GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 23 Oct 2019, 21:41

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

An investigation must be launched into the operations of the private

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Manager
Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Posts: 243
GPA: 3.57
Reviews Badge
An investigation must be launched into the operations of the private  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2017, 03:39
1
7
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

68% (01:44) correct 32% (02:08) wrong based on 386 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

An investigation must be launched into the operations of the private group that is training recruits ot fight against the Balaland Republic. THe US Neutrality Act plainly forbids US citizens from engaging in military campaigns against any nation with which we are not at war. Since no war has been declared between the US and the Balaland Republic we should bring charges against these fanatics, who are in open defiance of the law.

Which of the following if true would most weaken the argument above?

A- The Balaland republic is currently engaged in a bloody escalating civil war.

B- Diplomatic relations between the US and the Balaland Republic were severed last year.

C- The recruits are being trained to fight only in the event US goes to war against Balaland Republic.

D- The training of recruits is funded not by US citizens but rather by a consortium of individuals from abroad

E- Charges cannot be brought against the private group that is training the recruits unless an investigation is launched.

_________________
Please hit Kudos if this post helped you inch closer to your GMAT goal.
Procrastination is the termite constantly trying to eat your GMAT tree from the inside.
There is one fix to every problem, working harder!
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Jan 2017
Posts: 1
Re: An investigation must be launched into the operations of the private  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2017, 05:09
Evidence: Us neutrality act forbids US citizens from indulging war with non hostile nations. Us and balaland are not at war

Conclusion: Investigation against the rebel group

Assumption: The rebel group is going to war immediately with balance and needs to be stopped

AnswerC



Sent from my XT1562 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 24 Dec 2017
Posts: 185
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Real Estate
Schools: Johnson '21
An investigation must be launched into the operations of the private  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Oct 2018, 23:18
An investigation must be launched into the operations of the private group that is training recruits ot fight against the Balaland Republic. THe US Neutrality Act plainly forbids US citizens from engaging in military campaigns against any nation with which we are not at war. Since no war has been declared between the US and the Balaland Republic we should bring charges against these fanatics, who are in open defiance of the law.

Which of the following if true would most weaken the argument above?

A- The Balaland republic is currently engaged in a bloody escalating civil war.
Explanation: Engaged in a bloddy escalating civil war with who? - INCORRECT

B- Diplomatic relations between the US and the Balaland Republic were severed last year.
Explanation: Only severed but they are not war - INCORRECT

C- The recruits are being trained to fight only in the event US goes to war against Balaland Republic.
Explanation: There we go! The on going training is only to assist if US goes to war with Ballad Republic. Hence CORRECT

D- The training of recruits is funded not by US citizens but rather by a consortium of individuals from abroad
Explanation: Funding is not our problem! :D - INCORRECT

E- Charges cannot be brought against the private group that is training the recruits unless an investigation is launched.
Explanation: IRRELEVANT
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58471
Re: An investigation must be launched into the operations of the private  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jan 2019, 05:49
jedit wrote:
An investigation must be launched into the operations of the private group that is training recruits ot fight against the Balaland Republic. THe US Neutrality Act plainly forbids US citizens from engaging in military campaigns against any nation with which we are not at war. Since no war has been declared between the US and the Balaland Republic we should bring charges against these fanatics, who are in open defiance of the law.

Which of the following if true would most weaken the argument above?

A- The Balaland republic is currently engaged in a bloody escalating civil war.

B- Diplomatic relations between the US and the Balaland Republic were severed last year.

C- The recruits are being trained to fight only in the event US goes to war against Balaland Republic.

D- The training of recruits is funded not by US citizens but rather by a consortium of individuals from abroad

E- Charges cannot be brought against the private group that is training the recruits unless an investigation is launched.


KAPLAN OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:



C

U.S. law forbids U.S. citizens from engaging in military campaigns against countries unless the United States is at war with those countries. Since no war has been declared between the United States and the Balaland Republic, the author concludes that the recruits being trained to fight against the Balaland Republic are defying U.S. law. But if, as (C) asserts, the recruits are being trained to fight only if a war is declared, then they're not in defiance of U.S. law. Being prepared for battle is different from actually engaging in it.

(A)'s no weakener; we can't assume that the country's escalating civil war justifies military action against it. In (B), severing diplomatic ties doesn't go far enough to show that training recruits is justifiable under U.S. law. As for (D), who funds the rebels was never mentioned by the author and is irrelevant. And as for (E), the author starts off calling for an investigation, so he doesn't assert that charges should be brought without launching an investigation first.
_________________
SVP
SVP
User avatar
V
Status: It's near - I can see.
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Posts: 1686
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Operations
Schools: INSEAD Jan '19
GPA: 3.01
WE: Engineering (Real Estate)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: An investigation must be launched into the operations of the private  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Feb 2019, 04:07
jedit wrote:
An investigation must be launched into the operations of the private group that is training recruits ot fight against the Balaland Republic. THe US Neutrality Act plainly forbids US citizens from engaging in military campaigns against any nation with which we are not at war. Since no war has been declared between the US and the Balaland Republic we should bring charges against these fanatics, who are in open defiance of the law.


Which of the following if true would most weaken the argument above?

A- The Balaland republic is currently engaged in a bloody escalating civil war.

With America? We don't know and therefore can not justify the recruitment and fight against Balaland Republic

B- Diplomatic relations between the US and the Balaland Republic were severed last year.

Severity of relationship does not automatically converts to war. WRONG

C- The recruits are being trained to fight only in the event US goes to war against Balaland Republic.

Helps to weaken the conclusion. Correct

D- The training of recruits is funded not by US citizens but rather by a consortium of individuals from abroad .

Irrelevant info

E- Charges cannot be brought against the private group that is training the recruits unless an investigation is launched.

Irrelevant. Nobody is saying that investigation will not be done.

_________________
"Do not watch clock; Do what it does. KEEP GOING."
GMAT Club Bot
Re: An investigation must be launched into the operations of the private   [#permalink] 05 Feb 2019, 04:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by

An investigation must be launched into the operations of the private

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne