Attorney: I ask you to find Mr. Smith guilty of assaulting : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) - Page 2
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 Feb 2017, 23:07

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Attorney: I ask you to find Mr. Smith guilty of assaulting

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Affiliations: Project Management Professional (PMP)
Joined: 30 Jun 2011
Posts: 213
Location: New Delhi, India
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 12

Re: Attorney: I ask you to find Mr. Smith guilty of assaulting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jun 2012, 00:55
IMO C as all other options do not point to the flaw in the argument.
_________________

Best
Vaibhav

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, Thanks

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Posts: 271
GMAT 1: 750 Q V
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 6

Re: Attorney: I ask you to find Mr. Smith guilty of assaulting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jun 2012, 07:23
No mention is made in the prompt of a testimony by Mr. Smith so this precludes B from being correct.

The right answer is C, since that flawed reasonibg can be found in the argument.

Posted from my mobile device
_________________

+1 Kudos me - I'm half Irish, half Prussian.

Manager
Status: Time to apply!
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 220
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
GMAT 3: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.2
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 119 [0], given: 166

Re: Attorney: I ask you to find Mr. Smith guilty of assaulting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jul 2012, 02:23
Attorney: I ask you to find Mr. Smith guilty of assaulting Mr. Jackson. Regrettably, there were no eyewitnesses to the crime, but Mr. Smith has a violent character. Ms. Lopez testified earlier that Mr. Smith, shouting loudly, had threatened her. Smith never refuted this testimony.
The attorney’s argument is fallacious because it reasons that

One of the ways to Flaw a reasoning is to introduce errors in the use of Evidence.
"Errors in the use of evindence can be of 4 kinds as per powerscore :
1)Lack of evidence for a position is taken to prove that the position is false
2)Treating failure to prove a claim as evidence of the denial of that claim
3)Taking a lack of evidence for a claim as evidence that weakens the claim
4)Lack of evidence against a position is taken to prove hat the position is true.

In the above stimulus, the type of reasoning used is same as (4).
Here :
Position : Mr. Smith has a violent character.
Evidence for the position : Ms. Lopez testified earlier that Mr. Smith, shouting loudly, had threatened her.
Evidence against the position : None
Smith never refuted this testimony." that means there is Lack of evidence against the position
Hence , the argument is forcing us to believe that the positon is true, i.e. Mr. Smith has a violent character, and Mr. Smith is guilty of assaulting Mr. Jackson.
This falls in line with option (C) : since Smith never disproved the claim that he threatened Lopez, he did in fact threaten her
Hence (C) is the right answer

(A) aggressive behavior is not a sure indicator of a violent character
In fact the attorney reasons the opposite way - he/she indeed say whatever Smith has done, it is a sure indicator of a violent character
(B) Smith’s testimony is unreliable since he is loud and aggressive
The Attorney develops the reasoning in the argument based on Smith’s testimony. Hence Smith’s testimony cannot be unreliable as per the Attorney
(C) since Smith never disproved the claim that he threatened Lopez, he did in fact threaten her
Correct. Reason discussed above
(D) Lopez’s testimony is reliable since she is neither loud nor aggressive
In the argument, nothing is discussed about the behavior of Lopez. We don't know whether she is loud or aggressive.
(E) having a violent character is not necessarily associated with the commission of violent crimes
This is the opposite of what the Attorney is trying to convey. in fact the Attorney wants to reason that having a violent character is associated behaviors like assaulting others (like jackson in this case)
_________________

Didn't give up !!! Still Trying!!

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10633
Followers: 941

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 0

Re: Attorney: I ask you to find Mr. Smith guilty of assaulting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jun 2015, 12:11
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Attorney: I ask you to find Mr. Smith guilty of assaulting   [#permalink] 21 Jun 2015, 12:11

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 24 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
I'm not finding accuracy in Find the conclusion/Inference 1 21 Feb 2012, 22:23
Q24)Attorney: I ask you to find Mr. Smith guilty of 7 13 Jan 2011, 08:10
1 Q24)Attorney: I ask you to find Mr. Smith guilty of 11 23 Apr 2010, 21:47
6 Attorney: I ask you to find Mr. Smith guilty of assaulting 12 06 Jan 2010, 03:48
1 If Max were guilty, he would not ask the police to 4 01 Jul 2009, 00:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by