It is currently 24 Jun 2017, 09:22

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 05 May 2013
Posts: 43
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GRE 1: 326 Q161 V165
GPA: 3.1
WE: Military Officer (Military & Defense)
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2013, 14:58
I think this question is terrible.

Answer (B) is right because of the external fact that high land value implies multistory buildings--this is a fact they expect you to be able to reason. I don't care for this, but I think it'd be more acceptable if E wasn't also defensible using external knowledge.

e.g., E, which I picked:

Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often cleared to make wayfor
construction.

Since the stimulus reads: "in tropical areas bamboo... is always readily available."

And answer E explains that in areas where land values are increasing (which are the areas outlined by the exception in the stimulus), bamboo is NOT readily available, I think it's reasonable to conclude that bamboo is no longer an economical option because the availability--a premise of its economical quality in the first place, is no longer true.

To me, it's MORE reasonable than B, which involves introducing a totally new factoid, while E requires cobbling together pieces of the stimulus and the answer choice. That's what I liked about the LSAT: LSAC could throw out questions that had arguable ambiguity like this one. On the actual GMAT, I wouldn't even know I got this wrong.
Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2013
Posts: 86
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: ISB '15
WE: Account Management (Other)
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2013, 07:02
(A) Buildings constructed of bamboo are less likely to suffer earthquake damage than are steel and concrete buildings.

Accentuates the paradox. This does not explain why bamboo does not make better economic sense in areas where land values are high.

(B) Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings.
Initial Thought OFS. But after reading all other choices, this looked better.

Retrospection:

High land value leads to construction of multi storied buildings.( Is not there some element of assumption in this? I am not comfortable having to assume in these kind of questions and particularly in answer choices)

(C) In order to protect it from being damaged by termites and beetles, bamboo must be soaked, at some expense, in a preservative.

Some expense does not fully justify not making better sense. Moreover, this has got nothing to do with high land values which is the key for the question.

(D) In some tropical areas, bamboo is used to make the scaffolding that is used during large construction projects.

(E) Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often cleared to make way for construction.

It initially made some sense to me since Bamboo may not be available where land values are high since it is cleared. But the word increasing put me off. Moreover, The question talks about economic sense but not about availability.
Intern
Joined: 01 Aug 2013
Posts: 4
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2013, 11:31
I disagree on the correct answer choice.

Here we are asked to fill in an assumption which connect high land values and not using bamboo.

Answer choice B satisfies the latter and provides us enough reason to not use Bamboo; however, it fails to connect the reason which states "Bamboo should not be used when land values are high".
Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2013
Posts: 86
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: ISB '15
WE: Account Management (Other)
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2013, 11:37
finair wrote:
I disagree on the correct answer choice.

Here we are asked to fill in an assumption which connect high land values and not using bamboo.

Answer choice B satisfies the latter and provides us enough reason to not use Bamboo; however, it fails to connect the reason which states "Bamboo should not be used when land values are high".

That is my concern here. If we ignore the degree of assumption, we can connect any choice in the world in these connections. However, the assumption here is not too extreme. But I still prefer not making an assumption in evaluating a choice in the resolve the discrepancy problems.

This is OG. I don't know how to take it. But which other choice is better in your opinion?
Intern
Joined: 01 Aug 2013
Posts: 4
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2013, 12:10
pavan2185 wrote:
finair wrote:
I disagree on the correct answer choice.

Here we are asked to fill in an assumption which connect high land values and not using bamboo.

Answer choice B satisfies the latter and provides us enough reason to not use Bamboo; however, it fails to connect the reason which states "Bamboo should not be used when land values are high".

That is my concern here. If we ignore the degree of assumption, we can connect any choice in the world in these connections. However, the assumption here is not too extreme. But I still prefer not making an assumption in evaluating a choice in the resolve the discrepancy problems.

This is OG. I don't know how to take it. But which other choice is better in your opinion?

I went with Option C. Its the only option which refers to an increase in cost. I see all the other options as irrelevant. Option B sounds way out of scope. If the conclusion of the argument was "We should not build build buildings with bamboo" or something similar I would go with B.

I feel this question is way ambiguous.
Intern
Joined: 06 Jun 2012
Posts: 1
Schools: Booth '18
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2013, 10:47
I don't know whether my reply still counts or not. But why has everyone rejected Option E. The question clearly states:

"Moreover, in tropical areas bamboo is a much less expensive construction material than either steel or concrete and is always readily available."

"Is readily available".So if Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often cleared to make way for construction means Bamboo is not available readily. Hence it is not viable to use.

This makes more sense to me rather than simply assuming high land value = multi storey building.

Bluelagoon wrote:
betterscore wrote:
As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier than concrete. Moreover, in tropical areas bamboo is a much less expensive construction material than either steel or concrete and is always readily available. In tropical areas, therefore, building with bamboo makes better economic sense than building with steel or concrete, except where land values are high.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the exception noted above?

(A) Buildings constructed of bamboo are less likely to suffer earthquake damage than are steel and concrete buildings.
(B) Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings.
(C) In order to protect it from being damaged by termites and beetles, bamboo must be soaked, at some expense, in a preservative.
(D) In some tropical areas, bamboo is used to make the scaffolding that is used during large construction projects.
(E) Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often

I haven't seen such a question type where the GMAT boldly asks you to think why for a particular argument.
A) Strengthens the case.
B) Bingo ! this has high probability of being the answer.
D)Doesn't answer out question in any way. Out.

B wins.
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2096
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2013, 19:19
3
KUDOS
Expert's post
tkull wrote:
I don't know whether my reply still counts or not. But why has everyone rejected Option E. The question clearly states:

"Moreover, in tropical areas bamboo is a much less expensive construction material than either steel or concrete and is always readily available."

"Is readily available".So if Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often cleared to make way for construction means Bamboo is not available readily. Hence it is not viable to use.

This makes more sense to me rather than simply assuming high land value = multi storey building.

The problem with your logic is that you are going against the premise, a thing that is not allowed in GMAT. When the premise says that "bamboo is always readily available", an option statement indicating something against it is wrong for the reason that it contradicts the passage.

In addition, this is an official question and the official answer is B, so if you think E is correct, you think GMAC is wrong - not a fruitful way to approach GMAT.

Thanks,
Chiranjeev
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Intern
Joined: 15 Jul 2009
Posts: 41
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2014, 01:10
Can somebody please update the original post by completing the last option E?
Intern
Joined: 05 Jul 2014
Posts: 1
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jul 2014, 06:47
You don't build with bamboo, an economically sound material, in areas with high value because it would devalue the land price. You want to increase value by using high quality, expensive materials.

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Joined: 25 Aug 2010
Posts: 41
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2014, 01:44
my pick is E.

bamboo growing area is decreasing due to high land value, thus the total quantity of bamboo supplied is diminishing, causing the price to roar as well as the supply amount scarce, not suitable for building projects.
Director
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 597
Location: Germany
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 580 Q46 V24
GPA: 3.88
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2014, 05:16
We need an assumption, which weakens the position of using baboo as a constructiong material. As all stated points about bamboo in the argument were positive.
Consider you have a piece of land on the seashore (expensive \$/qm), which can be used to build a hotel on it. But bamboo is not a suitable construction material for multistory buildings. So if you use Bamboo you can build a building with 20 rooms instead of 120 rooms when using steel etc. --> It's a negative point for bamboo. Hence (B)
_________________

When you’re up, your friends know who you are. When you’re down, you know who your friends are.

800Score ONLY QUANT CAT1 51, CAT2 50, CAT3 50
GMAT PREP 670
MGMAT CAT 630
KAPLAN CAT 660

Director
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 597
Location: Germany
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 580 Q46 V24
GPA: 3.88
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2015, 07:21
So we need the connection between high land values and not using bamboos, although it's a best material of the above stated. Actually we need to find something negative regarding bamboos, on order not to use it, because in the argument we have read only positive points about usage of bamboos.

(A) Buildings constructed of bamboo are less likely to suffer earthquake damage than are steel and concrete buildings -> One more +1 for bamboo. Opposite....
(B) Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings --> makes sense, it's an example from a real life, in the areas with high land value you wont build a small house
(C) In order to protect it from being damaged by termites and beetles, bamboo must be soaked, at some expense, in a preservative --> ok, may be, but that doesn't explain why we schould not use bamboos in areas with high land values
(D) In some tropical areas, bamboo is used to make the scaffolding that is used during large construction projects --> Zero information for our case....
(E) Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often --> and what, after that it the discrepancy in the argument is even larger.
_________________

When you’re up, your friends know who you are. When you’re down, you know who your friends are.

800Score ONLY QUANT CAT1 51, CAT2 50, CAT3 50
GMAT PREP 670
MGMAT CAT 630
KAPLAN CAT 660

Intern
Joined: 21 Jan 2016
Posts: 17
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2016, 05:54
Bluelagoon wrote:
betterscore wrote:
As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier than concrete. Moreover, in tropical areas bamboo is a much less expensive construction material than either steel or concrete and is always readily available. In tropical areas, therefore, building with bamboo makes better economic sense than building with steel or concrete, except where land values are high.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the exception noted above?

