It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 15:03

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# As media exposure increased for the Jersey Shore in the last

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

SVP
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2139

Kudos [?]: 1604 [0], given: 8

Location: New York, NY
As media exposure increased for the Jersey Shore in the last [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Apr 2013, 19:25
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

77% (01:18) correct 23% (01:50) wrong based on 189 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

As media exposure increased for the Jersey Shore in the last 5 years, the annual number of people visiting the shore increased each year. Over the same period, however, the number of people getting sun burns from suntanning decreased, even though there was no reduction in the number of people suntanning on the beach each day. Further, the number of sunny days and the UV (Ultraviolet) Index actually increased.

Which of the following, if true for the Jersey Shore over the last 5 years, most helps to explain the decrease?

(A) Sunburns are most likely to happen when beach go-ers suntan for consecutive sunny days at the beach.

(B) Sunburns severely damage at least several people's skin each year at the Jersey Shore (hyperpigmentation, discoloration and burned patches of skin)

(C) People going to the Jersey Shore used suntan lotion with increasing levels of UV protection and monitored UV levels to help determine what times during the day were most suitable for being in the sun.

(D) The average length of stay for people visiting the Jersey Shore increased slightly.

(E) Construction of new shops, malls, and casinos by the Jersey shore helped attract visitors to go indoors rather than stay outdoors.

original source: GMAT Pill
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 1604 [0], given: 8

Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 132

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

26 Apr 2013, 19:40
C looks best .gives us a reason as why the number of people suffering sunburns will decrease although the number of people visiting the shore has increased

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 3

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1127

Kudos [?]: 3480 [0], given: 123

Location: United States

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2013, 00:00
IMO, C is correct.

Although there was no reduction in the number of people suntanning on the beach each day, the number of people getting sun burns from suntanning will decrease if these people are protected from sun burns or they go to the beach at a suitable time. C is correct.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Kudos [?]: 3480 [0], given: 123

Intern
Joined: 07 Mar 2013
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2013, 05:55
pqhai wrote:
IMO, C is correct.

Although there was no reduction in the number of people suntanning on the beach each day, the number of people getting sun burns from suntanning will decrease if these people are protected from sun burns or they go to the beach at a suitable time. C is correct.

Hi pqhai,

C can be the ans but does not give us the info that earlier they did not do what they did now (used suntan lotion with increasing levels of UV protection and monitored UV levels to help determine what times during the day )

whereas E clearly mentions a reason why the number with suntanning has decreased :go indoors rather than stay outdoors

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 333

Kudos [?]: 421 [2], given: 4

Schools: LBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2013, 06:14
2
KUDOS
Hi Himus,

The issue with E is that it contradicts with a sentence in the main paragraph:

even though there was no reduction in the number of people suntanning on the beach each day.

Which means that the new shops have not had any impact on the number of people on the beach.

We are looking for something that means that the number of sun burn cases has gone down, whilst the number of people has gone up/stayed the same...
_________________

Former GMAT Pill student, now on staff. Used GMATPILL OG 12 and nothing else: 770 (48,48) & 6.0

... and more

Kudos [?]: 421 [2], given: 4

Intern
Joined: 15 Jan 2016
Posts: 19

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 37

As media exposure increased for the Jersey Shore in the last [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2016, 15:16
plumber250 wrote:
Hi Himus,

The issue with E is that it contradicts with a sentence in the main paragraph:

even though there was no reduction in the number of people suntanning on the beach each day.

Which means that the new shops have not had any impact on the number of people on the beach.

We are looking for something that means that the number of sun burn cases has gone down, whilst the number of people has gone up/stayed the same...

I chose E, because I reasoned in the following way.

Because of the new attractions in Jersey shore, people did not spend as much time suntanning on the beach as they used to do earlier. Therefore the incidences of Sunburns have decreased.

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 37

Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3157

Kudos [?]: 3313 [0], given: 22

Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
As media exposure increased for the Jersey Shore in the last [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2016, 10:44
plumber250 wrote:
Hi Himus,

The issue with E is that it contradicts with a sentence in the main paragraph:

even though there was no reduction in the number of people suntanning on the beach each day.

Which means that the new shops have not had any impact on the number of people on the beach.

We are looking for something that means that the number of sun burn cases has gone down, whilst the number of people has gone up/stayed the same...

I chose E, because I reasoned in the following way.

Because of the new attractions in Jersey shore, people did not spend as much time suntanning on the beach as they used to do earlier. Therefore the incidences of Sunburns have decreased.

Your argument is valid. E can definitely be an explanation. However option C is a more direct explanation, whereas for E, a small assumption needs to be taken (that the visitors spent less time outdoors). In absence of C, E would be the best answer.

Kudos [?]: 3313 [0], given: 22

Chat Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 574

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 139

Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Re: As media exposure increased for the Jersey Shore in the last [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2016, 11:19
Looking for an explanation as to why sun burns decreased "even though there was no reduction in the number of people suntanning on the beach each day"

Reason is C.

E doesn't justify the premise in the argument --> "even though there was no reduction in the number of people suntanning on the beach each day"

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 139

Re: As media exposure increased for the Jersey Shore in the last   [#permalink] 05 Nov 2016, 11:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by