Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

At a charity fundraiser, 180 of the guests had a house both [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Apr 2012, 16:36

2

This post received KUDOS

4

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

64% (02:30) correct
36% (01:27) wrong based on 371 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

At a charity fundraiser, 180 of the guests had a house both in the Hamptons and in Palm Beach. If not everyone at the fundraiser had a house in either the Hamptons or Palm Beach, what is the ratio of the number of people who had a house in Palm Beach but not in the Hamptons to the number of people who had a house in the Hamptons but not in Palm Beach?

(1) One-half of the guests had a house in Palm Beach. (2) Two-thirds of the guests had a house in the Hamptons

I dont get why the answer is E and not C. It is given to use that all guests had a house in either the hamptons or palm beach. with that info we can use stmt 1 and say 1/2 the guest had a house in the hampton but not in pb and then with stmt 2 we have 1/3 of the guests had a house in PB but not in hamptons
_________________

I dont get why the answer is E and not C. It is given to use that all guests had a house in either the hamptons or palm beach. with that info we can use stmt 1 and say 1/2 the guest had a house in the hampton but not in pb and then with stmt 2 we have 1/3 of the guests had a house in PB but not in hamptons

Actually exactly the opposite of this is given: "NOT everyone at the fundraiser had a house in either the Hamptons or Palm Beach"

At a charity fundraiser, 180 of the guests had a house both in the Hamptons and in Palm Beach. If not everyone at the fundraiser had a house in either the Hamptons or Palm Beach, what is the ratio of the number of people who had a house in Palm Beach but not in the Hamptons to the number of people who had a house in the Hamptons but not in Palm Beach?

(1) One-half of the guests had a house in Palm Beach. (2) Two-thirds of the guests had a house in the Hamptons

Look at the diagram below for (1)+(2):

We should find the ratio of yellow boxes, but with the info given it's not possible.

I dont get why the answer is E and not C. It is given to use that all guests had a house in either the hamptons or palm beach. with that info we can use stmt 1 and say 1/2 the guest had a house in the hampton but not in pb and then with stmt 2 we have 1/3 of the guests had a house in PB but not in hamptons

Actually exactly the opposite of this is given: "NOT everyone at the fundraiser had a house in either the Hamptons or Palm Beach"

At a charity fundraiser, 180 of the guests had a house both in the Hamptons and in Palm Beach. If not everyone at the fundraiser had a house in either the Hamptons or Palm Beach, what is the ratio of the number of people who had a house in Palm Beach but not in the Hamptons to the number of people who had a house in the Hamptons but not in Palm Beach?

(1) One-half of the guests had a house in Palm Beach. (2) Two-thirds of the guests had a house in the Hamptons

Look at the diagram below for (1)+(2):

Attachment:

Houses.png

We should find the ratio of yellow boxes, but with the info given it's not possible.

Answer: E.

Hope it helps.

Hi Bunuel, a small doubt.

Why isn't the value in first row and first column i.e House in Palm Beach and House in Hamptons equal to 180?

Why isn't the value in first row and first column i.e House in Palm Beach and House in Hamptons equal to 180?

Why should they? It's seems that you are not comfortable with a double set matrix, this might help

Thank you very very much for the video link.

But I am still confused with regards to the answer given by you.

Please see attachment.

The language in the question - 180 of the guests had a house both in the Hamptons and in Palm Beach. Doesn't it seem to be the same as saying - there were 9 green trucks in the youtube example that you gave?

Why isn't the value in first row and first column i.e House in Palm Beach and House in Hamptons equal to 180?

Why should they? It's seems that you are not comfortable with a double set matrix, this might help

Thank you very very much for the video link.

But I am still confused with regards to the answer given by you.

Please see attachment.

The language in the question - 180 of the guests had a house both in the Hamptons and in Palm Beach. Doesn't it seem to be the same as saying - there were 9 green trucks in the youtube example that you gave?

I filled the entire matrix above (there was a typo, which is now edited). Hope it's clear now.
_________________

How do we know the ratio of the two in yellow cells is not solvable by just looking at it? I actually tried solving and of course got stuck at it but I thought because there is one degree of x in the equation it might actually lead to a ratio. How did you know it was unsolvable algebraically by just looking at it? Thank you in advance.

Bunuel wrote:

calreg11 wrote:

I dont get why the answer is E and not C. It is given to use that all guests had a house in either the hamptons or palm beach. with that info we can use stmt 1 and say 1/2 the guest had a house in the hampton but not in pb and then with stmt 2 we have 1/3 of the guests had a house in PB but not in hamptons

Actually exactly the opposite of this is given: "NOT everyone at the fundraiser had a house in either the Hamptons or Palm Beach"

At a charity fundraiser, 180 of the guests had a house both in the Hamptons and in Palm Beach. If not everyone at the fundraiser had a house in either the Hamptons or Palm Beach, what is the ratio of the number of people who had a house in Palm Beach but not in the Hamptons to the number of people who had a house in the Hamptons but not in Palm Beach?

