It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 08:22

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# automobile safety

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 May 2006
Posts: 368

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Location: Phoenix AZ

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2006, 23:44
The use of automobile safety seats by children aged 4 and under has nearly doubled in the past 8 years. It is clear that this increase has prevented child fatalities that otherwise would have occurred, because although the number of children aged 4 and under who were killed while riding in cars involved in accidents rose 10 percent over the past 8 years, the total number of serious automobile accidents rose by 20 percent during that period.
Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A. Some of the automobile safety seats purchased for children under 4 continue to be used after the child reaches the age of 5.

B. The proportion of serious automobile accidents involving child passengers has remained constant over the past 8 years.

C. Children are taking more trips in cars today than they were 8 years ago, but the average total time they spend in cars has remained constant.

D. The sharpest increase in the use of automobile safety seats over the past 8 years has been for children over the age of 2.

E. The number of fatalities among adults involved in automobile accidents rose by 10 percent over the past 8 years.

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1161

Kudos [?]: 190 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2006, 00:01
I got B.

Kudos [?]: 190 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1124

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangalore

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2006, 01:17
One more for B.

Conclusion:
The use of safety seats for kids aged 4 and below has lowered the number of child fatalities in automobile accidents.

Premise:
1. Use of safety seats has increased
2. Number of fatalities rose by only 10% although number of accidents rose by 20%.

Assumption:
The proportion of accidents involving children (under the age of 4) atleast remained constant.

A. Some of the automobile safety seats purchased for children under 4 continue to be used after the child reaches the age of 5. - out of scope. we need children who are 4 or younger.

B. The proportion of serious automobile accidents involving child passengers has remained constant over the past 8 years. - BINGO.

C. Children are taking more trips in cars today than they were 8 years ago, but the average total time they spend in cars has remained constant. - Irrelevant. We are bothered about fatality rates.

D. The sharpest increase in the use of automobile safety seats over the past 8 years has been for children over the age of 2. - Irrelevant.

E. The number of fatalities among adults involved in automobile accidents rose by 10 percent over the past 8 years. - So? This does not impact the argument.

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 197

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

Schools: Olin Business School - Washington University

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2006, 01:39
Going with B. B is tricky, but says the PROPORTION of serious auto accidents has remained constant, indicating that car accidents involving child passengers have also risen 20%.

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 702

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2006, 07:51
LiKE B

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 378

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Location: TX

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2006, 11:26
Agree with B .

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 26 Sep 2006
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: LUCKNOW

### Show Tags

26 Sep 2006, 04:53
ivymba wrote:
Agree with B .

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

26 Sep 2006, 04:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by