Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 May 2017, 22:07

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

### Show Tags

17 Mar 2011, 06:39
15
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

51% (02:20) correct 49% (01:06) wrong based on 438 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

As a bicycle salesperson, Norman earns a fixed salary of $20 per week plus$6 per bicycle for the first 6 bicycles he sells, $12 per bicycle for the next 6 bicycles he sells, and$18 per bicycle for every bicycle sold after first 12. This week, he earned more than twice as much as he did last week. If he sold x bicycles last week and y bicycles this week, which of the following statements must be true?

I. y>2x
II. y>x
III. y>3

A. I only
B. II only
C. I and II
D. II and III
E. I, II, III
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

target:-810 out of 800!

Last edited by Bunuel on 31 Mar 2012, 17:39, edited 2 times in total.
Edited the OA
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 38846
Followers: 7719

Kudos [?]: 105942 [10] , given: 11602

Re: word problem [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2012, 18:03
10
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
jj97cornell wrote:
Can someone verify the OA? I get D as well.

Correct answer is D. OA edited.

As a bicycle salesperson, Norman earns a fixed salary of $20 per week plus$6 per bicycle for the first 6 bicycles he sells, $12 per bicycle for the next 6 bicycles he sells, and$18 per bicycle for every bicycle sold after first 12. This week, he earned more than twice as much as he did last week. If he sold x bicycles last week and y bicycles this week, which of the following statements must be true?

I. y>2x
II. y>x
III. y>3

A. I only
B. II only
C. I and II
D. II and III
E. I, II, III

II and III are obviously always true:

II. y>x --> since this week, Norman earned more than he did last week and the total salary is in direct relationship with the # of bicycle sold, then y (# of bicycle sold this week) must be more than x (# of bicycle sold last week);

III. y>3 --> if Norman sold 3 bicycles this week then this week he earned 20+3*6=$38, which cannot be more than twice as much as he earned the last week, since the minimum salary is fixed to$20. So y must be more than 3;

I. y>2x --> if y=12 and x= 6 then this week Norman earned 20+6*6+6*12=$128, and the last week he earned 20+6*6=$56. $128 is more than twice as much as$56, so the condition in the stem holds but y=2x, which means that III is not always true.

Answer: D.
_________________
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 906
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 357 [3] , given: 123

Re: word problem [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Mar 2011, 07:07
3
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I will throw in the values of x and y since its going to be tough using algebra.

For first 6 bicycles - he gets $6 / bicycle For next 6 bicycles - he gets$12 / bicycle
For > 12 bicycles - he gets $18 / bicycle Constraint : This week he earned more than twice as much as he did last week. Paraphrase I: Did he double the quantity of bicycles sold to earn more than double the revenue from last week? I dont think so. Reasons - Lets say last week he sold 13 bicycles. Last week revenue = 20 + 6*6 + 6*12 + 1*18 = 146 146*2 + 1 = 292 + 1 = 293. To make this revenue he could sell (293 - 128)/18 = 165/18 i.e. 10 more than 12 bicycles Total bicycles sold this week = 12 + 10 = 22 (which is less than twice the bicyles sold last week) Hence I is ruled out. That leaves the options - B and D. B Vs D. I have to verify statement III Paraphrase III: Did he double the revenue from last week by selling minimum of 4 bicycles this week? Lets assume the contradiction is true. He sold 3 bicycles this week and 1 bicycle last week. Last week revenue = 20 + 6*1 = 26 This week revenue = 20 + 6*3 = 38 38 is less than twice 26. So the contradiction fails. Hence III is true. Answer D. Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Posts: 7370 Location: Pune, India Followers: 2283 Kudos [?]: 15089 [2] , given: 224 Re: MANHATTAN PS3 [#permalink] ### Show Tags 11 May 2012, 11:37 2 This post received KUDOS Expert's post 2 This post was BOOKMARKED piyushksharma wrote: As a bicycle salesperson, Norman earns a fixed salary of$20 per week plus $6 per bicycle for the first six bicycles he sells,$12 per bicycle for the next six bicycles he sells, and $18 per bicycle for every bicycle sold after the first 12. This week, Norman earned more than twice as much as he did last week. If he sold x bicycles last week and y bicycles this week, which of the following statements must be true? I. y > 2x II. y > x III. y > 3 A. I only B. II only C. I and II D. II and III E. I, II, and III I think II and III are pretty straight forward and I am assuming you have no problem deciding about those. Let me add here what I thought about I. One way is that you can try to find a case where he earns twice as much but doesn't sell twice as many bikes. Another is a more intuitive approach. You know that initially, he has to sell more bikes to make some money (he earns only$6 from first 6 bikes and $12 from next 6 bikes. First$20 is too small an amount). Later on, he gets $18 per bike which means he makes money at a much faster rate. Hence, later on, he can double the amount he made previously very quickly and by selling far fewer bikes. Hence it is not essential that he needs to sell twice as many bikes to make twice as much money. Hence y may not be greater than 2x. _________________ Karishma Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor My Blog Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7370
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 2283