(A) Buildings constructed of bamboo are less likely to suffer earthquake damage than are steel and concrete buildings.
(B) Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings.
(C) In order to protect it from being damaged by termites and beetles, bamboo must be soaked, at some expense, in a preservative.
(D) In some tropical areas, bamboo is used to make the scaffolding that is used during large construction projects.
(E) Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often

I haven't seen such a question type where the GMAT boldly asks you to think why for a particular argument.
A) Strengthens the case.
B) Bingo ! this has high probability of being the answer.
D)Doesn't answer out question in any way. Out.

B wins.

Hi there, I can understand why B is correct.
But just look at E, bamboo is often cleared in valuable lands--->fewer supply of bamboo--->bamboo is expensive in those areas.
Pls explain why E is incomplete in you opinion. Thanks.
Intern
Joined: 21 Jan 2016
Posts: 17
As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2016, 05:59
BrainLab wrote:
So we need the connection between high land values and not using bamboos, although it's a best material of the above stated. Actually we need to find something negative regarding bamboos, on order not to use it, because in the argument we have read only positive points about usage of bamboos.

(A) Buildings constructed of bamboo are less likely to suffer earthquake damage than are steel and concrete buildings -> One more +1 for bamboo. Opposite....
(B) Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings --> makes sense, it's an example from a real life, in the areas with high land value you wont build a small house
(C) In order to protect it from being damaged by termites and beetles, bamboo must be soaked, at some expense, in a preservative --> ok, may be, but that doesn't explain why we schould not use bamboos in areas with high land values
(D) In some tropical areas, bamboo is used to make the scaffolding that is used during large construction projects --> Zero information for our case....
(E) Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often --> and what, after that it the discrepancy in the argument is even larger.

Hi, I just can't get what you said about answer choice E, "the discrepancy in the argument is even larger."
From my point of view, it makes just as much sense as answer choice B does.
Bamboo is cleared in an area where land is getting more valuable--->less bamboo in that area--->bamboo is expensive--->bamboo is no longer economic building material.
Pls let me know your remarks on my reasoning. Thanks.
Jamboree GMAT Instructor
Status: GMAT Expert
Affiliations: Jamboree Education Pvt Ltd
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 286
Location: India
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2016, 23:47
In this argument all points have been given in favor of Bamboo except that it cannot be used in places where land values are high. We need to find out why that is the case. This is a paradox question. Hence as "B" suggests in places where land values are high, buildings with multiple floors are constructed and since Bamboo is not suitable for such buildings it is not used. "E" does not resolve the paradox rather makes it more complicated.Bamboo can be cleared for multiple purpose but that does not clarify why is it unsuitable for building purpose.
_________________

Aryama Dutta Saikia
Jamboree Education Pvt. Ltd.

Intern
Joined: 03 Mar 2015
Posts: 7
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V32
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.53
As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2016, 16:28
afabmp wrote:
I think this question is terrible.

Answer (B) is right because of the external fact that high land value implies multistory buildings--this is a fact they expect you to be able to reason. I don't care for this, but I think it'd be more acceptable if E wasn't also defensible using external knowledge.

e.g., E, which I picked:

Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often cleared to make wayfor
construction.

Since the stimulus reads: "in tropical areas bamboo... is always readily available."

And answer E explains that in areas where land values are increasing (which are the areas outlined by the exception in the stimulus), bamboo is NOT readily available, I think it's reasonable to conclude that bamboo is no longer an economical option because the availability--a premise of its economical quality in the first place, is no longer true.

To me, it's MORE reasonable than B, which involves introducing a totally new factoid, while E requires cobbling together pieces of the stimulus and the answer choice. That's what I liked about the LSAT: LSAC could throw out questions that had arguable ambiguity like this one. On the actual GMAT, I wouldn't even know I got this wrong.

Agree with this completely

B makes you assume high values -> multi story buildings
E you have to assume as supply goes down, price goes up

IMO, the assumption in E is MUCH easier to make.... I think this question is complete BS. Even if E is wrong, B doesn't seem right...
Director
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Posts: 650
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2016, 12:50
betterscore wrote:
As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier than concrete. Moreover, in tropical areas bamboo is a much less expensive construction material than either steel or concrete and is always readily available. In tropical areas, therefore, building with bamboo makes better economic sense than building with steel or concrete, except where land values are high.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the exception noted above?

