Kellogg (Chat #5); Stanford (Chat #2); Tepper (Chat #4) | Slight possibility of Tuck calls late afternoon (Join Chat #3)
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Join IIMU Director to gain an understanding of DEM program, its curriculum & about the career prospects through a Q&A chat session. Dec 11th at 8 PM IST and 6:30 PST
Enter The Economist GMAT Tutor’s Brightest Minds competition – it’s completely free! All you have to do is take our online GMAT simulation test and put your mind to the test. Are you ready? This competition closes on December 13th.
Attend a Veritas Prep GMAT Class for Free. With free trial classes you can work with a 99th percentile expert free of charge. Learn valuable strategies and find your new favorite instructor; click for a list of upcoming dates and teachers.
Does GMAT RC seem like an uphill battle? e-GMAT is conducting a free webinar to help you learn reading strategies that can enable you to solve 700+ level RC questions with at least 90% accuracy in less than 10 days.
As a result of implementing an experimental farming system that combin
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 17 Sep 2018, 08:41
2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
25% (medium)
Question Stats:
76% (01:40) correct 24% (02:00) wrong based on 280 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
As a result of implementing an experimental farming system that combined aggressive new fertilization, deep irrigation, and speculative pesticides, the yield on crops at a farm in central California grew consistently and considerably over the past six years. However, yields this year unexpectedly plummeted, causing the farm's owners considerable financial difficulties.
Which of the following statements, if true, best explains the unexpected drop in yield?
A) As a result of a serious and recent economic recession, the market for the products the farm produced shrank in size during the past year.
B) Other farms that began using the experimental system at about the same time also reported an unexpected plummet in yields this year.
C) The central California region where the farm in question is located experienced a drought 9 years ago, 3 years ago, and this past year.
D) A different experimental system, used on a different crop, failed after two years at a farm in Iowa. Scientists later discovered that chemicals involved in this different system slowly poisoned the soil.
E) Significant and sustained increases in agricultural productivity eventually lead to an exhaustion of important nutrients in land.
Re: As a result of implementing an experimental farming system that combin
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Feb 2015, 07:18
1
A) As a result of a serious and recent economic recession, the market for the products the farm produced shrank in size during the past year. Recessions and market conditions do not affect crop yields.
B) Other farms that began using the experimental system at about the same time also reported an unexpected plummet in yields this year. We are not interested in other farms. This is out of scope.
C) The central California region where the farm in question is located experienced a drought 9 years ago, 3 years ago, and this past year. The yield increased for the past six years, which includes the drought three years ago, so this is not sufficient.
D) A different experimental system, used on a different crop, failed after two years at a farm in Iowa. Scientists later discovered that chemicals involved in this different system slowly poisoned the soil. We are not interested in other experimental systems. This is out of scope.
E) Significant and sustained increases in agricultural productivity eventually lead to an exhaustion of important nutrients in land. This is the correct answer. It directly ties the experimental farming system in central California to the decrease in crop yield.
Re: As a result of implementing an experimental farming system that combin
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 May 2016, 14:44
only option E explains the link between experimental farming system to decreased yield which eventually resulted in the sustained increase in agricultural productivity thereby leading to loss of essential nutrients from land
Re: As a result of implementing an experimental farming system that combin
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 May 2016, 00:39
souvik101990 wrote:
As a result of implementing an experimental farming system that combined aggressive new fertilization, deep irrigation, and speculative pesticides, the yield on crops at a farm in central California grew consistently and considerably over the past six years. However, yields this year unexpectedly plummeted, causing the farm's owners considerable financial difficulties.
Which of the following statements, if true, best explains the unexpected drop in yield?
A) As a result of a serious and recent economic recession, the market for the products the farm produced shrank in size during the past year. B) Other farms that began using the experimental system at about the same time also reported an unexpected plummet in yields this year. C) The central California region where the farm in question is located experienced a drought 9 years ago, 3 years ago, and this past year. D) A different experimental system, used on a different crop, failed after two years at a farm in Iowa. Scientists later discovered that chemicals involved in this different system slowly poisoned the soil. E) Significant and sustained increases in agricultural productivity eventually lead to an exhaustion of important nutrients in land.
Premise: A new experimental farming system increased the yields fot the past 6 years. But now the yield has plummeted. We need to find a reason for this.
The yield can be reduced by - external factors such as rain, storm or by diminishing effect of the experimental farming system or by any other external factors.
Option E talks on the lines that the effects of the experimental farming system eventually lead to the exhaustion of nutrients in the land. Hence the correct answer.
Re: As a result of implementing an experimental farming system that combin
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Jun 2018, 11:00
Narrowed down to D and E.
But knocked off D cause it says " failed after two years at a farm in Iowa " but the case at hand happened at the seventh year, hence what happened at the second year of any experimental process at any other place is Out of scope.
Re: As a result of implementing an experimental farming system that combin
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Sep 2018, 08:19
1
souvik101990 wrote:
As a result of implementing an experimental farming system that combined aggressive new fertilization, deep irrigation, and speculative pesticides, the yield on crops at a farm in central California grew consistently and considerably over the past six years. However, yields this year unexpectedly plummeted, causing the farm's owners considerable financial difficulties.