Kudos [?]: 15089 [2] , given: 224

Re: As a bicycle salesperson, Norman earns a fixed salary of $20 [#permalink] ### Show Tags 16 Feb 2016, 23:08 2 This post received KUDOS Expert's post Sunil01 wrote: Hi Karishma and Bunuel, In order to prove the third statement 1.e y>3, you are assuming x=0. Is this allowed to assume x=0. Thanks & regards, Sunil01 So we need to figure out whether y must be greater than 3. So I think to myself - what is so great about y = 3 that it cannot happen while y = 4 can probably happen? That is why I put y = 3 and see the numbers I get. If y = 3, total earning = 20 + 3*6 = 38 I know that this week he earned more than twice of last week. So if he sold 3 bikes this week, he must have earned less than$19 last week. But last week he MUST have earned at least $20, right? That is his fixed salary. This is the reason y cannot be 3 or less. It MSUT be more than 3. We don't assume that x is 0. We say that even if x = 0, his last week's salary cannot be$19. This means he sold at least 4 bikes this week.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199 Veritas Prep Reviews Verbal Forum Moderator Joined: 02 Aug 2009 Posts: 4511 Followers: 394 Kudos [?]: 4187 [2] , given: 109 Re: As a bicycle salesperson, Norman earns a fixed salary of$20 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Feb 2016, 02:54
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Sunil01 wrote:
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
Sunil01 wrote:
Hi Karishma and Bunuel,

In order to prove the third statement 1.e y>3, you are assuming x=0.
Is this allowed to assume x=0.

Thanks & regards,
Sunil01

So we need to figure out whether y must be greater than 3. So I think to myself - what is so great about y = 3 that it cannot happen while y = 4 can probably happen?
That is why I put y = 3 and see the numbers I get.

If y = 3, total earning = 20 + 3*6 = 38
I know that this week he earned more than twice of last week. So if he sold 3 bikes this week, he must have earned less than $19 last week. But last week he MUST have earned at least$20, right? That is his fixed salary. This is the reason y cannot be 3 or less. It MSUT be more than 3.
We don't assume that x is 0. We say that even if x = 0, his last week's salary cannot be $19. This means he sold at least 4 bikes this week. Nicely explained thanks Karishma Hi, although the explanation is almost same as a post above this explanation, but since you did not understand my English, I got to start looking into my Verbal .. Kidding... Till the time you are learning, its ok, and I am sure none is contributing for appreciation. _________________ Absolute modulus :http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372 Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Posts: 7370 Location: Pune, India Followers: 2283 Kudos [?]: 15089 [2] , given: 224 Re: As a bicycle salesperson, Norman earns a fixed salary of$20 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2016, 22:59
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
target760gmat wrote:
I got this as the last qn (7#) or one before last .. Is it better to mark last 3-4 qns randomly when the time left is around 3 minutes or attend a qn or two properly in those three minutes and and leave the last 1/2 qn ? Experts pls advise.

