GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

It is currently 03 Apr 2020, 13:01

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Astrophysicists wrestling with the study of a new kind of star, the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Jan 2010
Posts: 86
GPA: 4
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Astrophysicists wrestling with the study of a new kind of star, the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 03 Oct 2019, 09:22
3
4
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 149 sessions

65% (03:03) correct 35% (03:08) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 163 sessions

44% (01:26) correct 56% (01:41) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 154 sessions

39% (00:42) correct 61% (00:46) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 154 sessions

57% (01:37) correct 43% (01:52) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 5
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 132 sessions

72% (01:29) correct 28% (01:37) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 6
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 126 sessions

60% (01:12) correct 40% (01:27) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 7
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 123 sessions

84% (00:29) correct 16% (00:48) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 8
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 132 sessions

64% (01:12) correct 36% (01:33) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 9
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 123 sessions

78% (00:51) correct 23% (01:06) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

New Project RC Butler 2019 - Practice 2 RC Passages Everyday
Passage # 368, Date : 03-Oct-2019
This post is a part of New Project RC Butler 2019. Click here for Details


Astrophysicists wrestling with the study of a new kind of star, the flat, “two-dimensional” configurations known as accretion disks have recently gained new insights into the behavior of these stars. Accretion disks exist in a variety of situations where matters swirl around a compact star such as a white dwarf star or a neutron star. Accretion disks are also suspected of playing a part in more exotic situations, in which the central object is imagined to be a supermassive black hole, the ultimate form of collapsed matter, rather than a compact star. The modeling of accretion disks is still in its infancy, a situation analogous to the days when ordinary stars were modeled by using elementary scaling laws without benefit of knowledge of the nuclear processes that power the stars. Similarly, the basic physics of the power by which accretion disks radiate, thought to originate in a form of turbulent friction, is known only at the crudest level.

Accretion disks were first defined in the context of Cataclysmic variables. In these systems, matter from the outer layers of an ordinary star is attracted by the gravitational influence of a nearby orbiting white dwarf star, the matter lost from the ordinary star cannot strike the surface of the tiny white dwarf directly but settles into an orbit around the star. The viscosity in the disk thus formed causes heating, radiation, and a slow spiraling of disk matter onto the surface of the white dwarf.

The rapid advances made in x-ray astronomy in the past decade have identified a second type of system in which accretion disks occur. In such a system, an accretion disk whirls about a neutron star rather than a white dwarf. The inner reaches of the accretion disk extend deeply into the gravitational potential of the neutron star where very rapid motion is the rule. The energy released by friction and the actual raining of the material from the disk onto the surface of the neutron star is so great that radiation is given off in a powerful flood of x-rays. And in at least one case, x-ray astronomers believe that the object in the center of an accretion disk is a black hole, suggesting that a third system may exist.

It had been assumed that portions of accretion disks would be unstable and that, as a result, clumping of their matter into rings would occur. There is no evidence from observation, however, that accretion disks do, in fact, suffer from these instabilities. In recent work, Abramowicz has shown that added gravitational effects due to general relativity may alter the expected Newtonian gravitational relationships in such a way that the disk remains stable, indicating that it is possible that these predicted instabilities do not occur.

Further progress toward understanding accretion disks will involve defining and proposing solutions to restricted problems just as was done in this case and was done and continues to be done for ordinary stars. Abramowicz’ work is a valuable example of the care that must be taken before reaching conclusions regarding accretion disks.


1. The author of the passage is primarily concerned with

(A) comparing Abramowicz’ work to the work of earlier astrophysicists
(B) providing information about accretion disks and discussing significant new work
(C) defining the conditions under which accretion disks can be observed
(D) exploring the question of whether a black hole can ever be the central object of an accretion disk
(E) describing the phenomenon of accretion disks and reviewing several conflicting theories of their origins



2. It can be inferred from the passage that predictions of the instability of accretion disks were based on which of the following?

(A) A calculation of the probable effects of standard Newtonian gravitational relationships
(B) A calculation of the probable relationship between general relativity and standard Newtonian gravitational relationships
(C) A calculation of the energy released by friction within a compact star
(D) Observation of the x-rays radiated by compact stars
(E) Observation of the clumping of accretion disk matter into rings around compact stars



3. The author’s attitude toward Abramowicz’ work can best be described as one of

(A) uncertain approval
(B) unqualified respect
(C) mild interest
(D) careful dismissal
(E) hostile skepticism



4. The passage suggests which of the following about current scientific knowledge of the nuclear processes of ordinary stars?

(A) Its pattern of development has been analogous to that of developments in x-ray astronomy.
(B) Its role in the explanation of turbulent friction has been significant.
(C) It has contributed to a more accurate modeling of ordinary stars.
(D) It lags behind knowledge of scaling laws.
(E) It explains the behavior of accretion disks as well as that of ordinary stars.



5. The passage suggests that Abramowicz’ work was motivated by which of the following assumptions?

(A) The quantity of energy released by accretion disks can be as large as it is only if the disks are stable.
(B) Improved techniques in x-ray astronomy would reveal any instabilities occurring in accretion disks.
(C) The lack of observational evidence of instabilities in accretion disks suggests that predictions of their occurrence might be wrong.
(D) Known methods of observing accretion disk surrounding compact stars and black holes do not permit the observation of the matter in accretion disks.
(E) The gravitational potential of compact stars does not vary from star to star.



6. The passage implies which of the following about the progress of knowledge in astrophysics?

(A) Adherence to outdated theories has, in the past, limited the activities of astrophysicists and restricted progress.
(B) Progress has, in the past, occurred only as a result of significant breakthroughs in basic physics and chemistry.
(C) Progress has, in the past, occurred as a result of a process of defining and solving restricted problems.
(D) Given the recent acquisition of knowledge about the nuclear processes of stars, further progress is likely to be limited to the refinement of what is already known.
(E) Conclusions in astrophysics have, in the past, been seriously flawed, thus limiting progress, although there have recently been signs of change.



7. The passage suggests that, compared to the study of ordinary stars, the study of accretion disks is

(A) derivative
(B) more sophisticated
(C) less clearly focused
(D) at an earlier stage of development
(E) more dependent on technological advances



8. According to the passage, some accretion disks originated in

(A) an increase in heat and radiation around an ordinary star
(B) a powerful flood of x-rays emitted by a neutron star
(C) a collision between two stars
(D) the turbulent friction on the surface of a compact star
(E) the accumulation of matter removed from an ordinary star



9. It can be inferred from the passage that the significance of Abramowicz’ work is that it

(A) provides a means of measuring the gravitational potential of neutron stars
(B) opens a new area for exploration in the field of x-ray astronomy
(C) proves that scaling laws cannot be applied to accretion disks
(D) proposes a new system of classification of stars
(E) suggests a resolution of a discrepancy between a theoretical prediction and actual observation


Originally posted by maheshsrini on 15 Nov 2011, 20:00.
Last edited by SajjadAhmad on 03 Oct 2019, 09:22, edited 2 times in total.
Updated - Complete topic (765).
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 350
Re: Astrophysicists wrestling with the study of a new kind of star, the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2011, 17:21
1
Q2 : I feel the correct answer is A

According to the passage(para 3)

Initial Assumption before Abramowicz : It had been assumed that portions of accretion disks would be unstable .....

Abramowicz's study: Added gravitational effects due to general relativity + the expected Newtonian gravitational relationships = disks are stable

Q2 asks about the predictions for unstability of disks. Unstability would be if we only consider the Newtonian gravitational relationships.

