It is currently 23 Oct 2017, 10:58

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Assumption Revision: Although there has been great scientific

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 888

Kudos [?]: 722 [0], given: 44

Location: Viet Nam
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07

Show Tags

13 Nov 2011, 19:10
How you can determine which is out of scope, between A and B. These two choices are quite relevant, although I agree that A is the right choice. B talk about the greenhouse gases, this is the consequence of globalwarming, right? I definitely confirmed this is not out of scope.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Kudos [?]: 722 [0], given: 44

Director
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 672

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 37

Show Tags

14 Nov 2011, 00:56
+1 for A.

An Assumption must be closely tied to the conclusion. According to the argument :
Premise:Temp will rise between 3-8 degrees.
Conclusion: Coastal population will have to be displaced.

A bridges the gap between Premise and Conclusion by acting as defender of the conclusion.

Crick

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 37

Manager
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 91

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

Show Tags

16 Nov 2011, 21:20
A

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 256

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 110

Show Tags

08 Dec 2011, 08:26
tuanquang269 wrote:
How you can determine which is out of scope, between A and B. These two choices are quite relevant, although I agree that A is the right choice. B talk about the greenhouse gases, this is the consequence of globalwarming, right? I definitely confirmed this is not out of scope.

B introduces greenhouse gases into the picture. They are not mentioned in the argument. In an assumption question, we are not required to bring in outside knowledge (the relation between greenhouse gases and global warming). That is why B is out of scope.
Please correct me if I am mistaken.

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 110

Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2011
Posts: 73

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 32

Schools: NUS

Show Tags

08 Dec 2011, 17:03
+1 for A as it weakens the argument by negation

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 32

Manager
Joined: 05 Mar 2011
Posts: 146

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 3

Show Tags

08 Dec 2011, 20:51
a

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 3

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2010
Posts: 280

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 1

Show Tags

08 Dec 2011, 22:31
i'm left only with A, after selecting out all the other options.

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2011
Posts: 184

Kudos [?]: 212 [0], given: 4

Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.7
WE: Account Management (Consumer Products)

Show Tags

08 Dec 2011, 23:01
A when negated will totally disprove the conclusion.
_________________

DETERMINED TO BREAK 700!!!

Kudos [?]: 212 [0], given: 4

Intern
Joined: 23 Sep 2011
Posts: 48

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 21

Location: Singapore
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.44
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)

Show Tags

08 Dec 2011, 23:08
Conclusion: rising temperatures will cause rise in sea levels, displacing millions of people
A - Defender. When negated, ie, If there were technological developments that would prevent all the said catastrophic effects, then conclusion falls apart.
B - Irrelevant
C - Irrelevant to conclusion
D - Irrelevant
E - strong wording, irrelevant

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 21

Director
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 520

Kudos [?]: 299 [0], given: 16

Location: United States
GPA: 3.86
WE: Accounting (Commercial Banking)

Show Tags

12 Dec 2011, 04:35
Can anyone justify why not E?
_________________

Kudos [?]: 299 [0], given: 16

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10106

Kudos [?]: 264 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

29 Nov 2014, 09:28
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 264 [0], given: 0

MBA Section Director
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4494

Kudos [?]: 17085 [3], given: 1963

Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Assumption Revision: Although there has been great scientific [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Feb 2015, 21:10
3
KUDOS
Expert's post
11
This post was
BOOKMARKED
This question is part of the GMAT Club Critical Reasoning : Assumption" Revision Project.

Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over global warming, most scientists now agree that human activity is causing the Earth’s temperature to rise. Though predictions vary, many global warming experts believe that average global temperatures will rise between three and eight degrees Fahrenheit during the next century. Such an increase would cause an alarming rise in sea levels, displacing millions of people by destroying major population centers along the world’s coastlines. Which of the following is an assumption in support of the argument’s conclusion?

• New technological developments in the next century will not divert rising seas from the world’s coastal cities.
• Individuals will not become more aware of the steps they can take to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases.
• Rising sea levels similarly affect all coastal population centers.
• Some global warming experts predict a greater than eight degree Fahrenheit increase in global temperatures
during the next century.
• Human activity is the sole cause of increasing global temperatures.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 17085 [3], given: 1963

Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 4994

Kudos [?]: 5531 [1], given: 112

Re: Assumption Revision: Although there has been great scientific [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Feb 2015, 06:50
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over global warming, most scientists now agree that human activity is causing the Earth’s temperature to rise. Though predictions vary, many global warming experts believe that average global temperatures will rise between three and eight degrees Fahrenheit during the next century. Such an increase would cause an alarming rise in sea levels, displacing millions of people by destroying major population centers along the world’s coastlines. Which of the following is an assumption in support of the argument’s conclusion?

• New technological developments in the next century will not divert rising seas from the world’s coastal cities.
this is an asssumption which is directly affecting conclusion.. so correct
• Individuals will not become more aware of the steps they can take to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases.
a very close second. it is truly an assumption but if we look closely. it does not support conclusion but supports the prediction...
• Rising sea levels similarly affect all coastal population centers.
no role in supporting..
• Some global warming experts predict a greater than eight degree Fahrenheit increase in global temperatures
during the next century.
out of scope
• Human activity is the sole cause of increasing global temperatures.
out of scope..
_________________

Absolute modulus :http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html

Kudos [?]: 5531 [1], given: 112

Chat Moderator
Joined: 19 Apr 2013
Posts: 688

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 537

Concentration: Strategy, Healthcare
Schools: Sloan '18 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V41
GPA: 4
Assumption Revision: Although there has been great scientific [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Feb 2015, 10:27
The answer is A. B was the nearest one, but it is wrong, because the argument speaks about what an increase would cause, not whether it will happen or not.
_________________

If my post was helpful, press Kudos. If not, then just press Kudos !!!

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 537

MBA Section Director
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4494

Kudos [?]: 17085 [4], given: 1963

Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: Assumption Revision: Although there has been great scientific [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Mar 2015, 19:41
4
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The argument concludes that rising sea levels caused by global warming will
destroy major coastal population centers and displace millions of people. Any
assumption in support of this conclusion would have to corroborate that these
events will definitively take place.

(A) CORRECT. If new technological developments in the next century allow
people to divert rising seas from the world’s cities (i.e., population centers), cities
will not be destroyed and millions of people will not be displaced. Thus, a
necessary assumption is that these technologies will not be developed.

(B) A simple awareness of the steps to reduce emissions in no way undermines
the argument’s conclusion, as this answer choice does not describe any action
being taken by individuals. Additionally, greenhouse gases are never mentioned
as the primary by-product of human activity that causes global warming, and are
therefore not sufficient to address the argument.

(C) The argument never suggests that all coastal population centers are similarly
affected; this choice is too extreme and overreaching for the argument’s
conclusion.

(D) This might be true, but it is not an assumption on which the conclusion rests.
Instead, this answer choice is simply an inference that might be drawn from the
premises.

(E) The idea that human activity is the sole cause of global warming is neither
suggested nor assumed by the argument. In addition, the wording "sole cause" is
too extreme.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 17085 [4], given: 1963

Current Student
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Posts: 301

Kudos [?]: 549 [2], given: 1474

Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 640 Q40 V37
GMAT 2: 650 Q43 V36
GMAT 3: 600 Q47 V27
GPA: 3.3
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)
Re: Assumption Revision: Although there has been great scientific [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Aug 2015, 11:25
2
KUDOS
The trick here is to correctly identify the conclusion which is:

OA: The argument concludes that rising sea levels caused by global warming will destroy major coastal population centers and displace millions of people. Any assumption in support of this conclusion would have to corroborate that these events will definitively take place.

(A) CORRECT. If new technological developments in the next century allow people to divert rising seas from the world’s cities (i.e., population centers), cities will not be destroyed and millions of people will not be displaced. Thus, a necessary assumption is that these technologies will not be developed.

(B) A simple awareness of the steps to reduce emissions in no way undermines the argument’s conclusion, as this answer choice does not describe any action being taken by individuals. Additionally, greenhouse gases are never mentioned as the primary by-product of human activity that causes global warming, and are therefore not sufficient to address the argument.