If you are left with just a few mins with 3-4 questions in hand, try to give a quick shot to each. Read the question stem and you might be able to narrow down the choices based on some simple logic. Take a guess out of those and move on. It increases the probability of a correct answer. Don't leave 1-2 questions unanswered at the end. Try to take a smart guess.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199 Veritas Prep Reviews Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Posts: 7370 Location: Pune, India Followers: 2283 Kudos [?]: 15089 [1] , given: 224 Re: word problem [#permalink] ### Show Tags 20 Jan 2014, 22:50 1 This post received KUDOS Expert's post jlgdr wrote: I'm having some issues picking the correct numbers, how can I decide which numbers to use to prove this case not necessarily true? Cheers! J There are no correct/incorrect numbers. You can just try to understand the logic using numbers. 6 bikes -$6 each i.e. total $36 next 6 bikes -$12 each i.e. total $72 So 12 bikes for a total sum of$108

But for every subsequent bike, he gets $18 so the next$108 he will be able to make by selling just 6 bikes. So even if he earns twice as much as before, he doesn't need to sell twice as many bikes.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199 Veritas Prep Reviews Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Posts: 7370 Location: Pune, India Followers: 2283 Kudos [?]: 15089 [1] , given: 224 Re: As a bicycle salesperson, Norman earns a fixed salary of$20 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2014, 21:55
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
russ9 wrote:
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
piyushksharma wrote:
As a bicycle salesperson, Norman earns a fixed salary of $20 per week plus$6 per bicycle for the first six bicycles he sells, $12 per bicycle for the next six bicycles he sells, and$18 per bicycle for every bicycle sold after the first 12. This week, Norman earned more than twice as much as he did last week. If he sold x bicycles last week and y bicycles this week, which of the following statements must be true?

I. y > 2x

II. y > x

III. y > 3

A. I only
B. II only
C. I and II
D. II and III
E. I, II, and III

I think II and III are pretty straight forward and I am assuming you have no problem deciding about those.

Let me add here what I thought about I. One way is that you can try to find a case where he earns twice as much but doesn't sell twice as many bikes.
Another is a more intuitive approach. You know that initially, he has to sell more bikes to make some money (he earns only $6 from first 6 bikes and$12 from next 6 bikes. First $20 is too small an amount). Later on, he gets$18 per bike which means he makes money at a much faster rate. Hence, later on, he can double the amount he made previously very quickly and by selling far fewer bikes.
Hence it is not essential that he needs to sell twice as many bikes to make twice as much money. Hence y may not be greater than 2x.

Hi Karishma,

I'm intrigued by your intuitive approach.

To backtrack a little -- word problems as a whole seem to be the biggest time suck for me. I spent 4 minutes on this problem, and although I got it right, I can't seem to figure out how to speed things up when it comes to word problems as such.

Is there a strategy you recommend to tackle word problems in general? I know that this is a vague question but any help would be appreciated. Can you recommend other word problems to do to help with practice?

Regarding what you said, to me, 2 seemed very straight forward but I still went and checked statement 3. Yes, in hindsight, all of this looks very simple after reading your explanation but I'm not as certain during the test.

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Thanks

Hey Russ,

Familiarity creates intuition. When you see a lot of word problems, you are often able to see what is going to work and usually it is correct. Till a few years back, I use to rely on algebra (equations) to solve all word problems. Then, a mentor forced me to see the big picture, the reason behind every step and how the steps are meant for machines only - how we are quite capable of using reason and logic to solve most questions in a reasoning based test such as GMAT. Now the problem is that when you need to give a solution to someone, just saying that use intuition is not helpful. You can barely explain it in a face-to-face situation.

Also, confidence comes with practice. You will start feeling confident in your inferences from the given data once you see that you are getting most of them right on practice questions.

