It is currently 23 Nov 2017, 10:07

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# At present, the Hollywood restaurant has only standard

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 22 Apr 2004
Posts: 156

Kudos [?]: 124 [0], given: 0

At present, the Hollywood restaurant has only standard [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Dec 2005, 08:00
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

At present, the Hollywood restaurant has only standard height tables. However, many customers come to watch celebrities who frequent Hollywood & they prefer tall tables in stools because such seating would afford better view of the celebrities. However, dinners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated on standard height tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood restaurant replaced some of its seating with higher tables and stools, its profits would increase.

The statement is vulnerable to criticism in that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that:
(a) Some celebrities come to Hollywood restaurant to be seen and so might choose to sit at tall tables if they are available
(b) The price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at Hollywood restaurant compensates for longer time, if any, that they spend lingering over their meals
(c) A customer of the Hollywood restaurant who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalisation about lingering
(d) A restaurant's customer who spends less time at their meal typically orders less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer
(e) With enough tall tables to accommodate all Hollywood restaurant's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables

Last edited by ronybtl on 05 Dec 2005, 15:26, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 124 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 658

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Location: London

### Show Tags

05 Dec 2005, 08:09
ronybtl wrote:
At present, the Hollywood restaurant has only standard height tables. However, many customers come to watch celebrities who frequent Hollywood & they prefer tall tables in stools because such seating would afford better view of the celebrities. However, dinners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated on standard height tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood restaurant replaced some of its seating with higher tables and stools, its profits would increase.

The statement is vulnerable to criticism in that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that:
(a) Some celebrities come to Hollywood restaurant to be seen and so might choose to sit at tall tables if they are available
(b) The price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at Hollywood restaurant compensates for longer time, if any, that they spend lingering over their meals
(c) A customer of the Hollywood restaurant who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generatlisation about lingering
(d) A restaurant's customer who spends less time at their meal typically orders less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer
(e) With enough tall tables to accommodate all Hollywood restaurant's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables

I think E is the best fit

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5201

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Dec 2005, 08:27
I think E is a bit extreme. How can we be certain that the proprietor of the restaurant wouldn`t strategically arrange some of his higher tables on the periphery for a better view of the hollywood stars??

I would go with (D) because patrons might be uncomfortable with the stools and hence order the less expensive entrees. therefore resulting in a potential loss of revenue for the proprietor.

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 453

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 0

Location: New York

### Show Tags

05 Dec 2005, 11:19
I would agree with E.

If ppl did not stick around too long in the high seats, they would be less likely to order expensive items on the entree.

ronybtl wrote:
At present, the Hollywood restaurant has only standard height tables. However, many customers come to watch celebrities who frequent Hollywood & they prefer tall tables in stools because such seating would afford better view of the celebrities. However, dinners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated on standard height tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood restaurant replaced some of its seating with higher tables and stools, its profits would increase.

The statement is vulnerable to criticism in that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that:
(a) Some celebrities come to Hollywood restaurant to be seen and so might choose to sit at tall tables if they are available
(b) The price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at Hollywood restaurant compensates for longer time, if any, that they spend lingering over their meals
(c) A customer of the Hollywood restaurant who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generatlisation about lingering
(d) A restaurant's customer who spends less time at their meal typically orders less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer
(e) With enough tall tables to accommodate all Hollywood restaurant's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Posts: 223

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Location: Germany

### Show Tags

05 Dec 2005, 11:44
I understood the argument in that way: The passage suggests that with stools customers spent less time in the restaurant, so they are replaced by other customers who also order meals i.e. in agiven time you have more orders because customers change more frequently AND spent the same dollars. Only D weakens the argument if we assume that the customers who stay less spent also less.

I would also go with D.

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 572

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 0

Location: NYC

### Show Tags

05 Dec 2005, 12:29
I would go for D too, since the conclusion talks about making money, earning profit and D refutes it the best.
_________________

Success is my only option, failure is not -- Eminem

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 03 Jul 2005
Posts: 5

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2006, 23:00
I believe the OA is C, a very tricky question because D and E also seem correct.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 713

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Feb 2006, 09:00
Between D and E I ll go with D
_________________

IE IMBA 2010

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 19 Jul 2005
Posts: 66

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Location: Atlanta

### Show Tags

07 Feb 2006, 09:43
Is the OA definitely C? I choose D.

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 16 Sep 2005
Posts: 62

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Feb 2006, 13:41
I think it is D too.
_________________

Thanks

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 14 Jan 2006
Posts: 24

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Feb 2006, 16:06
another one for 'D'

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

07 Feb 2006, 16:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# At present, the Hollywood restaurant has only standard

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.