Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 08:12 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 08:12

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2013
Status:1,750 Q's attempted and counting
Affiliations: University of Florida
Posts: 421
Own Kudos [?]: 2976 [4]
Given Kudos: 630
Location: United States (FL)
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
GMAT 2: 610 Q44 V30
GMAT 3: 600 Q45 V29
GMAT 4: 590 Q35 V35
GPA: 3.45
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
Send PM
User avatar
Economist GMAT Tutor Instructor
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 62
Own Kudos [?]: 181 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Posts: 6072
Own Kudos [?]: 4689 [0]
Given Kudos: 463
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2013
Status:1,750 Q's attempted and counting
Affiliations: University of Florida
Posts: 421
Own Kudos [?]: 2976 [0]
Given Kudos: 630
Location: United States (FL)
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
GMAT 2: 610 Q44 V30
GMAT 3: 600 Q45 V29
GMAT 4: 590 Q35 V35
GPA: 3.45
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
Send PM
Re: At the beginning of 2004, Congress enacted a 15% [#permalink]

Official Explanation



Answer D - In the stimulus, we are told that Charlesville's profits increased markedly in 2004 despite the fact that an increase in the federal minimum wage increased the company's cost structure. In order to find a proper explanation to this apparent paradox, we must find an answer choice that allows us to show that Charlesville could have also enjoyed a simultaneous increase in revenue. Only choice (D) does this. It says that the customer base of Charlesville was newly flush with cash because of the increase in the federal minimum wage. Despite the company's higher costs, the change in the minimum wage would also have allowed for greater demand of the company's products.

Choice (A) may have been tempting for many students. However this choice only states that employee wages represent a minority of the company's costs. While this could mean that a decline in cow prices would offset the increase in wages, the statement does not go so far as to actually say that. It also does not contradict the evidence given to us that the company's operating expenses did indeed go up.

Choice (B) only further fuels the apparent paradox. If all expenses went up and profits went up, then only an increase in revenue could account for the higher profits.

Choices (C) and (E) are irrelevant. Neither the consideration of a raise prior 2004, nor the fact that most of the employees work in meat packing helps to explain the apparent paradox.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Mar 2011
Posts: 14
Own Kudos [?]: 47 [0]
Given Kudos: 57
Send PM
Re: At the beginning of 2004, Congress enacted a 15% [#permalink]
avohden wrote:
At the beginning of 2004, Congress enacted a 15% increase in the federal minimum wage. At that time, Charlesville Hotdog and Beef Company employed 5,000 employees, with over 85 percent of the workforce making minimum wage. Despite the fact that the increase in minimum wage increased the operating expenses of Charlesville Co., the company reported record profits at the end of 2004.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent paradox?

OE to follow


(A) Charlesville Co. spends more money procuring cows for their Hotdog and Beef products than they do paying their 5,000 workers. This does not explain the profits at the end of 2004(B) Charlesville Co. also saw an increase in expenses other than its wages in 2004.
(C) Before 2004, the company had considered giving its employees a 15% raise, but ultimately decided not to do so. Same as A.
(D) The company's customer base is made up primarily of families that rely on minimum wage incomes. Customer increases salary (minimum wage increases)==> pay more==> profits increases
(E) The majority of the company's 5,000 employees work in the company's meat-packing facilities. Irrelevant.
Hope this helps!
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17221
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: At the beginning of 2004, Congress enacted a 15% [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: At the beginning of 2004, Congress enacted a 15% [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne