Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

The Competition Continues - Game of Timers is a team-based competition based on solving GMAT questions to win epic prizes! Starting July 1st, compete to win prep materials while studying for GMAT! Registration is Open! Ends July 26th

An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet
[#permalink]

Show Tags

18 May 2011, 16:42

7

122

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

67% (01:47) correct 33% (01:54) wrong based on 3002 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet after t seconds, where h = -16 (t -3)^2 + 150. At what height, in feet, is the object 2 seconds after it reaches its maximum height?

Re: An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet
[#permalink]

Show Tags

31 Oct 2012, 04:21

31

32

IEsailor wrote:

An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet after t seconds, where h = -16 (t -3)^2 + 150. At what height, in feet, is the object 2 seconds after it reaches its maximum height?

A. 6 B. 86 C. 134 D. 150 E. 214

Given that \(h=150-16(t-3)^2\).

In order to maximize \(h\), we need to minimize \(16(t-3)^2\) (since it's subtracted from 150), which means minimizing \((t-3)^2\). Now, since \((t-3)^2\) is always non-negative, then the smallest possible value of \((t-3)^2\) is 0, for \(t=3\).

Two seconds later or for \(t=3+2=5\), the height will be \(h=150-16(5-3)^2=86\).

2 sec's after reaching maximum height object will be in free fall mode. => height at t =1, is the height of the object 2 seconds after it reaches its maximum height?

2 sec's after reaching maximum height object will be in free fall mode. => height at t =1, is the height of the object 2 seconds after it reaches its maximum height?

substituting t=2 we have 150-16(4) =86

Answer is B.

How you can say the max height is reached when t=3

2 sec's after reaching maximum height object will be in free fall mode. => height at t =1, is the height of the object 2 seconds after it reaches its maximum height?

substituting t=2 we have 150-16(4) =86

Answer is B.

How you can say the max height is reached when t=3

Method 1: -16(t-3)^2 would reduce the value of 150 and h would be maximum when -16(t-3) ^2 = 0 ie t = 3 Method 2: using derivatives dh/dt = 0.

Re: An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet
[#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Aug 2013, 01:30

3

1

IEsailor wrote:

An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet after t seconds, where h = -16 (t -3)^2 + 150. At what height, in feet, is the object 2 seconds after it reaches its maximum height?

A. 6 B. 86 C. 134 D. 150 E. 214

Hi,

h = -16 (t -3)^2 + 150 h = 150 - 16 (t -3)^2

Now, in the above expression whenever t is of any value except 3, the overall \((t-3)^2\) is always +ve. and this +ve value is multiplies by -16.. Hence, this overall value is negative.

In order to make sure that max. height is reached, \(-16(t-3)^2\) has to be positive, but it is never positive. SO a zero value will work to get the max. height.

So t has to be 3 to get \(-16 (t -3)^2\) as zero, and obtain the maximum height.

Now, when t=3 h=150

The question asks for the height when time is 2 second after max height. After max. height, the object will fall. So, the time will be 5 second. ( 3+2)

\(h = 150 -16(5-3)^2\) h = 150 - 16*4 h = 150 -64 h = 86

Hence, the height will be 86 feet.

Thanks, Jai

KUDOS if it helped..!!!
_________________

MODULUS Concept ---> http://gmatclub.com/forum/inequalities-158054.html#p1257636 HEXAGON Theory ---> http://gmatclub.com/forum/hexagon-theory-tips-to-solve-any-heaxgon-question-158189.html#p1258308

An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet
[#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Jan 2015, 13:01

1

First find out what height would be considered as 'maximum' given the equation:

Since 150 is a constant, find out what the product's maximum value can be. It is a product of a negative number and a squared parenthesis; this product would ALWAYS be negative UNLESS the parenthesis yields zero - this would be the point at which the product would have maximum value.

For t = 3, the expression would yield 0 + 150. Hence, the maximum possible height given by this equation would be 150 feet. Therefore, after reaching this height, the object would start falling. The 'start' time of falling would be after 3 seconds, so adding 2 seconds would be 5:

Affiliations: AB, cum laude, Harvard University (Class of '02)

Joined: 10 Jul 2015

Posts: 696

Location: United States (CA)

Age: 39

GMAT 1: 770 Q47 V48

GMAT 2: 730 Q44 V47

GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42

GRE 1: Q168 V169

WE: Education (Education)

Re: An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet
[#permalink]

Show Tags

25 May 2016, 22:22

2

1

Attached is a visual that should help.

