It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 14:35

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Average hours of television viewing per American have rapidly

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
D
Joined: 29 Jan 2015
Posts: 446

Kudos [?]: 307 [0], given: 18

Location: India
WE: General Management (Education)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Average hours of television viewing per American have rapidly [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 May 2017, 03:03
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

52% (01:00) correct 48% (01:11) wrong based on 218 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Average hours of television viewing per American have rapidly increased for more than three decades. To fight the rise in obesity, Americans must limit their hours of television viewing.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the author’s conclusion?

(A) A person burns more calories while watching television than while sleeping.
(B) Over the last 30 years, there has been an increase in the number of fast food restaurants in America.
(C) Americans spend most of their television time watching sports events rather than cooking shows.
(D) Television viewing in Japan has also increased over the past three decades.
(E) Studies show that the number of television commercials that promote junk food has risen over the past ten years.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

If you liked my post, kindly give me a Kudos. Thanks.

Kudos [?]: 307 [0], given: 18

Math Forum Moderator
User avatar
P
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1504

Kudos [?]: 1116 [0], given: 885

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Average hours of television viewing per American have rapidly [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 May 2017, 03:54
Question Type: Weaken

Main Point: Reduce number of television viewing hours to fight obesity.
Assumption: Watching TV leads to obesity

(A) A person burns more calories while watching television than while sleeping. - Incorrect. Calories burnt while watching TV is compared with the calories burnt while sleeping. But we do not know whether the calories burnt is sufficient to reduce obesity.

(B) Over the last 30 years, there has been an increase in the number of fast food restaurants in America. - Correct. This option cites an alternate cause for the increase in obesity.

(C) Americans spend most of their television time watching sports events rather than cooking shows. - Incorrect. Irrelevant.

(D) Television viewing in Japan has also increased over the past three decades. - Incorrect. Irrelevant.

(E) Studies show that the number of television commercials that promote junk food has risen over the past ten years. - Incorrect. Opposite. This strengthens the fact that television viewing must be avoided to check the rise in obesity.

Answer: B

Kudos [?]: 1116 [0], given: 885

VP
VP
User avatar
G
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1074

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 534

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: 314 Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
Re: Average hours of television viewing per American have rapidly [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 May 2017, 09:59
IMO B
This option gives us a different reason for raise in obesity.
_________________

We are more often frightened than hurt; and we suffer more from imagination than from reality

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 534

2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 450

Kudos [?]: 179 [2], given: 186

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Average hours of television viewing per American have rapidly [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2017, 01:30
2
This post received
KUDOS
I don't understand how OA weakens the argument.

Let, thirty years ago, Americans watched television 3 hours per day, but 99% of these Americans did not take fast food. Now Americans watched television 5 hours per day and still 99% of these Americans do not take fast food. Nevertheless, they become obese.

On the otherhand, the number of fast food restaurants might be increased because of increased volume of consumption by the remaining 1% Americans.

So, the increase of number of fast food restaurants does not weaken the argument.
_________________

Hasan Mahmud

Kudos [?]: 179 [2], given: 186

BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
P
Joined: 26 Feb 2016
Posts: 1467

Kudos [?]: 597 [0], given: 16

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
WE: Sales (Retail)
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Average hours of television viewing per American have rapidly [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2017, 04:32
As per my understanding,
The argument links rise in obesity to the number of hours of TV viewing in America.
Since we need to weaken this link, we can provide an alternate explanation for the rise in Obesity

Option B (Over the last 30 years, there has been an increase in the number of fast food restaurants in America)
provides that alternate explanation, and in turn weakens the link of Obesity to TV Viewing.

Hope that helps!
_________________

Stay hungry, Stay foolish

2017-2018 MBA Deadlines

Class of 2020: Rotman Thread | Schulich Thread
Class of 2019: Sauder Thread

Kudos [?]: 597 [0], given: 16

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 450

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 186

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Average hours of television viewing per American have rapidly [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2017, 04:51
The argument links rise in obesity to the number of hours of TV viewing in America. But, how does option B link rise in obesity to the number of fast food restaurants in America without assuming that all people increase their intake of fast food, a trend may not be true according to my previous post?

Over the last 30 years, a lot of things happened in the world. I presume all of these are not linked to the rise in obesity.

Am I correct :?:
_________________

Hasan Mahmud

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 186

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 482

Kudos [?]: 121 [0], given: 126

Re: Average hours of television viewing per American have rapidly [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2017, 10:18
Mahmud6 wrote:
The argument links rise in obesity to the number of hours of TV viewing in America. But, how does option B link rise in obesity to the number of fast food restaurants in America without assuming that all people increase their intake of fast food, a trend may not be true according to my previous post?

Over the last 30 years, a lot of things happened in the world. I presume all of these are not linked to the rise in obesity.

Am I correct :?:


Hi Bro, I am no expert but let me give it a try

First and most important thing: If GMAT question says X is responsible for Y, then its ABSOLUTE. Nothing else can cause Y other then X.

Also, if the GMAT says in past 30 years lot of restaurants opened, it means that STRICTLY only restaurants increased. We do not presume that people started exercising or dieting. The option "B" is just giving us an alternate assumption that restaurants caused the obesity rather than televisions.

Hope that helps.
-----------------------
Kudos if it helps!
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Helpful links:
1. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation

Kudos [?]: 121 [0], given: 126

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 15 Jan 2017
Posts: 282

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 625

Re: Average hours of television viewing per American have rapidly [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Aug 2017, 02:02
I am really confused b/w B and E - both lead to weakening, though E weakens more. Expert opinions please on how to solve this.
One the first things for CR which I learnt was that correlation doesn't mean causation.
So, if there is a spike in TV watching and spike in obesity; it doesn't mean one causes the other. Similarly, for B as well, rise in the number of fast food chains doesn't mean it directly causes obesity.
E however, says there is a rise in the number of junk food commercials - this means even if they do limit or change TV watching behavior; if there is a link between the between watching TV and buying junk food.
Please explain the flaw in my reasoning in order to understand the OA.

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 625

Re: Average hours of television viewing per American have rapidly   [#permalink] 30 Aug 2017, 02:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Average hours of television viewing per American have rapidly

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.