It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 09:48

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of of

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 25 Feb 2005
Posts: 42

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2005, 00:00
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

17. Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of of mutual funds, with the intention to turn in good results in both â€œbullâ€

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 11

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2005, 00:59
I guess A

it shouldn't be C/D since
C--> no 2 verbs create and intended in a sentence
D--> break the parallelism structure in a sentence, create and intending
E is strange to me
B is too wordy

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4285

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2005, 09:11
C it is
A) portfolios cannot have any intention
C) portfolios however can be intended for some given goal
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Feb 2005
Posts: 486

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Location: Milan Italy

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2005, 09:14
C was pick too...
I often find "intended to" in articles etc. (don't know if familiarity always works )

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 25 Feb 2005
Posts: 42

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2005, 09:55
Paul wrote:
C it is
A) portfolios cannot have any intention
C) portfolios however can be intended for some given goal

OA is 'C'

Good Point! I overlooked it.

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 11

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2005, 22:26
I would like to go for more detail on the grammar in this question.

Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of of mutual funds, intended to turn in good results in both â€œbullâ€

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5034

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2005, 22:53
Paul wrote:
C it is
A) portfolios cannot have any intention
C) portfolios however can be intended for some given goal

But reading sentence, it seems we're supposed to be describing the investors rather than portfolios...

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4285

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2005, 07:03
C
subject: asset allocators
verb: create
object: portfolios
past participle(introducing participial phrase): intended

A
subject: Asset allocators
verb: create
object: portfolios
preposition(introducing prepositional phrase): with the intention...

The point is that in either A or C, the subject/verb/object stay similar. The difference is in the phrase which follows which are supposed to modify the noun immediately preceding them in which case is "portfolios". As you can see, once again, portfolios can be intended for X but cannot have any kind of intention as A implies
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 11

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2005, 09:14
One more question Paul :

how about using a passive past participle

Assets allocators create portfolios,...., are intended to turn in good result in both "bull" and "bear" markets

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 896

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2005, 12:50
Late but C it is . It's been previously discussed on this forum too

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 02 Dec 2004
Posts: 224

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2005, 12:57
Paul wrote:
C
subject: asset allocators
verb: create
object: portfolios
past participle(introducing participial phrase): intended

A
subject: Asset allocators
verb: create
object: portfolios
preposition(introducing prepositional phrase): with the intention...

The point is that in either A or C, the subject/verb/object stay similar. The difference is in the phrase which follows which are supposed to modify the noun immediately preceding them in which case is "portfolios". As you can see, once again, portfolios can be intended for X but cannot have any kind of intention as A implies

Paul,

A quick question on idiom. is "with the intention to" correct uage of English. Thanks

Good explanation

P

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4285

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2005, 20:50
patrickpui, "with the intention to" is an idiom but it must have a proper subject, an animate object, who can "have such an intention".

ex: Robert believed that he with intention to make a quick profit will not prevail in the long run.

subject: he--> animate object who can have an intention

tsefsnoopy, you cannot use the passive form of "to be(auxiliary) + past participle"
Assets allocators create portfolios,...., are intended to turn in good result in both "bull" and "bear" markets.
The second half of the sentence simply does not have a connector which links the second clause with the independent clause. "which" would have been good but because which could ambiguously refer to "mutual funds", the passive form is not good. Either way, you are better off with the more simple participial form which is clear and concise.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

04 Apr 2005, 20:50
Display posts from previous: Sort by