Crick
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Apr 2011
Posts: 157
Schools: Booth,NUS,St.Gallon
Re: Astrophysicists wrestling with the study of a new kind of star, the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Dec 2011, 23:31
I feel that for question 2 option B is the answer.The newtonian theories are already well defined and the results based on it have provided only satisfactory solutions .Only by comparing it with the relativity principles the solutions has been obtained .
_________________
+1 if you like my explanation .Thanks :)
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Apr 2013
Posts: 14
Location: India
Schools: Wharton Exec '17
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Re: Astrophysicists wrestling with the study of a new kind of star, the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Feb 2015, 03:35
Got q3 nd q6 wrong (21 mins)
Experts please comment why Q3 is B not C? The phrase "unqualified " is making little difference, what do you say?
Q 6, the questions asked about future, whereas, option C the phrase " in the past"...In Q6 what is wrong with E?
plz help...
thanks in advance.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 29 Apr 2018
Posts: 4
Location: India
Schools: INSEAD Jan '19
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.3
Re: Astrophysicists wrestling with the study of a new kind of star, the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 May 2018, 10:52
I got 8/9 correct in 17.5 minutes- How is it?

soumya170293 Following is the explanation on Q2 (as per my understanding):

Lets read this part carefully

There is no evidence from observation, however, that accretion disks do, in fact, suffer from these instabilities. In recent work, Abramowicz has shown that added gravitational effects due to general relativity may alter the expected Newtonian gravitational relationships in such a way that the disk remains stable, indicating that it is possible that these predicted instabilities do not occur.


2. It can be inferred from the passage that predictions of the instability of accretion disks were based on which of the following?
(A) A calculation of the probable effects of standard Newtonian gravitational relationships- As per the above lines, Newtonian law considered in silo, suggested that these disks might be unstable.
(B) A calculation of the probable relationship between general relativity and standard Newtonian gravitational relationships- Direct contradiction, calculation of relationship b/w general relativity and standard Newtonian gravitational relations suggested that discs might be stable
(C) A calculation of the energy released by friction within a compact star- Out of scope
(D) Observation of the x-rays radiated by compact stars- Out of scope
(E) Observation of the clumping of accretion disk matter into rings around compact stars- Out of scope
GMAT Club team member
User avatar
V
Status: GMAT Club Team Member
Affiliations: GMAT Club
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 5357
GPA: 3.62
Re: Astrophysicists wrestling with the study of a new kind of star, the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Oct 2019, 09:23
+1 Kudos to posts containing answer explanation of all questions
_________________
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 30 May 2019
Posts: 96
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GPA: 3.6
Astrophysicists wrestling with the study of a new kind of star, the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Oct 2019, 14:25
SajjadAhmad
I have a question, for you along with other @moderators/ senior members here.

These passages contain anywhere from 6-9 questions. This is not the format of gmat, which contains up to 4 questions.

Do you think it helps to do these RCs ? Or does it serve a specific purpose ?
GMAT Club team member
User avatar
V
Status: GMAT Club Team Member
Affiliations: GMAT Club
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 5357
GPA: 3.62
Re: Astrophysicists wrestling with the study of a new kind of star, the  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Oct 2019, 19:37
navderm wrote:
SajjadAhmad
I have a question, for you along with other @moderators/ senior members here.

These passages contain anywhere from 6-9 questions. This is not the format of gmat, which contains up to 4 questions.

Do you think it helps to do these RCs ? Or does it serve a specific purpose ?


There is no specific purpose than to practice. When GMAC build a passage it also creates roughly 6-10 questions from that passage having difficulty level sub-500 to 700+. In real GMAT test it gave you 3-4 questions with adaptive difficulty level. It is not unusual that two test takers faced the same passage with totally different questions. You will also find Official RC passages with 7 or more questions and they are also for practice purpose. If this were a Mock exam and you faced more than 5 questions then you could say this is something unusual but here just for practice and stamina-building purpose this all is fine. You will get 3-4 questions only in mock exams or real test not in other practice resources. I hope you will get my point.

Thanks and regards
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Astrophysicists wrestling with the study of a new kind of star, the   [#permalink] 03 Oct 2019, 19:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Astrophysicists wrestling with the study of a new kind of star, the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne