It is currently 12 Dec 2017, 10:13

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Analysis of an argument- Always 2 fallacies?

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 312

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 20

GMAT 1: 690 Q44 V41
GPA: 3.75
Analysis of an argument- Always 2 fallacies? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Sep 2009, 12:44
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The way I see it, the vast majority of the time, if not outright always, there's a comparison to a certain entity (can't think of a better word) such as a town or a business. To me there's always a correlation and causation issue with this. Sometimes it may be hidden a little. In the end however, one town is not necessarily representative of your town, and the solution that the other town came up with that worked is not necessarily the cause of the improvement. Considering stats and research are never a part of these arguments, I believe there's never any proof of causality and representativeness in these situations. It seems like almost every argument is also a variation of this. Therefore I think you can use these fallacies for almost all essays. I also say "almost" to be cautious, it may well be that EVERY argument is a variation of this. Am I right?

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 20

Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2005
Posts: 180

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 10

Re: Analysis of an argument- Always 2 fallacies? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Oct 2009, 16:27
you raise a good point.

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 10

Intern
Joined: 10 Oct 2009
Posts: 24

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 1

Re: Analysis of an argument- Always 2 fallacies? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2009, 09:08
Fantastic insight, sir. I would agree if you memorize these three logical fallacies:

1. Generalizing from particulars (representativeness)
2. Taking correlation as causation
3. Lack of substantiating evidence

You can almost always ace the AWA, and given good grammar and structure, score a 6.0.

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 312

Kudos [?]: 31 [1], given: 20

GMAT 1: 690 Q44 V41
GPA: 3.75
Re: Analysis of an argument- Always 2 fallacies? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2009, 15:39
1
KUDOS
jjwumaster wrote:
Fantastic insight, sir. I would agree if you memorize these three logical fallacies:

1. Generalizing from particulars (representativeness)
2. Taking correlation as causation
3. Lack of substantiating evidence

You can almost always ace the AWA, and given good grammar and structure, score a 6.0.

Interestingly enough on the real thing for the first time since I noticed th trend I didn't use causality. It seemed like the argument might have actually established causality (these guys accomplished this by doing this, so these other guys should do the same thing). So for a second weakness I used their recommended action. The recommended action mentioned an actual amount, yet the argument mentioned none. So how do you know that that's the amount needed? Anyway, altogether I got a 4.5 though.

BTW, I tried to be vague, I don't know if these get recycled or not and if I can get in trouble for giving out this info. Probably paranoia on my part though.

Kudos [?]: 31 [1], given: 20

Intern
Joined: 10 Oct 2009
Posts: 24

Kudos [?]: 14 [1], given: 1

Re: Analysis of an argument- Always 2 fallacies? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2009, 16:34
1
KUDOS
Haha I don't think that was too specific. I had to read it once or twice to get the gist of it. As for paranoia, better safe than sorry! You're right to be wary of using the word "always," but remembering those major logical fallacies can be very helpful in quickly identifying the problems and drawing out an outline. At the least, you'll be quicker out of the gates and at the best you'll improve your AWA.

Kudos [?]: 14 [1], given: 1

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10160

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 0

Re: Analysis of an argument- Always 2 fallacies? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2017, 01:01
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 275 [0], given: 0

Re: Analysis of an argument- Always 2 fallacies?   [#permalink] 10 Aug 2017, 01:01
Display posts from previous: Sort by