GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 21 Sep 2018, 15:22

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Armstrong: For the treatment of a particular disease, Dr. S

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Posts: 280
Armstrong: For the treatment of a particular disease, Dr. S  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2018, 05:31
3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

54% (01:12) correct 46% (01:34) wrong based on 101 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Armstrong: For the treatment of a particular disease, Dr. Sullivan argues for using nutritional supplements rather than the pharrnaceuticals
that most doctors prescribe. But this is in his self-interest since he is paid to endorse a line of nutritional supplements. Thus, we should not use nutritional supplements in treating the disease.

Armstrong's argument is flawed in that it

A. relies on two different meanings of the term "supplement" to draw a conclusion

B. relies solely on an appeal to an authority whose trustworthiness should not necessarily be taken for granted

C. appeals to people's emotions regarding the treatment of disease rather than to the efficacy of the two approaches to treatment

D. criticizes Dr. Sullivan's motives for holding a position rather than addressing the position itself

E.. fails to justify its presumption that nutritional supplements cannot be used in conjunction with other treatments

LSAT

KUDOS will be Appreciated
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 6797
Re: Armstrong: For the treatment of a particular disease, Dr. S  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2018, 08:59
AshutoshB wrote:
Armstrong: For the treatment of a particular disease, Dr. Sullivan argues for using nutritional supplements rather than the pharrnaceuticals
that most doctors prescribe. But this is in his self-interest since he is paid to endorse a line of nutritional supplements. Thus, we should not use nutritional supplements in treating the disease.

Armstrong's argument is flawed in that it

A. relies on two different meanings of the term "supplement" to draw a conclusion

B. relies solely on an appeal to an authority whose trustworthiness should not necessarily be taken for granted

C. appeals to people's emotions regarding the treatment of disease rather than to the efficacy of the two approaches to treatment

D. criticizes Dr. Sullivan's motives for holding a position rather than addressing the position itself

E.. fails to justify its presumption that nutritional supplements cannot be used in conjunction with other treatments

LSAT

KUDOS will be Appreciated


Armstrong initially attacks Dr S method and there after attaches his personal motive to that method.
So he does not attack the shortcomings of the method but involves personal motive to the method.

D gives the exact reasoning
_________________

1) Absolute modulus : http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
2)Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html
3) effects of arithmetic operations : https://gmatclub.com/forum/effects-of-arithmetic-operations-on-fractions-269413.html


GMAT online Tutor

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 05 Dec 2014
Posts: 217
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V36
GPA: 3.54
CAT Tests
Re: Armstrong: For the treatment of a particular disease, Dr. S  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Aug 2018, 12:49
chetan2u wrote:
AshutoshB wrote:
Armstrong: For the treatment of a particular disease, Dr. Sullivan argues for using nutritional supplements rather than the pharrnaceuticals
that most doctors prescribe. But this is in his self-interest since he is paid to endorse a line of nutritional supplements. Thus, we should not use nutritional supplements in treating the disease.

Armstrong's argument is flawed in that it

A. relies on two different meanings of the term "supplement" to draw a conclusion

B. relies solely on an appeal to an authority whose trustworthiness should not necessarily be taken for granted

C. appeals to people's emotions regarding the treatment of disease rather than to the efficacy of the two approaches to treatment

D. criticizes Dr. Sullivan's motives for holding a position rather than addressing the position itself

E.. fails to justify its presumption that nutritional supplements cannot be used in conjunction with other treatments

LSAT

KUDOS will be Appreciated


Armstrong initially attacks Dr S method and there after attaches his personal motive to that method.
So he does not attack the shortcomings of the method but involves personal motive to the method.

D gives the exact reasoning


Hi Chetan2u,
Can you please explain option D again. Armstrong did not initially attack Dr. Sullivan's method. He found a reason that since personal motives are involved, w cant trust Dr. Sulivan.
Option D states that- D. criticizes Dr. Sullivan's motives for holding a position rather than addressing the position itself
I think the flaw is Armstrong's method of reasoning to dismiss Sulivan's claim. Armstrong does not need to address the position whether nutritional supplements are better than the pharrnaceutical supplements. His logic of reasoning to dismiss Sulivan's claim is wrong.
Please help me on this.
Re: Armstrong: For the treatment of a particular disease, Dr. S &nbs [#permalink] 18 Aug 2018, 12:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Armstrong: For the treatment of a particular disease, Dr. S

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.