It is currently 12 Dec 2017, 01:38

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1258

Kudos [?]: 550 [2], given: 0

At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Mar 2009, 01:47
2
This post received
KUDOS
7
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

61% (00:57) correct 39% (00:57) wrong based on 708 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that forbid the use in speech or print of language that “offends” or “insults” the members of any group, especially women and racial, ethnic, and religious minorities. Although these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy,” they restrict freedom of speech and the press in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy.

The argument above attempts to prove its case primarily by

(A) impugning the credentials of an opponent
(B) providing examples that support a theoretical principle
(C) taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of “democracy”
(D) revealing a contradiction in an opposing point of view
(E) appealing to the patriotic feelings of its audience
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 550 [2], given: 0

Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 855

Kudos [?]: 516 [0], given: 7

Re: CR :colleges [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Mar 2009, 02:35
D.
The argument is using a contrast to make a point.

Kudos [?]: 516 [0], given: 7

Intern
Joined: 22 Jan 2009
Posts: 5

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Schools: rowan university
Re: CR :colleges [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Mar 2009, 15:44
D.The argument is using a contrast to make a point.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 426

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 4

Schools: Kellogg Class of 2012
Re: CR :colleges [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Mar 2009, 21:28
Agree with D

Cheers,
Unplugged

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 4

VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1258

Kudos [?]: 550 [0], given: 0

Re: CR :colleges [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2009, 06:55
OA is D

Kudos [?]: 550 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
Posts: 295

Kudos [?]: 248 [0], given: 7

Re: CR :colleges [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Mar 2009, 05:25
can u pls dissect the case with 2 point of views and inbuild contradictions ..will help me to understand it .
Thanks in advance .
_________________

"CEO in making"

Kudos [?]: 248 [0], given: 7

Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2009
Posts: 79

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 2

Re: CR :colleges [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Mar 2009, 17:22
Can anybody please explain why not C?

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Posts: 171

Kudos [?]: 174 [3], given: 0

Re: CR :colleges [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Mar 2009, 18:28
3
This post received
KUDOS
At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that forbid the use in speech or print of language that “offends” or “insults” the members of any group, especially women and racial, ethnic, and religious minorities. Although these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy,” they restrict freedom of speech and the press in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy.

The argument above attempts to prove its case primarily by
(A) impugning the credentials of an opponent
(B) providing examples that support a theoretical principle
(C) taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of “democracy”
(D) revealing a contradiction in an opposing point of view
(E) appealing to the patriotic feelings of its audience

Conclusion: regulations have been imposed that forbid the use in speech or print of language
Evidence: Although these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy
Regulations restrict X and Y in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy

Clearly the argument is proved by second portion. The although clause in evidence should be avoided.

Answer should be D.

Kudos [?]: 174 [3], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2009
Posts: 79

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 2

Re: CR :colleges [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Mar 2009, 18:30
thanks. +1

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Posts: 50

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 4

Re: CR :colleges [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2010, 07:53
I am not convinced with the Answer D.

Whats the "opposing point of view" here ? ".. these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy" would mean that the regulations are protected/supported by democratic rules.. so this is actually a supporting view.. the fact that it does have a contradiction is a different thing.

(D) should have read "revealing a contradiction in a supporting point of view". Wotsay ?

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 4

Current Student
Joined: 05 Jan 2010
Posts: 377

Kudos [?]: 93 [1], given: 3439

Re: CR :colleges [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2010, 09:01
1
This post received
KUDOS
I see what you're saying about C but I don't think it's the best answer here for a couple of reasons. "Democracy" isn't defined by its protection of free speech or free press but "the spirit of democracy" could be. Secondly, for the passage to be taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of democracy, it would need to call two separate definitions of "democracy" that clearly contradict each other. I don't think the passage is attempting to make that distinction. Instead, I think, its invoking the general understanding of "the spirit of democracy" and arguing partial censorship opposes that concept.

Kudos [?]: 93 [1], given: 3439

Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Posts: 50

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 4

Re: CR :colleges [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2010, 09:17
coakleym wrote:
I see what you're saying about C but I don't think it's the best answer here for a couple of reasons. "Democracy" isn't defined by its protection of free speech or free press but "the spirit of democracy" could be. Secondly, for the passage to be taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of democracy, it would need to call two separate definitions of "democracy" that clearly contradict each other. I don't think the passage is attempting to make that distinction. Instead, I think, its invoking the general understanding of "the spirit of democracy" and arguing partial censorship opposes that concept.

C is not convincing either. I think none of the answers is a clear winner. A un-gmat like question would you say?

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 4

Current Student
Joined: 05 Jan 2010
Posts: 377

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 3439

Re: CR :colleges [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2010, 09:28
kaptain wrote:
C is not convincing either. I think none of the answers is a clear winner. A un-gmat like question would you say?

Not sure. I like D and think its the best answer to the question but yeah, I agree, its definitely not the most straightforward of CR questions.

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 3439

Manager
Joined: 14 Aug 2009
Posts: 50

Kudos [?]: 22 [2], given: 29

Re: CR :colleges [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2010, 13:53
2
This post received
KUDOS
pmal04 wrote:
Can anybody please explain why not C?

C is not good because Democracy is not defined in the paragraph. C is outside the scope of the question. The question writer is hoping you use outside knowledge and information. You can only use the information provided. i hope that helps.
_________________

My will shall shape the future. Whether I fail or succeed shall be no man's doing but my own. I am the force; I can clear any obstacle before me or I can be lost in the maze. My choice; my responsibility; win or lose, only I hold the key to my destiny - Elaine Maxwell

Kudos [?]: 22 [2], given: 29

Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 134

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 1

Re: CR :colleges [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2010, 15:46
its D

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 1

Tuck Thread Master
Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Posts: 305

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 69

Location: Tbilisi, Georgia
Schools: Stanford (in), Tuck (WL), Wharton (ding), Cornell (in)
Re: CR :colleges [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2010, 15:06
Somehow I think the correct ans should be (C):

Regulators say that any offensive or insulting language should be forbidden in the name of democracy.

Author of the argument contends that in no way should the freedom of speech be restricted, because doing so would oppose true spirit of democracy

Regulators and author have different perceptions of what democracy might mean.

Author uses ambiguous nature of term "democracy" to prove his point.

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 69

Manager
Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Posts: 186

Kudos [?]: 152 [0], given: 6

Re: CR :colleges [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Feb 2010, 20:52
pmal04 wrote:
Can anybody please explain why not C?

The question if anything is expaining the inconsistencies in "freedom of speech" than in democracy --

Kudos [?]: 152 [0], given: 6

Director
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 747

Kudos [?]: 328 [0], given: 13

Location: Bangalore, India
Re: CR :colleges [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2010, 00:18
kaptain wrote:
I am not convinced with the Answer D.

Whats the "opposing point of view" here ? ".. these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy" would mean that the regulations are protected/supported by democratic rules.. so this is actually a supporting view.. the fact that it does have a contradiction is a different thing.

(D) should have read "revealing a contradiction in a supporting point of view". Wotsay ?

The author clearly supports that there should be “no” restriction on speech or print of language. The opposing point of view is what is actually implemented at many colleges today (there ‘are’ restrictions). The author reveals contradiction in that opposing point of view (by explaining democracy).
_________________

Thanks,
Ashish (GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle)
http://www.EducationAisle.com

Sentence Correction Nirvana available at Amazon.in and Flipkart

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi.com

Kudos [?]: 328 [0], given: 13

Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Posts: 236

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

Re: CR :colleges [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2010, 02:34
D is better than C.
too bad I selected C

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1375

Kudos [?]: 1720 [0], given: 62

Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Re: CR :colleges [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2011, 18:10
certainly d is the right ans.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1720 [0], given: 62

Re: CR :colleges   [#permalink] 06 Feb 2011, 18:10

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 27 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.