GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 21 Aug 2018, 03:23

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

An oil field prospector and developer reported a large oil

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1849
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: An oil field prospector and developer reported a large oil  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Sep 2017, 14:47
B is an important pattern that test takers must learn.
D has nothing to do with accuracy, and A is not good enough.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 84
Re: An oil field prospector and developer reported a large oil  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Nov 2017, 20:22
An oil field prospector and developer reported a large oil deposit in southwestern Texas. As a result, a large oil and gas company purchased the field with the intention of drilling oil wells in the area soon afterwards. However, the company found that what had been reported to be a large oil deposit was actually much smaller than had been indicated. Thus, the methods that the prospector had used to determine the size of the oil deposit must have been inaccurate.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

The company's methods of measuring the size of the oil deposit were determined by a third party to be more accurate than those used by the prospector.

The prospector did not purposefully fabricate or misrepresent the size of the oil deposit.
Though smaller than originally thought, the oil deposit contained enough oil to make drilling commercially feasible.
The prospector did not explore other oil fields and use the same methods to determine the magnitude of the oil present, if any.
The company had successfully drilled for oil in other large oil fields in Texas throughout the early twentieth century.

The conclusion that because oil deposits were smaller indicates that the methods used by the prospector to determine the size of the oil deposit must have been inaccurate rules out an other reason. The correct answer will defend the argument by ruling out any possible explanations for the discrepancy e.g. ruling out the possibility that the prospector fabricated data to lure buyers, B.

B

Kudos if you like the answer! :-)
_________________

Give me kudos and see what happens to your GMAT score :-)

Re: An oil field prospector and developer reported a large oil &nbs [#permalink] 08 Nov 2017, 20:22

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 22 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

An oil field prospector and developer reported a large oil

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.