(C) The argument never suggests that all coastal population centers are similarly affected; this choice is too extreme and overreaching for the argument’s conclusion.

(D) This might be true, but it is not an assumption on which the conclusion rests. Instead, this answer choice is simply an inference that might be drawn from the premises.

(E) The idea that human activity is the sole cause of global warming is neither suggested nor assumed by the argument. In addition, the wording "sole cause" is too extreme.
_________________

KUDO me plenty

Kudos [?]: 549 [2], given: 1474

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10106

Kudos [?]: 264 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

11 Dec 2015, 14:04
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 264 [0], given: 0

MBA Section Director
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4494

Kudos [?]: 17085 [0], given: 1963

Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
CR Revision: Although there has been great scientific debate for [#permalink]

Show Tags

31 Jan 2016, 23:54
Expert's post
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over global warming, most scientists now agree that human activity is causing the Earth’s temperature to rise. Though predictions vary, many global warming experts believe that average global temperatures will rise between three and eight degrees Fahrenheit during the next century. Such an increase would cause an alarming rise in sea levels, displacing millions of people by destroying major population centers along the world’s coastlines. Which of the following is an assumption in support of the argument’s conclusion?

A. New technological developments in the next century will not divert rising seas from the world’s coastal cities.

B. Individuals will not become more aware of the steps they can take to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases.

C. Rising sea levels similarly affect all coastal population centers.

D. Some global warming experts predict a greater than eight degree Fahrenheit increase in global temperatures during the next century.

E. Human activity is the sole cause of increasing global temperatures.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 17085 [0], given: 1963

Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2015
Posts: 103

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 92

GPA: 3.9
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: CR Revision: Although there has been great scientific debate for [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Feb 2016, 02:49
souvik101990 wrote:
Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over global warming, most scientists now agree that human activity is causing the Earth’s temperature to rise. Though predictions vary, many global warming experts believe that average global temperatures will rise between three and eight degrees Fahrenheit during the next century. Such an increase would cause an alarming rise in sea levels, displacing millions of people by destroying major population centers along the world’s coastlines. Which of the following is an assumption in support of the argument’s conclusion?

A. New technological developments in the next century will not divert rising seas from the world’s coastal cities.

B. Individuals will not become more aware of the steps they can take to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases.

C. Rising sea levels similarly affect all coastal population centers.

D. Some global warming experts predict a greater than eight degree Fahrenheit increase in global temperatures during the next century.

E. Human activity is the sole cause of increasing global temperatures.

Option D and E- Out of Scope
Option C: Similarity in affecting costal populations. Out of Scope
Option B: Not sure. But rejected because of green house gases. Even if individuals become aware will they take steps or will the temperature reduce.

IMO: A

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 92

Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2014
Posts: 98

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 36

Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
CR Revision: Although there has been great scientific debate for [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Feb 2016, 05:41
Although there has been great scientific debate for decades over global warming, most scientists now agree that human activity is causing the Earth’s temperature to rise. Though predictions vary, many global warming experts believe that average global temperatures will rise between three and eight degrees Fahrenheit during the next century. Such an increase would cause an alarming rise in sea levels, displacing millions of people by destroying major population centers along the world’s coastlines. Which of the following is an assumption in support of the argument’s conclusion?

Conclusion here is a little fragmented and If I can get then together it says something like -
In the next century , the rising sea levels ,caused by temperature hike , will destroy coastal cities and displace people.

A. New technological developments in the next century will not divert rising seas from the world’s coastal cities.

-This is the only option that strengthens the conclusion by eliminating the possibility that Technological enhancements will not save the coastal cities

B. Individuals will not become more aware of the steps they can take to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases.
-Argument does not talk about greenshouse gases and we do not know for sure what effect green house gases produce

C,D,E does not tackle the conclusion

_________________

The Mind ~ Muscle Connection
My GMAT Journey is Complete.Going to start the MBA in Information Management from 2016
Good Luck everyone.

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 36

CR Revision: Although there has been great scientific debate for   [#permalink] 01 Feb 2016, 05:41

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 52 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by