(1) One-half of the guests had a house in Palm Beach. (2) Two-thirds of the guests had a house in the Hamptons

Look at the diagram below for (1)+(2):

Attachment:

Houses.png

We should find the ratio of yellow boxes, but with the info given it's not possible.

How do we know the ratio of the two in yellow cells is not solvable by just looking at it? I actually tried solving and of course got stuck at it but I thought because there is one degree of x in the equation it might actually lead to a ratio. How did you know it was unsolvable algebraically by just looking at it? Thank you in advance.

Well, as you can see in the matrix all boxes are filled and we still have x in both of them which do not cancel when we make the ratio.
_________________

I dont get why the answer is E and not C. It is given to use that all guests had a house in either the hamptons or palm beach. with that info we can use stmt 1 and say 1/2 the guest had a house in the hampton but not in pb and then with stmt 2 we have 1/3 of the guests had a house in PB but not in hamptons

Actually exactly the opposite of this is given: "NOT everyone at the fundraiser had a house in either the Hamptons or Palm Beach"

At a charity fundraiser, 180 of the guests had a house both in the Hamptons and in Palm Beach. If not everyone at the fundraiser had a house in either the Hamptons or Palm Beach, what is the ratio of the number of people who had a house in Palm Beach but not in the Hamptons to the number of people who had a house in the Hamptons but not in Palm Beach?

(1) One-half of the guests had a house in Palm Beach. (2) Two-thirds of the guests had a house in the Hamptons

Look at the diagram below for (1)+(2):

Attachment:

Houses.png

We should find the ratio of yellow boxes, but with the info given it's not possible.

Answer: E.

Hope it helps.

Bunuel you nail the question in the easiest way possible. I had already visited all the forums possible, was about to give up on my doubt till i found your explanation. You are the Best!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Re: At a charity fundraiser, 180 of the guests had a house both [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 May 2014, 23:57

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Re: At a charity fundraiser, 180 of the guests had a house both [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Sep 2014, 07:26

I thought the answer was C...

The overlap of 2/3and 1/2 is 1/6 and we are given this is 180. From here you can figure out Hamptons & Palm Beach (540 & 720) and then take the ratio of Hamptons w/o 180 (360/540) and Palm Beach w/o 180 (540/720). The answer would then be (360/540)/(540/720). From what I understand, you don't need the number of people who don't have houses in either because the prompt doesn't ask for this info in the answer...

The overlap of 2/3and 1/2 is 1/6 and we are given this is 180. From here you can figure out Hamptons & Palm Beach (540 & 720) and then take the ratio of Hamptons w/o 180 (360/540) and Palm Beach w/o 180 (540/720). The answer would then be (360/540)/(540/720). From what I understand, you don't need the number of people who don't have houses in either because the prompt doesn't ask for this info in the answer...

1/2 of the guests had a house in Palm Beach and 2/3 of the guests had a house in the Hamptons does not means that 1/6 of them had a house both in the Hamptons and in Palm Beach because the stem explicitly mentions that not everyone at the fundraiser had a house in either the Hamptons or Palm Beach.

So, we have {Total} = {Palm Beach} + {Hamptons} - {Both} + {Neither} --> {Total} = {Total}*1/2 + {Total}*2/3 - 180 + {Neither}.

You assumed (incorrectly) that we had: {Total} = {Palm Beach} + {Hamptons} - {Both} --> {Total} = {Total}*1/2 + {Total}*2/3 - 180, which you can solve for {Total}.

Re: At a charity fundraiser, 180 of the guests had a house both [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Jun 2015, 12:44

Bunuel wrote:

calreg11 wrote:

I dont get why the answer is E and not C. It is given to use that all guests had a house in either the hamptons or palm beach. with that info we can use stmt 1 and say 1/2 the guest had a house in the hampton but not in pb and then with stmt 2 we have 1/3 of the guests had a house in PB but not in hamptons

Actually exactly the opposite of this is given: "NOT everyone at the fundraiser had a house in either the Hamptons or Palm Beach"

At a charity fundraiser, 180 of the guests had a house both in the Hamptons and in Palm Beach. If not everyone at the fundraiser had a house in either the Hamptons or Palm Beach, what is the ratio of the number of people who had a house in Palm Beach but not in the Hamptons to the number of people who had a house in the Hamptons but not in Palm Beach?

