Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 28 Feb 2018
Posts: 14

As is supported by evidence recently presented in mathematical
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Mar 2018, 17:02
Question Stats:
21% (01:16) correct 79% (01:29) wrong based on 609 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
As is supported by evidence recently presented in mathematical symposia, mathematicians are discovering more and more unsolved problems, nearly twice as many as confounded mathematicians of the 1950s. a. twice as many as confounded b. double the number of problems that confounded c. two times the problems as confounded the d. twice as many as the problems that confounded e. double the problems that confounded
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.



Intern
Joined: 21 Oct 2009
Posts: 17
Location: India
GPA: 2.83

Re: As is supported by evidence recently presented in mathematical
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Mar 2018, 18:09
jooyoung99 wrote: As is supported by evidence recently presented in mathematical symposia, mathematicians are discovering more and more unsolved problems, nearly twice as many as confounded mathematicians of the 1950s.
a. twice as many as confounded b. double the number of problems that confounded c. two times the problems as confounded the d. twice as many as the problems that confounded e. double the problems that confounded I answered it in a haste as (B)......I guess the sentence in simple words is trying to say: More and more unsolved problems are now being solved>>which is almost double the number of problems which could not be solved in 1950 and confounded=confused/tricked the then mathematicians'........ a) Twice as many as (the unsolved problems) that confoundedwe dont need to write the ones in bracket, as the reference is quite clear, as the clause immediately after the comma is referring to the "unsolved problems" which is just before the comma. b) double the number of problems  this part looks like directly referring to the unsolved problems, giving it a meaning as if the number of unsolved problems were exactly the same number of overall problems that confounded (confused/tricked) mathematicians' of 1950 (irrespective of they were finally solved/unsolved). c) same error as b d) Twice as many as the problems that confounded.......here again the reference to unsolved problems is wrongly made to the whole set of problems which confounded 1950 Mathematicians', some of which would have been solved too........ e) same error as b So A, is non wordy, correct reference, meaning contained and apt. Experts: Pls correct my understanding



Intern
Joined: 28 Feb 2018
Posts: 14

Re: Can someone help me explain this one?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Mar 2018, 20:13
So in this sentence, I think what is "nearly twice as many" are unsolved problems.
What's throwing me off is the comparison of "unsolved problems" to "confounded mathematicians of the 1950s".
How can there be twice as many "unsolved problems" as "confounded mathematicians"? Is there an implied "unsolved problems" somewhere?
I think this is how the sentence should be written:
As is supported by evidence recently presented in mathematical symposia, mathematicians are discovering more and more unsolved problems that are nearly twice as many as problems discovered by confounded mathematicians of the 1950s.
What am I missing?



Intern
Joined: 25 Jun 2017
Posts: 8

Re: As is supported by evidence recently presented in mathematical
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Mar 2018, 06:55
Hi experts Kindly provide the detailed explanation of the answer. IMO, the answer should be D as it correctly conveys the intended meaning by modifying unsolved problems' in a correct grammatical way.



Manager
Joined: 22 May 2017
Posts: 117

Re: As is supported by evidence recently presented in mathematical
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Mar 2018, 21:56
Can you provide detailed explanation why D is wrong
_________________
Kudos please if explanation helped  Don't stop when you are tired , stop when you are DONE .



Intern
Joined: 14 Nov 2017
Posts: 4

Re: As is supported by evidence recently presented in mathematical
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Mar 2018, 18:09
D is comparing the amount of problems that mathematicians found with the amount of problems that problems found which is illogical. In A confounded acts as an adjective to 1950's mathematicians.



Intern
Joined: 19 Feb 2018
Posts: 1

Re: As is supported by evidence recently presented in mathematical
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Mar 2018, 21:23
twice as many as "that" would make sense.. how can that be eliminated. What's wrong with option B?



VP
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1089

Re: As is supported by evidence recently presented in mathematical
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Mar 2018, 07:39
twice is used for comparison, double is mostly used as an adjective. here this question is for comparison. A vs D. let see comparison of what. "unsolved problem" compared with ??? D changed the meaning as it is talking about all the problem.
_________________
Thanks! Do give some kudos.
Simple strategy: “Once you’ve eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”
Best Gmat Resource: GmatPrep CRGmatPrep SCGmatPrep RC
Want to improve your Score: GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 1 GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 2
My Notes: Reading comprehension  Critical Reasoning



Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 476

Re: As is supported by evidence recently presented in mathematical
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Apr 2018, 10:06
is n't A a runon sentence? nearly twice as many as [number of problems] confounded ...... subject + verb , two independent clauses joined without conjunction. mikemcgarry can you please help?



Intern
Joined: 15 Jan 2016
Posts: 33

Re: As is supported by evidence recently presented in mathematical
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Apr 2018, 21:49
I’m unsure what the comparison is at this point.  problems?
Posted from my mobile device



Intern
Joined: 06 Mar 2018
Posts: 40

Re: As is supported by evidence recently presented in mathematical
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Apr 2018, 23:24
can some expert throw some light?