I will suggest you to start every word problem by trying to infer whatever you can from the given data. Try to minimize your use of equations (you can't let them go completely). Look for alternative solutions for every problem. Soon. you will start coming up with your own intuitive solutions.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

### Show Tags

01 Dec 2012, 23:00
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Test the inequalities:
I. $$y>2x$$
Let x = 1 bicycle; Earnings: 26 dollars
Let y = 3 bicylce; Earnings: 38 dollars
Is 38 more than twice of 26? NO!
II. $$y > x$$
Surely, there must be more bicycles sold in the second week. Always true! YES!
III. y>3
Testing I, we found that when y = 3 and x = 1, we still couldn't achieve the condition that the second week's earning is more than twice the first. Therefore, y must be greater than 3. YES!

Answer: D
_________________

Impossible is nothing to God.

Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 460
Location: India
Followers: 27

Kudos [?]: 426 [0], given: 14

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2014, 16:19
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
piyushksharma wrote:
As a bicycle salesperson, Norman earns a fixed salary of $20 per week plus$6 per bicycle for the first six bicycles he sells, $12 per bicycle for the next six bicycles he sells, and$18 per bicycle for every bicycle sold after the first 12. This week, Norman earned more than twice as much as he did last week. If he sold x bicycles last week and y bicycles this week, which of the following statements must be true?

I. y > 2x

II. y > x

III. y > 3

A. I only
B. II only
C. I and II
D. II and III
E. I, II, and III

I think II and III are pretty straight forward and I am assuming you have no problem deciding about those.

Let me add here what I thought about I. One way is that you can try to find a case where he earns twice as much but doesn't sell twice as many bikes.
Another is a more intuitive approach. You know that initially, he has to sell more bikes to make some money (he earns only $6 from first 6 bikes and$12 from next 6 bikes. First $20 is too small an amount). Later on, he gets$18 per bike which means he makes money at a much faster rate. Hence, later on, he can double the amount he made previously very quickly and by selling far fewer bikes.
Hence it is not essential that he needs to sell twice as many bikes to make twice as much money. Hence y may not be greater than 2x.

Hi Karishma,

I'm intrigued by your intuitive approach.

To backtrack a little -- word problems as a whole seem to be the biggest time suck for me. I spent 4 minutes on this problem, and although I got it right, I can't seem to figure out how to speed things up when it comes to word problems as such.

Is there a strategy you recommend to tackle word problems in general? I know that this is a vague question but any help would be appreciated. Can you recommend other word problems to do to help with practice?

Regarding what you said, to me, 2 seemed very straight forward but I still went and checked statement 3. Yes, in hindsight, all of this looks very simple after reading your explanation but I'm not as certain during the test.

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Thanks
Intern
Joined: 10 Nov 2013
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 20

### Show Tags

13 Sep 2014, 07:22
swaydzlycan wrote:
i still feel option (B) is correct because it says y>3 and you guys tested the condition with y=3 and x=1
but what about when y=4 and x=1 or 2
then the earning last week add up to 26 or 32 and the earnings this week is merely 44
and either ways the earnings last week is more than half of the earnings this week

Can you guys please clarify on this approach?

If Norman sold 3 bicycles this week then this week he earned 20+3*6=$38, which cannot be more than twice as much as he earned last week, since the minimum salary is fixed to$20. So y must be more than 3.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 17 Dec 2014
Posts: 11
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Dec 2014, 23:12
Lars1988 wrote:
As a bicycle salesperson, Norman earns a fixed salary of $20 per week plus$6 per bicycle for the first 6 bicycles he sells, $12 per bicycle for the next 6 bicycles he sells, and$18 per bicycle for every bicycle sold after first 12. This week, he earned more than twice as much as he did last week. If he sold x bicycles last week and y bicycles this week, which of the following statements must be true?