(1) One-half of the guests had a house in Palm Beach. (2) Two-thirds of the guests had a house in the Hamptons

Look at the diagram below for (1)+(2):

Attachment:

Houses.png

We should find the ratio of yellow boxes, but with the info given it's not possible.

Answer: E.

Hope it helps.

Hi Bunnel,

Can't we straight away use the statement ("NOT everyone at the fundraiser had a house in either the Hamptons or Palm Beach") as the Neither component

equation becomes :

Palm beach + Hampton - Both = Total - Neither x/2 + 2/3x - 180 = x - Neither

Since Neither is not know so C is also not sufficient. Hence E is answer.

Re: At a charity fundraiser, 180 of the guests had a house both [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Mar 2016, 09:41

Bunuel wrote:

calreg11 wrote:

I dont get why the answer is E and not C. It is given to use that all guests had a house in either the hamptons or palm beach. with that info we can use stmt 1 and say 1/2 the guest had a house in the hampton but not in pb and then with stmt 2 we have 1/3 of the guests had a house in PB but not in hamptons

Actually exactly the opposite of this is given: "NOT everyone at the fundraiser had a house in either the Hamptons or Palm Beach"

At a charity fundraiser, 180 of the guests had a house both in the Hamptons and in Palm Beach. If not everyone at the fundraiser had a house in either the Hamptons or Palm Beach, what is the ratio of the number of people who had a house in Palm Beach but not in the Hamptons to the number of people who had a house in the Hamptons but not in Palm Beach?

(1) One-half of the guests had a house in Palm Beach. (2) Two-thirds of the guests had a house in the Hamptons

Look at the diagram below for (1)+(2):

Attachment:

Houses.png

We should find the ratio of yellow boxes, but with the info given it's not possible.

Answer: E.

Hope it helps.

Since the question is asking for a ratio of 2 columns, why cant we assume a value to X and find the ratio?

I dont get why the answer is E and not C. It is given to use that all guests had a house in either the hamptons or palm beach. with that info we can use stmt 1 and say 1/2 the guest had a house in the hampton but not in pb and then with stmt 2 we have 1/3 of the guests had a house in PB but not in hamptons

Actually exactly the opposite of this is given: "NOT everyone at the fundraiser had a house in either the Hamptons or Palm Beach"

At a charity fundraiser, 180 of the guests had a house both in the Hamptons and in Palm Beach. If not everyone at the fundraiser had a house in either the Hamptons or Palm Beach, what is the ratio of the number of people who had a house in Palm Beach but not in the Hamptons to the number of people who had a house in the Hamptons but not in Palm Beach?

(1) One-half of the guests had a house in Palm Beach. (2) Two-thirds of the guests had a house in the Hamptons

Look at the diagram below for (1)+(2):

Attachment:

Houses.png

We should find the ratio of yellow boxes, but with the info given it's not possible.

Answer: E.

Hope it helps.

Since the question is asking for a ratio of 2 columns, why cant we assume a value to X and find the ratio?

Because for different values of x, the ratio will be different.
_________________

Re: At a charity fundraiser, 180 of the guests had a house both [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Mar 2016, 12:40

Bunuel wrote:

tinnyshenoy wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

Actually exactly the opposite of this is given: "NOT everyone at the fundraiser had a house in either the Hamptons or Palm Beach"

At a charity fundraiser, 180 of the guests had a house both in the Hamptons and in Palm Beach. If not everyone at the fundraiser had a house in either the Hamptons or Palm Beach, what is the ratio of the number of people who had a house in Palm Beach but not in the Hamptons to the number of people who had a house in the Hamptons but not in Palm Beach?

(1) One-half of the guests had a house in Palm Beach. (2) Two-thirds of the guests had a house in the Hamptons

Look at the diagram below for (1)+(2):

Attachment:

Houses.png

We should find the ratio of yellow boxes, but with the info given it's not possible.

Answer: E.

Hope it helps.

Since the question is asking for a ratio of 2 columns, why cant we assume a value to X and find the ratio?

Because for different values of x, the ratio will be different.

But in this question - in-a-certain-building-1-5-of-the-offices-have-both-a-window-141254.html - which also asks for the ratio of the same 2 columns , we assumed a value of x. Why not here?

Thanks for your reply.

gmatclubot

Re: At a charity fundraiser, 180 of the guests had a house both
[#permalink]
17 Mar 2016, 12:40

Its been long time coming. I have always been passionate about poetry. It’s my way of expressing my feelings and emotions. And i feel a person can convey...

Written by Scottish historian Niall Ferguson , the book is subtitled “A Financial History of the World”. There is also a long documentary of the same name that the...

Post-MBA I became very intrigued by how senior leaders navigated their career progression. It was also at this time that I realized I learned nothing about this during my...