing here?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Target MBA
Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 165
Location: Singapore
Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Oct 2011, 07:05
hemanthp wrote:
An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities unearthed five stone tablets incised with an undeciphered ancient script. The universities agreed that each would take one tablet to decipher. Because of the prestige involved for the university that cracks the script, critics of current academic practices fear that the universities will jealously guard their scholars' work until decipherment is complete, and this prevention of scholars building on each others' work will result in the script never being deciphered.

Which of the following, if true, would tend to weaken most seriously the critics' argument?

-Without healthy competition, the intellectual life of the university stagnates and research loses forward momentum.
-The decipherment of other ancient scripts has generally been the work of a single person working alone.
-Universities will give substantial funding to projects they consider prestigious.
-A university atmosphere generally provides an open forum for the exchange of ideas, which enhances the growth of intellectual projects.
-When deciphering a code, the military always works in secrecy to prevent any leaks to the enemy that will warn them to change their code.

Don't forget KUDOS if you like the question. This is from KAPLAN CAT.


Nice question.
Question type - weaken the argument.
Conclusion - "this prevention of scholars building on each others' work will result in the script never being deciphered"
(A) - "healthy competition" is not discussed in argument. Its about "jealousy"
(B) - Weakens.
(C) - Funding has already been provided. Out of scope.
(D) - Even in open forum because of "jealousy" students may not share knowledge. Does not weaken.
(E) - military is not one person, but is group of soldiers, commanders etc. Irrelevant.

(B) wins.
_________________

Thanks and Regards,
GM.

Re: An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities   [#permalink] 22 Oct 2011, 07:05

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 40 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

An archaeological dig sponsored by five universities

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.