It is currently 22 Oct 2017, 23:27

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Arguments - Verbal

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2004
Posts: 103

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 0

Location: san jose , CA
Arguments - Verbal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2004, 15:07
Some people have questioned why the Homeowners Association is supporting cooper's candidacy for mayor . But if the Association wants a mayor who will attarct more businesses to the town, cooper is the only candidate it could support.
so , since the Association is supporting cooper , it must have a goal of attracting more business to the town .

the reasoning in the argument is in error because

(A) the reasons the Homeowners Associatiob should want to attract more
businesses to the town are not given .

(B) the Homeowners association could be supporting coopers
candidacy for reasons unrelated to attracting businesses to the town

(c) other groups besides the Homeowners Association Could be supporting Cooper's candidacy .

(D) the Homeowners Association might discover that attracting more businesses to the town would not be in the best interest of its members .

(E) Cooper might not have all of the Skills that are needed by a mayor who wants to attract businesses to a town .
_________________

---- Hero never chooses Destiny
Destiny chooses Him ......

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 574

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

Location: San Jose, CA
Re: Arguments - Verbal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2004, 16:55
2.5 mins

Looks to me that B is correct

If B is true -> Association wants a mayor who will not necessarily attarct more businesses to the town -> Some people have questioned why the Homeowners Association is supporting cooper's candidacy for mayor is legitimate

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 20 Jul 2004
Posts: 590

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Jul 2004, 09:01
B.

Whenever a casue (A) - effect (B) is given and a conclusion is made, look out for
- if it's inverse is true (if actually B casued A)
- if there are other causes possible (C, D) for B to happen.

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2004
Posts: 103

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 0

Location: san jose , CA

### Show Tags

25 Jul 2004, 10:30
hardworker_indian wrote:
B.

Whenever a casue (A) - effect (B) is given and a conclusion is made, look out for
- if it's inverse is true (if actually B casued A)
- if there are other causes possible (C, D) for B to happen.

Hi,

can you little more clear on this , what is A here and what B is
here , I am sorry for asking a stupid question but i just started
my preparation .

Thanks
_________________

---- Hero never chooses Destiny
Destiny chooses Him ......

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 20 Jul 2004
Posts: 590

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Jul 2004, 11:06
Sure...

A = Cause (Cooper is the only candidate who who will attarct more businesses to the town)
B = Effect (Association supporting cooper)

In this case, there may be other causes for B (for why Association is supporting cooper). May be he is also a supporter of abolishing house taxes and hence the assocoation supports him.
There is no clear proof for Association having a goal of attracting business to town.

Eg: Lawyer A advocates for B. B kills.
Wrong Conclusion: Lawyer A's goal is to save people who kill.
Actually, A may just be advocating B just because B gives more money.

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2004
Posts: 103

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 0

Location: san jose , CA

### Show Tags

25 Jul 2004, 12:58
hardworker_indian wrote:
Sure...

A = Cause (Cooper is the only candidate who who will attarct more businesses to the town)
B = Effect (Association supporting cooper)

In this case, there may be other causes for B (for why Association is supporting cooper). May be he is also a supporter of abolishing house taxes and hence the assocoation supports him.
There is no clear proof for Association having a goal of attracting business to town.

Eg: Lawyer A advocates for B. B kills.
Wrong Conclusion: Lawyer A's goal is to save people who kill.
Actually, A may just be advocating B just because B gives more money.

Thank you very much , i got it
_________________

---- Hero never chooses Destiny
Destiny chooses Him ......

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 0

25 Jul 2004, 12:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Arguments - Verbal

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.