It is currently 22 Nov 2017, 22:50

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Astronomy professor: Stars twinkle when they are observed

Author Message
CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3452

Kudos [?]: 926 [0], given: 781

Astronomy professor: Stars twinkle when they are observed [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2005, 21:24
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

5.

Astronomy professor: Stars twinkle when they are observed from Earth because of the refraction in the Earthâ€™s atmosphere. This refraction is minor and so we donâ€™t see any twinkling of massive objects such as the Moon and the Sun.

Student: I disagree. The Earthâ€™s atmosphere is too transparent to cause any distortion of light coming from space. If your explanation of the twinkling of stars were correct then planets such as Mars and Venus would also twinkle when observed from Earth but they do not. I believe stars appear twinkling because they are so far away that light from them is travelling billions of miles and inevitably gets distorted by occasional aggregations of space dust.

The highlighted portions of the text perform which functions in the argument?

A: the first is the position the student disagrees with while the second is the evidence the student uses to back his opinion
B: the first is a rejection of a possible objection to the professorâ€™s statement; the second is used as evidence in the studentâ€™s argument
C: the first is a challenge to the professorâ€™s statement while the second mentions a fact which the student uses as evidence to refute the professorâ€™s statement
D: the first is a consideration that casts doubt on the professorâ€™s statement while the second is a development of this consideration
E: the first is a relevant addition to the professorâ€™s statement while the second describes a reason why the student disagrees with this addition.

Kudos [?]: 926 [0], given: 781

Director
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 848

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2005, 07:41
I will go with A

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 04 Mar 2005
Posts: 106

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Location: NYC

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2005, 08:21
I'll go with A.
E seemed close as well, but it seems to suggest that the student disagrees with just the addition rather than with professor's position of refraction in the earth's atmosphere.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 894

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2005, 08:44
I pick E because the first boldface is in fact relevant information in addition to the professorâ€™s initial stance that â€œStars twinkle when they are observed from Earth because of the refraction in the Earthâ€™s atmosphereâ€

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 278

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 0

Location: CA, USA

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2005, 08:59
E here

A says:
A: the first is the position the student disagrees with while the second is the evidence the student uses to back his opinion

The position the student disagrees with is actually the first sentence:

Stars twinkle when they are observed from Earth because of the refraction in the Earthâ€™s atmosphere.

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 329

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 12

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2005, 09:27
I go with E.

As Folaa mentioned, the first boldface is a relevant addition. IMO, the second boldface is a reason why the student disagrees with the addition. The student states that the refraction is not possible because the earth's atmosphere is too transparent. The second boldface is not an evidence to prove that the earth's atmo is too transparent. Instead, the student wants to say that if what the professor said was true of the massive objects not twinkling because they r huge, then mars and venus should twinkle becos they r smaller in size.

GA

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 12

CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3452

Kudos [?]: 926 [0], given: 781

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2005, 11:02
hmm.. no one got this one correct.

A and E are wrong because the student disagrees with the main professorâ€™s statement (that â€œstars twinkleâ€¦ because of the refraction in the Earthâ€™s atmosphereâ€

Kudos [?]: 926 [0], given: 781

22 Jul 2005, 11:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Astronomy professor: Stars twinkle when they are observed

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.