(A) Buildings constructed of bamboo are less likely to suffer earthquake damage than are steel and concrete buildings.
(B) Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings.
(C) In order to protect it from being damaged b[y termites and beetles, bamboo must be soaked, at some expense, in a preservative.
(D) In some tropical areas, bamboo is used to make the scaffolding that is used during large construction projects.
(E) Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often cleared to make way for construction.

Stimulus tells us that when land price is high then bamboo is NOT suitable.
Option B tells us why it should not used. -Because when land is expensive, it makes sense to make multi-storey buildings to get maximum value of that land.

BAMBOO CANNOT BE USED TO MAKE MULTI STOREY BUILDING; therefore it is an exception for areas with high land price.
B) Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings.

THEREFORE B IS THE CORRECT ANSWER.

_________________

Posting an answer without an explanation is "GOD COMPLEX". The world doesn't need any more gods. Please explain you answers properly.
FINAL GOODBYE :- 17th SEPTEMBER 2016. .. 16 March 2017 - I am back but for all purposes please consider me semi-retired.

Manager
Joined: 18 Sep 2015
Posts: 109
GMAT 1: 610 Q43 V31
GMAT 2: 610 Q47 V27
GMAT 3: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 4: 700 Q49 V35
WE: Project Management (Health Care)
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Oct 2016, 05:02
betterscore wrote:
As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier than concrete. Moreover, in tropical areas bamboo is a much less expensive construction material than either steel or concrete and is always readily available. In tropical areas, therefore, building with bamboo makes better economic sense than building with steel or concrete, except where land values are high.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the exception noted above?

(A) Buildings constructed of bamboo are less likely to suffer earthquake damage than are steel and concrete buildings.
(B) Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings.
(C) In order to protect it from being damaged by termites and beetles, bamboo must be soaked, at some expense, in a preservative.
(D) In some tropical areas, bamboo is used to make the scaffolding that is used during large construction projects.
(E) Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often cleared to make way for construction.

the logical chains is as follows:
1. Bambo-> "better" (stronger/cheaper/more available) than steel or concrete | when land is not expensive
2. Bambo -> steel/concrete are better than bamboo | when land is expensive

now in order to understand the correct answer C we need to understand it's implications:
- B. Says that steel/concrete are prefeable to bambo (becuase mambo is not good) | for multi story buildings
- When land value is expensive , we would like to build more per the area we are allowed to build in.
- This means, it is likley that when the land is expensive we will have in that area more multistory buildings.
- so option B helps to create the following logical chain: land is expensive->multistory buildings -> steel/concrete are better (since bambo is unsuitable)
- Hence, this bridge w/e seems to be in contradiction.
Intern
Joined: 20 Apr 2015
Posts: 25
GPA: 3.9
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2017, 04:31
Though B is the apt one among the given options. Instead of multi storied buildings people can opt to construct in a small area when land price is high. This is something like an apartment or multi storied building. Doesn't suit well for OG.
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 438
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2017, 12:13
As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier than concrete. Moreover, in tropical areas bamboo is a much less expensive construction material than either steel or concrete and is always readily available. In tropical areas, therefore, building with bamboo makes better economic sense than building with steel or concrete, except where land values are high.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the exception noted above?

(A) Buildings constructed of bamboo are less likely to suffer earthquake damage than are steel and concrete buildings.
(B) Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings.
(C) In order to protect it from being damaged by termites and beetles, bamboo must be soaked, at some expense, in a preservative.
(D) In some tropical areas, bamboo is used to make the scaffolding that is used during large construction projects.
(E) Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often cleared to make way for construction.

Yay i got it right jeje, well it was easy question and can be soved with POE,
after POE we are left with B and E,

in E the bamboos are used after cutting them from the ground and then used as required,so even if the land value is high and the bamboos are cleared that would mean that there are more bamboos available for use.also this point only address the area where the bamboos grow. but not all the areas where the price of the land is high.
Option B is correct from POE and also multistory buildings are ususally made where the land values are high to avoid land cost.

Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and   [#permalink] 09 Mar 2017, 12:13

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 42 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
6 Automobile manufacturers defend their substitution of steel frames in 1 13 Mar 2016, 03:44
1 Bamboo is slowly being recognized by a growing number of industries as 1 28 May 2017, 12:34
2 There is strong lobbying for privatization of governmental 3 16 Apr 2012, 05:59
4 An engineering firm has suggested the construction of an 10 02 Sep 2015, 08:38
31 The imposition of quotas limiting imported steel will not 10 07 Jun 2017, 23:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by