Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 27 May 2017, 09:18

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 20 Nov 2006
Posts: 210
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2007, 11:33
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

53% (01:22) correct 47% (00:47) wrong based on 21 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and destruction of a city are excavating in several possible places, including a middle and a lower layer of a large mound. The bottom of the middle layer contains some pieces of pottery of type 3, known to be from a later period than the time of the destruction of the city, but the lower layer does not.

Which of the following hypotheses is best supported by the evidence above?
(A) The lower layer contains the remains of the city where the siege took place.
(B) The legend confuses stories from two different historical periods.
(C) The middle layer does not represent the period of the siege.
(D) The siege lasted for a long time before the city was destroyed.
(E) The pottery of type 3 was imported to the city by traders.

archaeologists-seeking-the-location-of-a-legendary-siege-and-38845.html
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 863
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 127 [0], given: 0

Re: Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2007, 12:37
I think its C...not sure though
Intern
Joined: 02 Apr 2007
Posts: 32
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2007, 16:10
C is the answer. From the stmt, only C can be inferred among the choices.
Manager
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
Posts: 212
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Re: Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2007, 16:38
C is correct
Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 197
Location: California
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2007, 00:27
surbab wrote:
Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and destruction of a city are excavating in several possible places, including a middle and a lower layer of a large mound. The bottom of the middle layer contains some pieces of pottery of type 3, known to be from a later period than the time of the destruction of the city, but the lower layer does not.

Which of the following hypotheses is best supported by the evidence above?
(A) The lower layer contains the remains of the city where the siege took place.
(B) The legend confuses stories from two different historical periods.
(C) The middle layer does not represent the period of the siege.
(D) The siege lasted for a long time before the city was destroyed.
(E) The pottery of type 3 was imported to the city by traders.

C
Manager
Joined: 26 Aug 2006
Posts: 51
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 29

Re: Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2007, 07:23
I think, the answer is D.
What is OA?
VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1351
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 678 [0], given: 10

Re: Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2007, 07:46
surbab wrote:
Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and destruction of a city are excavating in several possible places, including a middle and a lower layer of a large mound. The bottom of the middle layer contains some pieces of pottery of type 3, known to be from a later period than the time of the destruction of the city, but the lower layer does not.

Which of the following hypotheses is best supported by the evidence above?
(A) The lower layer contains the remains of the city where the siege took place.
(B) The legend confuses stories from two different historical periods.
(C) The middle layer does not represent the period of the siege.
(D) The siege lasted for a long time before the city was destroyed.
(E) The pottery of type 3 was imported to the city by traders.

C
VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1351
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 678 [0], given: 10

Re: Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2007, 07:47
surbab wrote:
Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and destruction of a city are excavating in several possible places, including a middle and a lower layer of a large mound. The bottom of the middle layer contains some pieces of pottery of type 3, known to be from a later period than the time of the destruction of the city, but the lower layer does not.

Which of the following hypotheses is best supported by the evidence above?
(A) The lower layer contains the remains of the city where the siege took place.
(B) The legend confuses stories from two different historical periods.
(C) The middle layer does not represent the period of the siege.
(D) The siege lasted for a long time before the city was destroyed.
(E) The pottery of type 3 was imported to the city by traders.

C
VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1351
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 678 [0], given: 10

Re: Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2007, 07:48
surbab wrote:
Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and destruction of a city are excavating in several possible places, including a middle and a lower layer of a large mound. The bottom of the middle layer contains some pieces of pottery of type 3, known to be from a later period than the time of the destruction of the city, but the lower layer does not.

Which of the following hypotheses is best supported by the evidence above?
(A) The lower layer contains the remains of the city where the siege took place.
(B) The legend confuses stories from two different historical periods.
(C) The middle layer does not represent the period of the siege.
(D) The siege lasted for a long time before the city was destroyed.
(E) The pottery of type 3 was imported to the city by traders.

C
VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1351
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 678 [0], given: 10

Re: Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2007, 07:48
surbab wrote:
Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and destruction of a city are excavating in several possible places, including a middle and a lower layer of a large mound. The bottom of the middle layer contains some pieces of pottery of type 3, known to be from a later period than the time of the destruction of the city, but the lower layer does not.

Which of the following hypotheses is best supported by the evidence above?
(A) The lower layer contains the remains of the city where the siege took place.
(B) The legend confuses stories from two different historical periods.
(C) The middle layer does not represent the period of the siege.
(D) The siege lasted for a long time before the city was destroyed.
(E) The pottery of type 3 was imported to the city by traders.

C
VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1351
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 678 [0], given: 10

Re: Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2007, 07:49
vineetgupta wrote:
I think its C...not sure though

C
Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 115
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2007, 08:21
C.
Director
Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 591
Location: Kuwait
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 291 [1] , given: 0

Re: Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2007, 09:30
1
KUDOS
(A) The lower layer contains the remains of the city where the siege took place.
The argument does NOT provide any information about the lower layer. This statement can not be supported by the evidence.

(B) The legend confuses stories from two different historical periods.
Here is a scope-shift. The fact that the middle layer containts information about a specific age is a FACT and an evidence. It's not affected by what the Archaeologists are looking for.

(C) The middle layer does not represent the period of the siege. Exactly, if the middle layer contains pottery from another period, after the time of the city distruction, then it difnitely does NOT represent the period of the siege. By Logic, the siege comes first, then comes the distruction of the city.

(D) The siege lasted for a long time before the city was destroyed.
While this could be a possibility explaining the evidence in the argument, yet it can not be supported by the argument.

(E) The pottery of type 3 was imported to the city by traders.
Irrelevant and out of scope. Imported by traders ? where are we getting this from ?

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 435
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

Re: Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2007, 11:51
Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 747
Location: Dallas, Texas
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 0

Re: Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Apr 2007, 00:40
goalsnr - why u try to answer every question 3 times ?
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1351
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 678 [0], given: 10

Re: Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Apr 2007, 07:53
Swagatalakshmi wrote:
goalsnr - why u try to answer every question 3 times ?

Well, I did not do it on purpose.Every time I hit the submit button I was getting an error.Sorry for the convenience it might have caused you.
Manager
Joined: 23 Mar 2007
Posts: 174
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Apr 2007, 12:20
I will go with C
Manager
Status: 2 months to go
Joined: 11 Oct 2015
Posts: 135
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.8
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 36

Re: Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jun 2016, 11:45
The question's OA is indeed C

Added to the 1st post, as well as the link to the twin question.

Den
Re: Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and   [#permalink] 22 Jun 2016, 11:45
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and 3 07 Oct 2015, 08:51
43 In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred 27 13 Sep 2016, 13:29
4 Archaeologists have discovered various paintings on the 13 25 May 2014, 07:20
In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred 7 13 May 2012, 09:41
Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and 6 14 Aug 2013, 10:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by