I. y>2x
II. y>x
III. y>3

A. I only
B. II only
C. I and II
D. II and III
E. I, II, III

What if you just do:
x=1 so y>2*1=2 so let's say y=3

20+(1*6)=26 = earnings last week
20+(3*6)=38 = earnings this week

He earned this week more than twice as much as last week so 38 must be bigger than 26*2.

38<52 so this means y>2x does not have to be true.

Is this correct or is this the wrong way?

To prove that (I) needn't hold, you need to find numbers where he earned more than twice but y was not greater than twice of x. You have done the opposite - you have taken a case where y is greater than twice of x and shown that he did not earn more than twice. This doesn't prove that (I) needn't hold.

The numbers you need to consider would be say x = 12, y = 24 (y is NOT MORE than twice of x)
Last week's earning = 20 + 6*6 + 12*6 = 128
This week's earning = 20 + 6*6 + 12*6 + 12*12 = 128 + 144 (More than twice of last week's earning)

So he could earn more than twice of last week's earning and still, y > 2x may not hold.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199 Veritas Prep Reviews Intern Joined: 17 Dec 2014 Posts: 11 Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0 Re: As a bicycle salesperson, Norman earns a fixed salary of$20 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Dec 2014, 04:24
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
Lars1988 wrote:
As a bicycle salesperson, Norman earns a fixed salary of $20 per week plus$6 per bicycle for the first 6 bicycles he sells, $12 per bicycle for the next 6 bicycles he sells, and$18 per bicycle for every bicycle sold after first 12. This week, he earned more than twice as much as he did last week. If he sold x bicycles last week and y bicycles this week, which of the following statements must be true?

I. y>2x
II. y>x
III. y>3

A. I only
B. II only
C. I and II
D. II and III
E. I, II, III

What if you just do:
x=1 so y>2*1=2 so let's say y=3

20+(1*6)=26 = earnings last week
20+(3*6)=38 = earnings this week

He earned this week more than twice as much as last week so 38 must be bigger than 26*2.

38<52 so this means y>2x does not have to be true.

Is this correct or is this the wrong way?

To prove that (I) needn't hold, you need to find numbers where he earned more than twice but y was not greater than twice of x. You have done the opposite - you have taken a case where y is greater than twice of x and shown that he did not earn more than twice. This doesn't prove that (I) needn't hold.

The numbers you need to consider would be say x = 12, y = 24 (y is NOT MORE than twice of x)
Last week's earning = 20 + 6*6 + 12*6 = 128
This week's earning = 20 + 6*6 + 12*6 + 12*12 = 128 + 144 (More than twice of last week's earning)

So he could earn more than twice of last week's earning and still, y > 2x may not hold.

Oke I thought because y can be bigger than 2x and he can earn more than twice last week x=1 and y=6 for example than 56>52 but if y is 3, 4 or 5, which is bigger dan 2x, y<52 and he did not earn more than twice last week. So it can be true but also false. So that's why I thought y>2x does not stand at all time.

I now understand that I have to find y=2x and that he earned this week more than twice last week but I thought the other way around could also solve the problem.
Re: As a bicycle salesperson, Norman earns a fixed salary of $20 [#permalink] 18 Dec 2014, 04:24 Go to page 1 2 Next [ 25 posts ] Similar topics Replies Last post Similar Topics: A salesperson receives a base salary of$1000 per month and a commissi 1 14 Jun 2016, 04:22
1 The combined salaries of three brothers is $90,000. Mr. Big earns twic 3 23 Jul 2014, 23:59 2 A salesperson for an automobile dealer earns an annual salary of$25,0 7 22 Mar 2015, 06:49
7 As a bicycle salesperson, Norman earns a fixed salary of $20 3 26 Sep 2013, 08:41 3 As a bicycle salesperson, Norman earns a fixed salary of$20 5 26 Feb 2011, 12:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# As a bicycle salesperson, Norman earns a fixed salary of \$20

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.