Which of the following statements, if true, best explains the unexpected drop in yield?
A) As a result of a serious and recent economic recession, the market for the products the farm produced shrank in size during the past year. B) Other farms that began using the experimental system at about the same time also reported an unexpected plummet in yields this year. C) The central California region where the farm in question is located experienced a drought 9 years ago, 3 years ago, and this past year. D) A different experimental system, used on a different crop, failed after two years at a farm in Iowa. Scientists later discovered that chemicals involved in this different system slowly poisoned the soil. E) Significant and sustained increases in agricultural productivity eventually lead to an exhaustion of important nutrients in land.
As a result of implementing an experimental farming system that combin
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Sep 2018, 02:36
As a result of implementing an experimental farming system that combined aggressive new fertilization, deep irrigation, and speculative pesticides, the yield on crops at a farm in central California grew consistently and considerably over the past six years. However, yields this year unexpectedly plummeted, causing the farm's owners considerable financial difficulties.
Which of the following statements, if true, best explains the unexpected drop in yield?
A) As a result of a serious and recent economic recession, the market for the products the farm produced shrank in size during the past year. Explanation: IRRELEVANT
B) Other farms that began using the experimental system at about the same time also reported an unexpected plummet in yields this year. Explanation: IRRELEVANT
C) The central California region where the farm in question is located experienced a drought 9 years ago, 3 years ago, and this past year. Explanation: In this case, the farm should have experienced a decline on yield after 3 years of experimental farming system implementation.INCORRECT
D) A different experimental system, used on a different crop, failed after two years at a farm in Iowa. Scientists later discovered that chemicals involved in this different system slowly poisoned the soil. Explanation: This one is a strong contender. However it talks about a different system! Is it necessary to know about a different system to answer this question. Ofcourse no :D Secondly, Its a different experimental system on a different crop. Therefore most cases will have a different result due to factors like location, subject for experiment or even the experimental system itself. Hence INCORRECT
E) Significant and sustained increases in agricultural productivity eventually lead to an exhaustion of important nutrients in land. Explanation: This is very close to the passage. Significant and sustained increase - the yield on crops at the farm in Central California experienced a consistent growth and the process must have removed all the nutrients from the soil for the plant to grow further. Hence CORRECT.
Re: As a result of implementing an experimental farming system that combin
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Nov 2019, 02:59
souvik101990 wrote:
As a result of implementing an experimental farming system that combined aggressive new fertilization, deep irrigation, and speculative pesticides, the yield on crops at a farm in central California grew consistently and considerably over the past six years. However, yields this year unexpectedly plummeted, causing the farm's owners considerable financial difficulties.
Which of the following statements, if true, best explains the unexpected drop in yield?
A) As a result of a serious and recent economic recession, the market for the products the farm produced shrank in size during the past year.
B) Other farms that began using the experimental system at about the same time also reported an unexpected plummet in yields this year.
C) The central California region where the farm in question is located experienced a drought 9 years ago, 3 years ago, and this past year.
D) A different experimental system, used on a different crop, failed after two years at a farm in Iowa. Scientists later discovered that chemicals involved in this different system slowly poisoned the soil.
E) Significant and sustained increases in agricultural productivity eventually lead to an exhaustion of important nutrients in land.
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION
The yield at a central Californian farm dropped significantly after 6 years of consistent growth. Clearly, something of importance to the yield changed. Some possibilities include: (1) a storm decimated the crop (although this level of storm could have only hit this year, as the crops grew "consistently and considerably over the past six years") (2) the farmer stopped using the technique (3) over a period of six years, the technique overused natural soil nutrients and drained important chemicals that the farm crops needed to grow.
A. The original argument pertains to a decline in the yield of the farm, not a decline in the buyers. The farm's yield has no relationship with the number of buyers as yield simply refers to the ratio of seeds planted to crops available for harvest.
B. Although this confirms that the drop the farm in central California experienced is not unique, it does not explain the drop in yield.
C. Since a drought occurred 9 years ago prior to the experimental system and during the experimental system (3 years ago) without any affect on yields, it is not logical to conclude that the drought caused the decline in yields this year. In other words, since the yield grew "consistently" even during the drought 3 years ago and 6 years ago, it is illogical to conclude that the drought caused the decline in yield this year.
D. The circumstances between the two experimental systems are too different to allow comparisons and a logical deduction that the errors of the Iowa system explain the errors of the central California system. Specifically: (1) the length of time before declines in yields occurred differed considerably (2) the crops the farm produced differed (3) the geographic region of the farm (and climate) differed considerably.
E. The sustained (6 years, "consistently") and significant ("considerably") expansion in productivity ("yield") led to exhaustion of nutrients, meaning crops could not attain the chemical compounds they needed to grow. This answer explains why the crop yield dropped after so many years and why it dropped after years of growth.
_________________