Intern
Joined: 28 Apr 2014
Posts: 49

Re: As is supported by evidence recently presented in mathematical
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Apr 2018, 07:36
I am not sure y D is incorrect and A is correct?
Is it because in D it says problems rather than unsolved problems?



Intern
Joined: 30 Nov 2016
Posts: 34
GMAT 1: 570 Q47 V21 GMAT 2: 540 Q47 V16 GMAT 3: 560 Q39 V28

Re: As is supported by evidence recently presented in mathematical
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Apr 2018, 00:50
I'm still confused about the comparision. GMATNinja or any expert please help us here. Thank you.
_________________
Good things are going to happen. Keep fighting for what you want. Don't worry and have faith that it'll all work out!



Intern
Joined: 07 Jun 2017
Posts: 45
Location: United Arab Emirates
Concentration: Healthcare, International Business
GPA: 3.19

Re: As is supported by evidence recently presented in mathematical
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Apr 2018, 12:30
Hi Experts Can you pls explain why its A and why not B.I am confused



BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 495
Location: India
GPA: 4

Re: As is supported by evidence recently presented in mathematical
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Apr 2018, 01:08



Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1302

Re: As is supported by evidence recently presented in mathematical
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Apr 2018, 00:36
This isn't a wonderful sentence, but I think what's confounding many people here is that "confounded" is intended as a verb, not an adjective. We're not talking about "confounded mathematicians." We're saying that the current number is twice the number that confounded the mathematicians of the 50's.
_________________
Dmitry Farber  Manhattan GMAT Instructor  New York
Manhattan GMAT Discount  Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews  View Instructor Profile  Manhattan GMAT Reviews



Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 464
Location: Malaysia
GPA: 3.95
WE: Consulting (Energy and Utilities)

Re: As is supported by evidence recently presented in mathematical
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Apr 2018, 04:31
DmitryFarber wrote: This isn't a wonderful sentence, but I think what's confounding many people here is that "confounded" is intended as a verb, not an adjective. We're not talking about "confounded mathematicians." We're saying that the current number is twice the number that confounded the mathematicians of the 50's. Hi DmitryFarberCan you please Explain how D is grammatically wrong??
_________________
If my Post helps you in Gaining Knowledge, Help me with KUDOS.. !!



Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1302

Re: As is supported by evidence recently presented in mathematical
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Apr 2018, 22:59
rahul16singh28 Sure. First off, it works just fine to compare modifiers rather than nouns, so we don't need to add the words "the problems." When we do, it creates a potential misinterpretation. We could read this as "Mathematicians discovering twice as many unsolved problems as the problems that confounded mathematicians did." In other words, grammatically, we are comparing mathematicians to unsolved problems. This might seem like a really crazy way to read the sentence, but the structure creates that expectation. Think of the sentence "I scored ten goals, twice as many as the top player on the opposing team." Notice that here I'm comparing what I did to what the other player did. That's the same structure we see in D.
_________________
Dmitry Farber  Manhattan GMAT Instructor  New York
Manhattan GMAT Discount  Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews  View Instructor Profile  Manhattan GMAT Reviews



Director
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 539
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

As is supported by evidence recently presented in mathematical
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 May 2018, 02:08
DmitryFarber wrote: rahul16singh28 Sure. First off, it works just fine to compare modifiers rather than nouns, so we don't need to add the words "the problems." When we do, it creates a potential misinterpretation. We could read this as "Mathematicians discovering twice as many unsolved problems as the problems that confounded mathematicians did." In other words, grammatically, we are comparing mathematicians to unsolved problems. This might seem like a really crazy way to read the sentence, but the structure creates that expectation. Think of the sentence "I scored ten goals, twice as many as the top player on the opposing team." Notice that here I'm comparing what I did to what the other player did. That's the same structure we see in D. Hello DmitryFarber, Thanks for the post. I, however, am still struggling with understanding the issue with D. How is A more clear than D? I think the part 'twice as many as problems that confounded..' rightly presents the comparison of "the number of unsolved problems that the mathematicians are trying to solve" with the " number of problems that confounded mathematicians in....". Where am I going wrong? Would you please assist here?
_________________
 "Trust the timing of your life" Hit Kudus if this has helped you get closer to your goal, and also to assist others save time. Tq



Intern
Joined: 18 Feb 2018
Posts: 27

Re: As is supported by evidence recently presented in mathematical
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Jul 2018, 22:43
I understand that confounded is a verb here, but shouldn't 'that' or 'those' be placed between 'as' and 'confounded'. Shouldn't the sentence be: .......nearly twice as many (unsolved problems) as (those) confounded mathematicians of 1950s??




Re: As is supported by evidence recently presented in mathematical &nbs
[#permalink]
06 Jul 2018, 22:43