Attachments

Screen Shot 2016-05-25 at 9.42.24 PM.png [ 122.1 KiB | Viewed 30708 times ]

_________________

Harvard grad and 99% GMAT scorer, offering expert, private GMAT tutoring and coaching worldwide since 2002.

One of the only known humans to have taken the GMAT 5 times and scored in the 700s every time (700, 710, 730, 750, 770), including verified section scores of Q50 / V47, as well as personal bests of 8/8 IR (2 times), 6/6 AWA (4 times), 50/51Q and 48/51V.

You can download my official test-taker score report (all scores within the last 5 years) directly from the Pearson Vue website: https://tinyurl.com/y7knw7bt Date of Birth: 09 December 1979.

Re: An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet
[#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Jun 2016, 12:16

2

IEsailor wrote:

An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet after t seconds, where h = -16 (t -3)^2 + 150. At what height, in feet, is the object 2 seconds after it reaches its maximum height?

A. 6 B. 86 C. 134 D. 150 E. 214

We are given an equation h = –16(t – 3)^2 + 150, with the following information:

h = height of h feet

t = number of seconds

We need to determine the height, in feet, 2 seconds after it reaches maximum height. So we first need to determine the value of t when the object's height h is the maximum. In other words, we need to determine the maximum value for this equation.

We first focus on “-16(t - 3)^2”. We ascertain that (t – 3)^2 is always either positive or 0. However, when (t – 3)^2 is multiplied by –16, a negative number, the product will be negative. Thus, the best we can do is to have the expression -16(t - 3)^2 equal 0, which would yield the maximum value of –16(t – 3)^2 + 150. We can obtain this value by letting t = 3.

We now know that the object reaches its maximum height at t = 3 (and the maximum height is 150 ft). However, we want the height of the object 2 seconds after it reaches the maximum height. Thus, we want the height at t = 5 since 3 + 2 = 5. Thus, we can plug in 5 for t and solve for h.

Re: An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet
[#permalink]

Show Tags

31 Aug 2016, 20:25

ok here is what i did in the first attempt..... max height reached is 150 . 2 seconds after that h = -16(2-3)^2 + 150 = -16+150 = 134. 150-134 = 16. Where did i go wrong?

Re: An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet
[#permalink]

Show Tags

31 Aug 2016, 22:29

1

2 seconds after reaching the maximum height, time to reach the maximum height is 3 seconds, so after 2 seconds the fall is calculated is 134. I think i understand the flaw in my calculation the formula is from the starting point only hence it cannot be applied after reaching the maximum height.

Re: An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet
[#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Aug 2017, 13:37

Top Contributor

1

IEsailor wrote:

An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet after t seconds, where h = -16 (t -3)^2 + 150. At what height, in feet, is the object 2 seconds after it reaches its maximum height?

A. 6 B. 86 C. 134 D. 150 E. 214

The formula h = -16 (t - 3)² + 150 allows us to determine the height of the object at any time. For what value of t is -16(t-3)² + 150 MAXIMIZED(in other words, the object is at its maximum height)?

It might be easier to answer this question if we rewrite the formula as h = 150 - 16(t-3)² To MAXIMIZE the value of h, we need to MINIMIZE the value of 16(t-3)² and this means minimizing the value of (t-3)² As you can see,(t-3)² is minimized when t = 3.

We want to know the height 2 seconds AFTER the object's height is maximized, so we want to know that height at 5 seconds (3+2)

At t = 5, the height = 150 - 16(5 - 3)² = 150 - 16(2)² = 150 - 64 = 86 Answer:

Re: An object thrown directly upward is at a height of h feet
[#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Oct 2017, 11:45

1

Hi santro789,

This is an example of a 'limit' question - and this particular 'design' is relatively rare (you might not see it at all on Test Day). In the broader sense though, the concept isn't that difficult. You're told that there's a MAXIMUM height, so you have to think about what has to happen to achieve the highest possible height given that equation (and when you think of everything in those terms, you're really just dealing with a Number Property and using critical thinking skills - NOT 'math' skills). Even if you don't spot the pattern here, you can still 'brute force' the solution: just plug in increasing values of T until you get the answer.